Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- 27 The Critical Analysis of Genre and Social Action
- 28 Rhetorics, Discourse and Populist Politics
- 29 The Discourses of Money and the Economy
- 30 Corporate Discourse
- 31 Mediatized Communication and Linguistic Reflexivity in Contemporary Public and Political Life
- 32 Discourse Analysis and Digital Surveillance
- Index
- References
30 - Corporate Discourse
from Part VI - Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Part I (Con)Textualizing Discourses
- Part II Perspectives and Modes of Analysis
- Part III Discourse Materialities and Embodiment
- Part IV (Trans)Locations and Intersections
- Part V Ethics, Inequality and Inclusion
- Part VI Discourses, Publics and Mediatization
- 27 The Critical Analysis of Genre and Social Action
- 28 Rhetorics, Discourse and Populist Politics
- 29 The Discourses of Money and the Economy
- 30 Corporate Discourse
- 31 Mediatized Communication and Linguistic Reflexivity in Contemporary Public and Political Life
- 32 Discourse Analysis and Digital Surveillance
- Index
- References
Summary
Starting from the premise that discourse is what brings organizations into being, this chapter presents a state-of-the-art review of research on corporate discourse. Its main goal is to evaluate the contributions that discourse analytical perspectives and methodologies have made to the understanding of organizational practices, showing how corporations use discourse strategically to create and maintain corporate identity and perform ideological work. This chapter is divided into two parts. The first part reviews studies concerned with aspects of internal communications, highlighting discursive strategies for “doing” business and adopted across contexts and media including business meetings, job interviews and business emails. The second part discusses studies investigating external communications, focusing specifically on communications with investors and stakeholders as well as with the wider world. Studies exploring CEO letters, annual and corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports, advertising and branding are reviewed. This part also discusses research that examined corporate communications in “moments of crisis,” showing how corporations strategically employ discourse to maintain a positive public image. The final sections summarize the implications and the need for “doing” discourse analysis in corporate environments and conclude with avenues for further research.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies , pp. 666 - 686Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Further Reading
Using a combination of CDA and corpus linguistics, this volume offers comprehensive insights into the ways in which discourse constructs and maintains corporate identity and relationships with internal and external audiences. A wide range of written genres produced by corporations are explored in depth.
This book presents an excellent introduction to the role of language in many facets of business communication including stakeholder communication, brand narratives and management of conflict and self-branding. Each topic is discussed in an engaging way by drawing on a range of authentic examples.
Darics, E. and Koller, V. (2018). Language in Business, Language at Work. London: Palgrave Higher Education.Google Scholar
References
Alexander, R. J. (1999). Ecological Commitments in Business: A Computer-Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis. In Verschueren, J. (ed.) Language and Ideology: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference. Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association. 14–24.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Kärreman, D. (2000). Varieties of Discourse: On the Study of Organizations through Discourse Analysis. Human Relations 53(9): 1125–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, L. and Yin, J. (2018). Social Media and Crisis Communication. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bargiela-Chiappini, F., Nickerson, C. and Planken, B. (2007). Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88.Google Scholar
Baxter., J. (2010). The Language of Female Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting Narratives and the Narrative Turn in Accounting Research: Issues, Theory, Methodology, Methods and a Research Framework. British Accounting Review 46: 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beattie, V., Dhanani, A. and Jones, M. J. (2008). Investigating Presentational Change in UK Annual Reports. Journal of Business Communication 45(2): 181–222.Google Scholar
Benoit, W. L. (1997). Image Repair Discourse and Crisis Communication. Public Relations Review 23(2): 177–86.Google Scholar
Bhatia, A. (2012). The Corporate Social Responsibility Report: The Hybridization of a “Confused” Genre (2007–2011). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 55(3): 221–38.Google Scholar
Boden, D. (1994). The Business of Talk: Organizations in Action. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Breeze, R. (2012). Legitimation in Corporate Discourse: Oil Corporations after Deepwater Horizon. Discourse & Society 23(1): 3–18.Google Scholar
Coombs, W. T. (1998). An Analytic Framework for Crisis Situations: Better Responses from a Better Understanding of the Situation. Journal of Public Relations Research 10(3): 177–91.Google Scholar
Creelman, V. (2015). Sheer Outrage: Negotiating Customer Dissatisfaction and Interaction in the Blogosphere. In Darics, E. (ed.) Digital Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 160–85.Google Scholar
Darics, E. (2013). Non-verbal Signalling in Digital Discourse: The Case of Letter Repetition. Discourse, Context & Media 2(3): 141–8.Google Scholar
Davis, C. B., Glantz, M. and Novak, D. R. (2016). You Can’t Run Your SUV on Cute. Let’s Go!: Internet Memes as Delegitimizing Discourse. Environmental Communication 10(1): 62–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, A. R., Rennecker, J. A. and Hansen, S. (2010). Invisible Whispering: Restructuring Collaborative Decision Making with Instant Messaging. Decision Sciences 41(4): 845–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsworth, R. (2002). Leading with Purpose: The New Corporate Realities. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Introduction. In Fairclough, N. (ed.) Critical Language Awareness. Harlow: Longman. 1–29.Google Scholar
Fuoli, M. and Hart, C. (2018). Trust-Building Strategies in Corporate Discourse: An Experimental Study. Discourse & Society 29(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926518770264.Google Scholar
Fuoli, M. and Paradis, C. (2014). A Model of Trust-Repair Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 74: 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, R. K. and Danziger, J. N. (2007). IM = Interruption Management? Instant Messaging and Disruption in the Workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 13(1): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2014). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method, 4th ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gimenez, J. (2000). Business E-mail Communication: Some Emerging Tendencies in Register. English for Specific Purposes 19(3): 237–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1971). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Handford, M. (2010). The Language of Business Meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (2000). Doing Collegiality and Keeping Control at Work: Small Talk in Government Departments. In Coupland, J. (ed.) Small Talk. London: Longman. 32–61.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Marra, M. (2004). Relational Practice in the Workplace: Women’s Talk or Gendered Discourse? Language in Society 33: 377–98.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. and Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and Politeness in the Workplace. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (1998). Exploring Corporate Rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO’s Letter. Journal of Business Communication 35(2): 224–45.Google Scholar
Incelli, E. (2013). Managing Discourse in Intercultural Business Email Interactions: A Case Study of a British and Italian Business Transaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 34(6): 515–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworska, S. (2018). Change but No Climate Change: Discourses of Climate Change in Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in the Oil Industry. International Journal of Business Communication 55(2): 194–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworska., S. and Nanda, A. (2018). Doing Well by Talking Good? A Topic Modelling-Assisted Discourse Study of Corporate Social Responsibility. Applied Linguistics 39(3): 373–99.Google Scholar
Jay, T. (2000). Why We Curse: A Neuro-psycho-social Theory of Speech. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Koller, V. (2018). Language Awareness and Language Workers. Language Awareness 27(1–2): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lampi, M. (1986). Linguistic Components of Strategy in Business Negotiations, Studies B-85. Helsinki: Helsinki School of Economics.Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2015). The Semiotics of Modernist Space in the Branding of Corporations: A Multimodal Critical Discourse Analytic Approach. International Journal of Marketing Semiotics 3: 19–38.Google Scholar
Ledin, P. and Machin, D. (2017). The Neoliberal Definition of “Elite Space” in IKEA Kitchens. Social Semiotics 27(3): 323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lischinsky, A. (2011). The Discursive Construction of a Responsible Corporate Self. In Sjölander, A. E. and Gunnarson Payne, J. (eds.) Tracking Discourses: Politics, Identity and Social Change. Lund: Nordic Academic Press. 257–85.Google Scholar
Lischinsky, A. (2018). Critical Discourse Studies and Branding. In Flowerdew, J. and Richardson, J. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge. 540–52.Google Scholar
Livesey, S. (2002). Global Warming Wars: Rhetorical and Discourse Analytic Approaches to Exxonmobil’s Corporate Public Discourse. Journal of Business Communication 39(1): 117–48.Google Scholar
Livesey, S. and Kearins, K. (2002). Transparent and Caring Corporations? A Study of Sustainability Reports by the Body Shop and Royal Dutch/Shell. Organisation and Environment 15(3): 233–58.Google Scholar
Mak, B. C. N. and Lee, C. (2015). Swearing Is E-business: Expletives in Instant Messaging in Hong Kong Workplaces. In Darics, E. (ed.) Digital Business Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 122–41.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. (2010). Language and the Market Society: Critical Reflections on Discourse and Dominance. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Merkl-Davies, D. M. and Koller, V. (2012). “Metaphoring” People out of this World: A Critical Discourse Analysis of a Chairman’s Statement of a Defence Firm. Accounting Forum 36(3): 178–93.Google Scholar
Mullany, J. L. (2007). Gendered Discourse in Professional Communication. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neeley, T. (2012). Global Business Speaks English. Harvard Business Review, https://hbr.org/2012/05/global-business-speaks-english.Google Scholar
Nickerson, C. and de Groot, E. (2005). Dear Shareholder, Dear Stockholder, Dear Stakeholder: The Business Letter Genre in the Annual General Report. In Gillaerts, P. and Gotti, M. (eds.) Genre Variation in Business Letters. Bern: Peter Lang. 325–46.Google Scholar
Pollach, I. (2018). Issue Cycles in Corporate Sustainability Reporting: A Longitudinal Study. Environmental Communication 12(2): 247–60.Google Scholar
Quan-Haase, A., Cothrel, J. and Wellman, B. (2005). Instant Messaging for Collaboration: A Case Study of a High-Tech Firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10(4): JCMC10413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00277.x.Google Scholar
Rutherford, B. A. (2005). Genre Analysis of Corporate Annual Report Narratives: A Corpus Linguistics-Based Approach. Journal of Business Communication 42(4): 349–78.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., Scollon, S. and Jones, R. (2012). Intercultural Communication, 3rd ed. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse Semantics as Ideology. Discourse & Society 6(2): 243–89.Google Scholar
Vigneau, L., Humphreys, M. and Moon, J. (2014). How Do Firms Comply with International Sustainability Standards? Processes and Consequences of Adopting the Global Reporting Initiative. Journal of Business Ethics 131(2): 469–86.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. and O’Halloran, K. L. (2013). “Toward a Global Knowledge Enterprise”: University Websites as Portals to the Ongoing Marketization of Higher Education. Critical Discourse Studies 10(4): 468–85.Google Scholar
- 4
- Cited by