A crankshaft system model for structural dynamic analysis of internal combustion engines

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(01)00119-5Get rights and content

Abstract

A system model for analyzing the dynamic behavior of an internal combustion engine crankshaft is described. The model couples the crankshaft structural dynamics, the main bearing hydrodynamic lubrication and the engine block stiffness using a system approach. A two-level dynamic substructuring technique is used to predict the crankshaft dynamic response based on the finite-element method. The dynamic substructuring uses a set of load-dependent Ritz vectors. The main bearing lubrication analysis is based on the solution of the Reynold's equation. Comparison with experimental results demonstrates the accuracy of the model. Numerical results also show the capabilities and significance of the model in engine crankshaft design.

Introduction

Legislative and market pressures on internal combustion engine design call for increased engine power, reduced engine size and improved fuel economy, simultaneously. Also, efforts to reduce engine vibration and radiated noise while improving durability and reliability have become increasingly important to the automotive industry due to more stringent requirements for higher performance, lighter weight, low cost and fast-to-market engine designs. Optimized engine components are therefore required if competitive designs must be realized. Sophisticated analytical tools can greatly enhance the understanding of the physical phenomena associated with the operation of vital engine components. This is particularly true of crankshafts, one of the most analyzed engine components. Many sophisticated crankshaft analysis methods have been reported in the past. This has been mostly facilitated by the use of the finite-element method on high speed computers and the availability of elaborate finite-element preprocessors which can construct complex finite-element mesh models.

In recent years, noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) of automotive engines is becoming an integral part of the design process along with the traditional issues of durability and performance. NVH is strongly related to how customers perceive the quality of the engine; affecting, therefore, its competitiveness in the market place. Extensive static and dynamic analyses have been performed on vital engine components as crankshafts and engine blocks in order to improve their durability [1], [2], [3], [4] and NVH performance [5], [6], [7], [8]. The engine is a fine-tuned system of individual components. An optimum engine design requires a system approach since the performance of each component can be strongly dependent on the performance of the other components. This is particularly true for the crankshaft–block subsystem [9], [10], [11], [12].

A crankshaft–block subsystem consists of the crankshaft and the engine block coupled by the hydrodynamically lubricated main bearings. The loading on the system comes from the cylinder pressure and the piston–connecting rod inertia. The cylinder pressure applied on the piston crown is transmitted to the crankpin through the piston–connecting rod assembly. The inertia of the piston–connecting rod provides a load on the crankpin as well. The crankpin loads deform the crankshaft and are transmitted to the engine block at the main bearing locations through the main bearing hydrodynamics. Both the deformation of the crankshaft and the engine block affect the main bearing film thickness and therefore, the bearing hydrodynamics. For this reason, the mathematical model of the engine system requires three individual models which are coupled together; a structural model of the crankshaft, a structural model of the engine block and a lubrication model of the main bearings.

The large number of studies reported in the literature on the crankshaft–block interaction problem indicates its significance to the industry. A representative sample is given in Refs. [2], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17]. Due to the complexity of the problem, many simplifying assumptions have been used. The first attempt to solve the problem is reported in Refs. [9], [18] where a calculation of bearing performance in statically indeterminate crankshaft systems is described. A static (not dynamic) crankshaft analysis is used and the block elasticity is represented by linear springs. The mobility method [19] describes the oil-film hydrodynamics neglecting, therefore, the important effects of journal misalignment and bearing design attributes as oil grooves and oil holes. The oil-film hydrodynamics have been almost exclusively represented by either the mobility method [10], [12], [13], [14] or simple spring–damper combinations [15], [16], [17]. In some cases the oil-film is completely neglected [11].

The significance of the crankshaft–block interaction problem in internal combustion engine design is due to a variety of reasons. First, the engine crankshaft is a finely optimized component with significant resonances (both torsional and bending) within its normal operating range. These resonances affect, among others, the dynamic stress distribution on crankshafts, bearing caps and engine bulkheads [2], [4] and the noise of the engine lower end [3], [7], [10]. The accurate prediction of dynamic stress levels is important for durability, low weight and high fatigue life [2]. The crankshaft dynamic response is also needed for optimizing crankshaft accessories as pulleys [16], [17] and flywheels [4]. Also the consideration of the oil-film hydrodynamics in the crankshaft–block interaction problem provides an enhanced bearing load prediction [4]. This allows for the design of more durable bearings with less friction and therefore, better fuel economy [20], [21]. Furthermore, the motion of each journal within the bearing clearance is needed for predicting the magnitude and duration of bearing impacts which normally occur during bearing load reversals. Such a prediction is essential for reducing the emitted noise from the engine lower end [10], [22].

This paper describes a crankshaft–block interaction methodology called CRANKSYM (Crankshaft System Model). Section 2 gives an overview of the proposed crankshaft system model where all the features and assumptions are described in detail. Subsequent sections describe the crankshaft structural dynamic analysis and the engine block representation, the developed main bearing hydrodynamic analysis, and the coupled crankshaft–engine block model. The accuracy and efficiency of the crankshaft structural dynamic analysis is demonstrated in Ref. [23]. Comparison with experimental results shows the good accuracy of the proposed methodology. Finally, the capabilities and significance of the proposed crankshaft–engine block system model in engine design are illustrated using a V-shape six-cylinder engine.

Section snippets

Overview of the crankshaft system model (CRANKSYM)

CRANKSYM is a system model for analyzing an internal combustion engine crankshaft. In its most general form, it couples the crankshaft structural dynamics, the main bearing hydrodynamic lubrication and the engine block stiffness using a system approach.

A finite-element mesh for the entire crankshaft is needed in order to calculate its structural dynamic response. The main bearing lubrication analysis is performed by solving the 2-D Reynold's equation for each main bearing using the

Crankshaft structural dynamic analysis

The crankshaft structural analysis predicts the crankshaft dynamic response based on the finite-element method. A two-level dynamic substructuring with special Ritz vectors is performed. Initially, a given three-dimensional finite-element model of the crankshaft is divided into substructures. Each crankshaft bay and the crankshaft nose and tail (flywheel end) constitute separate substructures. Each substructure is dynamically reduced using a set of load-dependent Ritz vectors. Subsequently, all

Representation of engine block

The crankshaft is supported by the engine block at the main bearing locations. In this work the engine block is represented by its static stiffness neglecting therefore the engine block dynamic behavior. The engine block stiffness can be represented by a vertical and horizontal value for each main bearing. In practice, the vertical and horizontal stiffnesses are always different and they both vary around the circumference of each main bearing.

The engine block support can be modeled by a

Main bearing hydrodynamic analysis

The crankshaft structure is supported by the oil-film hydrodynamic pressure of the main bearings. The oil-film pressure distribution is described by the Reynolds equation which is derived from the Navier–Stokes equations and the continuity equation under simplifying assumptions [31]. For a Newtonian fluid, the Reynolds equation is written aszh3pz+1R2θh3pθ=6μωhθ+12μhtwhere p(z,θ,t) is the oil-film pressure, h(z,θ,t) is the oil-film thickness, μ is the oil viscosity, R is the journal

Coupled crankshaft–engine block model

The reduced crankshaft model is described in the rotating coordinate system by[Mc]{üc}+[Cc]{u̇c}+[Kc]{uc}={Fc}The vector {uc} is partitioned as{uc}={uic||Urc}Twhere {uic} is the generalized displacement vector after the second level of substructuring, {Urc} is the crankshaft retained (subscript r) displacement vector, and {Fc} is the vector of applied forces on the crankshaft. The superscript c, in the above quantities, denotes the crankshaft.

The engine block model is described in the rotating

Dynamic analysis of an in-line five-cylinder engine

In order to experimentally validate the accuracy of the proposed methodology, the dynamic analysis of a five-cylinder in-line (L5) engine crankshaft was performed using the finite-element based analytical tool CRANKSYM which implements the methodology presented in this paper. The response of the L5 crankshaft under wide-open-throttle (WOT) operating conditions was simulated and correlated with measurements.

Fig. 5, Fig. 6 show the measured and computed angular vibrations of the L5 crankshaft,

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to express his gratitude to Dr. Turgay Bengisu from the Synthesis and Analysis Department of the General Motors Powertrain Division for providing access to the experimental results presented in this paper. Furthermore, his efforts in productionizing and institutionalizing CRANKSYM within General Motors are greatly appreciated. His knowledge and experience on engine crankshaft vibrations and on vibrations in general have been invaluable in developing and improving CRANKSYM over

References (43)

  • R.R. Arnold et al.

    Application of Ritz vectors for dynamic analysis of large structures

    Comput Struct

    (1985)
  • Henry JP, Toplosky J, Abramczuk M. Crankshaft durability prediction – a new 3-D approach. SAE paper no. 920087,...
  • Heath AR, McNamara PM. Crankshaft stress analysis – the combination of finite element and classical techniques. ASME...
  • Kubota M, Kamichika R, Tanida K, Nakagawa E. Dynamic analysis of crankshaft using component mode synthesis. Part 1:...
  • Mourelatos ZP. An analytical investigation of the crankshaft–flywheel bending vibrations for a V6 Engine. SAE...
  • Kubozuka T, Hayashi Y, Hayakawa Y, Kikuchi K. Analytical study on engine noise caused by vibration of the cylinder...
  • Ide S, Uchida T, Ozawa K, Izawa K. Improvement of engine sound quality through a new flywheel system flexibly mounted...
  • Ochini K, Nakano M. Relation between crankshaft torsional vibration and engine noise. SAE paper no. 790365,...
  • R. Dejong

    Using vibration transmission analyses in the design of quiet engines

  • Welsh WA. Dynamic analysis of engine bearing systems. MS Thesis, Cornell University,...
  • Katano H, Iwamoto A, Saitoh T. Dynamic behaviour analysis of internal combustion engine crankshafts under operating...
  • D.J. Nefske et al.

    Coupled vibration response of the engine crank–block system

    ASME

    (1989)
  • Mayer LS, Zeischka J, Scherens M, Maessen F. Analysis of flexible rotating crankshaft with flexible engine block using...
  • Martin IT, Law B. Prediction of crankshaft and flywheel dynamics. Institute of Mechanical Engineers, Paper no....
  • Law B, Haddock AK. Prediction of main bearing and crankshaft loading in reciprocating engines. 15th CIMAC Congress,...
  • Okamura H, Shinno A, Yamanaka T, Suzuki A, Sogabe K. A dynamic stiffness matrix approach to the analysis of...
  • Morita T, Okamura H. A dynamic stiffness matrix approach to the analysis of three-dimensional vibrations of automobile...
  • Okamura H, Morita T. Influence of crankshaft–pulley dimensions on crankshaft vibrations and engine-structure noise and...
  • Stickler AC. Calculation of bearing performance in indeterminate systems. PhD Thesis, Cornell University,...
  • J.F. Booker

    Dynamically loaded journal bearings: numerical application of the mobility method

    Trans ASME, J Lubricat Technol

    (1971)
  • Paranjpe RS, Cusenza A. FLARE: an integrated software package for friction and lubrication analysis of automotive...
  • Cited by (122)

    • Effects of misfire on the dynamic behavior of gasoline Engine Crankshafts

      2021, Engineering Failure Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      Experimental signals from the pressure transducers and accelerometers highlighted the needful correction of the injection timing and emission. Mourelatos [20] proposed a methodology to study the interaction between the crankshaft and the block: The structural dynamic analysis of the crankshaft is carried out through the finite element method; the bearing lubrication is analyzed through Reynold’s equation and the flexibility of the block is modeled by stiffness in each bearing location. This methodology is applied on five and six cylinder engine and obtained results prove an accuracy comparing to the experimental results.

    • Material testing and evaluation of crankshafts for structural analysis

      2018, Materials Today: Proceedings
      Citation Excerpt :

      A crankshaft with high amounts of vibration leads to deterioration of the crankshaft structure itself reducing its lifetime and hence also reducing the performance of the automobile. There has always been a trade-off between the material composition of the crankshaft structure and its NVH levels [1–3]. This paper presents a comparison of the material composition of different crankshafts (petrol engine crankshaft and diesel engine crankshaft) and helps in determining an optimal material composition.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text