Original ArticleMean Brain Dose Remains Uninfluenced by the Lesion Number for Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for 10+ Metastases
Introduction
Brain metastases (BMs) represent an unfortunately common occurrence as improvements in screening techniques, diagnostic imaging, and systemic therapeutics have lengthened patient survival after primary cancer diagnosis.1 Radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of BMs.2 For patients with higher-burden intracranial disease, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has historically been the preferred therapeutic modality over stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).3 However, SRS confers several advantages relative to WBRT, including significantly lower incidence and magnitude of neurocognitive decline,4 minimal hair loss, and completion in 1 to a few days as opposed to the 1–3 weeks needed for WBRT.
The decision to offer WBRT rather than SRS is sometimes driven by the belief that distant brain sites may be seeded with micrometastatic disease in patients with many BMs. Therefore, irradiating the entire brain may theoretically confer a survival advantage.5 However, the number of BMs has been shown not to be a clinically meaningful prognostic indicator of overall survival.6 Additionally, improvements in systemic therapy have prolonged overall survival after treatment of extensive intracranial disease.7 Hence, to avoid the toxicity associated with WBRT, more radiation oncologists are offering upfront SRS rather than WBRT for extensive BMs.8 Despite this trend, the clinical and dosimetric consequences of treating 10 or more BMs with SRS are not well known. This study endeavored to determine cumulative radiation doses to the brain in patients who underwent Gamma Knife (GK) SRS for 10 or more lesions in a single session and their associated clinical outcomes.
Section snippets
Methods
We performed a single-institution, retrospective analysis of all patients who received GK SRS for 10 or more BMs in 1 session (not staged) at Northwestern Medicine between November 2014 and December 2018. The study was approved by the Northwestern University Institutional Review Board to retrospectively evaluate radiation dose to the brain from Leksell GammaPlan (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) data and associated clinical outcomes. To perform the analysis, we imported Leksell GammaPlan patient data
Results
Thirty patients were identified with a median of 13 tumors treated per patient (range 10–26 tumors) for a total of 427 tumors (Table 1). The median aggregate tumor volume was 4.70 cm3 (range 1.30–45.2 cm3). The median dose to the margin was 20 Gy (range 12–20 Gy) prescribed to the 50% isodose line. The mean treatment duration was 291.8 minutes (range 206.1–440.5 minutes). Histologic tumor types included non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC, 14 patients), breast cancer (5 patients),
Discussion
In an effort to avoid known neurocognitive side effects of WBRT, radiation oncologists are increasingly choosing SRS over WBRT for treatment of high-burden intracranial disease. In a recent survey of American radiation oncologists, 42.4% of physicians stated their willingness to treat up to 10 intracranial lesions without WBRT, while 17.2% were willing to treat more.9 As studies of patients treated with SRS for extensive BMs continue to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of such an approach,
Conclusion
Many radiation oncologists are offering SRS as an initial treatment for patients with many BM in an effort to avoid the toxicity associated with WBRT. The data from this clinical and dosimetric analysis suggest that the mean dose to the whole brain in patients treated with GK SRS for 10 or more BMs remains low, does not approximate WBRT dosing, and is associated with acceptable rates of radionecrosis. Ongoing randomized trials will provide prospective evidence for this challenging clinical
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Timothy L. Sita: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, approved the final version of the manuscript. Mahesh Gopalakrishnan: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Michael K. Rooney: Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing. Alexander Ho: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Rohan Savoor: Formal
References (28)
- et al.
Brain metastases: epidemiology
Handb Clin Neurol
(2018) - et al.
Radiotherapy for brain metastases
Neurosurg Clin N Am
(2011) - et al.
Neurocognition in patients with brain metastases treated with radiosurgery or radiosurgery plus whole-brain irradiation: a randomised controlled trial
Lancet Oncol
(2009) The management of brain metastases
Cancer Treat Rev
(2003)- et al.
Does modern management of malignant extracranial disease prolong survival in patients with >/=3 brain metastases?
World Neurosurg
(2016) - et al.
Initial SRS for patients with 5 to 15 brain metastases: results of a multi-institutional experience
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2019) - et al.
Predictors of survival in contemporary practice after initial radiosurgery for brain metastases
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2013) - et al.
Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2006) - et al.
A new prognostic index and comparison to three other indices for patients with brain metastases: an analysis of 1,960 patients in the RTOG database
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2008) - et al.
Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003)
12 Gy gamma knife radiosurgical volume is a predictor for radiation necrosis in non-AVM intracranial tumors
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Radiation dose-volume effects in the brain
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Effect of radiosurgery alone vs radiosurgery with whole brain radiation therapy on cognitive function in patients with 1 to 3 brain metastases: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA
Survival of patients with multiple intracranial metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: does the number of tumors Matter?
Am J Clin Oncol
Cited by (2)
Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare that the article content was composed in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.