Comparative study of wear-resistant DLC and fullerene-like CNx coatings produced by pulsed laser and filtered cathodic arc depositions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.06.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Unhydrogenated amorphous diamond-like carbon (DLC) and fullerene-like carbon nitride (CNx, N/C ratio ∼0.2) are rival surface protection coatings with exceptional mechanical and tribological properties. A comparative study was made on their performance under sliding wear. Identical surface preparation procedures, coating architectures, thickness, and substrates were used to facilitate the comparison. Coatings were produced using pulsed laser deposition (PLD) and filtered cathodic arc deposition (FCAD). Samples of laser-DLC, laser-CNx, arc-DLC, and arc-CNx coatings were prepared and an extensive comparison of properties was completed: composition, structure, hardness, elastic modulus, stress, friction, and wear. The tribological properties were determined using steel and SiC balls in humid and dry environments. The comparison indicated that PLD and FCAD produce coatings with very similar compositions, structures, and properties. Independent of the growth technique, DLC coatings had hardnesses of 52–57 GPa and elastic moduli in the range of 490–560 GPa. The CNx coatings offered a reasonably high hardness of 28–30 GPa, while their elastic modulus was as low as 160 GPa. There was a clear difference in the tribological behavior of DLC and CNx, which depends on humidity. In humid air, DLC coatings had a coefficient of friction (c.o.f.) of 0.1, a very low wear rate, and formed a graphitic transfer film in friction contact. In the same tests, CNx coatings had a c.o.f. of 0.3–0.4, a higher wear rate, and did not form a transfer film. In this environment, the wear tracks on CNx coatings were polished by abrasive wear. In dry nitrogen, DLC coatings had a c.o.f. of approximately 0.15 and a higher wear rate, while CNx coatings had a c.o.f. of 0.03–0.04 and a lower wear rate with formation of a graphitic-like transfer film. The observed difference in mechanical response and tribological performance can be used to optimize the selection between DLC and CNx coatings, depending on application requirements.

Introduction

Diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings provide exceptional mechanical properties and tribological performance as highlighted in recent reviews [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. These reports indicate a strong dependence of DLC properties on the preparation method, hydrogen concentration, and deposition configuration. High-quality unhydrogenated DLC coatings are typically produced by either pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [6], [7] or filtered cathodic arc deposition (FCAD) [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. They have predominantly sp3 interatomic bonding, hardness of 50–60 GPa, elastic modulus of 400–600 GPa, and coefficients of friction (c.o.f.) about 0.05–0.1 in unlubricated sliding against steel under ambient conditions [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The unhydrogenated DLC coatings, however, were less effective at elevated temperatures and/or in high vacuum environments due to the onset of graphitization by sp3sp2 bond relaxation and associated increase in c.o.f. and wear [13], [14], [15], [16].

Recently, another carbon-based material has emerged, providing competition to DLC for wear protection. Amorphous carbon nitride coatings are already replacing DLC for surface protection of hard disk drives. At the same time, fullerene CNx was reported to have a unique resilient behavior, providing hardness and flexibility [17]. This material was originally produced by magnetron sputtering [18] and has about 20 at.% N concentration, predominantly sp2 interatomic bonding, a high degree of graphite plane bending and cross-linking, hardness around 10–20 GPa, elastic modulus of 40–120 GPa, and c.o.f. about 0.3 at ambient conditions [17], [19], [20]. Fullerene-like CNx typically has better thermal stability than DLC, and the degree of stability depends on the preparation temperature and type of nitrogen bonding in the coating [21].

Most recently, PLD was demonstrated to produce fullerene-like CNx coatings by laser ablation of graphite in a nitrogen environment. In comparison to magnetron sputtering, the coatings had less order in the graphitic planes, a considerably higher hardness of 30 GPa, and elastic modulus of about 200 GPa [22], [23]. These mechanical properties are closer to that of unhydrogenated DLC grown by PLD and FCAD. Cathodic arc evaporation of graphite, including FCAD technique, was also reported to produce CNx coatings by either introducing nitrogen to the deposition chamber [24], [25], [26], [27] or using a nitrogen ion beam-assisted FCAD [28].

With these developments, it is important to understand what benefits CNx coatings may offer for friction reduction and wear protection as compared to DLC coatings. The question is somewhat difficult to answer because properties of both DLC and CNx are strongly influenced by the preparation method. Even for the same method, there are property deviations due to different configurations from one deposition system to another. Nevertheless, the existing experience with DLC and CNx applications indicates that these materials behave differently, depending on the operating conditions. For example, it is widely known that DLC provides low friction and reduced wear in humid air and at moderate temperatures (typically below 300 °C). At the same time, CNx recently replaced DLC as an overcoat for some magnetic disk applications because it provides a combination of good wear resistance and active bonding to surface lubricants.

This paper provides direct comparison between DLC and CNx coatings produced by PLD and FCAD in the same deposition system. Coatings produced by PLD are designed as laser-DLC and laser-CNx, and coatings produced by FCAD are designated as arc-DLC and arc-CNx. The cross-comparison of their chemical, mechanical, and tribological properties is used to discuss differences between DLC and CNx coatings independent of the preparation method. Special attention was paid to the differentiation of the tribological responses, depending on the environment and counterpart sliding material.

The paper also investigates the interchangeability of PLD and FCAD in growing both DLC and fullerene-like CNx. Over the years, PLD was shown as a versatile tool in manufacturing tribological materials ranging from single-phase solid lubricants to complex hard and environmently adaptive “chameleon” composites, which self-adjust their surface chemistry and structure to maintain low friction and wear in variable environments [29], [30], [31]. PLD is still awaiting a large-scale engineering coating application, which is becoming closer to reality as the price of laser output energy continues to drop and more efforts are being made for PLD technology scale-up [32], [33], [34]. At the near term, FCAD might be used to duplicate PLD coatings if the techniques would be proven to provide similar quality tribological materials.

Section snippets

Coating deposition

Mirror-polished 440C steel coupons of 25.4-mm diameter were used as tribological substrates and Si<100>wafers were coated for film stress measurements. Substrates were ultrasonically cleaned in an acetone bath and placed in a vacuum chamber, which was evacuated to a base pressure of 4×10−6 Pa. Prior to coating deposition, a 30-min sputter cleaning with a 1 kV glow discharge in 6.7 Pa of Ar was performed. The substrate temperature was set to 100 °C for DLC and 300 °C for CNx growth using

Chemical composition and bonding

XPS analyses of DLC films found only carbon with the C 1s binding energy peak at 284.9 eV for laser-DLC and at 284.8 eV for arc-DLC. Fig. 2a provides Raman spectra of laser-DLC and arc-DLC. Both spectra are similar and correspond to high-quality DLC as evidenced from a single broad peak positioned at about 1560 cm−1. The spectra are best fitted with two Gauss functions (not shown in Fig. 2): one located at 1565 cm−1 (known as the G-peak) and another at 1381 cm−1 (known as the D-peak). The

Conclusions

The composition, structure and tribological and mechanical properties of laser- and arc-DLC and laser- and arc-CNx were very similar. It is clear that PLD and FCAD can be used interchangeably for the growth of DLC and CNx. This opens the door to transition PLD coating developments for commercial applications by material duplication and scale-up using FCAD.

Comparison of DLC and CNx coatings shows that DLC coatings are super hard and stiff, while CNx coatings offer a combination of reasonably

References (56)

  • J. Robertson

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1992)
  • A. Grill

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1997)
  • C. Donnet

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1998)
  • A.A. Voevodin et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1997)
  • A.A. Voevodin et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1996)
  • I.I. Aksenov et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1991)
  • R.L. Boxman et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1996)
  • P.J. Martin et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2001)
  • M. Hakovirta et al.

    Diamond Relat. Mater.

    (1999)
  • H. Takikawa et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2003)
  • I.I. Aksenov et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1991)
  • A.A. Voevodin et al.

    Diamond Relat. Mater.

    (1996)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1999)
  • E. Broitman et al.

    Wear

    (2001)
  • M. Chhowalla et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1996)
  • Z.Y. Chen et al.

    Mater. Lett.

    (1997)
  • W. Precht et al.

    Vacuum

    (1999)
  • Z. Zhou et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2002)
  • C. Spaeth et al.

    Diamond Relat. Mater.

    (1997)
  • A.A. Voevodin et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (2000)
  • R. Dietsch et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Lackner et al.

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2003)
  • A.A. Voevodin et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1997)
  • D.A. Karpov

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1997)
  • A. Anders

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (1999)
  • H. Zaidi et al.

    Thin Solid Films

    (1995)
  • B.K. Yen

    Wear

    (1996)
  • S. Prawer et al.

    Diamond Relat. Mater.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (51)

    • Rolling performance of carbon nitride-coated bearing components in different lubrication regimes

      2017, Tribology International
      Citation Excerpt :

      Here, the coating acts as a solid lubricant, carrying the operational load for the first stages of the rolling until the lubricant film is fully formed [14,15]. Diamond-like carbon (DLC) and carbon nitride (CNx) coatings are good candidates for use in industrial bearing applications, due to their inherently low friction, high wear resistance, chemical inertness, and low cost [16–20]. DLC coatings grown by chemical vapor depositions (CVD) or any processes using high substrate temperatures are excluded, as the bearing steel is sensitive to temperatures above 170 °C.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text