Elsevier

Surface and Coatings Technology

Volume 235, 25 November 2013, Pages 97-107
Surface and Coatings Technology

Humidity resistant MoS2 coatings deposited by unbalanced magnetron sputtering

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.07.019Get rights and content

Highlights

  • MoS2 coatings applicable for varying environmental conditions were developed.

  • Effects of deposition conditions on film properties were examined using DoE.

  • High amounts of residual stress inside the coatings result in high wear resistance.

  • The amount of residual stress can be controlled in a targeted manner.

  • Best performing coatings show a (002)-oriented nanocrystalline structure.

Abstract

MoS2 is a suitable solid lubricant for environments free of oxygen or water vapor (i.e. vacuum). Humid air degrades film properties due to oxidation accompanied by high wear and increasing coefficients of friction. The present study aims at the further development of sputtered pure MoS2 coatings, extending their applicability to varying environmental conditions by increasing the resistance against humidity. The systematic coating development process is supported by using an experimental Box–Behnken design with variations of the deposition parameters cathode voltage, target/substrate distance, temperature and argon gas pressure. In contrast to common one-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) studies, this approach enables a determination of interactions between deposition process parameters and tribological–mechanical MoS2 film properties. The tribological improvement focuses on a maximization of wear resistance in air and vacuum measured in ball-on-disk experiments. The evaluated mechanical properties are hardness, elastic modulus and residual stresses. These stresses were determined by the substrate curvature method. The study reveals that the residual stress state in the films and the hardness-to-modulus ratio are crucial for their tribological performance in humid air and vacuum environments. After a detailed determination of the relationships between deposition conditions and film properties, some selected microstructural analyses are presented which show that a substantially basal orientation of the lattice has positive effects on wear but also causes anisotropic film properties which result in fissile fracture of the coating if strong shock or point loads occur.

Introduction

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) is known to be a well-established solid lubricant for vacuum applications. MoS2-films are therefore used in a variety of mechanisms of space technology. The prerequisites for the selection of MoS2 as a common lubricant in space were successful field tests in early space travel. A notable early example was its use on the extendible legs of the Apollo Lunar Module in 1969 [1]. Its excellent lubrication properties result from a layered lattice structure with easy shear in the basal plane direction [2]. The advantages over other solid lubricants such as PTFE or graphite are its high stability in high temperature, cryogenic temperature and vacuum environments, as well as a low coefficient of friction (COF) under space conditions and at high loads [3]. On the other hand, it is commonly known that the tribological properties of MoS2 are very sensitive to moisture. The reaction of MoS2 and H2O to MoO3 and H2S (gaseous) causes a higher coefficient of friction because of increasing shear strength of MoO3 [1], [4]. This effect particularly leads to increased wear and thus to a reduced lifetime of coated components.

Generally, many moving mechanical assemblies and tribological components must perform well in extreme space environments, as well as on earth, where they will be assembled and tested to guarantee correct and reliable operation [5]. In this case, lubricants additionally have to deal with humid air. In consequence, the creation of application-oriented test conditions cannot be achieved easily. Moreover, the mechanical stresses during these tests result in a more intense oxidation which degrades film properties. Further challenges are docking operations in human space travel, which are safety-critical and thus need increased attention. These interlocking mechanisms have to work not only in vacuum (UHV-conditions in space) but also in very moist air from inside the spaceship when the lock is open. The performance of currently existing or validated solid lubricants is limited concerning their suitability for varying environmental conditions and most of them do not meet these requirements [6].

Since the 1960s, sputtered MoS2 films have been under continuous improvement [7], [8]. Some important influences of manufacturing and application as well as their limitations are known [9], [10], [11], [12]. However, despite the most recent improvements, sensitivity to moisture is still an issue. For example, the humidity in the assembly hall of the WENDELSTEIN 7-X nuclear fusion reactor has to be controlled at below 50% RH. One reason for this expensive approach is to protect the MoS2 coatings of the support elements for superconducting coils from oxidation [13].

From the literature, some methods are known to reduce the moisture sensitivity of sputtered MoS2 coatings. Dopants like Ti, Cr, C, Al, Au and TiN [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] ensure increased wear resistance in air due to an increase in hardness on the one hand and an oxygen gettering effect during the co-deposition and wear process on the other hand [22], [23], [24]. These additions have the effect of interrupting the MoS2 crystal growth, causing a smaller grain size and enhancing disorder inside the coating [25].

There are also other possible ways to reduce the moisture sensitivity of pure MoS2 coatings. Dense microstructures with less porosity ensure a smaller surface that is exposed to oxidation because common columnar coatings show a space of about 100 Å between the crystallites [2], [13], [26]. A formation of a (002)-oriented structure with the crystal's basal plane parallel to the substrate surface additionally slows oxidation of the coating because closed sulfur layers on the surface create barriers, whereas oxygen in random-oriented films can react with molybdenum preferentially at the crystallite edges or defects rather than on the flat faces of the lamellae [1], [23]. Therefore, oxidation occurs to a depth of at least 10 nm in random-oriented films, but only to a depth of 1 nm for basal-oriented ones after storage in humid environments [27].

The current study is focused on developing sputtered pure MoS2 coatings in order to extend their outstanding tribological properties in dry and inert media to humid and oxidizing environments (with attention focused on wear). By making use of design of experiments (DoE) a determination of interactions between deposition process parameters and tribological and mechanical MoS2 film properties is possible. The statistical evaluation includes a description of the complex relationship between deposition parameters and residual stress of the generated films.

Section snippets

Deposition process and specimens

Powerful tools for the description of the relationship between process parameters and film properties are statistical experimental designs. Herein preliminary studies serve as a basis for the creation of the design, determining the process window and significant influencing parameters [28]. In the current study, a design after Box–Behnken was chosen, given the demand for analyzing quadratic relationships and the lowest possible number of necessary experiments. This design additionally shows no

Relationships between tribological and mechanical film properties

All measured values with their standard deviations and the associated deposition parameters of the 27 samples are recorded in Table 2. Samples 25, 26 and 27 (central point of the design space) were cleaned and coated separately from each other but the coating recipe remained constant. Comparisons of measured tribological and mechanical values of these samples indicate a precise repeatability (Table 2).

A comparison of wear rates in air and vacuum is shown in Fig. 2. The wear rates in air vary

Conclusions

The study makes a contribution to the further development of MoS2 coatings by increasing wear resistance in air and vacuum to extend their applicability to varying environmental conditions. The investigations additionally point out important relationships between deposition conditions and coating properties. Due to the variations of deposition conditions (according to Box–Behnken), 25 different coating types were achieved. The tribological performance in air and vacuum as well as mechanical

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as a part of the project Tribological Optimization of Molybdenum Disulfide PVD-Coatings for Varying Environmental Conditions (GR 1002/8-1, ME 1029/17-1, SZ 258/1-1). The authors also wish to thank Prof. Dr. Rainer Hock (Crystallography and Structural Physics, FAU Erlangen–Nürnberg) for the XRD analysis and his contributions to this work.

References (54)

  • J.K. Lancaster

    Tribol. Int.

    (1990)
  • J.L. Grosseau-Poussard

    Thin Solid Films

    (1997)
  • M.R. Hilton et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1992)
  • G. Theiler et al.

    Wear

    (2013)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2002)
  • G. Weise et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1997)
  • J. Wang et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2001)
  • R.I. Christy et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1979)
  • F. Koch et al.

    Fusion Eng. Des.

    (2007)
  • X. Ding et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2010)
  • N.M. Renevier et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2000)
  • M.C. Simmonds et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2000)
  • M. Steinmann et al.

    Tribol. Int.

    (2004)
  • M. Fenker et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2006)
  • J.J. Nainaparampil et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2004)
  • J.D. Holbery et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2003)
  • R. Goller et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1999)
  • N.M. Renevier et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2000)
  • P.D. Fleischauer et al.

    Tribol. Int.

    (1999)
  • T. Spalvins

    Thin Solid Films

    (1984)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2001)
  • C. Müller et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1988)
  • P.D. Fleischauer

    Thin Solid Films

    (1987)
  • K. Holmberg et al.

    Wear

    (2009)
  • A. Leyland et al.

    Wear

    (2000)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Mater. Sci. Eng., A

    (2006)
  • J.A. Thornton et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1989)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Structural reorientation and compaction of porous MoS<inf>2</inf> coatings during wear testing

      2022, Wear
      Citation Excerpt :

      Large-scale MoS2 coatings therefore generally show some degree of porosity. These porous coatings were sometimes reported to undergo local compaction associated to a certain extent of crystallographic reorientation under tribological loading [13,22–24]. This gives some hope that these coatings can provide satisfactory lubrication following running-in.

    • Evaluation of DLC, MoS<inf>2</inf>, and Ti<inf>3</inf>C<inf>2</inf>T<inf>x</inf> thin films for triboelectric nanogenerators

      2022, Nano Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      This might be related to the microstructure of sputter-deposited MoS2 films compared to single-crystal MoS2. Depending on the coating process parameters, sputter-deposition may yield three types of microstructures: (i) a basal texture, for which the basal planes of the hexagonal 2 H-MoS2 [60] lattice are oriented parallel to the substrate, which we believe to provide preferable electrical properties in terms of TENGs, but is seldomly found [61]. ( ii) A randomly oriented, nanocrystalline microstructure [62] or (iii) a prismatic texture associated to the growth of individual MoS2 sheets in the vertical direction (dendritic growth), which includes interdendritic voids [62].

    • Improving the tribological and anti-corrosion property of the WS<inf>2</inf> film through Ta doping

      2021, Vacuum
      Citation Excerpt :

      It has been demonstrated that the pure MoS2 film with basal plane orientation (002) parallel to substrate showed better tribological performance and oxidation resistance compared these with other orientations or random-oriented ones by controlling the deposition parameters [7,8]. Unfortunately, only in very few cases this orientation can be obtained, while most of deposition processes result in a random orientation [9,10]. Additionally, the tribological properties of (002) orientated films are presently worse than expectations due to the delamination at the film-substrate interface as well as their porous and loose structure [11,12].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text