Elsevier

Waste Management

Volume 61, March 2017, Pages 461-472
Waste Management

Review
Processing- and product-related causes for food waste and implications for the food supply chain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Causes for processing- and product-related food waste are summarised.

  • A literature review is supplemented with information from practitioner interviews.

  • Expert interviews provide new insights on causes for producer-related food waste.

  • A summary on product-related mechanisms leading to suboptimal foods is given.

  • The potential of factors for reducing food waste is discussed.

Abstract

Reducing food waste is one of the prominent goals in the current research, which has also been set by the United Nations to achieve a more sustainable world by 2030. Given that previous studies mainly examined causes for food waste generation related to consumers, e.g., expectations regarding quality or uncertainties about edibility, this review aims at providing an overview on losses in the food industry, as well as on natural mechanisms by which impeccable food items are converted into an undesired state. For this, scientific literature was reviewed based on a keyword search, and information not covered was gathered by conducting expert interviews with representatives from 13 German food processing companies. From the available literature, three main areas of food waste generation were identified and discussed: product deterioration and spoilage during logistical operations, by-products from food processing, and consumer perception of quality and safety. In addition, expert interviews revealed causes for food waste in the processing sector, which were categorised as follows: losses resulting from processing operations and quality assurance, and products not fulfilling quality demands from trade. The interviewees explained a number of strategies to minimise food losses, starting with alternative tradeways for second choice items, and ending with emergency power supplies to compensate for power blackouts. It became clear that the concepts are not universally applicable for each company, but the overview provided in the present study may support researchers in finding appropriate solutions for individual cases.

Introduction

In 2011 the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations estimated that one third of the worldwide food production is wasted or gets lost on the way from farm to fork (FAO, 2011). Wasted food is associated with an unnecessary use of energy and water, and emissions of greenhouse gases generated by production and delivery operations (Papargyropoulou et al., 2014, Tiwari et al., 2014); it is also contradictory to the increased amount of food demanded by a growing population (Ehrlich and Harte, 2015, Godfray et al., 2010). Reducing food waste is therefore one of the goals the UN have set to achieve a more sustainable world by 2030 (United Nations, 2015).

In many cases it is processing that links agricultural materials to the consumer. It is therefore important to ensure processing efficiency, and to have sufficient information on factors which may induce or prevent food waste generation on the processing level. 39% of the food losses in the EU occur in food manufacturing, and 5% along the distribution chain (European Commission, 2011).

Suboptimal foods have recently been defined as edible foods perceived as undesirable by the consumer because of visual or sensory deviations, or uncertain safety (Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2015). Suboptimal foods frequently end up as food waste, i.e. “… any food, and inedible parts of food, removed from the food supply chain to be recovered or disposed” which is inaccessible for consumption (Fusions, 2014).

In line with this definition, food waste in the context of this review is considered as

  • Any food-derived material lost during processing in the form of residues, faulty batches, retained or analysis samples, or by-products, and that is not recovered for human consumption. Such materials are frequently denoted as food or post-harvest losses because they are associated to food manufacturing and usually not wasted on purpose (Parfitt et al., 2010, Russ and Schnappinger, 2007); and

  • Foods that are rejected and finally discarded at retail or household levels because they do not match consumer expectations or legal requirements regarding quality or safety. This type of food waste is mainly connected to the consumer who decides what to purchase and consume, but also involves other actors (farmers, processors, carriers) who are responsible for the quality in which the food is delivered to the consumer (Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2015, Salhofer et al., 2008), and includes food that undergoes microbiological spoilage or mechanical damages during delivery, forcing the retailer to eventually reject it.

After providing a general overview on food wasted in the supply chain with a specific focus on logistical issues (chapter 3), this work aims to discuss

  • Processing techniques and requirements of quality assurance in the food industry that limit an efficient and sustainable resource exploitation (chapter 4), and

  • Physical, chemical, and biological mechanisms by which impeccable food items are converted into suboptimal foods (chapter 5).

The paper provides a unique overview of processing- and product-related causes of food waste, and contributes to tackling the food waste issue by identifying potential actions of food supply chain actors.

Section snippets

Literature search

A literature search was carried out using scientific databases (Web of Science, Business Source Complete, EBSCO, SciFinder, Science Direct, PubMed, and Google Scholar) and the book catalogue of the Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden (Germany). A general overview on the topic was obtained by searching for pre-defined keywords, namely “food waste” and “food loss” in combination with “food industry”, “food manufacturing”, or “food processing”. “Consumer” and “household” level food waste,

Food overproduction and redistribution

To provide edible products for the human population, a food has to pass several stages along the supply chain. It starts with raw materials production, followed by processing and subsequent distribution to consumers through the retailing system (Fig. 1). Although food is wasted at all supply chain stages, the cause of food waste does not necessarily arise at the same stage as the waste itself (Adenso-Díaz and Mena, 2014, Göbel et al., 2015, Mena et al., 2014, Papargyropoulou et al., 2014,

Food industry waste and losses

Reliable data on exact quantities of industrial food waste is scarce because of poor definitions and insufficient documentation. Kranert et al. (2012) accumulated several studies and estimated that the German food industry is responsible for approx. 14 kg of the 82 kg food waste per head and year; technical problems during processing and quality assurance measures were identified as the main causes, each representing approx. 30% of this quantity. Data published by the European Commission (2009)

Typical quality changes of food items

Apart from foods where deviations from desired quality come from natural variability (e.g., oddly shaped fruits and vegetables), suboptimal foods can be the result of poor processing, and/or physical or chemical reactions that are frequently accelerated through incorrect handling (Fig. 3). Perception of and dealing with suboptimal foods is highly individual among consumers, but it was proposed that a better understanding and a higher valuing of food may be a key factor for food waste reduction (

Conclusions and implications for the food supply chain

This review identifies significant causes for food waste in the supply chain related to logistical handling, product processing, and consumption. From the available literature, potential actions to reduce food waste are identified for the following areas:

  • Product deterioration and spoilage during transportation and storage. Devices such as RFID or GPS technologies, or strategic management processes may help to minimise losses along the supply chain by increased control of product shelf life and

Limitations of the study and further outlook

As research in investigating both consumer and producer causes of food waste generation is scarce, there is much left to explore in this domain. Further research may also use quantitative methods that help to generalise the findings from this qualitative study, especially with regard to the relative amounts of food waste arising from different issues within food processing. Expert interviews proved to be useful in identifying general causes of food waste in the processing sector, but further

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the co-workers at each partner organisation for their assistance in completing the manuscript, specifically Doris Jaros, Yvonne Schneider, and Susanne Struck. Furthermore, the interviewees are gratefully acknowledged for dedicating time to the project and sharing their information and thoughts on food waste.

The research has been funded by the SUSFOOD ERA-net ‘COSUS’ project (see https://cosus.nmbu.no/). The funding institutions for this review are the German Federal Ministry

References (112)

  • A. Giménez et al.

    Influence of evoked contexts on consumers’ rejection of two products: implications for shelf life estimation

    Food Res. Int.

    (2015)
  • M. Grunow et al.

    RFID in highly perishable food supply chains – remaining shelf life to supplant expiry date?

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2013)
  • J. Gustavsson et al.

    Retail waste of horticultural products in Sweden

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2011)
  • A. Halloran et al.

    Addressing food waste reduction in Denmark

    Food Policy

    (2014)
  • L. Kumari et al.

    Application of RFID in agri-food sector

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • Z. Li et al.

    Quantitative evaluation of mechanical damage to fresh fruits

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2014)
  • S.M. Loveday et al.

    Innovative yoghurts: novel processing technologies for improving acid milk gel texture

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2013)
  • C. Mena et al.

    The causes of food waste in the supplier–retailer interface: evidences from the UK and Spain

    Resour. Conserv. Recycl.

    (2011)
  • C. Mena et al.

    Causes of waste across multi-tier supply networks: cases in the UK food sector

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2014)
  • N. Mirabella et al.

    Current options for the valorization of food manufacturing waste: a review

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • C. Muriana

    Effectiveness of the food recovery at the retailing stage under shelf life uncertainty: an application to Italian food chains

    Waste Manage.

    (2015)
  • S. Nöbel et al.

    Technofunctional barrier layers for preventing fat bloom in triple-shot pralines

    Food Res. Int.

    (2009)
  • K. O’Callaghan

    Technologies for the utilisation of biogenic waste in the bioeconomy

    Food Chem.

    (2016)
  • E. Papargyropoulou et al.

    The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • S. Salhofer et al.

    Potentials for the prevention of municipal solid waste

    Waste Manage.

    (2008)
  • G.W. Smithers

    Whey and whey proteins – from ‘Gutter-to-Gold’

    Int. Dairy J.

    (2008)
  • G.W. Smithers

    Whey-ing up the options – yesterday, today and tomorrow

    Int. Dairy J.

    (2015)
  • T.A. Stortz et al.

    Heat resistant chocolate

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2011)
  • S. van Boxstael et al.

    Understanding and attitude regarding the shelf life labels and dates on pre-packed food products by Belgian consumers

    Food Control

    (2014)
  • A.J. van der Goot et al.

    Concepts for further sustainable production of foods

    J. Food Eng.

    (2016)
  • M. Vanderroost et al.

    Intelligent food packaging: the next generation

    Trends Food Sci. Technol.

    (2014)
  • J.B. Adams et al.

    Discoloration in raw and processed fruits and vegetables

    Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.

    (2007)
  • B. Adenso-Díaz et al.

    Food industry waste management

  • E.O. Afoakwa

    Industrial chocolate manufacture – process and factors influencing quality

  • M.S. Aghdam et al.

    Postharvest heat treatment for mitigation of chilling injury in fruits and vegetables

    Food Bioprocess. Technol.

    (2014)
  • G. Aiello et al.

    Economic benefits from food recovery at the retail stage: an application to Italian food chains

    Waste Manage.

    (2014)
  • E.L. Almeida et al.

    Par-baked bread technology: formulation and process studies to improve quality

    Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.

    (2016)
  • S. Anand et al.

    Whey and whey products

  • I.S. Arvanitoyannis et al.

    Vegetable waste treatment: comparison and critical presentation of methodologies

    Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.

    (2008)
  • J. Aschemann-Witzel et al.

    Consumer-related food waste: causes and potential for action

    Sustainability

    (2015)
  • R.N. Barbagallo et al.

    Enzymatic browning and softening in vegetable crops: studies and experiences

    Ital. J. Food Sci.

    (2009)
  • B. Böhme et al.

    Effect of alcohol in starch-thickened fillings on the storage stability of dark chocolate pralines

    J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.

    (2012)
  • J. Brockgreitens et al.

    Responsive food packaging: recent progress and technological prospects

    Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety

    (2016)
  • R.S. Chavan et al.

    Sourdough technology – a traditional way for wholesome foods: a review

    Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety

    (2011)
  • V. Cheynier

    Phenolic compounds: from plants to foods

    Phytochem. Rev.

    (2012)
  • M. Corniani

    Push and pull policy in market-driven management

    Symphonya: Emerg Iss. Manage.

    (2008)
  • A.R. de Jong et al.

    Active and intelligent packaging for food: is it the future?

    Food Addit. Contam.

    (2005)
  • M.C. do Nascimento Nunes et al.

    Improvement in fresh fruit and vegetable logistics quality: berry logistics field studies

    Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. A

    (2014)
  • R. Dobrucka et al.

    Active and intelligent packaging food – research and development – a review

    Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci.

    (2014)
  • P.R. Ehrlich et al.

    Food security requires a new revolution

    Int. J. Environ. Stud.

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text