Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Series Foreword
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- In Memoriam
- PART I COMING TO TERMS WITH COMMUNITY
- PART II DESIGNING FOR WEB-SUPPORTED COMMUNITY
- PART III FOSTERING COMMUNITY/MEMBER PARTICIPATION
- 7 The Centrality of Culture and Community to Participant Learning at and with The Math Forum
- 8 An Exploration of Community in a Knowledge Forum Classroom
- 9 Co-Evolution of Technological Design and Pedagogy in an Online Learning Community
- 10 From Ambitious Vision to Partially Satisfying Reality
- PART IV RESEARCHING ONLINE COMMUNITY
- Index
- Titles in the series
- References
8 - An Exploration of Community in a Knowledge Forum Classroom
An Activity System Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Series Foreword
- Foreword
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- In Memoriam
- PART I COMING TO TERMS WITH COMMUNITY
- PART II DESIGNING FOR WEB-SUPPORTED COMMUNITY
- PART III FOSTERING COMMUNITY/MEMBER PARTICIPATION
- 7 The Centrality of Culture and Community to Participant Learning at and with The Math Forum
- 8 An Exploration of Community in a Knowledge Forum Classroom
- 9 Co-Evolution of Technological Design and Pedagogy in an Online Learning Community
- 10 From Ambitious Vision to Partially Satisfying Reality
- PART IV RESEARCHING ONLINE COMMUNITY
- Index
- Titles in the series
- References
Summary
The past two decades have witnessed a remarkable transformation in the theoretical landscape of educational research. Classical in-the-head conceptions of thinking and learning are now sharing the epistemic spotlight with the sociocultural and sociohistorical theories of Vygotsky, Leont'ev, and Luria (Kuutti, 1996). These new perspectives argue that learning is fundamentally a social activity, inextricably tied to participation in communal practices (Lave & Wenger, 1991; Rogoff, Baker-Sennett, Lacasa, & Goldsmith, 1995). Accordingly, there has been a growing interest in the notion of community in educational circles, and the ways in which social groupings can be designed to advance individual and collective cognitions.
Like any theory of learning, sociocultural perspectives are susceptible to misinterpretation and oversimplification. The notion that development “is a process of participation in sociocultural activities” (Rogoff et al., 1995, p. 45) offers a new way of thinking about cognition and meaning, but it can also lead to unwarranted optimism regarding the educational efficacy of community-based strategies. While sociocultural theory has been widely interpreted as a call for framing pedagogies around social engagement, it would be a mistake to assume that any form of group activity will yield desirable educational outcomes. The word community is popularly (and sometimes erroneously) applied to a broad range of social organizations, from informal Internet chat rooms to carefully crafted models of classroom activity (e.g., CTGV, 1992; Brown & Campione, 1990; Riel, 1992; Scardamalia, Bereiter, McLean, Swallow, & Woodruff, 1989). Clearly, some kinds of community engagement offer more educational promise than others.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning , pp. 210 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004
References
Barab, S. A., & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.). Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 25–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, & (2001). Methodologies for capturing learner practices occurring as part of dynamic learning environments. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 10(1&2), 5–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (this volume). Characterizing an online professional development community
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989). Intentional learning as a goal of instruction. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 361–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, , , & (1997). Postmodernism, knowledge building, and elementary science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Human Development, 21, 108–125Google Scholar
, , & (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckman, A. (this volume). Co-evolution of technological design and pedagogy in an online learning community
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1992). Technology and the design of generative learning environments. In T. Duffy and D. Jonassen (eds.). Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation (pp. 77–89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, , & (2002). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derry, S., Seymour, J., Steinkuehler, C., & Lee, J., & Siegel, M. (this volume). From ambitious vision to partially satisfying reality: An evolving socio-technical design supporting community and collaborative learning in teacher education
(1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding. Helsinki: Orienta-konsultit
Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit Oy
Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies of work as a testbench of activity theory: The case of primary care medical practice. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.). Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context (pp. 64–103). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring Teachers Enquiring Learners. A Constructivist Approach to Teaching. New York: Teacher's College Press
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105–117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Hewitt, J. (2002). From a focus on tasks to a focus on understanding: The cultural transformation of a Toronto classroom. In T. D. Koschmann and N. Myake (Eds.). Computer Supported Cooperative Learning Volume 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 11–41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, & (1998). Design principles for distributed knowledge building processes. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 75–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, & (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology: Research and Development, 47(1), 61–79Google Scholar
Kling, R., & Courtright, C. (this volume). Group behavior and learning in electronic forums: A socio-technical approach
Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.). Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lave, J. (1993). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition (pp. 17–36). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press
(1997). An Activity Theory framework to explore distributed communities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 13, 210–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1992). A functional analysis of educational telecomputing: A case study of learning circles. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riel, M., & Polin, L. (this volume). Online learning communities
Rogoff, B. (1997). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.). Sociocultural Studies of the Mind (pp. 139–164). New York: Cambridge University Press
, , , & (1995). Development through participation in sociocultural activity. New Directions for Child Development, 67, 45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, G. (1995). Real Individuals in Complex Environments: A New Conception of Educational Psychology. Draft Document
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1993). Computer Support for Knowledge-Building Communities. Draft Document
, & (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Adaptation and understanding: A case for new cultures of schooling. In S. Vosniadou, E. DeCorte, R. Glaser, and H. Mandl (Eds.). International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-Supported Learning Environments (pp. 149–163). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
, , , , , & (1992). Educational applications of a networked communal database. Interactive Learning Environments, 2(1), 45–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , , & (1989). Computer-supported intentional learning environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlager, M., & Fusco, J. (this volume). Teacher professional development, technology, and communities of practice
Vaillancourt, D. (2002). Exploration of an online networking innovation with women entrepreneurs: A case study. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto
Wells, G. (1994, April). Discourse as a tool in the activity of learning and teaching. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA
Wenger, E. (1998). Communites of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- 16
- Cited by