Review
Addictive potential of cannabinoids: the underlying neurobiology

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-3084(02)00162-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Drugs that are addictive in humans have a number of commonalities in animal model systems—(1) they enhance electrical brain-stimulation reward in the core meso-accumbens reward circuitry of the brain, a circuit encompassing that portion of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) which links the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the mesencephalic midbrain with the nucleus accumbens (Acb) of the ventral limbic forebrain; (2) they enhance neural firing of a core dopamine (DA) component of this meso-accumbens reward circuit; (3) they enhance DA tone in this reward-relevant meso-accumbens DA circuit, with resultant enhancement of extracellular Acb DA; (4) they produce conditioned place preference (CPP), a behavioral model of incentive motivation; (5) they are self-administered; and (6) they trigger reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in animals behaviorally extinguished from intravenous drug self-administration behavior and, perforce, pharmacologically detoxified from their self-administered drug. Cannabinoids were long considered ‘anomalous’, in that they were believed to not interact with these brain reward processes or support drug-seeking and drug-taking behavior in these animal model systems. However, it is now clear—from the published data of several research groups over the last 15 years—that this view of cannabinoid action on brain reward processes and reward-related behaviors is untenable. This paper reviews those data, and concludes that cannabinoids act on brain reward processes and reward-related behaviors in strikingly similar fashion to other addictive drugs.

Introduction

The reward circuitry of the mammalian brain consists of synaptically interconnected neurons which link the ventral tegmental area (VTA), nucleus accumbens (Acb), ventral pallidum (VP), and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC). Laboratory animals avidly self-administer mild electrical stimulation to these loci, and to the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) which interconnects the VTA, Acb, and MPFC. Mild electrical stimulation of this circuit is intensely pleasurable in humans. This circuit is strongly implicated in the neural processes underlying drug addiction, and inhibition of this circuit is implicated in such phenomena as withdrawal dysphoria and dysphoria-mediated drug craving. These brain processes are believed to have evolved to subserve biologically essential natural rewards, such as the seeking and consumption of food and water, the seeking of and mating with sexual partners, and the performance of parenting behaviors. These brain processes are also believed to subserve drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviors supported by addictive drugs. Cannabinoids are euphorigenic in humans and have addictive liability, but were long considered to be devoid of pharmacological action on these brain reward processes or on drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviors. Work with cannabinoids over the last 15 years, however, makes it clear that they interact with these brain processes and influence drug-seeking and drug-taking behaviors in a manner strikingly similar to that of other addictive drugs.

Section snippets

Neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry of brain reward

The neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and neurochemistry of brain reward processes is known to involve a series of neural links associated with the MFB and located in the ventral limbic midbrain/forebrain (Gardner, 1997). Neuroanatomically, this system appears to consist of ‘first-stage’, ‘second-stage’, and ‘third-stage’ reward-related neurons ‘in series’ with one another (Wise and Bozarth, 1984, Gardner, 1997). From anatomical tracing studies and electrophysiological studies which allow

Modeling addiction with animal behavioral models

A number of salient features of addictive behavior at the human level have been successfully modeled at the animal level, with seemingly good face validity and predictive validity to the human situation (Gardner, 2000, Wise and Gardner, 2002a). These models include conditioned place preference (CPP), drug self-administration, and reinstatement.

Cannabinoid effects on brain reward processes

Although cannabinoids have clear addictive potential at the human level (Kozel and Adams, 1986, Kleber, 1988, Goldstein and Kalant, 1990, Anthony et al., 1994, Hall et al., 1994, MacCoun and Reuter, 1997, Crowley et al., 1998), they have been labeled by some (e.g. Felder and Glass, 1998) as ‘anomalous’, i.e. having no action on brain reward processes. Simply stated, this is an untenable position. Over the last 15 years, a large body of research has made it clear that marijuana and other

Cannabinoid actions on CPP

As noted above, CPP is a widely used behavioral model for studying drug-seeking behavior, and inferring the incentive motivational value and strength of addictive drugs. Fundamentally, CPP is the learned approach to a previously neutral set of environmental stimuli which have been paired with administration of a rewarding treatment (van der Kooy, 1987, Tzschentke, 1998). When used to assess drug-induced reward, animals are given drug injections while confined in one of two cue-distinctive

Neural models of cannabinoid actions on brain reward processes

From the evidence cited above, and from additional available data, hypotheses may be generated regarding where and how cannabinoids act to alter brain reward processes, and in turn, reward-related behaviors.

Summary

On the basis of more than 15 years of electrophysiological and biochemical evidence, cannabinoids appear to enhance brain reward processes in similar fashion to other addictive drugs. Also on the basis of electrophysiological and biochemical evidence, cannabinoid withdrawal appears to activate the same brain withdrawal processes as activated by withdrawal from other addictive drugs. Behaviorally, cannabinoids produce CPP, are self-administered, and trigger relapse to drug-seeking behavior in

Acknowledgements

Cannabinoid research cited in this paper from the author's laboratory was supported by research grants from the US Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health (grants AA09547, DA02089, DA03622, and RR05397); the US National Science Foundation (grant BNS-86-09351); the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; the New York State Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services; the New York State Office of Mental Health; the Aaron Diamond Foundation; the Julia

References (214)

  • P.B.S. Clarke et al.

    Autoradiographic evidence for nicotine receptors on nigrostriatal and mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons

    Brain Res.

    (1985)
  • T.J. Crowley et al.

    Cannabis dependence, withdrawal, and reinforcing effects among adolescents with conduct symptoms and substance use disorders

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (1998)
  • G. Di Chiara

    The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of its role in motivation

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (1995)
  • B.J. Everitt et al.

    Interactions between the amygdala and ventral striatum in stimulus-reward associations: studies using a second-order schedule of sexual reinforcement

    Neuroscience

    (1989)
  • R.A. Frank et al.

    The effect of chronic cocaine on self-stimulation train-duration thresholds

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1988)
  • E.D. French

    Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol excites rat VTA dopamine neurons through activation of cannabinoid CB1 but not opioid receptors

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1997)
  • P.J. Fudala et al.

    Conditioned aversion after delay place conditioning with amphetamine

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1990)
  • P.J. Fudala et al.

    Pharmacologic characterization of nicotine-induced conditioned place preference

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1985)
  • E.L. Gardner et al.

    Marijuana's interaction with brain reward systems: update 1991

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1991)
  • E.L. Gardner et al.

    Drug craving and positive/negative hedonic brain substrates activated by addicting drugs

    Semin. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • E.L. Gardner et al.

    Cannabinoid transmission and reward-related events

    Neurobiol. Dis.

    (1998)
  • F.R. George

    Genetic and environmental factors in ethanol self-administration

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1987)
  • F.R. George et al.

    Genetic approaches to the analysis of addiction processes

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1989)
  • G.L. Gessa et al.

    Cannabinoids activate mesolimbic dopamine neurons by an action on cannabinoid CB1 receptors

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1998)
  • F.G. Gonon

    Nonlinear relationship between impulse flow and dopamine released by rat midbrain dopaminergic neurons as studied by in vivo electrochemistry

    Neuroscience

    (1988)
  • J.W. Grimm et al.

    Dissociation of primary and secondary reward-relevant limbic nuclei in an animal model of relapse

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2000)
  • K. Gysling et al.

    Morphine-induced activation of A10 dopamine neurons in the rat

    Brain Res.

    (1983)
  • D.J. Heal et al.

    A new and highly sensitive method for measuring 3-methoxytyramine using HPLC with electrochemical detection: studies with drugs which alter dopamine metabolism in the brain

    Neuropharmacology

    (1990)
  • R.E. Heikkila et al.

    Studies on the distinction between uptake inhibition and release of (3H) dopamine in rat brain tissue slices

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1975)
  • M. Herkenham et al.

    Neuronal localization of cannabinoid receptors in the basal ganglia of the rat

    Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • M. Hershkowitz et al.

    Pretreatment with Δ1-tetrahydrocannabinol and psychoactive drugs: effects on uptake of biogenic amines and on behavior

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1979)
  • M. Hershkowitz et al.

    Effect of cannabinoids on neurotransmitter uptake, ATPase activity and morphology of mouse brain synaptosomes

    Biochem. Pharmacol.

    (1977)
  • M.D. Aceto et al.

    Dependence on delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol: studies on precipitated and abrupt withdrawal

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1996)
  • Z. Amit et al.

    Oral self-administration of alcohol: a valid approach to the study of drug self-administration and human alcoholism

  • J.C. Anthony et al.

    Comparative epidemiology of dependence on tobacco, alcohol, controlled substances and inhalants: basic findings from National Comorbidity Study

    Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol.

    (1994)
  • S.P. Banerjee et al.

    Cannabinoids: influence on neurotransmitter uptake in rat brain synaptosomes

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1975)
  • M.T. Bardo

    Neuropharmacological mechanisms of drug reward: beyond dopamine in the nucleus accumbens

    Crit. Rev. Neurobiol.

    (1998)
  • D. Bindra

    Neuropsychological interpretation of the effects of drive and incentive-motivation on general activity and instrumental behavior

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1968)
  • A.S. Bloom

    The effect of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol on the synthesis of dopamine and norepinephrine in mouse brain synaptosomes

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1982)
  • A.S. Bloom et al.

    A comparison of some pharmacological actions of morphine and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the mouse

    Psychopharmacology

    (1978)
  • A.S. Bloom et al.

    9-Nor-9beta-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol, a cannabinoid with potent antinociceptive activity: comparisons with morphine

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1977)
  • K. Blum et al.

    Reward deficiency syndrome

    Am. Scientist

    (1996)
  • K. Blum et al.

    The D2 dopamine receptor gene as a determinant of reward deficiency syndrome

    J. R. Soc. Med.

    (1996)
  • M.A. Bozarth et al.

    Anatomically distinct opiate receptor fields mediate reward and physical dependence

    Science

    (1984)
  • J.V. Brady et al.

    Testing Drugs for Physical Dependence Potential and Abuse Liability (NIDA Res. Monogr. 52)

    (1984)
  • J.V. Brady et al.

    Assessing drugs for abuse liability and dependence potential in laboratory primates

  • A.K. Cadogan et al.

    Influence of cannabinoids on electrically evoked dopamine release and cyclic AMP generation in the rat striatum

    J. Neurochem.

    (1997)
  • W.A. Carlezon et al.

    Rewarding actions of phencyclidine and related drugs in nucleus accumbens shell and frontal cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • F. Chaperon et al.

    Involvement of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors in the establishment of place conditioning in rats

    Psychopharmacology

    (1998)
  • J.F. Cheer et al.

    Cannabinoid receptors and reward in the rat: a conditioned place preference study

    Psychopharmacology

    (2000)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Neurosteroids and potential therapeutics: Focus on pregnenolone

      2016, Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, PREG has the ability to antagonize the addiction-related effects of cannabinoids [152]. A well-known consequence of the intake of Cannabis sativa and its derivatives is a positive reinforcing effect that can lead to regular use and ultimately to addiction [42]. First, we demonstrated that acute PREG decreased midbrain DA system activation that is involved in mediating addiction to most drugs of abuse, including cannabinoids [30,43,141].

    • The hippocampal NMDA receptors may be involved in acquisition, but not expression of ACPA-induced place preference

      2015, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previously, we reported that injection of NMDA into the dorsal hippocampus potentiates morphine-CPP (Zarrindast et al., 2007). These results confirm that cannabinoids act on brain reward processes and reward-related behaviors in strikingly similar fashion to other addictive drugs (Gardner, 2002). The present results also showed that the bilateral microinjection of D-AP7, a specific NMDA receptor antagonist, into the CA1 region of dorsal hippocampus alone, did not induce a significant place preference or aversion by itself, while co-administration of the antagonist with ACPA, during the conditioning phase, inhibited the ACPA (0.02 mg/kg)-induced place preference.

    • Substance abuse disorders

      2012, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The brain has at least two types of cannabinoid receptor – CB1 and CB2 – and there are at least two types of endogenous cannabinoid – anandamide and 2-AG (Elphick and Egertova, 2001). Regular consumption of cannabis (marijuana) can give rise to dependence, and the same dopaminergic reward pathways that underlie the development of addiction-based pathological neuroplasticity are activated by cannabis (Gardner, 2002). Thus, cannabinoid receptors are in high density in the vicinity of midbrain dopamine neurons.

    • Self-medication of a cannabinoid CB <inf>2</inf> agonist in an animal model of neuropathic pain

      2011, Pain
      Citation Excerpt :

      CB1 is predominantly located within the CNS [57]. Here, activation is linked to hypoactivity, hypothermia, catalepsy, antinociception [38], and rewarding properties typical of addictive substances [15,16,37,43]. CB2 is expressed predominantly, but not exclusively [4,7,52], in immune cells and occurs in brain at low levels [33,52].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text