Abstract

Introduction

Chomsky began to mention the creative aspect of language use in the early 1960s; his 1964 Current Issues discusses it. In 1966, Cartesian Linguistics takes it up in detail. At the end of the 1950s he had read extensively in the works of Descartes, Cudworth, Humboldt, and others in the seventeenth to mid-nineteenth centuries “Cartesian linguistics” tradition, and they provided a framework for articulating these ideas. Arguably, though, they were implicit in his review of Skinner and even in The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (ca. 1955). The creative aspect observations, along with the poverty of stimulus observations, offer a set of facts with which his and – he holds – any science of language must contend. However, he thinks that the lessons of the creative aspect observations in particular are often ignored, especially in dealing with semantic issues such as truth and reference, meaning and content. He may be right. I review the creativity observations and discuss some of their implications and suggestions for a semantic theory of the lexicon. In their light, I discuss briefly James Pustejovsky's different approach.