Simulation of accumulation and mineralization (CO2 release) of organic carbon in chernozem under different straw return ways after corn harvesting
Introduction
Chernozem is an important agricultural soil source in Songnen plain which has some problems such as poor organic matter, light texture and bad water retention or fertilizer conservation capacity, etc. (Jilin Soil and Fertilizer Station, 1998). Organic fertilizer application and crop stubble return are the traditional improvement method of chernozem. In recent years, with the continuous decrease of organic fertilizer application, corn stubble and straw has become the dominant technical measures for improving soil fertility. At present, “straw overturning” and “straw surface mulching” are the two important returning methods. For using the different harvesting machineries, “straw overturning” has varied ways. Some harvesting machineries can break corn straw into piece and spread them on the surface of the soil. When farmers plowing the soils, the small pieces of straw will be turn into the soil. Some machines only overwhelmed the straws in the situ. Then, rotary tillage machines will be used to break corn straw and stubble into piece into the soil. Some farmers simply burn straws in order to facilitate sowing. In recent years, corn stubble and straw return have become main technical measures for improving the soil fertilization. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the return of straw or stubble had significant effects on improving soil organic matter content, promoting soil water retention or fertilizer conservation capacity (Dou and Jiang, 1988, Jiang et al., 1988, Zhao, 1996, Sommer et al., 2011, Liu et al., 2014a, Liu et al., 2014b). With the environmental problems becoming more and more important, the reports about effects of the application of organic material on soil carbon emissions have increased day by day (Lal, 2004, Anders et al., 2013, Li et al., 2013). In recent years, “Straw surface mulching” is one of the important protective tillage method introduced into Northeast of China, which has been still in the stage of experimental demonstration. According to our investigation and observation, although the technology has certain protective effect on soil erosion, a large number of CO2 may be released to the atmosphere by directly exposing to the soil surface, aerobic mineralization. On the other hand, the content increase of soil organic matter was not obvious. Different tillage might alter the SOM decomposition environment by aerating the soil, breaking the aggregates, incorporating residue into the plow layer, and therefore, changing soil and crop residue contact. Therefore, there may be the different SOC storage and CO2 emissions between “straw overturning” and “straw surface mulching”. Relatively few studies have been conducted in the China Corn Belt of chernozem region relating SOC storage and CO2 emissions under a range of long-term tillage management. Monitoring CO2 emissions and changes in SOC for different tillage treatments are important to identifying the management practices that maintain soil productivity, increase C storage, and contribute to mitigate the greenhouse effects. Since the 1980s, agricultural researchers in China have carried out a lot of researches about the effect of non-decaying materials like crop straw on soil fertility (Lin et al., 1980, Cheng et al., 1981, Jiang et al., 1988). But these results were all about the mixing of organic materials and soil condition. There were not many comparative researches about the effect of “straw return mixed with soil or ploughing” and “straw return to the surface of soil “on soil fertility and environment. Many theoretical questions still had not been elucidated. This research chose chernozem from Songnen Plain as research object, simulated incubation experiments of corn straw covered and straw mixed with soil, and studied effects of two ways of straw returning on the emission of CO2 and accumulation of organic carbon. From the perspective of increasing organic matter and reducing CO2 emission, the aim of this study is to reveal the different effects of the two straw return ways on agriculture and environment. The result will provide theoretical support for constructing the environment friendly soil fertility and tillage system.
Section snippets
Experimental materials
The experimental soil was chernozem sampled from ploughed layer of corn field of Jianbala Village, Taohaotai Town, Qianguo County Jilin Province (124°40′58.47″ E, 44°54′6.17″ N) in the fall of 2012. The soil, which had been removed macroscopic straw and other organic residues, and dried from the 20th sieve, was reserved for use. For the experimental soil, the content of organic carbon was 11.40 g kg−1. Total nitrogen and total phosphorus were 0.82 g kg−1 and 0.77 g kg−1, respectively. Available
Effects of different ways of straw application on characteristic of CO2 emission of chernozem
After returning the soil, part of organic materials would be mineralized to CO2 with the action of soil microorganisms and discharged from soil surface (Roberto et al., 2013). Statistical data in Fig. 1 and Table 1 had shown the curves of emission rate, process and characteristic of soil CO2 under different amounts of straw addition and methods with the incubating time increasing.
All the curves of emission rate (Fig. 1) of CO2 appeared a CO2 emission peak on the first 4th day or 6th day during
Discussion
In this research, the effects of two straw application ways on the emission rate of CO2, the accumulation emission amount and organic carbon content of soil were quite different. And the “straw mixing” way had better effect on soil fertility and environment than “straw mulching “way. Lots of researches indicated that straw addition into soil would provide energy and nutrients for soil microorganisms and tend to stimulate the activity of soil microorganisms. Finally, a peak of a rapid
Conclusion
All the curves of emission rate of CO2 appeared an emission peak on the 4th day or 6th day during the cultivation. From the 13th day to 52nd day, the process stepped into the first slow emission platform and then stepped into second slow emission platform. This characteristic was more obvious with more amount of straw addition. With the same amount of straw, the peak value of CO2 emission rate of “straw mixing” was apparently greater than that of “straw mulching”, such as, 79.70 mg kg−1 d−1 for 6%
Acknowledgments
This research work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41403077) and Special Grand National Science-Technology Project (2014ZX07201-011).
References (29)
- et al.
Frequent addition of wheat straw residues to soil enhances carbon mineralization rate
Soil Biol. Biochem.
(2009) - et al.
Effect of type and quality of two contrasting plant residues on CO2 emission potential of ultisol soil: implications for indirect influence of temperature and moisture
Catena
(2014) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
Geoderma
(2004)- et al.
Soil CO2 emissions from a cultivated Mollisol Effects of organic amendments, soil temperature, and moisture, soil temperature, and moisture
Eur. J. Soil Biol.
(2013) - et al.
Differential responses of crop yields and soil organic carbon stock to fertilization and rice straw incorporation in three cropping systems in the subtropics
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2014) - et al.
Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2010) - et al.
The effect of soil aggregate size on pore structure and its consequence on emission of greenhouse gases
Soil Tillage Res.
(2013) - et al.
Combined inorganic/organic fertilization enhances N efficiency and increases rice productivity through organic carbon accumulation in a rice paddy from the Tai Lake region, China
Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.
(2009) - et al.
Long-term tillage effects on soil carbon storage and carbon dioxide emissions in continuous corn cropping system from an alfisol in Ohio
Soil Tillage Res.
(2009) - et al.
Microbial mineralization of biochar and wheat straw mixture in soil: a short-term study
Appl. Soil Ecol.
(2011)