Elsevier

Ultramicroscopy

Volume 151, April 2015, Pages 62-67
Ultramicroscopy

A nonlinear filtering algorithm for denoising HR(S)TEM micrographs

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2014.11.012Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A nonlinear filtering algorithm for denoising HR(S)TEM images is developed.

  • It can simultaneously handle both periodic and non-periodic features properly.

  • It is particularly suitable for quantitative electron microscopy.

  • It is of great interest for beam sensitive samples, in situ analyses, and atomic resolution EFTEM.

Abstract

Noise reduction of micrographs is often an essential task in high resolution (scanning) transmission electron microscopy (HR(S)TEM) either for a higher visual quality or for a more accurate quantification. Since HR(S)TEM studies are often aimed at resolving periodic atomistic columns and their non-periodic deviation at defects, it is important to develop a noise reduction algorithm that can simultaneously handle both periodic and non-periodic features properly. In this work, a nonlinear filtering algorithm is developed based on widely used techniques of low-pass filter and Wiener filter, which can efficiently reduce noise without noticeable artifacts even in HR(S)TEM micrographs with contrast of variation of background and defects. The developed nonlinear filtering algorithm is particularly suitable for quantitative electron microscopy, and is also of great interest for beam sensitive samples, in situ analyses, and atomic resolution EFTEM.

Introduction

Aberration-corrected high resolution (scanning) transmission electron microscopy (HR(S)TEM) enables quantitatively imaging atomic structures of condensed matters at sub-angstrom resolution [1], [2]. Nowadays, electron microscopes are widely equipped with CCD cameras. HR(S)TEM micrographs recorded from a CCD camera tend to be degraded by noise. A low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) often makes the accurate quantification difficult. The SNR can be improved by either increasing the signal intensity or decreasing the noise level. When it is possible, the increase of signal intensity is of higher priority than the decrease of noise level in achieving high SNR. However, for the majority of beam sensitive samples or in situ analyses, the increase of signal intensity may not be practical. Under these circumstances, any improvement of the SNR through noise reduction by filtering is incredibly valuable.

There are several important sources of noise in a micrograph [3]: (i) quantum noise (shot-noise) of electron beam; (ii) dark current noise from thermally generated electrons; (iii) the so-called Fano noise from electron–photon and photon–electron conversions; (iv) read-out noise from electronic devices to read the image from a CCD. The Poisson statistics would apply for the first three sources of noise, whereas Gaussian for the read-out noise. The dark current noise and the read-out noise are independent of beam intensity. The Fano noise is empirically described as a function of photon energy, while the shot noise is proportional to the square root of the number of recorded electrons per pixel.

At low to moderate electron dose, the shot-noise tends to dominate the noise in electron micrographs because of its dependence on the beam intensity. For more than 10 electrons detected, the Poisson distributed shot-noise appears to approach a Gaussian distribution with its standard deviation proportional to the square root of the number of detected electrons in each pixel. Therefore it usually is valid to assume an experimental electron micrograph (Iexp) as a certain theoretically predicted image (Ith) from a specific model plus uncorrelated additive Poisson or Gaussian (Inoise, σ2=Ith) noise for simplification, so thatIexp=Ith+InoiseNoise reduction can be considered as an inverse process to obtain an estimated theoretical micrograph (Iest) by applying a filter to the Iexp:Iest=IexpFThe noise reduction algorithms in general can be categorized into spatial and temporal filtering [4]. Frequently used spatial filters for denoising HR(S)TEM images include Bragg filter [5], Wiener filter [6], [7], [8], [9], and Gaussian filter [10], [11]. Whereas the simplest method of temporal filtering is frame averaging [4]. Registration of frames to one another is often essential before frame averaging to account for drift of the sample between frames. Both rigid [12] and non-rigid [13], [14] registration methods have been reported for frame averaging to obtain high SNR images.

Because HR(S)TEM studies are often aimed at resolving periodic atomistic columns and their non-periodic deviation at defect areas, it is important to develop a noise reduction algorithm that can simultaneously handle both periodic and non-periodic features properly. It is possible, often justified, to find out how complete the noise is removed and how well the periodic and non-periodic atomistic information is preserved by inspecting the difference (Idiff) between the recorded Iexp and the denoised Iest images:Idiff=IexpIestThe Idiff actually is estimated noise. In this work, simulated instead of experimental images were used as the first testing ground in order to justify the performance of filters by exactly knowing the true signal, Ith, so that an error image (Ierr) can be obtained:Ierr=IthIest

Section snippets

Tests of Gaussian and Wiener filters

A super cell of MgO with terrace and an edge dislocation with Burgers vector of a/2 11¯0 was constructed (Fig. 1a). A HRTEM image of the super cell with size of 512 ×512 pixels (0.01 nm/pixel) was simulated using the optimized FEI Titan 80–300 parameters at 300 kV under a negative spherical aberration (Cs) imaging (NCSI) condition (Fig. 1b), which is considered to be Ith. The maximum intensity of the noise-free image was normalized to 100. Poisson noise was included so that at each pixel the

Nonlinear filtering algorithm

Reduction of peak attenuation of 1D spectra has been reported by adding low-pass filtered residuals to the original low-pass filter output [17]. The nonlinear filtering algorithm described in this paper is by adding residuals of Wiener filtering (Fw) to the output of low-pass filtering (Flp), or vice versa through an iterative process.

Fig. 3 shows the flowchart of the nonlinear filtering algorithm. At each iteration, the output is used as input for the next iteration. The mathematic form of the

Simulated images

Tests were made to investigate the performance of the nonlinear filter in noise reduction and quantification of the simulated HR(S)TEM micrographs. Fig. 4a shows the nonlinear filtered image of the testing HRTEM image of the MgO super cell (Fig. 1c). No noticeable peak attenuation and artifacts are seen in the error image (Fig. 4b). For comparison, Fig. 4c shows the details at the dislocation core from the Poisson noise included (S+N), noise-free (S), nonlinear (NL), Wiener (W), and Gaussian

Conclusions

A nonlinear filtering algorithm has been developed by iteratively adding Wiener filtered residuals to the low-pass filtered output or vice versa. The developed nonlinear algorithm overcomes peak intensity attenuation and artifacts of low-pass and Wiener filters so that it can simultaneously handle both periodic and non-periodic features properly. Moreover, the present results have shown that both peak position and intensity can be more accurately determined by the nonlinear filtering, which

Acknowledgments

The author greatly appreciates C.L. Jia for fruitful discussion and L. Houben for help in the EFTEM imaging with the PICO microscope. The author also thanks the reviewers for their extremely valuable comments and suggestions. Financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 917) is kindly acknowledged.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (52)

  • Three-dimensional stacked filter: A non-linear filter for series images obtained using a transmission electron microscope

    2022, Ultramicroscopy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Among these, shot and dark current noises can be described using Poisson statistics, whereas Fano noise is empirically smaller than a Poisson distribution noise, as a function of photon energy. For higher doses, Fano noise approaches a Gaussian distribution for higher dose and the read-out noise is often directly depicted using Gaussian statistics [8,9]. With the development in cameras [10], noise has been reduced; however, the incident electron beams’ Poisson noise may become dominant on the image.

  • Anisotropic point defects in rhenium diselenide monolayers

    2021, iScience
    Citation Excerpt :

    Images used for point defects statistics were processed by removing the effect of the probe tail to more accurately identify the intensity on each atom position(Krivanek et al., 2010). Each frame of the time-sequence video was filtered using a nonlinear filter to increasing the signal to noise ratio(Du, 2015). The 4D-STEM experiments were performed on the same microscope with the same settings.

View all citing articles on Scopus

It is a great pleasure to dedicate this paper to Prof. Harald Rose in celebration of his 80th birthday.

View full text