Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 128, March 2022, 108583
Epilepsy & Behavior

Review
Perampanel in achieving status epilepticus cessation: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108583Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Status epilepticus necessitates rapid seizure control.

  • Perampanel has been shown to work in lithium-pilocarpine models.

  • Perampanel was given at 2–32 mg between 30 min and 51 days from status epilepticus onset.

  • Status epilepticus cessation ranged from 2 h to 51 days after perampanel initiation.

  • Perampanel may be a possible therapeutic option, but requires further clinical studies.

Abstract

Background

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency necessitating rapid seizure control to prevent long-term consequences. Perampanel (PER) is a novel selective, noncompetitive alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic (AMPA) receptor antagonist that demonstrated efficacy and safety in lithium-pilocarpine models of SE; however, data in humans are limited. This systematic review was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of PER in patients with SE, RSE, and SRSE.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE (accessed through PubMed), Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until May 30, 2021 to identify all human studies on PER for the treatment of SE of any type and etiology. An additional search was performed on DANS Easy Archive, in which OpenGrey data were stored, from inception until January 10, 2022 and conference proceedings by the International League Against Epilepsy from 2011 onward. The GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach was used to assess the overall certainty of the body of evidence.

Results

Twenty-one studies (7 case reports, 9 case series, and 5 retrospective cohort studies) were included with a total of 369 cases of SE in 368 patients aged 11 months to 99 years, of which 56.2% were female. Seizures of the majority were refractory (n = 220), super refractory SE (n = 70), or either (n = 81) with prominent motor symptoms (n = 284) and are associated with a structural etiology (n = 218). The number of antiseizure medications and/or anesthetics used prior to PER ranged from 1 to 13. PER was administered in 324 cases and was initiated at a dose of 2–36 mg between 30 min to 59 days from SE onset. SE cessation ranged from 1 h to 4 weeks from PER initiation. A total of 119 cases (36.6%) were considered PER responders. According to the GRADE approach, there is very low certainty of evidence for all outcomes.

Conclusions

The real-world data of PER as a possible therapeutic option in SE of any type are increasing. However, there is very low certainty of evidence for its use and this requires further clinical studies to establish the appropriate timing, dosing, and titration that are efficacious and safe for SE cessation.

Introduction

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency defined as a condition resulting either from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or from the initiation of mechanisms that lead to abnormally prolonged seizures (>5 min for tonic-clonic SE, >10 min for focal SE, and >15 min for absence SE) [1]. This devastating condition can cause long-term consequences, including neuronal death, neuronal injury, and alteration of neuronal networks, depending on the type and duration of seizures [1]. Data from the United States (US) National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1979 to 2010 showed an increase in incidence of SE from 3.5 to 12.5 per 100,000 and a cumulative in-hospital mortality rate of 9.2% without significant change over the study period [2].

Treatment of SE should target rapid seizure control (emergent-control phase) and prevention of further seizures (urgent-control phase) with the use of intravenous (IV) benzodiazepines and IV antiseizure medications (ASMs), respectively [3]. Those who do not respond to at least two appropriately selected and dosed parenteral medications, including benzodiazepines, are considered to have refractory SE (RSE) [2], [4]. Super-refractory SE (SRSE) is defined as SE that continues for 24 h or more after the onset of anesthetic therapy, including those in whom SE recurs while on appropriate anesthetic treatment or after withdrawal requiring reintroduction of anesthetic treatment [4]. Progression to RSE is seen in approximately 12–43% and to SRSE in 10–15% in patients with SE [2], [5].

Research in animal models has described several mechanisms that contribute to the development of SE including loss of inhibitory γ-aminobutiric acid (GABA)A neuronal activity due to the internalization of postsynaptic receptors and sustained glumatate-mediated excitatory activity due to an increase in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4- isoxazolepropionic (AMPA) receptors. The alteration in GABAA receptors might explain the resistance of SE to benzodiazepines leading to RSE and SRSE [6]. Perampanel (PER), a novel selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist, may be effective in this condition. It has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) as treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures in patients with epilepsy ≥ 4 years and as adjunct treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients aged ≥ 12 years [7]. However, clinical use of PER in SE has only been studied in animal models and remains limited to case reports and case series in humans [8]. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PER in patients with SE, RSE, and SRSE.

Section snippets

Methodology

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used in this study (see Supplementary File 1) [9]. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021278872).

Two authors (DP and AE) screened all titles, abstracts, and full-text articles to assess eligibility of identified studies, assessed the methodological quality, and collected and analyzed data of included studies. Any disagreement was resolved through discussion

Study characteristics

A total of 643 potentially relevant literature were identified from the databases, reference lists, and conference proceedings of international congresses by the ILAE, of which 615 were excluded after the removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts. Twenty-eight studies were sought and reviewed for detailed assessment, of which 7 abstracts were excluded due to the following: PER was initiated with a combined ASM (n = 3); PER was not the last ASM added or adjusted (n = 2);

Discussion

This systematic review assessed the available studies demonstrating the use of PER in the treatment of SE of any type and etiology. Abstracts published in conference proceedings as well as those without retrievable full-text that passed eligibility criteria were included to minimize publication bias wherein studies with positive results are more likely to be published by authors.

Case reports and small case series tend to provide evidence in favor of the intervention, as seen in all case reports

Implications to clinical practice

The real-world data of PER as a possible therapeutic option in SE, RSE, and SRSE are increasing, with infrequent and mild side effects. Due to the limitation of this systematic review to observational studies, there is a very low certainty of evidence for its use and requires more robust data from clinical trials to establish a direct causal relationship to SE, RSE, and SRSE cessation. Thus, the use of PER for this indication should be made with caution until further studies on its timing,

Financial and competing interests disclosures

The authors have no affiliations or financial relationships with any organization or entity that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.

Author contribution

Dr. Perez was involved in the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the initial and final draft of the manuscript for intellectual content.

Dr. Espiritu was involved in the study conception, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the final draft of the manuscript for intellectual content.

Dr. Jamora was involved in the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content, and study

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (41)

  • E.D. Wieruszewski et al.

    Pharmacologic management of status epilepticus

    AACN Adv Crit Care

    (2020)
  • L.J. Hirsch et al.

    Proposed consensus definitions for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and related conditions

    Epilepsia

    (2018)
  • A. Leo et al.

    The role of AMPA receptors and their antagonists in status epilepticus

    Epilepsia

    (2018)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration website. Eisai Co., Ltd. Fycompa® (perampanel) [package insert] 2019....
  • A. Strzelczyk et al.

    Perampanel in the treatment of focal and idiopathic generalized epilepsies and of status epilepticus

    Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol

    (2015)
  • Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated...
  • Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetc R, et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk....
  • G.H. Guyatt et al.

    GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • A. Rohracher et al.

    Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit: a single-center audit of 30 patients

    Epilepsia

    (2018)
  • A. Strzelczyk et al.

    Perampanel for treatment of status epilepticus in Austria, Finland, Germany, and Spain

    Acta Neurol Scand

    (2019)
  • View full text