Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T17:47:44.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

18 - Distributive Justice and the Value of Information: A (Broadly) Rawlsian Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Jeroen Van Den Hoven
Affiliation:
Professor of moral philosophy Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft University of Technology; Professorial Fellow Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Australian National University
Emma Rooksby
Affiliation:
Research Fellow Centre for Applied Philosophy; Public Ethics Australian National University
John Weckert
Affiliation:
Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Distributive justice in contemporary information societies concerns, among other issues, the distribution of information, information services, and information infrastructures. There is currently much enthusiasm about the potential of new information and communication technologies (ICTs), and the immense information resources contained on the World Wide Web, to improve the lives of those who have access to them. But at the same time, there is mounting concern over the uneven distribution of the new information wealth, both within nations and internationally. Some even fear that we may be heading for a regime of local and global ‘information-apartheid’ (Ratan 1995; Wresch 1996; Loader 1998; Schiller 1996), in which the ‘information-haves’ are segregated from the ‘information have-nots’.

A host of empirical research adds force to such concerns. According to a 2005 UNCTAD study (UNCTAD 2006) the digital divide in the first years of the twenty-first century between nations is still wide. A person in a high-income country is more than twenty-two times more likely to be an Internet user than one in a low-income nation. In a high-income country, Internet affordability relative to income is more than150 times better than in a low-income nation. Even in lower-middle-income countries, the cost of twenty hours of inferior Internet service is nearly one-third the average monthly income. In high-income countries the cost of Internet service is affordable for most households, although the report claims that, even within these countries, considerable digital divides continue to exist between urban and rural areas, genders, age groups, and racial groups.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, B. 1988. Information as an economic good: Sources of individual and social value, in Mosco, V. and Wasco, J. (Eds.), The political economy of information. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 76–94.Google Scholar
Buckland, M. 1991. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 42, 5, pp. 351–360.3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, N. 1990. Equality of what: Welfare, resources, or capabilities?Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 1, suppl., 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowding, K. 1992. Choice: Its increase and its value. British Journal of Political Science, 22, pp. 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, P., and Braithwaite, J. 1996, A history of intellectual property. Ashgate: Aldershot.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1981a. What is equality? Part 1: Equality of resources. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 185–246;Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1981b. What is equality? Part 2: Equality of welfare. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 10, 283–345.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 2000. The sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equalityCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, A. 1981. Forms of explanation, rethinking the questions in social theory. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. 1984. Positional goods. Philosophy, 18, suppl., 97–110.Google Scholar
Loader, B. (Ed.). 1998. Cyberspace divide. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogge, T. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ratan, S. 1995. A new divide between haves and have-nots?Time Special Issue: Welcome to Cyberspace, Spring, pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1982a. The basic liberties and their priority, in McMurrin, S. M. (Ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Value 3. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1982b. Social unity and primary goods, in Sen, A. and Williams, B. (Eds.), Utilitarianism and beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1999. A theory of justice (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, H. 1996. Information inequality: The deepening social crisis in America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1990. Justice: Means versus freedom. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, 2, 111–121.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sessions, W. L. 1981. Rawls's concept and conception of primary good. Social Theory and Practice, 7, 3, 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, J. Information and citizenship in Europe, in Loader, B. (Ed.), Cyberspace divide. London: Routledge.
Thomsen, E. F. 1992. Prices and knowledge: A market-process perspective. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2006. The Digital divide: ICT diffusion index 2005. United Nations, New York. Retrieved 3 August 2006 from http://www.unctad.org/en/docs/iteipc20065_en.pdf.
van den Hoven, M. J. 1995. Equal access and social justice, in Information technology and moral philosophy. PhD thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam. (See also http://www.ccsr.cse.dmu.ac.uk/conferences/ethicomp/ethicomp95/abstracts.vandenHoven.html.)
Hoven, M. J. 2000. Privacy and health information: The need for a fine-grained account. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 12, 1, 5–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walzer, M. 1983. Spheres of justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wresch, W. 1996. Disconnected: Haves and have-nots in the Information Age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×