Stress Sharing Between the Sinus and Leaflets of Canine Aortic Valve

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60554-1Get rights and content

Abstract

A knowledge of the behavior of the aortic valve sinuses is necessary to the understanding of stress sharing between the sinuses and the leaflets. Radiopaque markers were placed on the sinuses and the leaflets of dogs during cardiopulmonary bypass, and the movement of the markers was studied using fluoroscopy. The center of the sinus moved radially during each cardiac cycle, but in an inconsistent manner. The sinus was under a dual influence: the passive influence of aortic pressure and the active influence of myocardial contraction. The longitudinal curvature of the sinus showed no dimensional change, whereas the radius of the circumferential curvature decreased by 15.7% from systole to diastole. In diastole, the stress in the sinus was 6.1 g/mm2 and was 24.3 g/mm2 circumferentially and 12.1 g/mm2 radially in the leaflet. Histologically, the main stress-bearing component of the leaflet was made up of thick, dense, collagenous fibers oriented circumferentially. These fibers curved into the sinus wall instead of inserting straight into the aortic wall, thereby suggesting that the high stress in the leaflet is shared with the sinus and that continuity of the circumferential stress exists between the leaflet and the sinus. The leaflet does not pull inwardly on the aortic wall. In diastole, the sinus adapts to the new stress conditions in the leaflet by reducing its radius of circumferential curvature. This stress sharing is important for the longevity of the aortic valve.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (98)

  • In vitro evaluation of a new aortic valved conduit

    2021, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Long-term outcomes of aortic root operations for Marfan syndrome: A comparison of Bentall versus aortic valve-sparing procedures Read at the 95th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Seattle, Washington, April 25-29, 2015.

    2016, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, reimplantation technique externally fixes the entire aortic valve complex within the tube graft, theoretically preventing late dilation of the aortic annulus and minimizing the risk of subsequent valve failure. Before 2002, we favored the remodeling technique because it allows for preservation of the sinuses, which minimizes valve leaflet stress and allows optimal aortic root function.28-31 Our initial experience with the remodeling technique yielded patients who developed AI and required late valve replacement, usually due to annular dilation.32,33

  • Form ever follows function

    2016, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Long-Term Hemodynamic Performance of the Aortic Valve After David I: An Echocardiographic Study

    2015, Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the use of a straight tubular graft has always raised concerns about the nonphysiological rheology produced in the aortic box after the David I procedure.10 In fact, there is general agreement that the presence of sinuses reduces the stress on the leaflets and increases the freedom from the deterioration induced by the opening and closing cycles.3,11 On the contrary, different reports in literature lack to demonstrate a clear superiority of David I over neo-sinus-creating techniques (eg, Valsalva graft or David-V Stanford modification).12

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text