ReviewPerampanel in achieving status epilepticus cessation: A systematic review
Introduction
Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency defined as a condition resulting either from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for seizure termination or from the initiation of mechanisms that lead to abnormally prolonged seizures (>5 min for tonic-clonic SE, >10 min for focal SE, and >15 min for absence SE) [1]. This devastating condition can cause long-term consequences, including neuronal death, neuronal injury, and alteration of neuronal networks, depending on the type and duration of seizures [1]. Data from the United States (US) National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1979 to 2010 showed an increase in incidence of SE from 3.5 to 12.5 per 100,000 and a cumulative in-hospital mortality rate of 9.2% without significant change over the study period [2].
Treatment of SE should target rapid seizure control (emergent-control phase) and prevention of further seizures (urgent-control phase) with the use of intravenous (IV) benzodiazepines and IV antiseizure medications (ASMs), respectively [3]. Those who do not respond to at least two appropriately selected and dosed parenteral medications, including benzodiazepines, are considered to have refractory SE (RSE) [2], [4]. Super-refractory SE (SRSE) is defined as SE that continues for 24 h or more after the onset of anesthetic therapy, including those in whom SE recurs while on appropriate anesthetic treatment or after withdrawal requiring reintroduction of anesthetic treatment [4]. Progression to RSE is seen in approximately 12–43% and to SRSE in 10–15% in patients with SE [2], [5].
Research in animal models has described several mechanisms that contribute to the development of SE including loss of inhibitory γ-aminobutiric acid (GABA)A neuronal activity due to the internalization of postsynaptic receptors and sustained glumatate-mediated excitatory activity due to an increase in N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4- isoxazolepropionic (AMPA) receptors. The alteration in GABAA receptors might explain the resistance of SE to benzodiazepines leading to RSE and SRSE [6]. Perampanel (PER), a novel selective, noncompetitive AMPA receptor antagonist, may be effective in this condition. It has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) as treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures in patients with epilepsy ≥ 4 years and as adjunct treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in patients aged ≥ 12 years [7]. However, clinical use of PER in SE has only been studied in animal models and remains limited to case reports and case series in humans [8]. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PER in patients with SE, RSE, and SRSE.
Section snippets
Methodology
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used in this study (see Supplementary File 1) [9]. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021278872).
Two authors (DP and AE) screened all titles, abstracts, and full-text articles to assess eligibility of identified studies, assessed the methodological quality, and collected and analyzed data of included studies. Any disagreement was resolved through discussion
Study characteristics
A total of 643 potentially relevant literature were identified from the databases, reference lists, and conference proceedings of international congresses by the ILAE, of which 615 were excluded after the removal of duplicates and screening of titles and abstracts. Twenty-eight studies were sought and reviewed for detailed assessment, of which 7 abstracts were excluded due to the following: PER was initiated with a combined ASM (n = 3); PER was not the last ASM added or adjusted (n = 2);
Discussion
This systematic review assessed the available studies demonstrating the use of PER in the treatment of SE of any type and etiology. Abstracts published in conference proceedings as well as those without retrievable full-text that passed eligibility criteria were included to minimize publication bias wherein studies with positive results are more likely to be published by authors.
Case reports and small case series tend to provide evidence in favor of the intervention, as seen in all case reports
Implications to clinical practice
The real-world data of PER as a possible therapeutic option in SE, RSE, and SRSE are increasing, with infrequent and mild side effects. Due to the limitation of this systematic review to observational studies, there is a very low certainty of evidence for its use and requires more robust data from clinical trials to establish a direct causal relationship to SE, RSE, and SRSE cessation. Thus, the use of PER for this indication should be made with caution until further studies on its timing,
Financial and competing interests disclosures
The authors have no affiliations or financial relationships with any organization or entity that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.
Author contribution
Dr. Perez was involved in the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the initial and final draft of the manuscript for intellectual content.
Dr. Espiritu was involved in the study conception, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, and writing of the final draft of the manuscript for intellectual content.
Dr. Jamora was involved in the acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision of the manuscript for intellectual content, and study
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References (41)
- et al.
Incidence and mortality of super-refractory status epilepticus in adults
Epilepsy Behav
(2015) - et al.
Efficacy of perampanel in refractory nonconvulsive status epilepticus and simple partial status epilepticus
Epilepsy Behav
(2015) - et al.
Use of perampanel in one case of super-refractory hypoxic myoclonic status: case report
Epilepsy Behav Case Rep
(2015) - et al.
Efficacy of perampanel in a patient with epilepsia partialis continua
Epilepsy Behav Case Rep
(2017) - et al.
Perampanel: A therapeutic alternative in refractory status epilepticus associated with MELAS syndrome
Epilepsy Behav Case Rep
(2019) - et al.
Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit
Epilepsy Behav
(2015) - et al.
A retrospective, observational study of perampanel in refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus
J Neurol Sci
(2020) - et al.
Does semiology of status epilepticus have an impact on treatment response and outcome?
Epilepsy Behav
(2018) - et al.
A definition and classification of status epilepticus - Report of the ILAE Task Force on Classification of Status Epilepticus
Epilepsia
(2015) - et al.
The epidemiology of status epilepticus in the United States
Neurocrit Care
(2014)
Pharmacologic management of status epilepticus
AACN Adv Crit Care
Proposed consensus definitions for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES), and related conditions
Epilepsia
The role of AMPA receptors and their antagonists in status epilepticus
Epilepsia
Perampanel in the treatment of focal and idiopathic generalized epilepsies and of status epilepticus
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
BMJ
Perampanel in patients with refractory and super-refractory status epilepticus in a neurological intensive care unit: a single-center audit of 30 patients
Epilepsia
Perampanel for treatment of status epilepticus in Austria, Finland, Germany, and Spain
Acta Neurol Scand
Cited by (3)
Remote seizures and drug-resistant epilepsy after a first status epilepticus in adults
2024, European Journal of Neurology