The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120296Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Triple helix theoretical framework explains the effect of collaborating with different agents on business innovation.

  • R&D cooperation increases the likelihood of business innovation.

  • Synergic effect between the agents of the triple helix approach (industry, university, government) is confirmed.

  • The greater the number of helices involved in innovation, the greater the likelihood of business innovation.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to describe and analyse the possible synergic effect of the cooperation of Triple Helix agents, university, industry and government, on business innovation. We use data available in the PITEC database (Technological Innovation Panel), taking a sample comprising 11,769 Spanish firms from different sectors for the 2007–2016 period. The binomial logistic model used reveals that the cooperation of firms with any Triple Helix agent increases the likelihood of innovation regardless of the type (product innovation, process innovation or a combination thereof). It also concludes that the greater the number of Triple Helix model agents who cooperate, the greater the chances of business innovation, confirming the synergic effect between different agents.

Introduction

Innovation has been recognised as a key driver of economic development (González-Pernía et al., 2015). This argument is not new. Almost a century ago, Schumpeter described the positive impact that the discontinuous emergence of new combinations (innovations) had on economic development (Schumpeter 1934). Consequently, there is a global consensus that innovation, together with science and technology, plays a central role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015 (Walsh et al., 2020). As a result, innovation has become increasingly important over the last few decades (Badillo et al., 2017).

Today, a firm's ability to innovate determines its chances to gain sustainable competitive advantage; knowledge has become a key strategic asset for firms, more than any other resource (Grant 2002; Grant 2013). However, most firms lack the necessary means to innovate. For this reason, it is increasingly common for firms to resort to collaborative R&D strategies with other agents, with the ultimate goal of accessing a broader base of resources and knowledge while diversifying (Meoli et al., 2013).

Collaboration is a crucial factor in innovation, making it both faster and easier (Triguero et al., 2018). Therefore, the UN 2030 Agenda document highlights the importance of articulating mechanisms that facilitate cooperation to foster knowledge sharing and access to innovation, this being a crucial issue for the achievement of the SDGs (Walsh et al., 2020). Collaboration in R&D provides the necessary organisational tools to transfer and develop new knowledge among partners, as well as an incentive to overcome the difficulties posed by possible spillover effects (Husted and Michailova 2010; Un and Rodríguez 2018). Firms can thus make use of the transfer of external and internal knowledge and technology to acquire the resources and capabilities that they need, ultimately increasing their ability to innovate (Belderbos et al., 2004; Nieto and Santamaría 2007; Mudambi et al., 2007; Hannigan et al., 2015).

There is a large number of academic studies about collaboration in R&D and business innovation, focusing either on relations with certain partners (customers, suppliers, competitors, universities, etc.) (Takeishi 2002; Wu 2012; Ritala and Hurmelinna-Laukkanen 2013; Fidel et al., 2015; Guimón and Salazar-Elena 2015), or a given set of them (Tether 2002; Nieto and Santamaría 2007; Un et al., 2010; Un and Asakawa 2015; González-Pernía et al., 2015; Badillo et al., 2017; Un and Rodríguez 2018). Still, authors such as Zhang et al. (2019) invite to contribute to the theoretical literature with studies that investigate the effects of innovation collaboration for the parties involved.

Previous studies have adopted different theoretical approaches, but none of them have examined the issue from the Triple Helix perspective and considering the synergic effect on business innovation. The Triple Helix approach, which forms part of considerable literature on innovation systems, identifies certain agents whose interaction is of key importance for promoting innovation: universities-industry-government (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1995; Linton 2018).

The objective of this study is to describe and analyze the possible synergic effect of the cooperation of Triple Helix agents, university, industry and government, on business innovation. Use is made of the data available in the PITEC (Panel de Innovación Tecnológica) database, taking a sample of 11,769 Spanish firms from different sectors for the 2007–2016 period, with a total of 94,347 observations. The main contribution of this study to the literature about the benefits of cooperation for innovation lies precisely in this new theoretical approach, besides providing empirical evidence for the Spanish case.

The paper is organised as follows. The following section presents the Triple Helix theoretical model and explains how it can be used to describe the synergic effect of its main agents’ cooperation in R&D on business innovation. The third section describes the methodology used in the study. This is followed by the results of this analysis. Finally, the results and the study's most important conclusions and implications are discussed.

Section snippets

The triple helix model, business innovation and cooperation

The Triple Helix model was proposed by Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff in 1995 in order to explain innovation as the result of collaborative creative processes involving three main agents: universities, industry and governments (Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1995; 2000; Leydesdorff and Etzkowitz 1996; Etzkowitz 1998). According to this model, the interrelations between these three agents create a climate favourable to the generation of synergies, innovation in the knowledge economy (

Sample

This study uses the Panel de Innovación Tecnológica (PITEC) unbalanced database published by Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) and Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT). The data was collected in the course of two nationwide surveys: ‘Encuesta sobre Innovación Tecnológica en las Empresas’ and ‘Estadística sobre actividades I + D’. The database adopts the theoretical framework established by the European ‘Community Innovation Survey’ (CIS) and the innovation

Results

Table 2 shows the relationship between type of innovation and business cooperation, considering the number of Triple Helix agents involved in cooperation. A positive association is seen between the number of firms that cooperate and innovation. Regarding firms that cooperate, 73.4% innovate in products (versus 32.4% of the firms that do not cooperate), 69.5% innovate in processes (versus 35.4% of the firms that do not cooperate) and 54.3% innovate in both products and processes (versus 19.6% of

Discussion, conclusions and implications

This study represents a contribution to our understanding of the effect of R&D cooperation on business innovation (in products, processes or a combination thereof), providing new evidence from the perspective of the Triple Helix approach.

After analysing a sample of Spanish firms from the PITEC database, through binomial logistic regression, the results confirm the positive effect of cooperation on business innovation; Triple Helix agents have been considered both individually and in various

Sample credit author statement

Alejandro Hernández-Trasobares: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing original draft, writing-reviewing and editing, funding acquisition.

Josefina L. Murillo-Luna: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, investigation, resources, writing original draft, writing-reviewing and editing, funding acquisition.

Declaration of Competing Interest

None.

Funding sources

This work was supported by the Government of Aragón (Group Reference CREVALOR: S42_17R) and co-financed with FEDER 2014–2020 “Construyendo Europa desde Aragón”. In addition, we acknowledge financial support from research projects ECO2016-77,843-P / ECO2017-86,305-C4-3-R, funded by MINECO, Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad.

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely grateful to the comments received from anonymous referees. Also, the authors would like to thank to the Spanish Institute of Statistics (INE) and Spain's Science and Technology Foundation (FECYT), for providing the data used.

Alejandro Hernández-Trasobares has a PhD in Economics and Business Administration and is an associate professor in the Department of Business Management and Organization of the University of Zaragoza (Spain). He teaches at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Work. His-research focuses in the areas of management, family business, innovation and high growth firms. He has published in national and international journals and he has participated as a speaker in national and international conferences.

References (108)

  • H. Etzkowitz et al.

    The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations

    Res. Policy

    (2000)
  • P. Fidel et al.

    Collaborating to innovate: effects on customer knowledge management and performance

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2015)
  • R. Fontana et al.

    Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: the importance of searching, screening and signalling

    Res. Policy

    (2006)
  • A. García-Pozo et al.

    Innovation, environment, and productivity in the Spanish service sector: an implementation of a CDM structural model

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • B. Godin et al.

    The place of universities in the system of knowledge production

    Res. Policy

    (2000)
  • J. Hagedoorn et al.

    Research partnerships

    Res. Policy

    (2000)
  • K. Husted et al.

    Dual allegiance and knowledge sharing in inter-firm R&D collaborations

    Org. Dyn.

    (2010)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    The effect of the triple helix system and habitat on regional entrepreneurship: empirical evidence from the US

    Res. Policy

    (2012)
  • L. Leydesdorff et al.

    Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics

    Res. Policy

    (2006)
  • A. Marzucchi et al.

    Forms of knowledge and eco-innovation modes: evidence from Spanish Manufacturing firms

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2017)
  • L. Miotti et al.

    Cooperative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis

    Res. Policy

    (2003)
  • S. Monjon et al.

    Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data

    Int. J. Ind. Org.

    (2003)
  • M.J. Nieto et al.

    The importance of diverse collaborative networks for the novelty of product innovation

    Technovation

    (2007)
  • H.W. Park et al.

    Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: the role of programmatic incentives

    Res. Policy

    (2010)
  • C. Plewa et al.

    The evolution of university–industry linkages—A framework

    J. Eng. Technol. Manag.

    (2013)
  • C. Quintana-García et al.

    Cooperation, competition, and innovative capability: a panel data of European dedicated biotechnology firms

    Technovation

    (2004)
  • B.S. Tether

    Who co-operate for innovations, and why: an empirical analysis

    Res. Policy

    (2002)
  • A. Trigo et al.

    Scope and patterns of innovation cooperation in Spanish service enterprises

    Res. Policy

    (2012)
  • A. Triguero et al.

    Inbound open innovative strategies and eco-innovation in the Spanish food and beverage industry

    Sustain. Prod. Consump.

    (2018)
  • K.H. Tsai

    Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: toward a contingency perspective

    Res. Policy

    (2009)
  • S. Alarcón et al.

    The public funding of innovation in agri-food businesses

    Span. J. Agric. Res.

    (2018)
  • A. Altuzarra

    Public funding for innovation at different levels of government: an analysis of Spanish manufacturing

    Eur. J. Econ., Financ. Admin. Sci.

    (2010)
  • C. Annique et al.

    Local and global knowledge complementarity: R&D collaborations and innovation of foreign and domestic firms

    J. Int. Manag.

    (2018)
  • H.I. Ansoff

    Corporate strategy: Business Policy for Growth and Expansion

    (1965)
  • D.B. Audretsch

    From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society

    J. Technol. Transf.

    (2014)
  • E.R. Badillo et al.

    Cooperation in R&D, firm size and type of partnership: evidence for the Spanish automotive industry

    Eur. J. Manag. Bus. Econ.

    (2017)
  • E.R. Badillo et al.

    What drives the choice of the type of partner in R&D cooperation? Evidence for Spanish manufactures and services

    Appl. Econ.

    (2016)
  • R. Belderbos et al.

    Complementarity in R&D cooperation strategies

    Rev. Ind. Org.

    (2006)
  • M. Bengtsson et al.

    Cooperation and competition in relationships between competitors in business networks

    J. Bus. Ind. Mark.

    (1999)
  • S. Breznitz et al.

    The engaged university

    J. Technol. Transf.

    (2013)
  • M. Callejón et al.

    La cooperación pública-privada en la innovación a través de los centros tecnológicos

    Econ. Ind.

    (2008)
  • E.G. Carayannis et al.

    The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation

    J. Innov. Entrepre.

    (2012)
  • E.G. Carayannis et al.

    'Mode 3′ and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem

    Int. J. Technol. Manag.

    (2009)
  • S. Choi et al.

    The triple helix and international collaboration in science

    J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.

    (2015)
  • J.P. De Jong et al.

    Determinants of product innovation in small firms: a comparison across industries

    Int. Small Bus. J.

    (2006)
  • L. Dooley et al.

    University-industry collaboration. Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures

    Eur. J. Innov. Manag.

    (2007)
  • H. Etzkowitz

    Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of university-industry-government relations

    Soc. Sci. Inf.

    (2003)
  • H. Etzkowitz

    The Triple helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action

    (2008)
  • H. Etzkowitz et al.

    The Triple Helix-University-industry-government relations: a laboratory for knowledge based economic development

    EASST Rev.

    (1995)
  • A. Fernández-Ribas

    Public support to private innovation in multi-level governance systems: an empirical investigation

    Sci. Public Policy

    (2009)
  • Cited by (41)

    • Cooperation with the Triple Helix and corporate environmental innovation

      2023, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this study, from a methodological point of view, the size of the sample of firms considered, as well as the long time period, allow the use of more complex econometric techniques (Gkoumas and Christou, 2020; Rauter et al., 2019; Janahi et al., 2022). With respect to Hernández-Trasobares and Murillo-Luna's study (2020), in this paper not only has environmental innovation been considered as a key variable, but also a larger database has been used and robustness tests have been provided, which corroborate to a greater extent the results obtained. The results obtained have interesting implications.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Alejandro Hernández-Trasobares has a PhD in Economics and Business Administration and is an associate professor in the Department of Business Management and Organization of the University of Zaragoza (Spain). He teaches at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Work. His-research focuses in the areas of management, family business, innovation and high growth firms. He has published in national and international journals and he has participated as a speaker in national and international conferences.

    Josefina L. Murillo-Luna has a PhD in Economics and Business Administration and is an associate professor in the Department of Business Management and Organization of the University of Zaragoza (Spain). She teaches at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Work. The main research areas in which she works are related to the strategic environmental behavior of companies, corporate social responsibility and social entrepreneurship. She has published in national and international journals and he has participated as a speaker in national and international conferences.

    Corresponding author.

    View full text