Elsevier

Water Research

Volume 49, 1 February 2014, Pages 62-82
Water Research

Review
Methods for assessing biochemical oxygen demand (BOD): A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.10.066Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Alternative methods for monitoring biochemical oxygen demand have been reviewed.

  • The concepts and the technical features are described.

  • Some methods allow to assess BOD in only 70 s vs 5 days with the standard method.

  • Performances of the various methods have been compared.

Abstract

The Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) is one of the most widely used criteria for water quality assessment. It provides information about the ready biodegradable fraction of the organic load in water. However, this analytical method is time-consuming (generally 5 days, BOD5), and the results may vary according to the laboratory (20%), primarily due to fluctuations in the microbial diversity of the inoculum used.

Work performed during the two last decades has resulted in several technologies that are less time-consuming and more reliable. This review is devoted to the analysis of the technical features of the principal methods described in the literature in order to compare their performances (measuring window, reliability, robustness) and to identify the pros and the cons of each method.

Introduction

The biological measurement “Biochemical Oxygen Demand” (BOD) was selected in 1908 as an indicator of the organic pollution of rivers by the U.K. Royal Commission on River Pollution. The traditional five day period to estimate the BOD5 parameter was chosen for this test because this is supposedly the longest time that river water takes to travel from its source to its estuary in the U.K. (Great Britain. Royal commission on sewage disposal, 1908). Thereafter, this parameter was adopted by the American Public Health Association Standard Methods Committee in 1936 as a reference indicator to evaluate the biodegradation of chemicals and hazardous substances.

This parameter is defined as the amount of oxygen, divided by the volume of the system, taken up through the respiratory activity of microorganisms growing on the organic compounds present in the sample (e.g. water or sludge) when incubated at a specified temperature (usually 20 °C) for a fixed period (usually 5 days, BOD5). It is a measure of that organic pollution of water which can be degraded biologically. In practice, it is usually expressed in milligrams O2 per litre (Nagel et al., 1992).

The BOD5 has three major applications. First, it is an indicator of the conformity of the wastewater discharge and the waste treatment procedure to the current regulations. Second, in wastewater treatment plants, the ratio between BOD5 and COD (chemical oxygen demand) indicates the biodegradable fraction of an effluent. Third, the ratio COD/BOD5 is an indicator of the size of a wastewater treatment plant required for a specific location.

Conventionally, BOD is determined according to the standardised method described in the next paragraph. However, the main disadvantage of this approach is the time required for its achievement (5 days) (Riedel et al., 2002). The standardised method, which allows only a deferred analysis of the wastewater quality, does not appear today to be the most suitable tool for real-time environmental monitoring.

This test is one of the most widespread in the domain of water monitoring; however, the measurement variability in certified laboratories reaches 20% (internal measurements), and this value increases between laboratories (comparative measurements) due to the variability of the microbial populations sampled (Guyard, 2010).

Due to the worldwide use of BOD methods, alternatives have been developed that range from static bioassays to online biosensors. In this review, we are interested in the analysis systems developed during the last twenty years to estimate BOD. Five main development strategies have been used by the research teams to design these new systems. Among these innovative technologies, some were transferred and marketed to industry.

Section snippets

How to assess BOD?

Aerobic biodegradation consists of oxidising organic matter biologically. During this process, the organic matter is converted by microorganisms into microbial biomass, eventual transformation products of biodegradation reaction (compounds derived from the initial organic matter), CO2 and H2O, according to Equation (1) (Swisher, 1987, Pagga, 1997, Reuschenbach et al., 2003).X0+S+O2N,P,MNXf+Tp+CO2+H2O

  • X0: Initial biomass

  • S: Organic carbon sources

  • O2: Oxygen

  • N: Nitrogen source

  • P: Phosphorus source

  • MN:

Methods of BOD measurement

Because of the required time by the tests, the methods presented in this part are essentially designed to perform occasional analyses of BOD or to monitor an effluent with a measurement frequency inferior to one per week. They are primarily methods that present an improvement relative to the simplifying of the standard method (e.g., a decrease in the maintenance, a reduction of the working area or an enlargement of the measurement ranges of the organic load). Nevertheless, these methods are

Technological evaluation

In order to compare the main strategies of BOD assessment described above, the main assets and drawbacks of each method are listed in Table 1. These methods are classified in two categories i.e. the real measurement or the mathematical prediction.

Conclusion

This review has identified the main technological strategies designed to measure or to estimate the BOD parameter, used as an indicator of the biodegradability of organic matter. It focuses on the technological aspect of the assessment methods, on the nature of the performed measurement (real measurement or prediction) and on the pros and cons of them.

From a technical point of view, the latest advances show that the “measurement” aspect of biological signals (bioluminescence, cellular activity,

References (120)

  • G.-J. Chee et al.

    Development of photocatalytic biosensor for the evaluation of biochemical oxygen demand

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2005)
  • S.A. Chiappini et al.

    A new microbial biosensor for organic water pollution based on measurement of carbon dioxide production

    Sens. Actuators B: Chem.

    (2010)
  • M. Di Lorenzo et al.

    A single-chamber microbial fuel cell as a biosensor for wastewaters

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • R.A. Dobbs et al.

    The use of ultra-violet absorbance for monitoring the total organic carbon content of water and wastewater

    Water Res.

    (1972)
  • A.C. Edwards et al.

    Relationships between ultraviolet absorbance and total organic carbon in two upland catchments

    Water Res.

    (1987)
  • M. Grzebyk et al.

    Microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with interpolymer cation exchange membranes

    Separat. Purif. Technol.

    (2005)
  • J.K. Jang et al.

    Construction and operation of a novel mediator- and membrane-less microbial fuel cell

    Process Biochem.

    (2004)
  • J. Jia et al.

    Co-immobilized microbial biosensor for BOD estimation based on sol–gel derived composite material

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2003)
  • Y. Jiang et al.

    Optical biosensor for the determination of BOD in seawater

    Talanta

    (2006)
  • M.-N. Kim et al.

    Klebsiella BOD sensor

    Sens. Actuators B: Chem.

    (2001)
  • M.-N. Kim et al.

    Immobilization of enzymes for Klebsiella BOD sensor

    Sens. Actuators B: Chem.

    (2004)
  • A. Kumlanghan et al.

    Microbial fuel cell-based biosensor for fast analysis of biodegradable organic matter

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2007)
  • A. Kumlanghan et al.

    Microbial BOD sensor for monitoring treatment of wastewater from a rubber latex industry

    Enzyme Microb. Technol.

    (2008)
  • N.-Y. Kwok et al.

    An optical biosensor for multi-sample determination of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)

    Sens. Actuators B: Chem.

    (2005)
  • M. Lehmann et al.

    Measurement of biodegradable substances using the salt-tolerant yeast Arxula adeninivorans for a microbial sensor immobilized with poly(carbamoyl)sulfonate (PCS): Part II: application of the novel biosensor to real samples from coastal and island regions

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (1999)
  • L. Lin et al.

    Novel BOD optical fiber biosensor based on co-immobilized microorganisms in ormosils matrix

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2006)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Immobilised activated sludge based biosensor for biochemical oxygen demand measurement

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2000)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Short-term BOD (BODst) as a parameter for on-line monitoring of biological treatment process: Part I. A novel design of BOD biosensor for easy renewal of bio-receptor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2004)
  • J. Liu et al.

    Short-term BOD (BODst) as a parameter for on-line monitoring of biological treatment process: Part II: instrumentation of integrated flow injection analysis (FIA) system for BODst estimation

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2004)
  • L. Liu et al.

    Organic–inorganic hybrid material for the cells immobilization: long-term viability mechanism and application in BOD sensors

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2009)
  • C. Liu et al.

    Immobilized multi-species based biosensor for rapid biochemical oxygen demand measurement

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2011)
  • C. Liu et al.

    A biofilm reactor-based approach for rapid on-line determination of biodegradable organic pollutants

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2012)
  • C. McDonagh et al.

    Phase fluorometric dissolved oxygen sensor

    Sens. Actuators B: Chem.

    (2001)
  • M. Mrkva

    Automatic u.v.-control system for relative evaluation of organic water pollution

    Water Res.

    (1975)
  • M. Mrkva

    Evaluation of correlations between absorbance at 254 nm and COD of river waters

    Water Res.

    (1983)
  • H. Nakamura et al.

    A chemiluminescence biochemical oxygen demand measuring method

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2007)
  • H. Nakamura et al.

    A spectrophotometric biochemical oxygen demand determination method using 2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol as the redox color indicator and the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2007)
  • H. Nakamura et al.

    A new BOD estimation method employing a double-mediator system by ferricyanide and menadione using the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Talanta

    (2007)
  • R.W. Okey et al.

    A QSAR-based biodegradability model—A QSBR

    Water Res.

    (1996)
  • S. Oota et al.

    Development of mediated BOD biosensor system of flow injection mode for Shochu distillery wastewater

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2010)
  • U. Pagga

    Testing biodegradability with standardized methods

    Chemosphere

    (1997)
  • N. Pasco et al.

    MICREDOX®—development of a ferricyanide-mediated rapid biochemical oxygen demand method using an immobilised Proteus vulgaris biocomponent

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2004)
  • Z. Qian et al.

    Response characteristics of a dead-cell bod sensor

    Water Res.

    (1998)
  • Z. Qian et al.

    BOD measurement in the presence of heavy metal ions using a thermally-killed-Bacillus subtilis biosensor

    Water Res.

    (1999)
  • K. Rabaey et al.

    Microbial fuel cells: novel biotechnology for energy generation

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2005)
  • G. Ramsay et al.

    Development of an electrochemical method for the rapid determination of microbial concentration and evidence for the reaction mechanism

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1988)
  • S. Rastogi et al.

    Development and characterization of a novel immobilized microbial membrane for rapid determination of biochemical oxygen demand load in industrial waste-waters

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2003)
  • S. Rastogi et al.

    BOD analysis of industrial effluents: 5 days to 5 min

    Curr. Appl. Phys.

    (2003)
  • M. Raud et al.

    Bioelectronic tongue and multivariate analysis: a next step in BOD measurements

    Water Res.

    (2013)
  • M. Raud et al.

    Comparative study of semi-specific Aeromonas hydrophila and universal Pseudomonas fluorescens biosensors for BOD measurements in meat industry wastewaters

    Enzyme Microb. Technol.

    (2012)
  • Cited by (299)

    • Biological elements as important tools in the detection/monitoring of drug compounds in organic and environmental samples

      2024, Development in Wastewater Treatment Research and Processes: Innovative Trends in Removal of Refractory Pollutants from Pharmaceutical Wastewater
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text