Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:55:06.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Effects of arthropods as physical ecosystem engineers on plant-based trophic interaction webs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

Robert J. Marquis
Affiliation:
University of Missouri–St. Louis
John T. Lill
Affiliation:
George Washington University
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Insect herbivores and other arthropods create a variety of constructs on their host plants: silk webs, leaf shelters, galls, and stem cavities. This state change, often modifying resource availability for species other than the construct-builder (constructor, hereafter), is an example of allogenic physical ecosystem engineering. Physical ecosystem engineers are “organisms that directly or indirectly control the availability of resources to other organisms by causing physical state changes in biotic or abiotic materials” (Jones et al. 1994, 1997). In the case of allogenic engineering (in contrast to autogenic engineering), the physical state change is caused by the engineer, but the engineer is not part of the new physical state.

The presence of constructs can impact the species richness, food web structure, and trophic interactions of the community of arthropods associated with engineered plants. The impact of engineering will depend on the responses of individual species to the presence of the constructs and the resulting interactions with all other species. One approach to understanding the nature of these responses is to view the engineered plant as a mosaic of engineered and nonengineered habitats. The response of a particular animal species to a plant that has been colonized by a constructor will depend on the relative value of the engineered versus nonengineered habitat to that animal. This value will be a function of differences between the two habitat types in the intensity of abiotic stress, the relative quality of food resources, competitive and mutualistic interactions (with other species in nonengineered habitats and with other secondary inhabitants in engineered habitats), and responses of natural enemies to engineering.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Communities
Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs
, pp. 246 - 274
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamson, W. G., Hunter, M. D., Melika, G., and Price, P. W.. 2003. Cynipid gall-wasp communities correlate with oak chemistry. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:208–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agrawal, A. A., and Zandt, P. A.. 2003. Ecological play in the coevolutionary theater: genetic and environmental determinants of attack by a specialist weevil on milkweed. Journal of Ecology 91:1049–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (ed.) 1984a. Biology of Gall Insects. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Ananthakrishnan, T. N. 1984b. Adaptive strategies in cecidogenous insects, pp. 1–9 in Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (ed.) Biology of Gall Insects. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Araujo, L. M., Lara, A. C. F., and Fernandes, G. W.. 1995. Utilization of Apion sp. (Coleoptera, Apionidae) galls by an ant community in southeastern Brazil. Tropical Zoology 8:319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlegrim, O. 1989. Exclusion of birds from bilberry stands: impact on insect larval density and damage to the bilberry. Oecologia 79:136–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, J. K., and Whitham, T. G.. 2003. Interactions among elk, aspen, galling sawflies and insectivorous birds. Oikos 101:127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, B. L. 1987. Nitrogen fixation by epiphylls in a tropical rainforest. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 74:234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenbaum, M. R. 1978. Toxicity of furanocoumarin to armyworms: a case of biosynthetic escape from insect herbivores. Science 201:532–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluthgen, N., and Fiedler, K.. 2002. Interactions between weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina, homopterans, trees and lianas in an Australian rain forest canopy. Journal of Animal Ecology 71:793–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. L., Vargo, S., Connor, E. F., and Nuckols, M. S.. 1997. Causes of vertical stratification in the density of Cameraria hamadryadella. Ecological Entomology 22:16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappuccino, N. 1993. Mutual use of leaf-shelters by lepidopteran larvae on paper birch. Ecological Entomology 18:287–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappuccino, N., and Martin, M.-A.. 1994. Eliminating early-season leaf-tiers of paper birch reduces abundance of mid-summer species. Ecological Entomology 19:399–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M. R., and Kearby, W. H.. 1978. Microlepidopterous leaf tiers (Lepidoptera: Gelichioidea) in central Missouri. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 51:457–471.Google Scholar
Carver, M., Bluethgen, N., Grimshaw, J. F., and Bellis, G. A.. 2003. Aphis clerodendri Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae), attendant ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and associates on Clerodendrum (Verbenaceae) in Australia. Australian Journal of Entomology 42:109–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clancy, K. M., Price, P. W., and Sacchi, C. F.. 1993. Is leaf size important for a leaf-galling sawfly (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)? Environmental Entomology 22:116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. B., and Clark, D. A.. 1985. Seedling dynamics of a tropical tree: impacts of herbivory and meristem damage. Ecology 66:1884–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, A. A., and Varanda, E. M.. 2002. Building of leaf shelters by Stenoma scitiorella Walker (Lepidoptera: Elachistidae): manipulation of host plant quality? Neotropical Entomology 31:537–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, T. P., Itami, J. K., and Price, P. W.. 1990. The window of vulnerability of a shoot-galling sawfly to attack by a parasitoid. Ecology 71:1471–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crespi, B. J. 1992. Behavioral ecology of Australian gall thrips (Insecta, Thysanoptera). Journal of Natural History 26:769–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csóka, G. 1994. Variation in Quercus robur susceptibility to galling wasps (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) linked to tree phenology, pp. 148–152 in Price, P. W., Mattson, W. J., and Baranchov, Y. N. (eds.) The Ecology and Evolution of Gall-Forming Insects. St. Paul, MN: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service.Google Scholar
Damman, H. 1987. Leaf quality and enemy avoidance by the larvae of a pyralid moth. Ecology 68:88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, A. L. T., Fernandes, G. W., and Figueira, J. E. C.. 2001. Host plant response and phenotypic plasticity of a galling weevil (Collabismus clitellae: Curculionidae). Austral Ecology 26:173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickson, L. L., and Whitham, T. G.. 1996. Genetically based plant resistance traits affect arthropods, fungi, and birds. Oecologia 106:400–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliason, E. A., and Potter, D. A.. 2000. Biology of Callirhytis cornigera (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) and the arthropod community inhabiting its galls. Environmental Entomology 29:551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliason, E. A., and Potter, D. A.. 2001. Spatial distribution and parasitism of leaf galls induced by Callirhytis cornigera (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) on pin oak. Environmental Entomology 30:280–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, T. A. 1997. Distribution of social crab spiders in eucalypt forests. Australian Journal of Ecology 22:107–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feller, I. C., and Mathis, W. N.. 1997. Primary herbivory by wood-boring insects along an architectural gradient of Rhizophora mangle. Biotropica 29:440–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felt, E. P. 1940. Plant Galls and Gall Makers. London: Hafner.Google Scholar
Fernandes, G. W., Fagundes, M., Woodman, R. L., and Price, P. W.. 1999. Ant effects on three-trophic level interactions: plant, galls, and parasitoids. Ecological Entomology 24:411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. D., and Clark, K. L.. 1994. Analysis of leaf-rolling behavior of Caloptilia serotinella (Lepidoptera: Gracillaridae). Journal of Insect Behavior 7:859–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, T. D., Clark, K. L., Vanderpool, R., and Phillips, C.. 1991. Leaf shelter-building caterpillars harness forces generated by axial retraction of stretched and wetted silk. Journal of Insect Behavior 4:21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foss, L. K., and Rieske, L. K.. 2004. Stem galls affect oak foliage with potential consequences for herbivory. Ecological Entomology 29:273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fournier, V., Rosenheim, J. A., Brodeur, J., Laney, L. O., and Johnson, M. W.. 2003. Herbivorous mites as ecological engineers: indirect effects on arthropods inhabiting papaya foliage. Oecologia 135:442–450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, S. V., and MacGarvin, M.. 1985. The impact of hairy wood ants, Formica lugubris, on the guild structure of herbivorous insects on birch, Betula pubescens. Journal of Animal Ecology 54:847–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, A. 2001. Indirect interactions mediated by leaf shelters in animal–plant communities. Population Ecology 43:31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukui, A., Murakami, M., Konno, K., Nakamura, M., and Ohgushi, T.. 2002. A leaf-rolling caterpillar improves leaf quality. Entomological Science 5:263–266.Google Scholar
Gaston, K. J., Reavey, D., and Valladares, G. R.. 1991. Changes in feeding habit as caterpillars grow. Ecological Entomology 16:339–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. E. 1990. Components of resource competition in plant communities, pp. 27–49 in Grace, J. B. and Tilman, D. (eds.) Perspective on Plant Competition. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Green, E. S., Zangerl, A. R., and Berenbaum, M. R.. 1998. Reduced aggressive behavior: a benefit of silk-spinning in the parsnip webworm, Depressaria pastinacella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). Journal of Insect Behavior 11:761–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, B. A. 1994. Pattern and Process in Host–Parasitoid Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heads, P. A., and Lawton, J. H.. 1985. Bracken, ants and extrafloral nectaries. III. How insect herbivores avoid ant predation. Ecological Entomology 10:29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, S. B., and Buchanan, C. K.. 1998. Larval performance and association within and between two species of hackberry nipple gall insects, Pachypsylla spp. (Homoptera: Psyllidae). American Midland Naturalist 140:351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodkinson, I. D. 1984. The biology and ecology of the gall-forming Psylloidea (Homoptera), pp. 59–77 in Ananthakrishnan, T. N. (ed.) Biology of Gall Insects. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hölldobler, B. 1983. Territorial behavior in the green tree ant (Oecophylla smaragdina). Biotropica 15:241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O.. 1990. The Ants. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, E. E., and Stiling, P.. 1997. Exploitative competition strongly affects the herbivorous insect community on Baccharis halimifolia. Oikos 79:521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D. 1987. Opposing effects of spring defoliation on late season oak caterpillars. Ecological Entomology 12:373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D. 1992. A variable insect–plant interaction: the relationship between tree budburst phenology and population levels of insect herbivores among trees. Ecological Entomology 16:91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. D., and Wilmer, P. G.. 1989. The potential for interspecific competition between two abundant defoliators on oak: leaf damage and habitat quality. Ecological Entomology 14:267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. N., Mayhew, P. J., Douglas, A. E., and Hartley, S. E.. 2002. Insects as leaf engineers: can leaf-miners alter leaf structure for birch aphids? Functional Ecology 16:575–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H., and Shachak, M.. 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, M. T., Castellanos, I., and Weiss, M. R.. 2002. Do leaf shelters always protect caterpillars from invertebrate predators? Ecological Entomology 27:753–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagata, H., and Ohgushi, T.. 2004. Leaf miner as a physical ecosystem engineer: secondary use of vacant leaf mines by other arthropods. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97:923–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaitaniemi, P., Vehvilainen, H., and Ruohomaki, K.. 2004. Movement and disappearance of mountain birch defoliators are influenced by the interactive effects of plant architecture and induced resistance. Ecological Entomology 29:437–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampichler, C., and Teschner, M.. 2002. The spatial distribution of leaf galls of Mikiola fagi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and Neuroterus quercusbaccarum (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) in the canopy of Central European mixed forest. European Journal of Entomology 99:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R., and Baldwin, I. T.. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopelke, J. P. 2003. Natural enemies of gall-forming sawflies on willows (Salix spp.) (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae: Euura, Phyllocolpa, Pontania). Entomologia Generalis 26:277–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, K. C., and Whitham, T. G.. 1997. Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling. Oecologia 109:575–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larson, K. A., and Harman, D. M.. 2003. Subcortical cavity dimension and inquilines of the larval locust borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 105:108–119.Google Scholar
Larsson, S., Haggstrom, H. E., and Denno, R. F.. 1997. Preference for protected feeding sites by larvae of the willow-feeding leaf beetle Galerucella lineola. Ecological Entomology 22:445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corff, J., Marquis, R. J., and Whitfield, J. B.. 2000. Temporal and spatial variation in a parasitoid community associated with the herbivores that feed on Missouri Quercus. Environmental Entomology 29:181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letourneau, D. K. 1998. Ants, stem borers, and fungal pathogens: experimental tests of fitness advantage in Piper ant plants. Ecology 79:593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letourneau, D. K., and Barbosa, P.. 1999. Ants, stem borers, and pubescence in Endospermum in Papua New Guinea. Biotropica 31:295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A. C. 1979. Feeding preferences for diseased and wilted sunflower in the grasshopper, Melanoplus differentialis. Entomologica Experimentalis et Applicata 26: 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lill, J. T. 1999. Structure and dynamics of a parasitoid community attacking larvae of Psilocorsis quercicella (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae). Environmental Entomology 28:1114–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lill, J. T. 2004. Seasonal dynamics of leaf-tying caterpillars on white oak. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 58:1–6.Google Scholar
Lill, J. T., and Marquis, R. J.. 2003. Ecosystem engineering by caterpillars increases insect herbivore density on white oak. Ecology 84:682–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lill, J. T., and Marquis, R. J.. 2004. Leaf ties as colonization sites for forest arthropods. Ecological Entomology 29:300–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeffler, C. C. 1996. Adaptive trade-offs of leaf folding in Dichomeris caterpillars on goldenrods. Ecological Entomology 21:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardero, M. J., Ayres, M. P., Hofstetter, R. W., Moser, J. C., and Lepzig, K. D.. 2003. Strong indirect interactions of Tarsonemus mites (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) and Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Oikos 102:243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louda, S. M. 1982. Inflorescence spiders: a cost/benefit analysis for the host plant, Haplopappus venetus Blake (Asteraceae). Oecologia 55:185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapes, C. C., and Davies, P. J.. 2001a. Indole-3-acetic acid and ball gall development on Solidago altissima. New Phytologist 151:195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapes, C. C., and Davies, P. J.. 2001b. Cytokinins in the ball gall of Solidago altissima and in the gall forming larvae of Euostoma solidaginis. New Phytologist 151:203–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, R. J. 1992. Selective impact of herbivores, pp. 301–325 in Fritz, R. S. and Simms, E. L. (eds.) Plant Resistance to Herbivores and Pathogens. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, R. J. 1996. Plant architecture, sectoriality, and tolerance to herbivory. Vegetatio 127:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, R. J., and Whelan, C. J.. 1996. Plant morphology and recruitment of the third trophic level: subtle and little-recognized defenses? Oikos 75:330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, R. J., Lill, J. T., and Piccini, A.. 2002. Effect of plant architecture on colonization and damage by leaf-tying caterpillars of Quercus alba. Oikos 99:531–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsen, G. D., Floate, K. D., Waltz, A. M., Wimp, G. M., and Whitham, T. G.. 2000. Positive interactions between leafrollers and other arthropods enhance biodiversity on hybrid cottonwoods. Oecologia 123:82–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, W. E. 2004. Host breadth and voltinism in gall-inducing Lepidoptera. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 58:44–47.Google Scholar
Mopper, S., and Simberloff, D.. 1995. Differential herbivory in an oak population: the role of plant phenology and insect performance. Ecology 76:1233–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morin, P. J. 1999. Community Ecology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1972. Predation by insects and spiders inhabiting colonial webs of Hyphantria cunea. Canadian Entomologist 104:1197–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morse, D. H. 1992. Predation on dispersing Misumena vattia spiderlings and its relationship to maternal foraging decisions. Ecology 73:1814–1819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mound, L. A., and Morris, D. C.. 2000. Inquilines or kleptoparasites? New phlaeothripine Thysanoptera associated with domicile-building thrips on Acacia trees. Australian Journal of Entomology 39:130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, M. 1999. Effect of avian predation on survival of leaf-rolling lepidopterous larvae. Researches on Population Ecology 41:135–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., and Ohgushi, T.. 2003. Positive and negative effects of leaf shelters on herbivorous insects: linking multiple herbivore species on a willow. Oecologia 136:445–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nakamura, M., Miyamoto, Y., and Ohgushi, T.. 2003. Gall initiation enhances the availability of food resources for herbivorous insects. Functional Ecology 17:851–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Offenberg, J., Havanon, S., Aksornkoae, S., MacIntosh, D. J., and Nielsen, M. G.. 2004. Observations on the ecology of weaver ants (Oecophylla smaragdina Fabricius) in a Thai mangrove ecosystem and their effect on herbivory of Rhizophora mucronata Lam. Biotropica 36:344–351.Google Scholar
Oki, Y. 2000. Herbivoria por lepidópteros em Byrsonima intermedia Juss. (Malpighiaceae) na ARIE Pé-de-Gigante, Santa Rita do Passa Quatro, SP. M.S. thesis, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ollerstam, O., and Larsson, S.. 2003. Salicylic acid mediates resistance in the willow Salix viminalis against the gall midge Dasineura marginemtorquens. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:163–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ott, J. R., Nelson, J. A., and Caillouet, T.. 1998. The effect of spider-mediated flower alteration on seed production in golden-eye phlox. Southwestern Naturalist 43:430–436.Google Scholar
Pilson, D. 1992. Aphid distribution and the evolution of goldenrod resistance. Evolution 46:1358–1372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plantard, O., and Hochberg, M. E.. 1998. Factors affecting parasitism in the oak-galler Neuroterus quercusbaccarum (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Oikos 81:289–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. W. 2003. Macroevolutionary Theory on Macroecological Patterns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., and Louw, S.. 1996. Resource manipulation through architectural modification of the host plant by a gall-forming weevil Urodontus scholtzi Louw (Coleoptera: Anthribidae). African Entomology 4:103–110.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., N. Cobb, T. P. Craig, et al. 1990. Insect herbivore population dynamics on trees and shrubs: new approaches relevant to latent and eruptive species and life table development, pp. 1–38 in Bernays, E. A. (ed.) Insect–Plant Interactions. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Price, P. W., Fernandes, G. W., Lara, A. C. F., et al. 1998. Global patterns in local number of insect galling species. Journal of Biogeography 25:581–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathcke, R. J. 1976. Competition and coexistence within a guild of herbivorous insects. Ecology 57:76–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, M., and R. Cameron. 1994. Risk of parasitism on Taxomyia taxi (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in relation to the size of its galls on yew, Taxus baccata, pp. 213–230 in Williams, M. A. J. (ed.) Plant Galls. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rehill, B. J., and Schultz, J. C.. 2001. Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis. Oikos 95:94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riihimaki, J., Kaitaniemi, P., and Ruohomaki, K.. 2003. Spatial responses of two herbivore groups to a geometrid larva on mountain birch. Oecologia 134:203–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roininen, H., and Danell, K.. 1997. Mortality factors and resource use of the bud-galling sawfly, Euura mucronata (Hartig), on willows (Salix spp.) in arctic Eurasia. Polar Biology 18:325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roininen, H., Price, P. W., and Tahvanainen, J.. 1996. Bottom-up and top-down influences in the trophic system of a willow, a galling sawfly, parasitoids and inquilines. Oikos 77:44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romero, G. Q., and Vasconcellos-Neto, J.. 2004. Beneficial effects of flower-dwelling predators on their host plant. Ecology 85:446–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, L. M., and Stoetzel, M. B.. 1991. Inquilines in egg nests of periodical cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 93:480–488.Google Scholar
Sagers, C. L. 1992. Manipulation of host plant quality: herbivores keep leaves in the dark. Functional Ecology 6:741–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandberg, S. L., and Berenbaum, M. R.. 1989. Leaf-tying by tortricid larvae as an adaptation for feeding on phototoxic Hypericum perforatum. Journal of Chemical Ecology 15:875–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanver, D., and Hawkins, B. A.. 2000. Galls as habitats: the inquiline communities on insect galls. Basic and Applied Ecology 1:3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonrogge, K., Stone, G. N., and Crawley, M. J.. 1996. Abundance patterns and species richness of the parasitoids and inquilines of the alien gall-former Andricus quercuscalicis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae). Oikos 77:507–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibert, T. F. 1993. A nectar-secreting gall wasp and ant mutualism: selection and counter-selection shaping gall wasp phenology, fecundity and persistence. Ecological Entomology 18:247–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyffarth, J. A. S., Colouro, A. M., and Price, P. W.. 1996. Leaf rollers in Ouratea hexasperma (Ocnaceae): fire effect and plant vigor hypothesis. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 56:135–137.Google Scholar
Shorthouse, J. D. 1994. Host shift of the leaf galler Diplolepis polita (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) to the domestic shrub rose Rosa rugosa. Canadian Entomologist 126:1499–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sopow, S. L., Shorthouse, J. D., Strong, W., and Quiring, D. T.. 2003. Evidence for long-distance, chemical gall induction by an insect. Ecology Letters 6:102–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiura, S., Yamazaki, K., and Fukasawa, Y.. 2004. Weevil parasitism of Ambrosia galls. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 97:184–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thakur, S. S., Kashyap, N. P., and Mehta, P. K.. 1996. New record of a stem boring weevil, Cypricerus emarginatus Fst. (Curculionidae: Coleoptera) on rajmash in Himachal Pradesh. Journal of Insect Science 9:183.Google Scholar
Hezewijk, B. H., and Roland, J.. 2003. Gall size determines the structure of the Rhabdophaga strobiloides host–parasitoid community. Ecological Entomology 28:593–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washburn, J. O. 1984. Mutualism between a cynipid gall wasp and ants. Ecology 65:654–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weis, A. E., Abrahamson, W. G., and McCrea, K. D.. 1985. Host gall size and oviposition success by the parasitoid Eurytoma gigantea. Ecological Entomology 10:341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M. R. 2003. Good housekeeping: why do shelter-dwelling caterpillars fling their frass? Ecology Letters 6:361–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitham, T. G. 1983. Host manipulation of parasites: within-plant variation as a defense against rapidly evolving pests, pp. 15–41 in Denno, R. F. and McClure, M. S. (eds.) Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. 1995. Fungal endophytes which invade insect galls: insect pathogens, benign saprophytes, or fungal inquilines. Oecologia 103:255–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woodman, R. L., and Price, P. W.. 1992. Differential larval predation by ants can influence willow sawfly community structure. Ecology 73:1028–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, G. R. 2003. Life history, biology, host plants and natural enemies of the psyllid Trioza eugeniae Froggatt (Hemiptera: Triozidae). Australian Entomologist 30:31–38.Google Scholar
Young, T. P., Stubblefield, C. H., and Isbell, L. A.. 1997. Ants on swollen-thorn acacias: species coexistence in a simple system. Oecologia 109:98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×