Impact of Adaptive Front-lighting Systems (AFS) on road safety: Evidences and open points
Highlights
► Rigorous reflections on AFS influence on road safety and their consequences are really necessary. ► The research on this field has been mainly focused in the bending lights, but not in the new classes. ► A relationship between what these systems are and how they should improve road safety is established.
Introduction
Although only a small part of travels by car are carried out after the sunset, 40% of fatal and serious injuries take place during night-time (Ward et al., 2005). Given that public lighting is mainly limited to urban areas, this figure gives us a significative idea of how deep the impact of accurate vehicle lighting is. Accurate vehicle lighting is not achieved only with levels of illumination according to the visual task of driving, but also with a strict control of glare, which can be even more dangerous than low levels of illumination.
The remarks above remind us that the final objective of vehicle lighting is to see and to be seen. This target has encouraged lighting and car manufacturers to continuously improve and innovate their lighting systems in order to make driving safer.
Hence, among the large amount of advances in vehicle lighting during the last years (Daytime Running Lamps, use of Light Emitting Diodes (LED), Cornering Lamps and many other), there is one that will change our way to understand automotive lighting and even vehicles themselves: the introduction of the Adaptive Front-lighting Systems (AFS).
Although the main target of AFS is easy to understand (adapt headlamp illumination to some given driving conditions), the complexity of these systems requests a precise definition of what an AFS is. In this sense, the regulatory framework in the UNECE countries, that is, those belonging to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and also in Japan, provides rigorous definitions of such systems and the large variety of related concepts.
Within this regulatory framework, commonly known as ECE Regulations, AFS are described in detail in Regulation ECE 123 (2008) and the relevant amendments to Regulation ECE 48 (2008) that came into force after May 2008.
Hence, Regulation ECE 123 defines an Adaptive Front-lighting System (or just “system”) as a lighting device, providing beams with differing characteristics for automatic adaptation to varying conditions of use of the passing beam and, if it applies, the main beam with a minimum functional content, which will be described in the next section. According to this Regulation, such systems consist of the “system control”, one or more “supply and operating devices”, if any, and the “installation units” of the right and of the left side of the vehicle.
The situation in USA and Canada is less complex because the variety of cases and situations is not so exhaustively described as in ECE. The Society of American Engineers (SAE), in Standard SAE J2591 (2008), defines an “Adaptive Forward Lighting System” (note the slight difference in the denominations between ECE Regulations and SAE standards), as a forward lighting system intended to adapt a forward lighting device’s beam pattern to improve driver visibility based on inputs such as vehicle speed, road geometry, and/or environmental conditions. The system is comprised of one or more forward lighting devices and the entirety of components required to control and operate the devices.
Anyhow, this paper is focussed in the impact of AFS in the ECE area, and comparations with the North American regulatory framework will be scarcely mentioned and only with the aim of highlighting some important differences.
The remarks above give us an idea about the complexity of AFS. If we also consider the huge amount of factors taking place in road safety and the fact that most of the research on AFS has been exclusively focussed on the bending light systems (Rumar, 1997, Sivak et al., 2005a, Sivak et al., 2005b, Sullivan and Flannagan, 2006), but not in the “new” AFS classes (E, V W), we find that the impact of these systems on road safety is a rather unexplored field yet.
Section snippets
Theory
In AFS, the passing beam can show quite different light patterns depending on the different road conditions. These ways of work are called “classes”. Such classes will consist on the automatic adaptation (that is, not managed by the driver but for the vehicle itself) of the way to light the road with the target of increasing safety when driving in towns, motorways or under adverse weather conditions.
Thus, there are four classes of passing beam in AFS: C (the classic passing beam), E (specially
Conclusions
In paragraphs above, we have introduced what could be called “AFS Philosophy”, that is, main concepts, brief description and, the most important, how each AFS is expected to contribute to road safety within the ECE regulatory framework.
These concepts clearly break up with the classical idea of headlamp and some extremely important conclusions can be inferred from them:
- (1)
AFS are automatic systems. It means that it is not the vehicle user, but the system who decides how to manage the way to light
References (31)
- et al.
Modeling rear-end collisions including the role of driver’s visibility and light truck vehicles using a nested logit structure
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2004) - et al.
Dependence of reaction times to motion onset on luminance and chromatic contrast
Vision Research
(2001) The effects on accidents of compulsory use of daytime running lights for cars in Norway
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(1993)A meta-analysis of studies concerning the safety effects of daytime running lights on cars
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(1996)- et al.
Effects of daytime running lights on multiple-vehicle daylight crashes in the United States
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(2002) - et al.
The intraocular straylight function in 129 healthy volunteers; dependence on angle, age and pigmentation
Vision Research
(1990) - et al.
Influence of daytime running lamps on visual reaction time of pedestrians when detecting turn indicators
Journal of Safety Research
(2010) - et al.
Optimal strategies for adaptive curve lighting
Journal of Safety Research
(2005) - et al.
Daytime running lights as a vehicle collision countermeasure – the Swedish evidence reconsidered
Accident Analysis and Prevention
(1995) - et al.
An evaluation of the impact of daytime running lights on traffic safety in Canada
Journal of Safety Research
(1997)
The contribution of vehicle lights in urban and peripheral urban environments
Lighting Research and Technology
Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments: Critical Issues in Driver Interactions with Intelligent Transport Systems
Cited by (18)
Insights into analysis and evaluation on the tunnel lighting environment influenced by vehicle headlights
2024, Tunnelling and Underground Space TechnologyDriver glare exposure with different vehicle frontlighting systems
2021, Journal of Safety ResearchCitation Excerpt :However, several authors have described the increased risk of nighttime accidents associated to disability glare caused by vehicle headlights (Babizhayev, 2003; Lachenmayr, Berger, Buser, & Keller, 1998). Notwithstanding the foregoing, vehicle lighting systems have experienced significant advances in recent years and show potential contributions to improve safety performance (Mehler, Reimer, Lavalliere, Dobres, & Coughlin, 2014; Peña-García, Peña, Espín, & Aznar, 2012). The geometry of the highways also plays an important role in the incidence of headlight glare since certain alignment sequences might contribute to glare.
Design optimisation of adaptive head lights
2021, Materials Today: ProceedingsCitation Excerpt :A. Opfermann et al. [2] assessed adaptive lighting systems by using an innovative hardware platform by means of the data obtained from simulations for vehicle dynamics. A. Peña-García et al. [3] presented a new lighting technology, known as AFS or Adaptive Front-Lighting Systems and the consequences of the ECE regulations on this technology. Xiangbing et al. [4] built an LED array in order to resolve problems like excessive cost and lower optical efficiency of the LED- based headlamps available for vehicles.
A review on light-emitting diode based automotive headlamps
2015, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :And regulations for the low beam pattern [26] mostly focus on the maximum intensity, HV point, illumination in four zones, cut-off lines, as shown in Fig. 2. In addition, more beams patterns with adaptation to various conditions, called an adaptive front-lighting system (AFS) [27], are defined in Regulations ECE 123 and 48. Most of the optical regulations for the LED headlamp are derived from the traditional headlamps.
Development of adaptive headlight system for automobile
2023, AIP Conference Proceedings