Skip to main content
Log in

A Phase-Dependent Hypothesis for Locomotor Functions of Human Foot Complex

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The human foot is a very complex structure comprising numerous bones, muscles, ligaments and synovial joints. As the only component in contact with the ground, the foot complex delivers a variety of biomechanical functions during human locomotion, e.g. body support and propulsion, stability maintenance and impact absorption. These need the human foot to be rigid and damped to transmit ground reaction forces to the upper body and maintain body stability, and also to be compliant and resilient to moderate risky impacts and save energy. How does the human foot achieve these apparent conflicting functions? In this study, we propose a phase-dependent hypothesis for the overall locomotor functions of the human foot complex based on in-vivo measurements of human natural gait and simulation results of a mathematical foot model. We propse that foot functions are highly dependent on gait phase, which is a major characteristics of human locomotion. In early stance just after heel strike, the foot mainly works as a shock absorber by moderating high impacts using the viscouselastic heel pad in both vertical and horizontal directions. In mid-stance phase (~80% of stance phase), the foot complex can be considered as a springy rocker, reserving external mechanical work using the foot arch whilst moving ground contact point forward along a curved path to maintain body stability. In late stance after heel off, the foot complex mainly serves as a force modulator like a gear box, modulating effective mechanical advantages of ankle plantiflexor muscles using metatarsal-phalangeal joints. A sound understanding of how diverse functions are implemented in a simple foot segment during human locomotion might be useful to gain insight into the overall foot locomotor functions and hence to facilitate clinical diagnosis, rehabilitation product design and humanoid robot development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hicks J H. The mechanics of the foot. I. The joints. Journal of Anatomy, 1953, 87, 345–357.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hicks J H. The mechanics of the foot. II. The plantar aponeurosis and the arch. Journal of Anatomy, 1954, 88, 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Whittle M W. Generation and attenuation of transient impulsive forces beneath the foot: A review. Gait and Posture, 1999, 10, 264–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Carrier D R, Heglund N C, Earls K D. Variable gearing during locomotion in the human musculoskeletal system. Science, 1994, 265, 651–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Erdemir A, Piazza S J. Rotational foot placement specifies the lever arm of the ground reaction force during the push-off phase of walking initiation. Gait and Posture, 2002, 15, 212–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carson M C, Harrington M E, Thompson N, O’Connor J J, Theologis T N. Kinematic analysis of a multi-segment foot model for research and clinical applications: A repeatability analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001, 34, 1299–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Clercq D, Aerts P, Kunnen M. The mechanical characteristics of the human heel pad during foot strike in running: An in vivo cineradiographic study. Journal of Biomechanics, 1994, 27, 1213–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: A basic tool for clinical applications. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2000, 122, 630–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagatsu M, Kubota S, Aoki M, Tsukishima T, Arimoto H, Sato K, Gilchrist L A, Winter D A. A two-part, viscoelastic foot model for use in gait simulations. Journal of Biomechanics, 1996, 29, 795–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkyn T R, Nicol A C. A multi-segment kinematic model of the foot with a novel definition of forefoot motion for use in clinical gait analysis during walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40, 3271–3278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ker R F, Bennett M B, Bibby S R, Kester R C, Alexander R M. The spring in the arch of the human foot. Nature, 1987, 325, 147–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nester C J, Liu A M, Ward E, Howard D, Cocheba J, Derrick T, Paterson P. In vitro study of foot kinematics using a dynamic walking cadaver model. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40, 1927–1937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott S H, Winter D A. Biomechanical model of the human foot: Kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 1993, 26, 1091–1104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren L, Howard D, Ren L Q, Tian L M, Nester C J. A generic analytical foot rollover model for predicting translational ankle kinematics in gait simulation studies. Journal of Biomechanics, in review.

  15. Winter D A, Sidwall H G, Hobson D A. Measurement and reduction of noise in kinematics of locomotion. Journal of Biomechanics, 1974, 7, 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pezzack J C, Norman R W, Winter D A. An assessment of derivative determining techniques used for motion analysis. Journal of Biomechanics, 1977, 10, 377–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansen A H, Childress D S, Knox E H. Roll-over shapes of human locomotor systems: Effects of walking speed. Clinical Biomechanics, 2004, 19, 407–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y. In vivo biomechanical behavior of the human heel pad during the stance phase of gait. Journal of Biomechanics, 2001, 34, 1661–1665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ker R F. The time-dependent mechanical properties of the human heel pad in the context of locomotion. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1996, 199, 1501–1508.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cavagna G A, Heglund N C, Taylor C R. Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: Two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure. American Journal of Physiology, 1977, 233, R243–R261.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Donelan J M, Kram R, Kuo A D. Simultaneous positive and negative external mechanical work in human walking. Journal of Biomechanics, 2002, 35, 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Adamczyk P G, Collins S H, Kuo A D. The advantages of a rolling foot in human walking. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2006, 209, 3953–3963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McGeer T. Passive dynamic walking. International Journal of Robotics Research, 1990, 9, 62–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren L, Jones R K, Howard D. Predictive modelling of human walking over a complete gait cycle. Journal of Biomechanics, 2007, 40, 1567–1574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Ren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ren, L., Howard, D., Ren, Lq. et al. A Phase-Dependent Hypothesis for Locomotor Functions of Human Foot Complex. J Bionic Eng 5, 175–180 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60022-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60022-0

Keywords

Navigation