Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T16:45:27.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 December 2009

Martin R. Perrow
Affiliation:
Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside CA, USA
Mark L. Tomlinson
Affiliation:
ECON, Ecological Consultancy, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Luis Zambrano
Affiliation:
Colección Nacional de Peces, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Mexico DF
Martin R. Perrow
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Anthony J. Davy
Affiliation:
University of East Anglia
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Fish exhibit far greater diversity than any other vertebrate group with 20 000 living species (Nelson, 1984), more than twice as many as birds or reptiles and amphibians and four times as many as mammals. Fish have colonised nearly all waters on the planet from the deepest oceans to temporary pools, with a diversity of form, ecology and biology to match. Around 1% of fish have even mastered the physiological stresses of migrating from salt to fresh waters and vice versa (Nelson, 1984). The fact that fish are supported in water has provided terrific scope for body size range. In the sea, only the great whales attain greater size than the 12.5 m long, 12.5 tonne whale shark (Rhincodon typus), making fish some of the largest vertebrates alive. At the other extreme the pygmy goby (Pandaka pygmaea) is 250 million times smaller, reaching 7.5–9.9 mm at adult size.

Fish may be carnivores, herbivores, detritivores and both external and internal parasites, specialising on all conceivable prey items from whole fish to parts of fish (scales, fins and blood) other vertebrates (including mammals), invertebrates, algae, fruit and plankton of various sorts. The radiation of fish into virtually every available aquatic niche has, in many cases, left them vulnerable to extinction as aquatic systems have been extensively modified and exploited of their resources. Several major river basins such as the Amazon are also likely to retain a relatively high proportion of unknown species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, M. A. & Whyte, I. W. (1990). Fish Habitat Enhancement: A Manual for Freshwater, Estuarine and Marine Habitats. Vancouver, Canada: Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Program Planning and Economics Branch
Backx, J. J. G. M. & Grimm, M. P. (1994). Mass removal of fish from Lake Wolderwijd, the Netherlands. 2: Implementation phase. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 401–414. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Bales, M. (1992). Corp and river environment deterioration: villain or innocent by-stander? Newsletter of the Australian Society of Fisheries Biologits, 22, 26–27Google Scholar
Bean, C. W. & Winfield, I. J. (1995). Habitat use and activity patterns of roach (Ritilus ritlus (L.)), rudd (Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.)), perch (Perca fluviatilis (L.)) and pike (Esox lucius L.) in the laboratory: the role of predation threat and structural complexity, Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 4, 37–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaumont, A. R., Bray, J., Murphy, J. M. & Winfield, I. J. (1995). Genetics of whitefish and vendace in England and Wales. Journal of Fish Biology, 46, 880–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, S. & J⊘rgensen, J. (1994). Stocking experiments with 0+ eels (Anguilla anguilla L.) in Danish streams: post-stocking movements, densities and mortality. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 314–325. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Berg, S., Jeppeson, E. & S⊘ndergaard, M. (1997), Pike (Esox lucius L.) stocking as a biomanipulation tool. 1. Effects on the fish population in Lake Lyng, Denmark. Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, J. J. (1992). Citizen restoration efforts in the Mattole River Watershed. In Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology and Public Policy, ed. National Research Council (US), pp. 457–463. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Bernard, T. & Young, J. (1997). The Ecology of Hope: Communities Collaborate for Sustainability. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers
Borcherding, J., Maw, S. K. & Tauber, S. (2000). Growth of 0+ perch (Perca fluviatilis) predating on 0+ bream (Abramis brama). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 9, 236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brabrand, ö. (1995). Intra-cohort cannibalism among larval stages of perch (Perca fluviatilis). Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 4, 70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breukelaar, A. W., Lammens, E. H. R. R., Klein Breteler, J. G. P. & Tatrai, I. (1994). Effects of benthivorous beam (Abramis brama L.) and carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) on sediment resuspension and concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a. Freshwater Biology, 32, 113–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönmark, C. & Weisnev, S. E. B. (1996). Decoupling of cascading trophic interactions in a freshwater, benethic food chain. Oecologia, 108, 534–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönmark, C., Klosiewski, S. P. & Stein, R. A. (1992). Idirect effects of predation in a freshwater, bentic food chain. Ecoloy, 73, 1662–1674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönmark, C. (1994). Effect of tench and perch on interactions in a freshwater, bentic food chain. Ecoloy, 15, 1818–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brönmark, C. & Vermaat, J. E. (1998). Complex fish–snail–epiphyton interactions and their effects on submerged freshwater macrophytes. In The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, eds. E. Jeppesen, Ma. S⊘ndergaard, Mo & S⊘ndergaard, K. Christoffersen, pp. 47–68. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Brooks, J. L. & Dodson, S. I. (1965). Predation, body size, and composition of plankton. Science, 150, 28–35CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, B. J. & Evans, D. R. (1986). Restoration of anadromous fish: not as simple as it sounds. In Wild Trout, Steelhead and Salmon in the 21st Century, ed. D. Guthrie, pp. 61–74. Portland, OR: Oregon State University Sea Grant Publication
Brown, G. E., Chivers, D. P. & Smith, R. J. F. (1996). Effects of diet on localized defecation by Northern pike Esox lucius. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 22, 467–475CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bry, C. (1996). Role of vegetation in the life-cycle of pike. In Pike: Biology and Exploitation, ed. J. F. Craig, pp. 45–67. London: Chapman & HallCrossRef
Cahn, A. R. (1929). The effect of carp on small lake, the carp as a dominant. Ecology, 10, 271–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. & Kitchell, J. F. (eds.) (1993). The Trophic Cascade in Lakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 385 ppCrossRef
Carvalho, L. & Moss, B. (1995). The current status of a sample of English sites of special scientific interest subject to eutrophication. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 5, 191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B. & Persson, L. (1993). Species-specific antipredator behaviours: effects on prey choice in different habitats. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 32, 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, G. C. (1997). Integrated management of sea lamprey: lessons for potential control of ruffe. In International Symposium on Biology and Management of Ruffe, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 21–23 March 1997, Symposium Abstracts, ed. D. A. Jensen, p.23. Ann Arbor, MI: Great Lakes Fisheries Commission
Cline, J. M., East, T. L. & Threlkeld, S. T. (1994). Fish interactions with the sediment–water interface. Hydrobiologia, 275/276, 301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contreras-Balderas, S. (2000). Annotated checklist of introduced invasive fishes in México, with examples of some recent introductions. In Non-Indigenous Freshwater Organisms, eds. R. Claudi & J. H. Leach, pp. 33–56. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers
Copp, G. H. & Peñáz, M. (1988). Ecology of fish spawning and nursery zones in the flood plain, using a new sampling approach. Hydrobiologia, 169, 209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowder, A. & Painter, D. S. (1991). Submerged macrophytes in Lake Ontario: current knowledge, importance, threats to stability and needed studies. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48, 1539–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cryer, M., Peirson, G. & Townsend, C. R. (1986). Reciprocal interactions between roach, Rutilus rutilus, and zooplankton in a small lake: Prey dynamics and fish growth and recruitment. Limnoogy and Oceanography, 31, 1022–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deegan, L. A. & Peterson, B. J. (1992). Whole river fertilization stimulates fish production in an Arctic tundra river. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49, 1890–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobler, E. (1977). Correlation between the feeding time of the pike (Esox lucius) and the dispersal of a school of Leucaspius delineatus. Oecologia, 27, 93–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eklöv, P. (1992). Group foraging versus solitary foraging efficiency in piscivorous predators: the perch Perca fluviatilis, and pike Esox lucius, patterns. Animal Behaviour, 44, 313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuselier, L. & Edds, D. (1995). An artificial riffle as restored habitat for the threatened Neosho madtom. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 15, 499–5032.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M. B. (1981). Mechanisms of size selectivity by planktivorous fish: a test of hypotheses. Ecology, 62, 571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, N. (ed.) (1992). Wildlife after Gravel: Twenty Years of Practical Research by The Game Conservancy and ARC. Fordingbridge, UK: Game Conservancy
Giles, N. (1994). Freshwater Fish of the British Isles: A Guide for Anglers and Naturalists. Shrewsbury, UK: Swan Hill Press
Gliwicz, Z. M. & Rachner, A. (1992). Diel migrations of juvemile fish: a ghost of predation past or present? Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 124, 385–410Google Scholar
Gray, R. W. & Cameron, J. D. (1987). A deep-substrate streamside incubation box for Atlantic salmon eggs. Progressive Fish Culturist, 49, 124–1292.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamrin, S. F. & Persson, L. (1986). Asymmetrical competition between age classes as a factor causing population oscillations in an obligate planktivorous fish species. Oikos, 47, 223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, L. W., Flagg, T. A. & Waknitz, F. W. (1987). Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Brood-Stock Program (1981–1986), Final Report of Contract A179–83BP39642. US Department of Energy
Harris, G. P. (1994). Pattern, process and prediction in aquatic ecology: a limnological view of some general ecological problems. Freshwater Biology, 32, 143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, C. J., Peterson, B. J., Bowden, W. B., Hershey, A. E., Miller, M. C., Deegan, L. A. & Finlay, J. C. (1998). Biological responses to fertilization of Oksrukuyik Creek, a tundra stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 17, 190–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, M. L. (1995). The contribution of hatchery fish to the restoration of American shad in the Susquehanna River. In Uses and Effects of Cultured Fishes in Aquatic Ecosystems, eds. H. L. Schramm Jr & R. G. Piper, pp. 329–336. Bethesda, MD: American Fisheries Society
Hickley, P. (1994). Stocking and introduction of fish: a synthesis. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 247–254. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Hildrew, A. G., Townsend, C. R. & Francis, J. (1984). Community structure in some southern English streams: the influence of species interactions. Freshwater Biology, 14, 297–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. R., He, X. & Kitchell, J. F. (1993). The fish populations. In The Trophic Cascade in Lakes, ed. S. R. Carpenter & J. F. Kitchell, pp. 43–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
House, R. (1996). An evaluation of stream restoration structures in a coastal Oregon stream, 1981–1993. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 16, 272–2812.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hrbacek, J., Dvorakova, M., Korinek, M. & Prochazkova, L. (1961). Demonstration of the effect of the fish stock on the species composition of zooplankton and the intensity of metabolism of the whole plankton association. Verhandlungen inernationale Vereinigung fur theoretische und angewandte Limnologie, 14, 192–195Google Scholar
Jacobsen, L. & Perrow, M. R. (1998). Predation risk from piscivorous fish influmming the diet use of macrophytes by planetivorous fish in experimental ponds. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 7, 78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen, E., Jensen, J. P., S⊘ndergaard, W., Lauridsen, T. L., Pedersen, L. J. & Jensen, L. (1997). Top–down control in freshwater lakes: the role of nutrient state, submerged macrophytes and water depth. Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 151–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppesen, E., Lauridsen, T. L., Kairesalo, T. & Perrow, M. R. (1998a). Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish–zooplankton interactions in lakes. In The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, eds. E. Jeppesen, Ma. S⊘ndergaard, Mo. S⊘ndergaard & K. Christoffersen, pp. 91–114. NewYork: Springer-Verlag
Jeppesen, E., Jensen, J. P., S⊘ndergaard, M.Lauridsen, T. L., M⊘ller, P. H. & Sandby, K. (1998b). Changes in nutrient retention in shallow eutrophic lakes following a decline in density of cyprinids. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 142, 129–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, L., Perrow, M. R., Landkildehus, F.Hj⊘rne, M., Lauridsen, T. L. & Berg, S. (1997). Interactions between piscivores, zooplanttivores and zooplantton in submerged macrophytes: preliminary observations from enclosure and pond experimentsHdrobiologie, 242/243 197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B. G. H. (1988). A comparison of the effectiveness of sea lamprey control in Georgian Bay and the North Channel of Lake Huron. Hydrobiologia, 163, 215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jokikokko, E. (1990). Brown trout stockings in the restored rapids of the tributaries of the river Oulujoki system in eastern Finland. Polskie Archiwum Hydrobiologii/Polish Archives of Hydrobiology, 38, 79Google Scholar
Jones, J. I., Moss, B. & Young, J. O. (1998). Interactions between periphyton, nonmolluscan invertebrates, and fish in standing waters. In The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes, eds. E. Jeppesen, Ma. S⊘ndergaard & Mo. S⊘ndergaard, K. Christoffersen, pp. 69–90. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRef
Jones, R. A. (1978). A history of trying success with salmon: breeding new stocks for the Connecticut rivers. Oceans, 11, 59–60Google Scholar
Jungwirth, M., Schmutz, S. & Weiss, S. (eds.) (1998). Fish Migration and Fish Bypasses. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Kitchell, J. F. & Carpenter, S. R. (1993). Synthesis and new directions. In The Trophic Cascade in Lakes, eds. S. R. Carpenter & J. F. Kitchell, pp. 332–350. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRef
Kurmayer, R., Keckeis, H., Schrutka, S. & Zweimueller, I. (1996). Macro- and microhabitats used by 0+ fish in a side-arm of the River Danube. Archiv für Hydrobiologie (suppl. Large Rivers), 113, 425–432Google Scholar
Lammens, E. H. R. R., Geurse, J. & MacGillavry, P. J. (1987). Diet shifts, feeding efficiency and coexistence of bream Abramis brama, roach Rutilus rutilus and white bream Blicca bjoerkna in hypertrophic lakes. In Proceedings of the 5th Congress of European Ichthyologists, pp. 153–162. Storhoim: Europen lchthyological Dnion
Lammens, E. H. R. R. & Hoogenboezem, W. (1991). Diets and feeding behaviour. In Cyprinid fishes: Systematics, Biology and Exploitation, eds. I. J. Winfield & J. S. Nelson, pp. 353–376. London: Chapman & HallCrossRef
Lampert, W. (1993). Ultimate causes of diel bertical migration of zooplankton: new evidence for the predator avidance hypothesis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, and Ergebnisse Limnologie, 39, 79–88Google Scholar
Larkin, G. A. & Slaney, P. A. (1997). Implications of trends in marine-derived nutrient influx to south coastal British Columbia salmonid production. Fisheries, 22, 16–242.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauridsen, T. L. & Lodge, D. (1996). Avoidance by Daphnia magna of fish and macrophytes: chemical cues and predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. Limnology and Oceanography, 41, 794–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingel, R. & Fish, G. (2001). Mattole Salmon Group Update. Mattole Restoration Newsletter, Spring/Summer 2001, Issue 16
Love, R. M. (1980). The Chemical Biology of Fishes. London: Academic Press
Lucas, M. C. & Frear, P. A. (1997). Effects of a flow-gauging weir on the migratory behaviour of adult barbel, a riverine cyprinid. Journal of Fish Biology, 50, 382–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, P. S. (1995). The conservation of freshwater fish: past and present experience. Biological Conservation, 72, 259–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maitland, P. S. & Campbell, R. N. (1992). Freshwater Fishes. London: HarperCollins
Marine conservation Society (2000) http://www.mtsuk.org/
Martin, T. H., Crowder, L. B.Dumas, C. F. & Burkholder, J. M. (1992). Indirect effects of fish on macrophytes in Bays Mountain Lake: evidence for a littoral trophic cascade. Oecologia, 89, 476–481CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mattole Restoration Council (2000). http://www.mattole.org/
Mattole Salmon Group (1999). http://www.humboldt.net/∼salmon/
McQueen, D. J., Post, J. R. & Mills, E. L. (1986). Trophic relationships in freshwater pelagic ecosystems. Canadian Journel of Fisheies and Aquatic Sciences, 43, 1571–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, M.-L., Jeppesen, E.Donk, E.Moss, B.Scheffer, M.Lammens, E.Nes, E., Berkum, J. A., Jong, G. L., Faafeng, B. A. & Jensen, J. P. (1994). Long term responses to fish stock reduction in small shallow lakes: interpretation of five-year results of four biomanipulation cases in The Netherlands and Denmark. Hydrobiologia, 275/276, 457–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijer, M.-L. (2000). Biomanipulation in The Netherlands: 15 Years of Experience. Lelystad, The Netherlands: Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Institute for Inland Water Management
Meijer, M.-L., Lammens, E. H. H. R., Raat, A. J. P., Klein Breteler, J. G. P. & Grimm, M. P. (1995). Development of fish communities in lakes after biomanipulation. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 29, 91–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mih, W. C. & Bailey, G. C. (1981). The development of a machine for the restoration of stream gravel for spawning and rearing of salmon. Fisheries, 6, 16–20Google Scholar
Milbrink, G. (1988). Restoration of fish population in impounded lakes in Scandinavia by locally applied fertilization. In Eutrophication and Lake Restoration: Water Quality and Biological Impacts French–Swedish Limnological Symposium, Thonon-les-Bains, 10 June 1987, ed. G. Balvay, pp. 193–203. Thonon-les-Bains, France: Institut Nationale de la Recherche Agronomique, Institut de Limnologie
Mills, C. A. (1991). Reproduction and early life history. In Cyprinid Fishes: Systematics, Biology and Exploitation, eds. I. J. Winfield & J. S. Nelson, pp. 483–508. London: Chapman & HallCrossRef
Minns K. C. & Cooley, J. M. (2000). Intentional introductions: are the incalculable risks Worth it? In Non-Indigenous Freshwater Organisms, ed. R. Claudi & J. H. Leach, pp. 57–60 Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers
Mourelatos, S. & Lacroix, G. (1990). In situ filtering rates of Cladocera: effect of body length, temperature, and food concentration. Limnology and Oceanography, 35, 1101–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mujica, C. E. (1987). Los cuerpos de agua continentales adecuados por el cultivo de carpa. Revista Mexicana de Acuacultura, 9, 7–10Google Scholar
National Research Council (1992). Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems: Science, Technology and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Xlational Academy Press
Nelson, J. S. (1984). Fishes of the World, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley
Nielsen, E. E., Hansen, M. M. & Loeschcke, V. (1997). Analysis of microsatellite DNA from old scale samples of Atlantic salmon: a comparison of genetic composition over sixty years. Molecular Ecology, 6, 487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, E. E., Hansen, M. M. & Bach, L. (2001). Looking for a needle in a haystack: discovery of indigenous salmon in heavily stocked populations. Conservation Genetics, 2, 219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okemwa, E. & Ogari, J. (1994). Introductions and extinction of fish in Lake Victoria. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 326–337. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Ochumba, P. B. O, Gophen, M. & Pollingher, U. (1994). Ecological changes in the Lake Victoria after the introduction of Nile perch (Lates niloticus): the catchment, water quality and fisheries management. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 338–347. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Pandian, T. J. & Vivekanandan, E. (1985). Energetics of feeding and digestion. In Fish Energetics: New Perspectives, eds. P. Tytler & P. Calow, pp. 99–124. London: Croom HelmCrossRef
Perrow, M. R. (1980). Causes and consequences of a two-year cycle in recruitment of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in Aldersen Broad. PhD thesis, University of East Anglia, Norvich UK
Perrow, M. R. & Irvine, K. (1992). The relationship between cladoceran body size and the growth of underyearling roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in two shallow lowland lakes: a mechanism for density-dependent reductions in growth. Hydrobiologia, 241, 155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, M. R. & Jowitt, A. J. D. (2000). On the trail of spined loach: developing a conservation plan for a poorly known species. British Wildlife, 11, 390–397Google Scholar
Perrow, M. R., Person, G. & Townsend, C. R. (1990). The dynamics of a population of roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)) in a shallow lake: is there a two-year cycle in recruitment? Hydrobiologia, 191, 67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, M. R. & Moss, B. & Stansfield, J. (1994). Trophic interactions in a shallow lake following a reduction in nutrient loading: a long-term study. Hydrobiologia, 275/276/Developments in Hydrobiology, 94, 43–52CrossRef
Perrow, M. R., Jowitt, A. J. D., Stansfield, J. H. & Phillips, G. L. (1999a). The importance of the interactions between fish, zooplankton and macrophytes in the restoration of shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia, 395/396, 199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, L. (1983a). Effects of intra- and interspecific competition on dynamics and size structure of a perch (Perca fluviatilis) and a roach (Rutilus rutilus) population. Oikos, 41, 126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, L. (1983b). Food consumption and the significance of detritus and algae to intraspecific competition in roach Rutilus rutilus in a shallow eutrophic lake. Oikos, 41, 118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, L. (1986a). Effects of reduced interspecific competition on resource utilisation in perch (Perca fluviatilis). Ecology, 67, 355–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, L. (1986b). Temperature-induced shift in foraging ability in two fish species, roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis): implications for coexistence between poikilotherms. Journal of Animal Ecology, 55, 829–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, L. (1987). Effects on habitat and season on competitive interactions between roach (Rutilus rutilus) and perch (Perca fluviatilis). Oecologia, 73, 170–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petridis, D. (1990). The influence of grass carp on habitat structure and its subsequent effect on the diet of tench. Journal of Fish Biology, 36, 533–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, G. L., Eminson, D. F. & Moss, B. (1978). A mechanism to account for macrophyte decline in progressively eutrophicated waters. Aquatic Botany, 4, 103–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, G., Jackson, R., Bennet, C. & Chilvers, A. (1994). The importance of sediment phosphorus release in the restoration of very shallow lakes (the Norfolk Broads, England) and implications for biomanipulation. Hydrobiologia, 275/276, 445–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poleo, A. B. S., Oxnevad, S. A., Ostbye, K., Heibo, E., Andersen, R. A. & Vollestad, L. A. (1995). Body morphology of crucian carp Carassius carassius in lakes with or without piscivorous fish. Ecography, 18, 225–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. E. (1992). Habitat heterogeneity and the functional significance of fish in river food webs. Ecology, 73, 1675–1688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. E., Matthews, W. J. & Stewart, A. J. (1985). Grazing minnows, piscivorous bass and stream algae: dynamics of a strong interaction. Ecology, 66, 1448–1456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prejs, A. (1984). Herbivory by temperate fresheater fishes and its consequences. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 10, 281–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prejs, A., Martyniak, a., Boró, S., Hliwa, P. & Koperski, P. (1994). Food web manipulation in a small eutrophic Lake Wirbel, Poland: effect of stocking with juveuile pike on planklivorons fish. Hydrobiologia, 275/276, 65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptolemy, R. A. (1997). A retrospective review of fish habitat improvement projects in British Columbia: do we know enough to do the right thing? In Symposium on Sea-Run Cutthroat Trout: Biology, Management and Future Conservation, eds. J. D. Hall, P. A. Bisson, & R. E. Gresswell, pp. 145–147. Corvallis, Or: American Fisheries Society
Raieigh, R. F. & Duff, D. A. (1980). Tront Stream habitat improvement: ecology and hydrology. In Proceedings of Wild Trust, 29–25 september 1979, pp. 67–77. Vienna, VA: Tront Unlimited
Rasmussen, J. B. (1999). The Skjern River Restoration Project. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of the Environment and Energy, National Forest and Nature Agency
Rinne, J. N. (1992). The effects of introduced fishes on native fishes in Arizona, southwestern United States. In Protection of Aquatic Biodversity, Proceedings of the World Fisheries Congress, Theme 3, eds. D. P. Philipp, J. M. Epifanio, J. E. Marsden & J. E. Claussen, pp. 149–159. Enfield, NH Science Publishers, Inc
Roberts, J., Chick, A., Oswald, L. & Thompson, P. (1995). Effect of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.), an exotic benthivorous fish, on aquatic plants and water quality in experimental ponds. Marine and Freshwater Research, 46, 1171–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Pierre, R. A. (1996). A Recipe for Success: Anadromous Fish Restoration in the Susquehanna River, USA,. Council Meeting Papers of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), Reykjavik, 27 September–4 October 1996. Copenhagen: ICES
Scheffer, M. (1998). Ecology of Shallow Lakes. London: Chapman & Hall
Scheffer, M., Hosper, S. H., Meijer, M.-L., Moss, B. & Jeppesen, E. (1993). Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. TREE, 8, 275–279Google ScholarPubMed
Schiemer, F. & Waidbacher, H. (1992). Strategies for conservation of a Danubian fish fauna. In River Conservation and Management, eds. P. J. Boon, P. Calow & G. E. Petts, pp. 363–382. Chichester, UK: John Wiley
Schindler, D. E., Kitchell, J. F. & Ogutu-Ohwayo, R. (1998). Ecological consequences of alternative gill net fisheries for Nile perch in Lake Victoria. Conservation Biology, 12, 56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schriver, P., B⊘gestrand, J., Jeppesen, E. & S⊘ndergaard, M. (1995). Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish–zooplankton–phytoplankton interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow lake. Freshwater Biology, 33, 255–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, D. A., Anderson, T. C. & King, L. W. (1998). Pamehac Brook: a case study of the restoration of a river impacted by flow diversion for pulpwood transportationAquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8, 145–1573.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selgeby, J. H., Eshenroder, R. L., Krueger, C. C., Marsden, J. E. & Pycha, R. L. (eds.) (1995). Proceedings of the International Conference on Restoration of Lake Trout in the Laurentian Great Lakes, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 10–14 January 1994. Journal of Great Lakes Research,21
Shapiro, J., Lamaeea, V. & Lynch, M. (1975). Biomennupuation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. In Proceeding of Symposinum on Water Quality Management through Biological Control, eds. P. L. Brezonik & J. L. Fox, pp. 85–96. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida
Sibbing, F. A. (1991). Food capture and oral processing. In Cyprinid Fishes: Systematics, Biology and Exploitation, eds. I. J. Winfield & J. S. Nelson, pp. 377–412. London: Chapman & HallCrossRef
Skov, C. & Berg, S. (1999). Utilization of natural and artificial habitats by YOY pike in a biomanipulated lake. Hydrobiologia, 408/409, 115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skov, C., Perrow, M. R., Berg, S. & Skovgaard, H. (in press). Freshwater Biology
Spanovskaya, V. D. & Grygorash, V. A. (1977). Development and food of age-0 eurasion perch (Perca fluviatilis) in reservoirs near Moscow, USSR. Journal of Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 34, 1551–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, C. N., & King, D. L. (1984). Role of fish in regulation of plant and animal communities in eutrophic poxids. Canadian Journal of Fishnes and Agnatic Sciences, 41, 1851–1855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansfield, J. H., Perrow, M. R., Tench, L. D., Jowitt, A. J. D. & Taylor, A. A. L. (1997). Submerged macrophytes as refuges for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observations on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation pressure. Hydrobiologia, 342/343, 229–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, R. H. & Clepper, H. (eds.) (1979). Predator–Prey Systems in Fisheries Management, Proceedings of an International Symposium on Predator–Prey Systems in Fish Communities and their Role in Fisheries Management, Atlanta, Georgia, 24–27, July 1978. Washington, DC: Sport Fishing Institute
Tatrai, I. & Istvanovics, V. (1986). The role of fish in the regulation of nutrient cycling in Lake Balaton, Hungary. Freshwater Biology, 16, 417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatrai, I., Lammens, E. H. R. R., Breukelaar, A. W. & Klein Breteler, J. G. P. (1994). The impact of mature cyprinid fish on the composition and biomass of benthic macroinvertebrates. Archive für Hydrobiologie, 131, 309–320Google Scholar
Threlkeld, S. T. (1987). Experimental evaluation of trophic-cascade and nutrient mediated effects of planktivorous fish on plankton community structure. In Predation: Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities, eds. W. C. Kerfoot & A. Sih, pp. 161–173. Hanover, NH: University of New England Press
Threlkeld, S. T. (1994). Benthic–pelagic interactions in shallow water columns: an experimentalist's perspective. Hydrobiologia, 275/276, 293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, M. L., Perrow, M. R., Hoare, D., Pitt J.-A., Johnson, S., Wilson, C. & Alborough, D. (in press). Restoration of Ormesby Broad through biomanipulation: ecological, technical and sociological issues. In Management and Ecology of Lake and Reservoir Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Tonn, W. M., Magnuson, J. J., Rask, M. & Toivonen, J. (1991). Intercontinental comparison of small-lake fish assemblages: the balance between local and regional processes. American Naturalist, 136, 345–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C. R. & Perrow, M. R. (1989). Eutrophication may produce population cycles in roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), by two contrasting mechanisms. Journal of Fish Biology, 34, 161–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C. R. & Risebrow, A. J. (1982). The influence of light level on the functional response of a zooplanktivorous fish. Oecologia, 53, 293–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, C. R. & Winfield, I. J. (1985). The application of optimal foraging theory to feeding behaviour in fish. In Fish Energetics: New Perspectives, ed. P. Tytler & P. Calow, pp. 67–98. London: Croom HelmCrossRef
Townsend, C. R., Sutherland, W. J. & Perrow, M. R. (1990). A modelling invetigation of population cycles in the fish Rutilus rutilus (L.). Journal of Animal Ecology, 59, 469–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TRAFFIC (1996) http://www.traffic.org/publications/pubs_shaks.html/
Turner, A. M. & Mittelbach, G. G. (1990). Predator avoidance and community structure: interactions among piscivores, planktivores, and plankton. Ecology, 71, 2241–2254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, G. J. C., Thomas, J. D. & Baker, J. H. (1992). An experimental investigation of interactions in snail–macrophyte–epiphyte systems. Oecologia, 91, 587–595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Utzinger, J., Roth, C. & Peter, A. (1998). Effects of environmental parameters on the distribution of bullhead Cottus gobio with particular consideration of the effects of obstructions. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35, 882–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donk, E. & Otte, A. (1996). Effects of grazing by fish and waterfowl on the biomass and species composition of submerged macrophytes. Hydrobiology, 340, 285–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Densen, W. L. T. (1994). Predator enhancement in freshwater fish communities. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 102–119. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Zyll de Jong, M. C., Cowx, I. G. & Scruton, D. A. (1997). An evaluation of instream habitat restoration techniques on salmonid populations in a Newfoundland stream. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management, 13, 603–6143.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venugopal, M. N. & Winfield, I. J. (1993). The distribution of juvenile fishes in a hypereutrophic pond: can macrophytes potentially offer a refuge for zooplankton? Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 8, 389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, P. A. (1994). Development of pike and perch populations after biomanipulation of fish stocks. In Rehabilitation of Freshwater Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx, pp. 376–89. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Weatherley, A. H. & Gill, H. S. (1987). The Biology of Fish Growth. London: Academic Press
Williamson, M. & Fitter, A. (1996). The varying success of invaders, Ecology, 77, 1661–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winemiller, K. O. & Anderson, A. A. (1997). Response of endangered desert fish populations to a constructed refuge. Restoration Ecology, 5, 204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, I. J. (1986). The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. Journal of Fish Biology, 29, 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, I. J., Peirson, G., Cryer, M. & Townsend, C. R. (1983). The behavioural basis of prey selection by underyearling bream (Abramis brama (L.)) and roach (Rutilus rutilus (L.)). Freshwater Biology, 13, 139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winfield, I. J., Cragg-Hine, D., Fletcher, J. M. & Cubby, P. R. (1996). The conservation ecology of Coregonus albula and C. lavaretus in England and Wales, UK. In Conservation of Endangered Freshwater Fish in Europe, eds. A. Kirchhofer & D. Hefti, pp. 213–223. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser
Winfield, I. J., Fletcher, J. M. & Cubby, P. R. (1998). The impact on the whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus (L.)) of reservoir operations at Haweswater, UK. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 50, 185–195Google Scholar
Winfield, I. J., Fletcher, J. M. & Winfield, D. K. (in press). Conservation of the endangered whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus) population of Haweswater, UK. In Management and Ecology of Lake and Reservoir Fisheries, ed. I. G. Cowx. Oxford: Fishing News Books
Zambrano, L. & Hinojosa, D. (1999). Direct and indirect effect of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) on macrophyte and benthic communities in experimental shallow ponds in central Mexico. Hydrobiologia, 409, 131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano, L. & Macças-Garcça, C. (2000). Impact of introduced fish for aqua-culture in Mexican freshwater systems. In Non-Indigenous Freshwater Organisms, eds. R. Claudi & J. H. Leach, pp. 113–126. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers
Zambrano, L., Perrow, M., Aguirre-Hidalgo, V. & Macças-Garcça, C. (1999). The impact of introduced carp (Cyprinus carpio) in subtropical shallow ponds. Journal of Aquatic Stress Ecosystems and Recovery, 6, 281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zambrano, L., & Scheffer, M. & Martinez-Ramos, M. (2000) Catastrophic response of lakes to benthivorous fish introduction. Oikos, 94, 344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaret, T. M., & Kerfoot, W. C. (1975). Fish predation on Bosmina longirostris: body-size selection versus visibility selection. Ecology, 56, 232–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Fish
    • By Martin R. Perrow, Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside CA, USA, Mark L. Tomlinson, ECON, Ecological Consultancy, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK, Luis Zambrano, Colección Nacional de Peces, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Mexico DF
  • Edited by Martin R. Perrow, University of East Anglia, Anthony J. Davy, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Handbook of Ecological Restoration
  • Online publication: 29 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549984.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Fish
    • By Martin R. Perrow, Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside CA, USA, Mark L. Tomlinson, ECON, Ecological Consultancy, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK, Luis Zambrano, Colección Nacional de Peces, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Mexico DF
  • Edited by Martin R. Perrow, University of East Anglia, Anthony J. Davy, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Handbook of Ecological Restoration
  • Online publication: 29 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549984.019
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Fish
    • By Martin R. Perrow, Center for Conservation Biology, University of California, Riverside CA, USA, Mark L. Tomlinson, ECON, Ecological Consultancy, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK, Luis Zambrano, Colección Nacional de Peces, Instituto de Biología, UNAM, Mexico DF
  • Edited by Martin R. Perrow, University of East Anglia, Anthony J. Davy, University of East Anglia
  • Book: Handbook of Ecological Restoration
  • Online publication: 29 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511549984.019
Available formats
×