From the floret to the canopy: High temperature tolerance during flowering

Heat waves induced by climate warming have become common in food-producing regions worldwide, frequently coinciding with high temperature (HT)-sensitive stages of many crops and thus threatening global food security. Understanding the HT sensitivity of reproductive organs is currently of great interest for increasing seed set. The responses of seed set to HT involve multiple processes in both male and female reproductive organs, but we currently lack an integrated and systematic summary of these responses for the world’s three leading food crops (rice, wheat, and maize). In the present work, we define the critical high temperature thresholds for seed set in rice (37.2°C ± 0.2°C), wheat (27.3°C ± 0.5°C), and maize (37.9°C ± 0.4°C) during flowering. We assess the HT sensitivity of these three cereals from the microspore stage to the lag period, including effects of HT on flowering dynamics, floret growth and development, pollination, and fertilization. Our review synthesizes existing knowledge about the effects of HT stress on spikelet opening, anther dehiscence, pollen shedding number, pollen viability, pistil and stigma function, pollen germination on the stigma, and pollen tube elongation. HT-induced spikelet closure and arrest of pollen tube elongation have a catastrophic effect on pollination and fertilization in maize. Rice benefits from pollination under HT stress owing to bottom anther dehiscence and cleistogamy. Cleistogamy and secondary spikelet opening increase the probability of pollination success in wheat under HT stress. However, cereal crops themselves also have protective measures under HT stress. Lower canopy/tissue temperatures compared with air temperatures indicate that cereal crops, especially rice, can partly protect themselves from heat damage. In maize, husk leaves reduce inner ear temperature by about 5°C compared with outer ear temperature, thereby protecting the later phases of pollen tube growth and fertilization processes. These findings have important implications for accurate modeling, optimized crop management, and breeding of new varieties to cope with HT stress in the most important staple crops.


INTRODUCTION
Extreme hot weather induced by climate change has become increasingly serious in its frequency, intensity, and duration (Stocker et al., 2014).Heat waves, periods of extreme high temperature that usually last for several days or even weeks, greatly threaten global agricultural production (Chakraborty et al., 2019).In major countries for maize (Zea mays L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production worldwide, high-temperature (HT) stress occurs frequently during the life cycle of these crops (Supplemental Figures 1A-1C;Gourdji et al., 2013;Hassan et al., 2020).If the global mean temperature increases by 1 C without CO 2 fertilization, the warmer temperature is estimated to reduce crop yield by 7.4% in maize, 3.2% in rice, and 6% in wheat (Zhao et al., 2017).The global average near-surface temperature has increased by 0.8 C with a more rapid speed in the past 30 years compared with 1961-1990 (Supplemental Figure 1D;Morice et al., 2021).Yield loss is expected to be exacerbated if heat waves occur at the flowering stage, as this is the most heat-sensitive period for successful sexual reproduction and grain yield formation (Hedhly et al., 2009;Lohani et al., 2020;Xu et al., 2020;Impa et al., 2021).
The rapid increase in global nighttime temperature, which has been rising 1.4 times faster than daytime temperature over the past five decades (Solomon et al., 2007), makes nighttime heat stress another threat to food production (Coast et al., 2015;Garcı ´a et al., 2015;Wang et al., 2020b;Sakai et al., 2022).Although nighttime heat stress during flowering has been shown to negatively impact spikelet fertility, its effects are less pronounced under controlled and field conditions (Shi et al., 2013;Garcı ´a et al., 2015;Jagadish et al., 2015;Wang et al., 2020b).Hence, our focus is mainly on how daytime heat stress during flowering effects grain number formation in the three major staple cereals, which together contribute more than 85% of global grain production.Successful pollination and seed set are dependent on crop male and female reproductive organs in relation to growth and development, flowering pattern, reproductive organ activity, and the fertilization process (Jagadish, 2020;Wang et al., 2021a;Zhu et al., 2021).These processes are sensitive to HT stress, even for short periods of time (Hedhly et al., 2009;Prasad et al., 2017;Lohani et al., 2020).Heat stress for 2-5 days around flowering significantly reduced seed set in rice (pre-or postheading stage; Endo et al., 2009;Fu et al., 2016) and maize (pre-and post-silking; Wang et al., 2020aWang et al., , 2020b)), resulting in irreversible yield losses (Zhu et al., 2021).HT-induced yield losses are partly attributable to disruption of flowering behaviors, including an extended anthesis-silking interval in maize and a small spikelet opening angle, reduced pollen shedding number due to failure of anther dehiscence, and early morning flowering, night flowering, or lack of flowering in wheat (Steinmeyer et al., 2013;Aiqing et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2019b;Matsui and Hasegawa, 2019;Chen et al., 2020).In addition, HT stress during flowering can negatively affect the function of male and female reproductive organs, reducing floret fertility and ultimately lowering seed number (Hays et al., 2007;Arshad et al., 2017;Smith, 2019).Rice, wheat, and maize have different HT thresholds at flowering, beyond which seed set and grain number will be significantly reduced (Sanchez et al., 2014), suggesting that these three cereals likely respond differently to HT stress.As a monecious crop, maize has individual male (tassel) and female (ear) flowers on the same plant, with the tassel exposed directly to sunlight.Wheat and rice plants have bisexual flowers, with several florets in one spikelet of wheat and a single floret in each fertile spikelet of rice (Bortiri and Hake, 2007;Gol et al., 2017).Unlike wheat, maize and rice experience more HT events in space and time, although temperatures in the paddy field are expected to be more stable for rice growth (Alberto et al., 2009;Matsui et al., 2021).As a tall crop with a high canopy structure, maize creates a more favorable microenvironment for ear growth and fertilization (Khush and Peng, 1998;Pangga et al., 2013;Tivoli et al., 2013).The maize canopy has been shown to produce a temperature difference of up to 8.5 C between ears directly exposed to sunlight and those protected by the canopy (Khabba et al., 2001).Furthermore, the husk leaves of maize ears can reduce the inner ear temperature by 5 C compared with the outer ear temperature (Wang et al., 2023), alleviating the negative effects of HT stress on pollen tube growth, fertilization, and zygote development (Salvador and Pearce, 1988;Khabba et al., 1999Khabba et al., , 2001;;Cui et al., 2020).These differences in growing environments, phenology, morphology, and physiology produce the common and unique mechanisms by which maize, rice, and wheat cope with HT stress through resistance and adaptation.Despite its importance, this information has yet to be systematically synthesized.
In this review, our objective was to comprehensively assess the effects of HT stress on seed set, flowering, and fertilization of rice, wheat, and maize.This involved (1) determining the critical HT thresholds of these crops for seed set, floret growth and development, and pollination and fertilization; (2) evaluating their sensitivities to HT stress at key developmental stages during flowering; (3) analyzing the effects of HT stress from the ecosystem on reproductive organs and tissues; (4) synthesizing existing knowledge about the adaptation and escape mechanisms of crops to HT stress; and (5) summarizing the current status of research on HT stress around flowering.We hope that research on accurate modeling, crop management optimization, and variety breeding strategies associated with HT stress during flowering will benefit from this study.
Sensitivity of seed set to HT stress around flowering in maize, rice, and wheat Critical temperature thresholds for seed set We collected data from experiments with accurately and/or nonaccurately controlled environments (e.g., growth cabinet/chamber, sun-lit phytotron, and field-based heat tents), yielding a total of 43 articles: 8 for maize, 25 for rice, and 10 for wheat.Based on a fitted curve of a non-linear Boltzmann model to all measured values, we estimated the daytime and nighttime HT thresholds for seed set during flowering for each crop (Figure 1; Supplemental Table 1; Wang et al., 2021b).In this study, HT thresholds during flowering are defined as the temperatures above which seed set will be significantly reduced.Our findings estimated the high daytime temperature (HDT) thresholds (with standard error [SE]) to be 37.9 C (SE 0.4 C; n = 202) in maize, 37.2 C (SE 0.2 C; n = 386) in rice, and 27.3 C (SE 0.5 C; n = 202) in wheat (Figure 1A).Daytime temperatures whose average exceeds the critical threshold across hourly, daily, and weekly time courses overlapping with the crop reproductive period cause highly variable reductions in seed set (Supplemental Table 2).Heat waves that last for more than 1 week cause the seed set of rice, wheat, and maize to fall below 60%.Our results indicated that maize and rice had a similar sensitivity to the stress of HDT at anthesis.The temperature threshold of 37.9 C for anthesis in maize was confirmed in controlled environment experiments in the study of Wang et al. (2021b), who used six temperature levels ranging from 30 C/20 C to 40 C/30 C at 2 C increments over nearly 2 weeks bracketing the silking stage.In this study, seed set of two maize hybrids ranged from 20% to 50% after heat treatment of >38 C that lasted for 2 weeks.In rice, a similar temperature threshold of 37 C (SE 1.2 C) at anthesis was defined by Sanchez et al. ( 2014), with japonica varieties having a lower threshold of 36.9C (SE 2.2 C).Several temperature-controlled trials have shown that rice spikelet fertility was reduced by >50% when HT (>37 C) lasted for less than 1 week at the middle stage of heading (Matsui et al., 2001, Matsui andOmasa, 2002;Jagadish et al., 2007;Chen et al., 2020).The SE is higher in maize than in rice, perhaps because maize is grown at a wider range of altitudes and latitudes, ranging from ca. 60 N to 40 S, including both cool and hot regions (Shiferaw et al., 2011).The high SE may also be due to variability in HT tolerance among varieties and in experimental designs among studies.
Interestingly, maize had a lower high nighttime temperature (HNT) threshold during flowering than did rice (27.3 C vs. 31.2C; Figure 1B; Supplemental Table 1), making maize more sensitive than rice to HNT during flowering.When nighttime temperature exceeds the critical threshold for more than 1 week, seed set of rice and maize generally remains at 30%-60%, depending on crop type and actual temperature levels (Supplemental Table 2).With climate warming, nighttime temperature is rising 1.4 times faster than daytime temperature, and this has a negative impact on crop grain yield (Peng et al., 2004;Solomon et al., 2007;Sadok and Jagadish, 2020;Impa et al., 2021).In the study of Peng et al., (2004), rising nighttime temperature was expected to pose larger threats to grain yield in rice than daytime temperature, as grain yield declined by 10% with a 1 C increase in growing season nighttime temperature.HNT during flowering, even for a short period, can induce spikelet sterility and directly reduce grain yield in both rice and maize by altering flowering patterns, reducing pollen viability, and increasing spikelet degeneration (Laza et al., 2015;Wang et al., 2020b;Sakai et al., 2022).When HDT stress is followed by HNT stress, the negative effects of HDT on flowering events can be greatly exacerbated by HNT (Sakai et al., 2022).Even if plants attempt to avoid HDT stress bracketing the midday by rescheduling their flowering (Ishimaru et al., 2010;Jagadish et al., 2015), they are unable to escape stress damage caused by elevated nighttime minimum temperature (Sakai et al., 2022).Under HNT conditions, leaf respiration increases, reducing the carbon available for plant growth and yield formation (Cantarero et al., 1999;Laza et al., 2015).In addition, reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate rapidly in reproductive organs, directly effecting pollination and lowering seed set (Sadok and Jagadish, 2020;Impa et al., 2021).Furthermore, HNT increases night vapor pressure deficit (VPD), a combination of temperature and relative air humidity, which slows plant growth by reducing water content in plant tissues (Turc et al., 2016;Grossiord et al., 2020).It is noteworthy that both vegetative and reproductive organs grow more rapidly in the nighttime than in the daytime (Zweifel et al., 2021), and increased night VPD is expected to disturb flowering patterns (Turc et al., 2016).Presumably, the higher HNT sensitivity at flowering in maize is associated with suppression of silk growth and reduction in silk emergence rate as a result of high nighttime VPD and temperature.
Compared with maize and rice, wheat exhibits lower HDT (27.3 C) and HNT (19.6 C) thresholds for anthesis (Figure 1B), which reflects a greater susceptibility of wheat reproductive events to HT stress.Either HDT or HNT that lasts for more than 1 week can reduce seed set of wheat to about 60% (Supplemental Table 2).The vulnerable anthesis of wheat sometimes meets with HTs above 27 C in European regions (Semenov and Shewry, 2011;Stratonovitch and Semenov, 2015), and the frequency of such events is increasing with the warming climate.Porter and Gawith (1999) found that the critical temperature threshold for loss of wheat grain number due to pollen sterility was 31 C (SE 3.7 C) at anthesis, which was 3.7 C higher than the temperature estimated in the present study.A temperature threshold of 31 C was identified based on HT shortly before anthesis (5 days) in the study of Wheeler et al. (1996aWheeler et al. ( ,1996b) ) based on limited compiled data (n = 1; Porter and Gawith, 1999).Wheeler et al. (1996a) and Mitchell et al. (1993) also found that a daytime temperature of 27 C or more that lasted for more than a week at 50% anthesis resulted in a high proportion of wheat grain abortion and substantial yield losses; this estimate was very close to the estimated threshold of 27.3 C in our study.Stone and Nicolas (1995) 1. Crops and related references: rice - Matsui et al., 2001;Matsui and Omasa, 2002;Matsui and Hasegawa, 2019;Cheng et al., 2009;Endo et al., 2009;Mohammed and Tarpley, 2009, 2010, 2011;Mohammed et al., 2013;Ishimaru et al., 2010;Jagadish et al., 2010Jagadish et al., , 2015;;Madan et al., 2012;Shi et al., 2013Shi et al., , 2016Shi et al., , 2017;;Zhang et al., 2013;Coast et al., 2015;Hirabayashi et al., 2015;Koike et al., 2015;Fu et al., 2016;Wu et al., 2016Wu et al., , 2019;;Yan et al., 2017;Chen et al., 2020;wheat -J€ ager et al., 2008;Prasad et al., 2008aPrasad et al., , 2008bPrasad et al., , 2011;;Khan et al., 2015;Narayanan et al., 2015;Joshi et al., 2016;Aiqing et al., 2018;Bheemanahalli et al., 2019;Fa ´bia ´n et al., 2019;Djanaguiraman et al., 2020); and maize - Yu et al., 2016;Li et al., 2019;Wang et al., 2019Wang et al., , 2020aWang et al., , 2020bWang et al., , 2021aWang et al., , 2021b;;Sheng et al., 2020;Mu et al., 2022;Liu et al., 2023.revealed that plants were most sensitive to HDT in the first 3 days after anthesis in Australian wheat varieties.An HNT threshold of 19.6 C (SE 2.7 C) for anthesis was also identified in wheat (Figure 1B), consistent with the findings of Prasad et al. (2008aPrasad et al. ( , 2008b)), who reported that wheat spikelet fertility and grains per spike were significantly lower when nighttime temperatures exceeded 20 C.These results indicate that the temperature threshold may vary over a daily or weekly time course at anthesis.The temperature thresholds estimated in our study were based on experimental results for short time courses before, after, and bracketing the anthesis stage in different varieties, providing a comprehensive understanding of temperature limitations on wheat seed set during flowering.Key flowering traits and their respective critical temperatures In most studies of HT stress, reductions in grain yield and spikelet/floret fertility in maize, rice, and wheat have frequently been attributed to negative effects of HT on flowering dynamics, floret growth and development, and pollination and fertilization (PF) (Supplemental Table 3).Using the critical temperature assessment method of Sanchez et al. (2014), we estimated the critical temperatures for key flowering traits of the three main cereal crops around the flowering stage (Figure 2).Critical temperatures for anthesis were estimated to be 38 C for rice and 34 C for wheat.Above these temperatures, each increase of 1 C caused significant changes in the onset, peak, and/or duration of anthesis, resulting in 2.4%-7% spikelet fertility loss in rice and 22%-38% grain yield loss in wheat (Jagadish et al., 2007;Aiqing et al., 2018).Rice and wheat plants can partially adjust daily flowering patterns, for example, by moving the peak of flowering toward cooler early morning or evening, in an attempt to reduce the effects of HT stress on seed set (Bheemanahalli et al., 2017;Aiqing et al., 2018).For monoecious and cross-pollinated crops, maize plants bear separate male and female flowers, and HTs above 36 C significantly advance tasseling and pollen shedding time (male reproductive organs; Wang et al., 2019b).HT stress has slight effects on female reproductive organs in maize, but when temperature increased to 38 C, silking time was significantly delayed, extending the anthesis-silking interval and increasing kernel loss (Edreira et al., 2011;Wang et al., 2021b;Liu et al., 2022b).This creates complexity for understanding the effects of HTs on maize yield formation, as male and female reproductive organs differ in their critical temperatures at flowering.Temperatures in excess of 38 C in rice and maize or 31 C in wheat during floret development can cause irreversible damage to PF (Figure 2; Supplemental Table 3) due to changes in lodicule expansion, anther dehiscence, pollen shedding and germination, pollen tube growth, and style growth and activity (Saini and Aspinall, 1982;Matsui et al., 2000;Prasad and Djanaguiraman, 2014;Begcy et al., 2019;Matsui and Hasegawa, 2019;Chen et al., 2020).Because of the difficulty in identifying critical temperatures for PF, especially in rice and wheat, the critical temperatures for pollen germination, pollen tube elongation, and/or zygote formation were averaged in this study.The critical temperature for PF was estimated to be 37.8 C ± 0.5 C in maize, followed by 37.2 C ± 0.5 C in rice and 31.8C ± 1.1 C in wheat (Figure 2), similar to the order of the HDT thresholds for seed set (Figure 1A).In brief, the ''penalty'' mechanism by which HT stress above the HT threshold affects crop yield is primarily a ''derailing'' of normal flowering events.

Temperature sensitivity at different phases around flowering
In crops, two stages are particularly sensitive to HT stress: (1) floral bud development during micro-or megasporogenesis and (2) the flowering stage (Prasad et al., 2001;Prasad et al., 2008a;Wassmann et al., 2009).In maize, silk emergence is frequently regarded as an important index and time step for evaluating the effects of HT stress on flowering pattern and seed set (Ca ´rcova et al., 2003;Borra ´s et al., 2007;Liu et al., 2022a).Results from field experiments indicated that 2 weeks of HT stress after silking had greater effects on kernel number per ear than presilking HT stress (Dong et al., 2021;Liu et al., 2022b).In a controlled environment experiment, 5 days of pre-silking HT stress (40 C/30 C) reduced maize seed set by 10% compared with that of the respective control (32 C/22 C), whereas 5-day post-silking HT stress reduced seed set by 23% (Figure 3A; Wang et al., 2020a).A post-pollination heat spell over an hourly time course resulted in pollination failure by derailing pollen tube growth in maize silk (Dupuis and Dumas, 1990).This evidence reveals that the post-silking growth stage (e.g., FD, flowering dynamics-flowering time, peak, and duration for rice and wheat, tasseling and shedding pollen time, date, and duration for maize male flowers (tassel), and silk emergence date and duration for maize female flowers (ear); FGD, floret growth and development-spikelet opening, anther dehiscence, stigma/silk elongation, pollen production, and/or silk emergence rate for rice, wheat, and maize florets; PF, pollination and fertilization-pollen and stigma spatiotemporal interaction, pollen germination, pollen tube elongation, and double fertilization for female reproductive organs.Compared with rice and wheat, maize has separate critical temperatures for FD and FDM because maize has separate male and female organs.Temperature data were obtained from the articles and averaged as the critical temperature (i.e., mean ± SE) beyond which crop flowers were injured, flowering behavior/habit changed, or physiological processes ceased.The ''n'' values represent the number of temperature data points collected for the traits from the articles.All references are listed in the supplemental information.

Plant Communications
Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals pollination) is most sensitive to HT stress during maize kernel formation.
Unlike maize, rice and wheat experienced greater kernel abortion in response to pre-heading HT stress rather than post-anthesis HT stress (Figure 3A).Evidence from studies in rice indicated that 5-0 days of HT stress (39 C-40 C) before heading caused greater reductions in seed set than did post-anthesis HT relative to their respective control treatment (70% vs. 45%; Endo et al., 2009;Fu et al., 2016).In addition, heat damage induced by 35 C air temperature 5-0 days before anthesis resulted in 30% reduction in spikelet fertility (Yoshida et al., 1981;Wassmann et al., 2009).In wheat, two phases (8-6 days and 2-0 days before anthesis) were found to be more sensitive to short episodes (2-5 days) of HT stress.These results suggest that aspects of early floret development such as microspore development in rice and wheat are most sensitive to HT (Figure 3B), mainly because of effects on pollen viability (Endo et al., 2009;Prasad and Djanaguiraman, 2014;Bheemanahalli et al., 2019).HT stress during microsporogenesis can dramatically reduce pollen viability by affecting basic metabolic pathways such as starch, lipid, and energy biosynthesis (Prasad and Djanaguiraman, 2014;Djanaguiraman et al., 2018;Begcy et al., 2019) and by arresting anther development (Abiko et al., 2005;Sakata and Higashitani, 2008).
In summary, stage-dependent sensitivities to HT stress in cereal crops show both similarities and differences among rice, wheat, and maize.The microsporogenesis stage, particularly the tetrad stage, is highly sensitive to HT stress across all three cereals (Wassmann et al., 2009;Barber et al., 2017;Begcy et al., 2018Begcy et al., , 2019;;Smith, 2019).However, in maize, the post-silking growth stage in the daily time course appears to be more sensitive to HT stress than the microsporogenesis stage (Wang et al., 2020a), as multiple flowering events occur simultaneously in the short postsilking period, including spikelet opening, anther dehiscence, pollen shedding, silking, pollen germination, pollen tube elongation, double fertilization, and early embryo formation (De Jong and Klinkhamer, 2005;Tranel, 2007;Riechmann and Wellmer, 2014).

Floret characteristics
In rice, each spikelet contains one fertile floret, two sterile lemmas, and two rudimentary glumes, with each floret consisting of six stamens, one pistil, and two lodicules enclosed by the lemma and palea (Supplemental Figures 2A and 2E).In wheat, the spikelet meristem (SM) initiates several floret meristems (FMs) and florets on each spike rachis node (corresponding to 2-3 grains in one spikelet), each of which is enclosed by a pair of glumes and consists of three stamens, one pistil, one lemma, one palea, and two lodicules (Supplemental Figures 2B and 2F;Gol et al., 2017).In maize, male flowers are located on the tassel and female flowers on the ear (Supplemental Figures 2C, 2D, 2G, and 2H).The floret in the tassels consists of three stamens, one lemma, one palea, and two lodicules (Dellaporta and Calderon-Urrea, 1994;Tranel, 2007).In the ear, each spikelet produces two FMs (upper and lower FMs), although only the upper FM normally develops into a floret (Bortiri and Hake, 2007).The floret organs in the ear are wrapped by leaf sheath and husk leaves.
The distinct morphological features of spikelets and florets in maize, rice, and wheat probably contribute to their varying levels of tolerance to HT stress during flowering.The protective structures, such as glumes, lemma, palea, or husks in the maize ear, shield the reproductive organs (e.g., stamens and/or pistil) from the negative effects of HT stress.For example, cleistogamy in Detailed information related to the data: (1) maize, 40 C/30 C for HT stress treatment (day/ night temperature) and 32 C/22 C for normal temperature treatment occurred 5-0 days before silking and 0-5 days after silking (Wang et al., 2020a(Wang et al., , 2020b)); (2) rice, 39 C/30 C for HT stress treatment and 28 C/22 C for normal temperature treatment occurred 5-0 days before heading (Endo et al., 2009); 35 C air temperature-induced heat injury occurred during different stages of panicle development for 5 days, and 5 days of HT before anthesis produced the highest reduction in spikelet fertility (Yoshida et al., 1981;Wassmann et al., 2009); HT stress of 40 C/30 C and nonstressed temperatures of 33 C/24 C were applied to a heat-sensitive rice plant (Zhong9) for 5 days from anthesis (Fu et al., 2016); (3) wheat, 36 C/26 C for HT stress treatment and 25 C/15 C for normal temperature treatment occurred at 10-5 and 5-0 days before anthesis and 0-5 days after anthesis (Prasad and Djanaguiraman, 2014).The white words on the bars of the graph (A) are the names of varieties chosen in the above literature.Based on the reduction in seed set/spikelet fertility (%) of maize, rice, and wheat under different HT stress treatments and referring to Jagadish (2020), we inferred HT stress sensitivity/tolerance of reproductive developmental processes (from the microspore stage to the lag period) in maize, rice, and wheat (B).

Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals
Plant Communications rice, in which the florets remain closed during anthesis, has been shown to reduce the negative effects of HT stress (>38 C) during flowering on seed set by providing an internal environment with a temperature that is approximately 1.8 C lower than the outside temperature (Koike et al., 2015).Reduced exposure of the stigma within glumes to HT stress has also been reported to improve spikelet fertility and heat tolerance (Wu et al., 2019).In addition, the sheathed panicle phenotype in rice was reported to ensure sufficient pollen number and germination on the stigma for successful pollination at higher spikelet tissue temperatures (38 C-40 C) at anthesis, and total spikelet number was thus unaffected by heat stress (Lawas et al., 2018).
In maize tassels, the glumes of the spikelet and the lemma and palea of the floret are designed to open at anthesis, promoting successful pollination but also likely decreasing the spikelet's tolerance to HT stress during male gametophyte development (Mitchell and Petolino, 1988).The maize ear is located in the middle section of the plant and is wrapped by multiple layers of husk leaves, which regulate the temperature inside the ear to be 2 C-3 C lower than the outside temperature (Khabba et al., 2001;Wang et al., 2023).However, HTs above 38 C can delay silk emergence, reduce silk emergence rate, and greatly limit seed set (Liu et al., 2022a).Compared with research on the tassel (male floret), there has been less focus on the effects of HT on female floret development and fertility in maize.

Flowering behaviors
HT stress can advance, delay, or inhibit flowering in cereal crops, depending on its severity (Cicchino et al., 2010;Arshad et al., 2017;Aiqing et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2021b).HTs at 36 C advanced tasseling and anthesis in maize (Wang et al., 2019b), whereas HTs >38 C induced spikelet closure in rice (Supplemental Figure 3D; Wang et al., 1989;Jagadish et al., 2007;Yan et al., 2017;Yang et al., 2020).In cereal crops, spikelet opening is the result of floret opening and anther extrusion, which is rather short and usually lasts for less than 30 min (Supplemental Figures 3A-3C;De Vries, 1971;Ishimaru et al., 2012;Yan et al., 2017).The swelling of lodicules located between the lemma and the ovary base drives floret and spikelet opening by pushing away the rigid lemma and palea, which is an essential pre-condition for pollination in maize and cross-pollination in rice and wheat (Heslop-Harrison and Heslop-Harrison, 1996;Qin et al., 2005;Yoshida, 2012;Beauzamy et al., 2014;Xiao et al., 2014).In wheat, the ability to disperse pollen for cross-pollination depends on anther extrusion after spikelet opening (Denisow et al., 2022).A secondary opening in wheat florets, which follows the lodicule-induced opening that results from lateral expansion of unfertilized ovaries, increased seed set via cross-pollination (Okada et al., 2018).Silk (stigma) emergence from the husk is the other half of the flowering event in maize, lasting for nearly 20 days from the first silk elongation from basal ovules of the cob (ca.10-14 days prior to the silking stage, corresponding to the 12-leaf stage; Nielsen, 2016).This prolonged period increases the likelihood that silk elongation and emergence will meet with abiotic stress, thus reducing silk viability and emergence rate (Oury et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2022a), although this has rarely been investigated compared with tassel flowering patterns.
The lodicule as the first ''switch'' for floret opening in cereal crops has been an increasing focus of abiotic stress research (Figure 4A-4C;Liu et al., 2017;Chen et al., 2020;Yang et al., 2020).The swelling of lodicules is dependent on osmotic regulation substances (ORSs) and water potential (Figure 4D; Honda et al., 2005;Liu et al., 2017).Studies in rice confirmed that HT-induced spikelet closure, even in a short period of 45 h, was mainly attributable to failed swelling of lodicules (Supplemental Figures 3D and 3G;Chen et al., 2020).Jasmonic acid (JA) in lodicules has been found to play a role in their water uptake and release, and its regulation of swelling and withering under HT stress has been verified by molecular evidence (Cai et al., 2014;Xiao et al., 2014;Yan et al., 2017;Yang et al., 2020).The gene OsJAR1, which encodes JA-amino acid synthetases such as JA-isoleucine synthase and is essential for controlling the timing of floret opening, has been identified as a key member of the JA signaling pathway in the lodicule (Xiao et al., 2014).In osjar1 mutants in which OsJAR1 is silenced, the lodicule K + concentration is higher than that of the wild type, suggesting a role for K + homeostasis in regulation of lodicule swelling and withering (Chen et al., 2016).Liu et al. (2017) found that JA deficiency reduced lodicule swelling mainly by retarding the accumulation of ORSs such as soluble sugars through downregulation of OsAOC expression.Application of methyl jasmonate has been shown to induce floret opening and increase the numbers of opening florets, thus increasing tolerance to HT stress during flowering (Zeng et al., 1999;Yan et al., 2017;Yang et al., 2020).In addition, an inward calcium (Ca 2+ ) flux across the plasma membrane is considered to be the primary pathway for heat signal transduction under HT stress (Mittler et al., 2012), strengthening the integrity of cell membranes and stimulating the synthesis of JA (Wang et al., 2019a;Gao et al., 2019).The plant steroid hormones brassinosteroids (BRs) participate in regulating lodicule swelling by affecting the accumulation of ORSs upon HT stress during flowering in relation to the expression of sterol methyltransferase2 (Figure 4D; Liu et al., 2023).Sterol methyltransferase2 encodes sterol 24-carbon methyltransferases that are intermediates in BR biosynthesis (Fujioka and Yokota, 2003).Exogenous epibrassinolide increased the spikelet opening angle and number of opening spikelets in the maize tassel, confirming the ability of BRs to enhance tassel flowering (Liu et al., 2023).
Vascular bundles in the lodicule are involved in water uptake and release (Wang et al., 1991).Evidence from maize and rice indicated that a large number of vascular bundles in the lodicule is unfavorable for the persistence of spikelet opening (Yan et al., 2017;Liu et al., 2023) because water release occurs mainly from the vascular bundles of the lodicules rather than from the lodicule surface (Wang et al., 1991).HT stress can accelerate water release from the lodicules via vascular bundles and thus inhibit spikelet opening or promote spikelet closing.

Plant Communications
Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals anther structure and pollen wall morphology (Hedhly et al., 2009).
The anther is comprised of four pollen sacs, each with four cell layers: the epidermis, endothecium, middle cell layers, and a secretory tapetum that surrounds the inner sporophytic cells (Figure 4F; Scott et al., 2004;Wilson et al., 2011).Anther opening is a function of localized cellular differentiation and degeneration as well as changes in the structure and water status of the anther, including enzymatic breakdown of the septum, programmed cell death (PCD) of the septum, stomium, and endothecium, secondary thickening, pollen swelling, and anther dehydration (Kuriyama and Fukuda, 2002;Sanders et al., 2005;Wilson et al., 2011).Phytohormones, particularly JA and auxin (IAA), play important roles in regulating anther dehiscence, filament elongation, and pollen viability (Scott et al., 2004;Cecchetti et al., 2008).Deficiencies in JA can delay or prevent anther dehiscence because JA is involved in tapetal degeneration, septum breakdown, and endothecium thickening (Ishiguro et al., 2001).Local increases in auxin can also delay anther dehiscence by hindering septum breakdown (Yasuor et al., 2006;Cecchetti et al., 2008).Ethylene defects also retard anther dehiscence by delaying degeneration of the stomium cells and dehydration (Rieu et al., 2003).Gibberellins are involved in the regulation of tapetal breakdown and the initiation of dehiscence and hence regulate anther dehiscence (Hu et al., 2008).In addition, the OsHXK10 promoter was found to drive the expression of b-glucuronidase specifically in anther wall, and its downregulation inhibited anther cell wall thickening and resulted in non-dehiscence (Xu et al., 2008).
HT stress affects anther dehiscence by inhibiting tapetum differentiation and microsporogenesis and promoting the PCD process in anther cells, especially in the endothecium layer, and it thus results in male sterility (Kim et al., 2001;Giorno et al., 2013;Zhang et al., 2021).Under HT stress conditions, levels of JA, IAA, and The completion of spikelet-opening behavior as the first ''switch'' for pollen release in rice and maize during flowering requires the driving force provided by water absorption and swelling of the lodicule (A-C).HT stress disrupts hormone synthesis, signaling regulation (JA and BRs in both rice and maize), and downstream targets (i.e., K + , Ca 2+ ), leading to an imbalance in osmotic regulation substances (ORSs) in the lodicules.A large vascular bundle system can accelerate water loss from the lodicule under heat stress (D).Anther dehiscence as the second ''switch'' for pollen release occurs in two different types: apical and bottom dehiscence occur in the rice anther, but only apical dehiscence occurs in the maize anther (E).(F) illustrates the cross-sectional morphology of anther development, with four pollen sacs consisting of the epidermis, endothecium, middle layer, tapetum, and reproductive cell layer, modified from Zhang et al. (2021).The microspore mother cells first undergo meiosis to form tetrads wrapped by callose and then proceed with mitoses to produce mature pollen grains.In the later stage of anther development, the septum and stomium gradually dehisce at the point where the anther splits to release pollen grains.JA, jasmonic acid; BRs, brassinosteroids; K + , potassium; Ca 2+ , calcium; ADL, apical dehiscence length; BDL, bottom dehiscence length; E, epidermis; En, endothecium; ML, middle layer; T, tapetum; Sm, septum; St, stomium; MMC, microspore mother cells; C, callose; PS, pollen sac.

Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals
Plant Communications gibberellins are reduced, whereas abscisic acid (ABA) levels increase in the anther, leading to reduced spikelet fertility (Tang et al., 2007;Khan et al., 2022a).Reduced JA levels impede the thickening of the secondary wall in endothecium cells by reducing lignification and result in indehiscent anthers due to accumulation of excessive ROS in anthers (Khan et al., 2022a).HT-induced ROS accumulation has been observed in the anthers of many crops (Djanaguiraman et al., 2018), and disruption of ROS homeostasis can result in undesirable PCD of the endothecium cells (Khan et al., 2022b).In rice, higher ABA levels and ABAinduced ROS accumulation in HT-stressed anthers resulted in earlier initiation of PCD induction and subsequently in abnormal tapetum degeneration (Bheemanahalli et al., 2020;Zhao et al., 2023).SAPK2 is required for ABA-induced ROS generation in the developing anther, but reduced ROS accumulation due to impaired ABA signaling was not observed in heat-stressed anthers of the OsSARK2 knockout mutant (Zhao et al., 2023).HT stress has direct effects on anther development and results in malformed structures, including a knitted anther cuticle structure of the epidermis, an undegraded septum, a thickened anther wall, and unevenly distributed Ubisch bodies (Hu et al., 2021).In addition, HT stress during flowering can also inhibit swelling of pollen grains, which is crucial for anther opening (Matsui et al., 2000).
Anther dehiscence responds differently to HT stress in maize, rice, and wheat.A long anther dehiscence for pollen release is one trait associated with HT stress tolerance (Matsui and Hasegawa, 2019).Evidence concerning the effects of HT stress on anther dehiscence is limited in wheat, and most studies have revealed that loss of pollen viability is the main factor limiting spikelet fertility under HT stress (J€ ager et al., 2008;Prasad and Djanaguiraman, 2014;Begcy et al., 2018).We therefore performed comparisons between maize and rice in the present study (Figure 4E).Rice exhibits apical and bottom dehiscence in the anther, with the latter playing a more crucial role in coping with HT stress (Matsui et al., 2005;Jagadish et al., 2010).A large bottom dehiscence size has been shown to enhance pollen deposition on the stigma (Matsui and Kagata, 2003), and extending the bottom cleft of the anther by 100 mm reduced the incidence of HT-induced sterility by 20% and increased heat tolerance by 0.66 C (Matsui and Hasegawa, 2019).In maize, anther dehiscence occurs only at the apex as a result of deformation of the endothelial wall confined to the tip (Cheng et al., 1979;Keijzer et al., 1996).HT stress during the 14 days bracketing the silking stage had no significant effects on maize anther dehiscence length but significantly reduced anther width, making pollen shedding number the main constraint on seed set (Wang et al., 2020b).At present, there is very limited information on anther apex dehiscence under HT stress in maize.

Pollen germination, tube elongation, and double fertilization
The fertilization process of crops like rice and wheat involves a series of events from pollen capture to gamete fusion (Figure 5; Weterings, 2004;Ge et al., 2007).Upon release from the anthers, pollen grains travel a short distance before being captured by the bifurcated and plumose stigma (phase I).
Pollen germination commences within 2-3 min of landing on the stigma, and pollen tubes then penetrate the stigma tissue (phase II) and grow within the style.The tubes continue to grow in the style for 5-10 min (phase III) until entering the various tissue layers of the ovary and reaching the micropyle in about 0.5-1.0h (phase IV).The male gametes enter the egg cell in approximately 1.5 h, and fusion of female and male nuclei is usually complete at about 5-7 h after pollination (phase V; Figure 5A; Hoshikawa, 1959;Wu and Tsai, 1965;Huang et al., 2004;Chen et al., 2008;Thomas and Franklin-Tong, 2013).By contrast, maize pollen grains have to flow from the tassel (top section of the plant) to the silks (middle section of the plant) and do not begin germinating until 10 min after pollination (We ˛dzony and Van Lammeren, 1996).Maize pollen tubes develop and grow in a long path (20 cm) along the transmitting tissues of silks to reach the ovarian cavity (Figure 5C;Miller, 1919), a process that takes 6-24 h, depending upon silk length, much longer than the time required in rice and wheat (Heslop-Harrison et al., 1984;You and Jensen, 1985;Jagadish et al., 2010;Dresselhaus et al., 2011).During this journey, the resources carried in the pollen sustain pollen tube growth for only about 2 cm (Heslop-Harrison et al., 1984); thereafter, the tube becomes increasingly dependent on metabolites from the silks (Dresselhaus et al., 2011).The period from pollen tube arrival at the embryo sac to gamete fusion is relatively short, taking less than 1 h.However, the time from contact to fusion of male and female nucleoli is longer, nearly 5 h in the egg cell and 3 h in the central cell (Mol et al., 1994).
The former then becomes a zygote and develops into a diploid embryo, whereas the latter forms the triploid nutritive endosperm (Lord and Russell, 2002).
The processes of pollen germination, pollen tube growth, and fertilization are all sensitive to HT stress (Dupuis and Dumas, 1990;Kakani et al., 2005;Snider et al., 2011a;Shi et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018).When the temperature was over 30 C-35 C, more than 50% of pollen grains failed to germinate in rice (Coast et al., 2016).Similarly, wheat pollen grains germinated in vitro under HT stress (34 C/16 C) with a 40% reduction in pollen germination across genotypes (Bheemanahalli et al., 2019).Pollen viability was significantly reduced at temperatures >38 C in maize (Wang et al., 2021b).Pollen germination failure induced by HT stress is a result of altered pollen morphology (Parish et al., 2012;De Storme and Geelen, 2014;Djanaguiraman et al., 2014), inhibited metabolic processes (Aloni et al., 2001;Karni and Aloni, 2002), and disturbed ROS homeostasis (Rutley et al., 2021;Zhou and Dresselhaus, 2022).It has also been shown that ROS can induce dormancy in some pollen grains under HT stress during the daytime but that the dormant pollen grains germinate at cool temperatures at night, providing new insight for improving heat tolerance during pollination (Rutley et al., 2021).Maize pollen development is particularly sensitive to HT stress, especially at the tetrad stage (Lohani et al., 2020).Temperatures >30 C that occurred at the meiosis phase of wheat pollen development caused pollen abortion (Ullah et al., 2022).A short HT stress at the tetrad stage (35 C/25 C light/dark period for 48 h) reduced pollen germination to 20% and severely reduced seed set (Begcy et al., 2019;Smith, 2019).
Pollen-stigma interaction, which includes pollen adhesion, hydration, and germination, is critical for successful pollen tube growth from the stigma to the ovule (Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong, 2013).Under HT stress conditions, pollen-stigma interaction is affected by deformed pollen grains with abnormal pollen wall patterning (especially the exine wall ornamentation; Allen et al.,

Plant Communications
Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals 2011; Djanaguiraman et al., 2018;Santiago and Sharkey, 2019), as well as low stigmatic receptivity due to increased oxidative stress and reduced soluble carbohydrate and ATP content in the pistil (Snider et al., 2009;Jiang et al., 2019).HT-induced loss of stigmatic receptivity occurs sequentially, first affecting the capacity to assist pollen tube penetration to the transmitting tissue of the pistil, then the ability to support pollen germination, and finally the capacity to maintain pollen grain adhesion (Hedhly et al., 2005).The energy demand of the actively growing pollen tube is nearly 10-fold higher than that of vegetative tissues (Tadege and Kuhlemeier, 1997).HT stress significantly reduced soluble carbohydrate content in the pistil during pollen tube growth and hence reduced pollen tube growth rates in the transmitting tissue (Snider et al., 2011a(Snider et al., , 2011b)).Auxin, flavonol, and ROS homeostasis in the pistils also play key roles in pollen germination and tube elongation in rice (Muhlemann et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018).Reduced auxin levels in the pistils of heatsensitive rice genotypes slow pollen tube growth under HT stress (Zhang et al., 2018).Flavonol maintains the integrity of pollen tube growth by regulating the dynamic balance of ROS (Muhlemann et al., 2018).In wheat, heat-stressed stigmas had similar numbers of germinated pollen grains compared with non-stressed stigmas, but fewer pollen tubes reached the ovary (Saini et al., 1983).Damaged female organs (stigma and style) cannot provide clear guidance that typically comes from synergid cells in the embryo sac after pollen germination, resulting in undirected pollen tube growth (Higashiyama et al., 2001;Okuda et al., 2009;Snider et al., 2009).These previous results were also confirmed by our recent studies in maize.Compared with pollen adherence and germination on the stigma, pollen tube growth in the transmitting tissue of the style/silk and ovary (phase III and/or IV) is expected to be more sensitive to HT stress (Figures 5B and  5D), closely associated with reduced energy supply from the silk and increased ABA and ROS content (Rezaul et al., 2019).In addition, degenerated eggs and synergids, malformed embryo sacs, and more aberrant or abortive ovules have been observed in heat-stressed pistils of tomato, canola (Brassica napus L.), wheat, and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) (Iwahori, 1965;Saini et al., 1983;Polowick and Sawhney, 1988;Snider et al., 2009;Djanaguiraman et al., 2018).These can result in fertilization failure, directly or indirectly, by hindering pollen tube burst and sperm cell release (Dresselhaus and Franklin-Tong, 2013).
The findings above suggest that the hidden stigmas of monoecious crops such as rice and wheat are beneficial for resisting or escaping from HT stress compared with exserted anthers (Supplemental Figure 3).But for maize, the silks must expose themselves to hot, dry air to receive pollen grains under HT stress conditions, and this is expected to reduce stigma receptivity and pistil energy supply.Pollen shedding, pollen germination, and initial growth of the pollen tube also involve exposure to the outside environment, increasing the difficulty of successful maize pollination under HT stress.Moreover, the long maize silk requires a long period of pollen tube growth, further increasing the HT stress sensitivity of seed set in maize.Nonetheless, little detailed information is available on stigma The graphics illustrate pollen grains shed from the anther (yellow represents pollen grains under normal conditions; red represents pollen grains affected by HT stress) that are captured and adhere to the stigma (phase I).Pollen grains that have germinated on the stigma surface after hydration produce pollen tubes, which penetrate the inner stigma (phase II), grow apically in the pistil transport tract (phase III), pass through the various layers of tissues comprising the ovary (phase IV), and enter the micropyle under the guidance of cell signals (phase V).The pollen tube enters the female gametophyte, interacts with the egg apparatus, and then releases two sperm for double fertilization with the egg cell and polar nuclei, thus initiating early embryo formation and development.Under HT stress, the stigmas on the pistil capture pollen grains, but fewer pollen grains germinate, and pollen tube elongation is hindered.
It is difficult for the pollen tube to reach the micropyle for double fertilization.Literature and experimental observations indicate that phases III and/or IV of pollen tube elongation are most sensitive to HT stress.The reddish background represents HT stress, and the blueish background represents normal conditions.The red cross (y) indicates the HT stress-sensitive phase-a critical factor that affects seed set under HT stress-and the green tick (O) indicates a phase that is relatively tolerant of HT stress.This graphic was drawn based on Thomas and Franklin-Tong (2013), Jagadish (2020), and Lohani et al. (2020), with modification.

Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals
Plant Communications receptivity, pollen tube growth, and fertilization in cereal crops, especially maize .

Canopy and tissue temperatures upon HT stress during flowering
Studies of the effects of HT stress on crop seed set generally rely on temperature-controlled experiments or field experiments over large regions in which temperatures are measured by standard weather stations at a 2-m height (Jagadish et al., 2007;Siebert et al., 2014;Aiqing et al., 2018;Wang et al., 2019b;Liu et al., 2022a).In natural field conditions, yield reduction in wheat as a result of HT stress during flowering is underestimated when temperature is measured at a 2-m height (Siebert et al., 2014), highlighting the importance of canopy temperature for reducing the uncertainty in assessing HT stress effects on crop yield (Ayeneh et al., 2002).Temperatures of leaf, spike, and panicle tissues are lower than air temperatures and are more significantly correlated with spikelet sterility during flowering in rice (Rajendran et al., 2016).Lower panicle temperature is expected to reduce the effects of HT stress during flowering on seed set (Mackill and Coffman, 1983) and can partly explain the relatively high panicle fertility of rice subjected to HTs >35 C at the heading and flowering stages (Julia and Dingkuhn, 2013).The characteristics of these plant tissues have important implications for selecting and breeding HT-tolerant crop varieties.
The present results based on previously published field work showed that canopy temperature (CT) was higher than panicle/spike/ear temperature in rice, wheat, and maize but lower than air temperature (AT) above the canopy (Figure 6), consistent with previous findings (Ayeneh et al., 2002;Yan et al., 2010;Yadav et al., 2015).Lower canopy and tissue temperatures result from the strong interaction between AT and relative humidity (RH; Matsui et al., 1997;Yan et al., 2010).In conditions with low RH, transpiration increases, which lowers the temperature of tissues, particularly leaves (Rajendran et al., 2016;Lin et al., 2017;Drake et al., 2018).During a heat wave, transpiration provides substantial latent cooling (an average cooling of 2.8 C; Drake et al., 2018), which serves as an important response to HT stress.Other factors, such as soil moisture, canopy roughness, plant height, and leaf physical traits, also affect the extent of AT reduction (Fuchs, 1990;Stockle and Dugas, 1992;Julia and Dingkuhn, 2013;Lin et al., 2017).In the case of rice grown in paddy fields, the presence of a ponded water layer in the irrigation system can change the microclimate within the canopy population (Stuerz et al., 2014).Under these conditions, the flag leaf temperature can be 5 C lower than AT because of the cooling effect of the buffering layer of ponded water (Figure 6A; Yan et al., 2010).The soil temperature is also lowered, and root activity can therefore  Ayeneh et al., 2002).(C) Temperature data for the maize population were obtained from a field experiment at the ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (78 31 0 E, 17 21 0 N), Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, India, during the 2013 summer season (see Yadav et al., 2015).The outer and inner ear temperature data were obtained from a field experiment performed at the Wuqiao Experiment station (116 30 0 E, 37 36 0 N; Wang et al., 2023), Hebei Province, China.The outer and inner ear temperatures were recorded at 10-s intervals for 12 h using a microthermometer with a microneedle thermometer sensor and a microlinear thermometer sensor.Temperature was measured from 13:00 to 14:00.AT, air temperature; CT, canopy temperature; PT, panicle temperature; ST, spike temperature; FLT, flag leaf temperature; LT, leaf temperature; OET, outer ear temperature; IET, inner ear temperature; PH, plant height.

Plant Communications
Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals be maintained at a high level under HT conditions after application of saturated irrigation at the post-heading stage (Matsue et al., 2021).In some rice varieties, the cooling effects of the water layer on canopy, tissues, and organs have enabled spikelet number and fertility to be maintained even in controlled environments up to 39 C (Jagadish et al., 2015).
In wheat, the growing environment does not typically expose plants to HT stress of >38 C during flowering.Under natural field conditions, ATs experienced by wheat can range from 33.3 C to 35 C, and the CT, spike temperature, and flag leaf temperature are lower: 29.5 C to 30.3 C, 30.5 C, and 29.2 C to 30.2 C, respectively (Figure 6B; Ayeneh et al., 2002).Temperature depression in the canopy and tissues was mainly attributed to transpirational cooling mediated by low RH (Yan et al., 2010;Lin et al., 2017).In irrigated agriculture, HT stress in wheat is considerably reduced owing to surface cooling (Siebert et al., 2017).
In maize, tall plants (2 m in height) cause the top of the canopy to be close to the height at which weather stations measure A comprehensive list of selection indexes for breeding HT-tolerant varieties and crop production management strategies for coping with HT stress is provided.The color of the wire indicates the expected magnitude of the effect on seed set and yield formation, and the shape of the wire reflects the level of knowledge underpinning the link represented by the wire.
AT, but a significant reduction in temperature still exists between AT, CT, and leaf temperature (LT) (Yadav et al., 2015).
During anthesis, when ATs ranged from 37.6 C to 41.4 C, CT and leaf temperature ranged from 32.5 C-39.3 C and 31.9C-35.9 C, respectively (Figure 6C).Because of the different locations of male and female reproductive organs on maize plants, the tassel has a higher tissue temperature, and the ear located at the middle section of the plant has a lower tissue temperature.Moreover, ear temperature declines significantly from the outer to the inner side because of the thick husk leaves, which can shield pollen tube growth and fertilization processes from HT stress (Wang et al., 2023).When the AT was as high as 40 C, the outer ear temperature ranged from 33.5 C to 34.1 C, whereas the inner ear temperature ranged from 28.8 C to 29.9 C (Figure 6C).
Above all, accurate assessment of the effects of HT stress requires a precise understanding of the responses of canopy and tissue temperatures (especially reproductive tissues) to AT. CT is widely recognized as a reliable indicator for assessing crop yield losses under HT stress (Siebert et al., 2014(Siebert et al., , 2017;;Webber et al., 2016).Lowering reproductive tissue temperatures is beneficial for maintaining stable spikelet fertility under HT stress (Yan et al., 2010;Bonari et al., 2020).Currently, we have limited information on the critical thresholds of canopy/tissue temperatures for seed set at different reproductive growth stages in the three staple crops.

Concluding remarks and future perspectives
As the climate warms, crop grain yield is at risk from increasing frequency, duration, and intensity of HT stress.Hence, it is becoming especially important to ensure high seed set/ spikelet fertility under HT stress.In this study, we used the concept of a wiring diagram to summarize the impact level and the current state of knowledge about key reproductive events that affect seed set in rice, wheat, and maize (Figure 7).When Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals Plant Communications the temperature exceeds the critical temperature thresholds, crop growth and development and the processes of seed formation become ''derailed,'' resulting in a significant reduction in seed number (Sanchez et al., 2014;Wang et al., 2021b;Zhu et al., 2021).Until recently, the effects of HDT during flowering on crop reproductive events have been more clearly understood than the effects of HNT.Because of the limited research on HNT, we tentatively derived critical HNT thresholds for seed set in rice (31.2 C ± 0.2 C), maize (27.3 C ± 1.3 C), and wheat (19.6 C ± 2.7 C).The mechanisms underlying the effects of HNT during flowering on seed set are relatively poorly understood, as the phenomenon of anomalous nighttime warming has not been closely examined until recent years.More research should be devoted to revealing the negative effects of HNT on crop fertility at the phenotypic, physiological, and molecular levels.
Crops have different HT stress sensitivities at different reproductive phases, corresponding to different critical air, canopy, and tissue temperature thresholds for growth, development, and seed set (Figures 2, 3, and 6).Rice, wheat, and maize are extremely sensitive to HT stress during the early stage of reproductive development (i.e., the microspore stage) and at the pollination stage (Yoshida et al., 1981;Endo et al., 2009;Wassmann et al., 2009;Wang et al., 2020a).Asynchronies between individual male and female flowers in growth, development, and flowering increase the complexity of the HT stress response in maize (Wang et al., 2020a).Heat damage to pollen development, anther dehiscence, and pollen viability greatly reduces the fertility of male reproductive organs (Matsui et al., 2000;Endo et al., 2009;Begcy et al., 2019;Matsui and Hasegawa, 2019;Hu et al., 2021).The effect of pollen shedding number on seed set has rarely been examined in rice and wheat under HT stress owing to the difficulty of quantifying pollen grains.Presumably, pollen shedding number is not a key factor affecting seed set in these two crops, as they exhibit cleistogamy and autogamy (Supplemental Figures 3A,3B,3D,and 3E).Compared with that in rice and wheat, the fertility of male reproductive organs in maize is more sensitive to heat damage.Spikelet opening is a pre-condition for pollination in maize, and pollen release from the anther is expected to be more difficult in maize than in rice (Figure 4E).At present, there are fewer studies on HT stress in female reproductive organs of the three crops.HT effects on stigma exposure, pollen adherence and germination on the stigma, pollen tube growth, and fertilization have been detailedly studied in rice.In maize, HT stress disrupts silk development (advancing or delaying silk emergence, depending on the HT level), reduces silk emergence number, and limits silk viability.Surprisingly, pollen tube growth in the pistil tissue transmitting tract is more sensitive than pollen germination to HT stress, especially in maize (Figure 5).The occurrence of a heat spell at noon frequently coincides with pollen tube growth and reduces spikelet fertility, an important but often neglected phenomenon in research and practice.
How to reduce the effects of HT stress on crop yield is becoming an increasingly urgent question, and the answer will depend mainly on improvements in crop breeding and management.The present study reveals several parameters that can be used as selection indexes in breeding and selection for HT tolerance and avoidance during flowering in the three staple crops (Figure 7).Some important selection indexes and their regulatory mechanisms are listed below.
(1) Flowering time in days (blooming synchronicity between male and female flowers) and hours (early-morning flowering to escape heat damage at noon).-A quantitative trait locus (qEMF3) in rice shifts flower opening time 1.5-2 h earlier so that flower opening is completed before the temperature reaches 35 C in the late morning, thus mitigating heat-induced spikelet sterility under diverse environmental conditions (Hirabayashi et al., 2015;Ishimaru et al., 2022).(2) Pollen production in the anther, pollen shedding number, and pollen viability to maintain high spikelet fertility at different reproductive phases.-OsmiRNA528 improves pollen development in rice by inducing OsUCL23 gene expression to influence flavonoid metabolism (Zhang et al., 2020).
(3) Spikelet opening angle, lodicule size, and lodicule structure to ensure anther emergence under HT stress, especially in maize.-Diurnal Flower Opening Time 1 (DFOT1) modulates pectin methylesterase activity to regulate pectin methylesterification levels of lodicule cell walls, thereby affecting lodicule swelling and spikelet opening time in rice (Wang et al., 2022).-Sterol methyltransferase2 controls lodicule swelling in maize and thus affects spikelet opening and anther emergence (Liu et al., 2023).( 4) Anther dehiscence to enhance pollen release (length of bottom dehiscence is more important for rice, and length of apical dehiscence is critical for maize).-Basal dehiscence length (qBDL2-2 and qBDL10) has a significant effect on heat tolerance in rice and can be used in heat-tolerance breeding (Zhao et al., 2016).( 5) Pistil growth and viability to receive pollen grains and protect pollen germination and pollen tube growth in the transmitting tract (silk elongation, uniformity of silk emergence at different cob positions, and silk receptivity are particularly important factors that affect seed set under HT stress in maize).-Loss of KIRA1-LIKE1 function extends the duration of silk receptivity and thus markedly increases kernel set ( Sima ´ skova ´et al., 2022).
Existing varieties of the three crops still exhibit limited HT stress tolerance, especially under extreme heat waves.Crop management is likely to have expected effects on reducing damage due to HT stress (Figure 7).Based on the present study, suitable crop management practices that can reduce and/or avoid HT stress damage during flowering should include the following.
(1) Adjustment of sowing date to avoid HT events coinciding with HT-sensitive stages of sexual reproduction (e.g., anthesis; sowing date is generally advanced to avoid HT stress at anthesis).-Adjusting the sowing date of maize increased kernel number per ear in contrasting genetic backgrounds by 70% by avoiding heat stress at the flowering stage under natural field conditions (Liu et al., 2022b).

Plant Communications
Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals Plant Communications

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Figure 2Critical temperatures for key flowering traits of three major cereal crops around the flowering stage.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Reduction in seed set/spikelet fertility relative to normal conditions for maize, rice, and wheat under high-temperature (HT) stress around flowering (A) and their temperature sensitivity at different phases around flowering (B).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Simplified model of the lodicule swelling mechanism, anther dehiscence types, and anther cross-sectional structure of rice and maize spikelets.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Pollen grain germination and pollen tube elongation on the female reproductive organ (pistil) with a bifurcated plumose stigma in rice and wheat and a filiform stigma in maize under normal temperatures (NT; A and C) and HT stress (B and D).

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Air, canopy, and organ (flag leaf, panicle/spike/ear) temperatures of three main global cereal crop populations during flowering under field conditions.Because of variations in sowing date and growing environment, rice and maize are more likely to experience HT stress.The reddish background for rice and maize represents more severe HT stress, and the yellowish background for wheat represents low HT stress.The scales at the right side of each crop population represent the change in temperature from the ground to 2 m above the ground.The range of temperature change varies with the vertical height of different crop populations (e.g., plant height) and growing environments (e.g., flooded vs. dry land).(A) Temperature levels of different heights of rice populations were obtained from field experiments performed at the Jiangning Experimental Station (118 30 0 E, 31 50 0 N), Jiangsu Province, China (see Yan et al., 2010).Temperature was measured at the heading and anthesis stages on September 11 and August 25, 2017.(B) Temperature data for the wheat population were obtained during the 2000-2001 winter-spring growing season at CIMMYT's experimental station, Ciudad Obregon (109 56 0 W, 27 29 0 N), Mexico (see Ayeneh et al., 2002).(C) Temperature data for the maize population were obtained from a field experiment at the ICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture (78 31 0 E, 17 21 0 N), Santoshnagar, Hyderabad, India, during the 2013 summer season (seeYadav et al., 2015).The outer and inner ear temperature data were obtained from a field experiment performed at the Wuqiao Experiment station (116 30 0 E, 37 36 0 N;Wang et al., 2023), Hebei Province, China.The outer and inner ear temperatures were recorded at 10-s intervals for 12 h using a microthermometer with a microneedle thermometer sensor and a microlinear thermometer sensor.Temperature was measured from 13:00 to 14:00.AT, air temperature; CT, canopy temperature; PT, panicle temperature; ST, spike temperature; FLT, flag leaf temperature; LT, leaf temperature; OET, outer ear temperature; IET, inner ear temperature; PH, plant height.

Figure 7 .
Figure 7.A wiring diagram for the response of male and female reproductive organs to HT stress, critical temperature thresholds, and canopy (tissue) temperatures in rice, wheat, and maize during the flowering stage.
(2) Irrigation to reduce soil, canopy, and tissue temperatures and maintain the structure and function of plant organs Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals Plant Communications Plant Communications Heat tolerance during flowering in cereals Plant Communications 4, 100629, November 13 2023 ª 2023 The Author(s).