Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T10:06:56.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enzyme supplementation of broiler chicken diets based on cereals with endosperm cell walls rich in arabinoxylans or mixed-linked β-glucans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2010

D. Pettersson
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
H. Graham
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
P. Åman
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, S-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

The efficacy of an enzyme preparation added to barley and rye-based diets given to broiler chickens and containing both β-glucanase and arabinoxylanase activities, was investigated and compared with a well characterized commercial enzyme preparation containing predominantly P-glucanase activity.

Both enzyme preparations significantly improved body weight, cumulative food intake and food conversion efficiency for chickens given both barley- and rye-based diets. For the barley-fed chickens, on average a notable increase in body weight of 171 g at day 13 and 477 g at day 24 was noted, for both enzyme preparations. However, the preparation containing high amounts of both β-glucanase and arabinoxylanase activities was more effective in reducing the incidence of sticky droppings for rye-fed chickens, and, in comparison with previously published data, gave an optimal response at a lower supplementation rate. The results indicate that it is possible to reduce the protein content in enzyme-supplemented broiler chicken diets.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Science 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Åman, P. and Graham, H. 1987. Analysis of total and insoluble mixed linked (1–3), (1–4) βD-glucans in barley and oats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 35: 704709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Åman, P. and Hesselman, K. 1984. Analysis of starch and other main constituents of cereal grains. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 14: 135139.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1971. Determination of crude oils and fats. Official Journal of the European Communities L297: 995997.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Elwinger, K. and Saterby, B. 1987. The use of β-glucanase in practical broiler diets containing barley and oats. Effect of enzyme level, type and quality of grain. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 17: 133140.Google Scholar
Fry, R. E., Allred, J. B., Jensen, L. S. and McGinnis, J. of enzyme supplementation and water treatment on the nutritional value of different grains for poultry. Poultry Science 37: 372375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, R. J. 1985. A comparison of the non-starch carbohydrates in cereal grains. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture 36: 12431253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herstad, O. and McNab, J. M. 1975. The effect of heat treatment and enzyme supplementation on the nutritive value of barley for broiler chicks. British Poultry Science 16: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselman, K. and Åman, P. 1986. The effect of βglucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chickens fed on barley of low- or high-viscosity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 15: 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselman, K., Elwinger, K., Nilsson, M. and Thomke, S. 1981. The effect of βglucanase supplementation, stage of ripeness, and storage treatment of barley in diets fed to broiler chickens. Poultry Science 60: 26642671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesselman, K., Elwinger, K. and Thomke, S. 1982. Influence of increasing levels of β-glucanase on the productive value of barley diets for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 7: 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, L. S., Fry, R. E., Allred, J. B. and McGinnis, J. 1957. Improvement in the nutritional value of barley for chicks by enzyme supplementation. Poultry Science 36: 919921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, R. I. 1980. Dietary fibre dilution as a means of controlling broiler breeder growth. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Mares, D. J. and Stone, B. A. 1973. Studies on wheat endosperm. I. Chemical composition and ultrastructure of the cell walls. Australian Journal of Biological Science 26: 793812.Google Scholar
Moran, E. T., Lall, S. P. and Summers, J. D. 1969. The feeding value of rye for the growing chick: effect of enzyme supplements, antibiotics, autoclaving and geographical area of production. Poultry Science 48: 939949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, E. T. and McGinnis, J. 1965. The effect of cereal grain and energy level of the diet on the response of turkey poults to enzyme and antibiotic supplements. Poultry Science 44: 12531261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pettersson, D. 1988. Composition and productive value for broiler chickens of wheat, triticale and rye (Ph.D. Thesis). Report, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, No. 177.Google Scholar
Pettersson, D. and Åman, P. 1988. Effects of enzyme supplementation of diets based on wheat, rye or triticale on their productive value for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 20: 313324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, D. and Åman, P. 1989. Enzyme supplementation of a poultry diet containing rye and wheat. British Journal of Nutrition 62: 139149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salih, J. L. 1986. The interaction of bird age and dietary carbohydrate gums on digestion in the chicken. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Sellers, A. F. 1977. Genesis and propagation of motor activity in the digestive tract. In Duke's Physiology of Domestic Animals (ed. Swenson, M. J.), pp. 233239. Ithaca, New York.Google Scholar
Silva, S. De, Hesselman, K. and Åman, P. 1983. Effects of water and β-glucanase treatment on non-starch polysaccharides in endosperm of low and high viscous barley. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 13: 211219.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System Institute. 1985. User's Guide: Statistics. Statistical Analysis System Institute, Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Theander, O. and Åman, P. 1979. Studies of dietary fibres. I. Analysis and chemical characterization of water-soluble and water-insoluble dietary fibres. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 97106.Google Scholar
Theander, O. and Westerlund, E. 1986. Studies on dietary fiber. 3. Improved procedures for analysis of dietary fiber. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 34: 330336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, N. L. and Morris, S. C. 1982. Rapid determination of sugars in cantaloupe melon juice by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 240: 257261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar