Implicit and explicit interethnic attitudes and ethnic discrimination in hiring
Highlights
► We study effects of explicit and implicit interethnic attitudes on discrimination. ► We do so by means of a laboratory experiment. ► Ethnic discrimination in grades is influenced only by explicit attitudes. ► Discrimination in selection is influenced by both explicit and implicit attitudes. ► Positive discrimination in selection is influenced only by explicit attitudes.
Section snippets
Introduction and research problem
A large body of sociological literature has examined prejudiced interethnic attitudes and its causes (Pettigrew and Tropp, 2000, Riek et al., 2006). This emphasis on attitudes is often justified by means of the argument that negative interethnic attitudes and negative intergroup behaviour are closely related. Many studies assume that harbouring negative interethnic attitudes leads to more negative intergroup behaviour. Allport (1954, p. 14), for example, wrote that “It is true that any negative
Explicit interethnic attitudes and discriminatory behaviour
As mentioned above, many sociological studies are based on the assumption that prejudiced interethnic attitudes lead to corresponding discriminatory behaviour. This is, however, a much debated issue and has been so for a long time. There are several publications which have shown that people’s behaviour towards out-group members is not always in accordance with their self-reported interethnic attitudes. A classical study revealing attitude–behaviour inconsistencies is one by LaPiere (1934), a
Data and measurement
The laboratory experiment was conducted amongst 288 students in Utrecht, the Netherlands, in February and March 2010. Of these participants, 203 were university students and 85 attended higher vocational education. Students of whom at least one parent was born in Morocco or Turkey or who were born in these countries themselves (n = 16) were excluded from the analyses. Thus, 272 respondents were included in the analyses.
The study consisted of three elements: (1) a recruitment test, to measure
Results
Before we turn to the effects of explicit and implicit interethnic attitudes on discriminatory behaviour, we will briefly look at the relationships between explicit and implicit interethnic attitudes.
Conclusion
This paper examined the effects of explicit and implicit interethnic attitudes on ethnic discrimination in hiring, by means of a laboratory experiment. We tested the classical hypothesis that interethnic attitudes affect this specific type of interethnic behaviour and improved upon previous research in several ways. First, in contrast to most previous field experiments on ethnic discrimination in the labour market, this study aimed to increase our knowledge about the causes of ethnic
Acknowledgment
The authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their very valuable comments and suggestions.
References (51)
The theory of planned behavior
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(1991)Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behaviour: the MODE model as an integrative framework
- et al.
Are “implicit” attitudes unconscious?
Consciousness and Cognition
(2006) - et al.
Relations among the implicit association test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2001) - et al.
Responses to other-imposed pro-black pressures: acceptance or backlash?
Journal of Experimental Psychology
(2001) Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: real-world evidence
Labour Economics
(2010)- et al.
How strong is the relationship between prejudice and discrimination? A meta-analytic answer
International Journal of Intercultural Relations
(1996) - et al.
Stereotypic explanatory bias: implicit stereotyping as a predictor of discrimination
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2003) The nature of prejudice
(1954)- et al.
Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination
The American Economic Review
(2004)
The effect of education on nationalism and ethnic exclusionism: an international comparison
Political Psychology
Attitudes and action: a field experiment joined to a general population survey
American Sociological Review
Implicit ingroup favouritism, outgroup favouritism, and their behavioral manifestations
Social Justice Research
Naamdiscriminatie bij cv-screening [name discrimination in cv-screening]
Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken
Hiring discrimination against Arab minorities: interactions between prejudice and job characteristics
Human Performance
Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination: another look
Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Lab experiments are a major source of knowledge
Science
Implicit measures in social cognition research: their meaning and use
Annual Review of Psychology
Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Psychological Review
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Understanding and using the implicit association Test: I: an improved scoring algorithm
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Understanding and using the Implicit Assaciotiation Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
A meta-analysis on the correlation between the implicit association test and explicit self-report measures
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Attitudes and the implicit association test
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (36)
What predicts employer discrimination? The role of implicit and explicit racial attitudes
2022, Social Science ResearchCitation Excerpt :Further, given egalitarian norms and an ambiguous selection process, I expect hiring agents to justify their evaluations without invoking race. In this section, I describe limitations of prior studies that have examined the relationship between participants’ implicit and explicit ethnoracial attitudes and their evaluations of jobseekers (Blommaert et al. 2012; Derous et al. 2009; Derous, 2015; Kang et al., 2010; Rooth 2010; Son et al., 2008; Yogeeswaran and Dasgupta 2010; Ziegert and Hanges, 2005). These limitations plausibly account for the inconsistent findings of these studies.
As if it weren't hard enough already: Breaking down hiring discrimination following burnout
2021, Economics and Human BiologyExamining ethno-religious labor market inequalities among women in the Netherlands
2019, Research in Social Stratification and MobilityThe Judgment Bias Task: A flexible method for assessing individual differences in social judgment biases
2018, Journal of Experimental Social PsychologyPeople notice and use an applicant's religion in job suitability evaluations
2016, Social Science JournalCitation Excerpt :We manipulated the applicant's racial group by varying her photo (Black/White) and the demographic section explicitly stated her racial group. Similar studies have used basic demographic information to vary the applicant's ethnicity (e.g., Blommaert et al., 2012). Participants listed three things about Aisha that they used as information when making the judgments about her suitability for the job.
Structured Curriculum Vitae Scoring as a Standardized Tool for Selecting Interview Candidates for Academic Neuroradiology Faculty Positions
2020, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology