Elsevier

Bone

Volume 20, Issue 3, March 1997, Pages 213-218
Bone

Original article
Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: Relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(96)00383-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Femoral neck axis length, neck width, and neck-shaft angle were measured on radiographs of right proximal femora from 64 cadavers (28 female, 36 male). Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for various regions of interest, and quantitative computed tomography (QCT) was used to determine BMD and bone areas for cortical and trabecular bone at the trochanter and femoral neck. The strength of the femur was determined by a mechanical test simulating a fall on the greater trochanter, and the fracture type (cervical or trochanteric) was subsequently determined from radiographs. Twenty-six cervical fractures and 38 trochanteric fractures were observed, with no significant sex difference in the distribution of fracture types. Femoral strength was significantly elevated in males compared to females. DXA trochanteric BMD was more strongly (p < 0.05) correlated with femoral strength (r2 = 0.88) than were any of the other DXA BMD measurements (r2 = 0.59–0.76). In multiple regression models, a combination of different DXA BMD measurements produced only a small increase (1%) in the explained variability of femoral strength. Of the OCT measurements, trochanteric cortical area yielded the optimal correlation with femoral strength (r2 = 0.83). Weak, but significant, correlations were observed between femoral strength and cortical BMD at trochanteric (r2 = 0.28) and neck regions (r2 = 0.07). In multiple regression models, combining QCT parameters yielded, at best, an r2 of 0.87. Of the geometrical parameters, both neck axis length and neck width were significantly correlated with femoral strength (r2 = 0.24, 0.22, respectively), but no significant correlation was found between strength and the neckshaft angle. Combining DXA trochanteric BMD with femoral neck width resulted in only a small increase in the explained variability (1%) compared to trochanteric BMD alone. The results demonstrated that DXA and QCT had a similar ability to predict femoral strength in vitro. Trochanteric BMD was the best DXA parameter, and cortical area (not cortical BMD) was the optimal QCT parameter. Geometric measurements of the proximal femur were only weakly correlated with the mechanical strength, and combinations of DXA, QCT, and geometric parameters resulted in only small increases in predictive power compared to the use of a single explanatory variable alone.

References (27)

  • R.B. Martin

    Determinants of the mechanical properties of bones

    J Biomech

    (1991)
  • P.H.F. Nicholson et al.

    Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro. Relationship to ultrasonic measurements at the calcaneus

    Bone

    (1997)
  • A. Alho et al.

    Bone mineral content and mechanical strength: An ex vivo study on human femora at autopsy

    Clin Orthop

    (1988)
  • T.J. Beck et al.

    Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data: A structural approach

    Invest Radiol

    (1990)
  • S. Boonen et al.

    Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1995)
  • M.L. Bouxsein et al.

    Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs

    Calcif Tissue Int

    (1995)
  • J. Cordey et al.

    Effect of bone size, not density, on the stiffness of the proximal part of normal and osteoporotic human femora

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1992)
  • A.C. Courtney et al.

    Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration

    J Bone Joint Surg

    (1995)
  • N. Dalén et al.

    Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck

    Acta Orthop Scand

    (1976)
  • J. Dequeker

    Assessment of quality of bone in osteoporosis BIOMED I: Fundamental study of relevant bone

    Clin Rheumatol

    (1994)
  • K. Faulkner et al.

    Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: The study of osteoporotic fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1993)
  • K.G. Faulkner

    Letter to the Editor: Hip axis length and osteoporotic fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1995)
  • C. Glüer et al.

    Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1994)
  • Cited by (247)

    • Hip fracture risk functions for elderly men and women in sideways falls

      2020, Journal of Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Experimental testing of post-mortem human substitutes (PHMS) of the hip for sideways fall configuration has been used systematically with identical configurations in several studies resulting in a total of several hundred individual hip fracture force values for both elderly women and men (Cheng et al., 1997; Bouxsein et al., 1999; Manske et al., 2006; Bouxsein et al., 2007; de Bakker et al., 2009; Dragomir-Daescu et al., 2011; Grote et al., 2013; Nishiyama et al., 2013; Gilchrist et al., 2014; Johannesdottir et al., 2017). Women have been shown to have lower mean hip fracture loads than men in several of these studies (Cheng et al., 1997; Lochmüller et al., 2002; Manske et al., 2006; Bouxsein et al., 2007; Dragomir-Daescu et al., 2011; Johannesdottir et al., 2017) as well as in combined BMD-FE-analysis (Keyak et al., 2011; Nasiri and Luo, 2016) and in developing a female specific impact force equation (Sarvi and Luo, 2019). The objective is therefore to generate hip fracture force risk functions for elderly women and men in sideways falls which are as mathematically simple as possible, having as few parameters as possible, while accurately matching experimental data with high statistical power and satisfactory goodness of fit.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was presented in part at the 1996 World Congress on Osteoporosis, Amsterdam, May 18–23, 1996.

    View full text