Elsevier

The Spine Journal

Volume 19, Issue 8, August 2019, Pages 1354-1361
The Spine Journal

Clinical Study
A retrospective cohort analysis of the effects of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on spinal fusion in ACDF patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.04.017Get rights and content

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Recently, preclinical and clinical studies suggest an association between renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and bone healing, particularly in the context of osteoporotic bone fractures.

PURPOSE

To determine the correlation between the use of RAS inhibitors and fusion outcomes and neurologic status in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative disorders.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Spinal fusion status and neurologic function (modified Japanese Orthopedic Association [mJOA] and Nurick grading scales).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed, including 200 patients who underwent ACDF for degenerative disorders with 1-year minimum follow-up. Demographic data, comorbidities, antihypertensive medication, neurologic examination, and fusion status were collected. Spinal fusion was assessed via plain cervical x-ray, resorting to dynamic radiographs and/or computer tomography (CT) in cases of uncertainty. Preoperative mJOA and Nurick scores and recovery rates were calculated to determine neurologic status.

RESULTS

Of the 200 patients (42.5% females, 57.5% males, median age of 53.7 years), 82 hypertensive patients were identified. Seventy-seven (93.9%) were taking antihypertensive medication as follows: 36.4% angiotensin-II receptor blockers (ARBs), 35.1% angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and the remaining patients were taking other medication. In the analysis of fusion rates, patients treated with ARBs exhibited a higher fusion rate, while those treated with ACEIs displayed a lower fusion rate compared to untreated nonhypertensive patients (p = .04 and .02, respectively). The difference in fusion rates between ARBs and ACEIs was also significant, with the former displaying higher rates (p < .001). Smoking exhibited a negative correlation with spinal fusion (p < .001). In the multivariate analysis, ARBs remained an independent factor for successful fusion (p = .02), while smoking remained a risk factor for failed fusion (p = .002). In the neurologic examination, ACEIs, hypertension status, and older age correlated with lower modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) recovery rates (p = .001, <.001, and <.001, respectively) in the univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In ACDF patients, we observed that ARBs were associated with higher fusion rates. Conversely, ACEIs and smoking were related to failed fusion. Prospective case-control studies are needed to confirm these RAS inhibitors effects on spinal fusion.

Introduction

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is well known for its significant role in circulatory homeostasis; and therefore, RAS blocker drugs are commonly used in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases [1], such as arterial hypertension, which affects 50% to 80% of spinal fusion patients [2]. Recent evidence suggests an association between RAS blockers and bone metabolism, particularly in the context of bone healing. In animal models, angiotensin-II (AngII) has been shown to decrease bone mass, while blockage of RAS signaling (mainly via angiotensin-II receptor blockers [ARBs]) seems to counteract these effects. For example, in ovariectomized mice, Zhou et al. [3] demonstrated that AngII accelerated osteoporotic bone resorption, while treatment with AT1R and AT2R blockers relieved AngII-induced osteoporosis. In ovariectomized rats that underwent transverse osteotomy of the proximal metaphysis of the femur, Rajkumar et al. reported that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and ARBs increased the consolidation of experimental osteoporotic fractures and the average value of the microcirculation in the fracture zones [4]. In addition, clinical studies have suggested a potential correlation between the use of RAS blockers and reduced osteoporotic fracture risk. Chen et al. [5] reported a significantly higher incidence of osteoporotic fractures in hypertensive patients not treated with RAS inhibitors compared to those who were treated. This association between RAS inhibitors and bone metabolism may play a critical role in spinal fusion patients who also suffer from arterial hypertension. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is a correlation between the use of antihypertensive medication, particularly AngII inhibitors, and outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery.

Section snippets

Study design, setting, and participants

We performed a retrospective study according to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement [6] guidelines to investigate whether there is a correlation between spinal fusion outcomes in a cohort of ACDF patients and treatment with AngII inhibitors. A chart review of patients who underwent ACDF at a single institution was performed, with prior Institutional Review Board approval (IRB00178932). A cohort of adult patients of both sexes, with symptomatic

Demographic and clinical data

A total of 200 patients with cervical degenerative disorders who underwent ACDF were identified, including 85 females (42.5%) and 115 males (57.5%), with a median age of 53.7 (range 24–90) years. Median follow-up was 21.7 months (range 12.2–44.3). Out of the included patients, 32 smokers (16%), 39 diabetic patients (19.5%), and 82 hypertensive patients (41%) were identified. Out of the 82 hypertensive patients, 77 (93.9%) were taking antihypertensive drugs (28 [36.4%] received ARBs, 27 [35.1%]

Discussion

In this study, the statistical analysis revealed RAS blockade to be a significant factor for fusion in ACDF patients. With a median follow-up of 22 months, patients treated with ARBs presented a significantly higher fusion rate (p = .04), while patients treated with ACEIs displayed a higher rate of fusion failure (p = .02). As in previous studies [14], [15], smoking was also correlated with a higher rate of pseudarthrosis (p < .001). Age, hypertension status, and treatment with ACEIs were

Conclusions

In our cohort of ACDF patients, treatment with ARBs was associated with an increased fusion rate, while treatment with ACEIs and smoking were identified as risk factors for pseudarthrosis. Further preclinical and clinical studies are warranted to confirm the beneficial effects of ARBs and deleterious influence of ACEIs on spinal fusion.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge research funding from the Gordon & Marylin Macklin Foundation.

References (35)

  • DS Rajkumar et al.

    Comparative evaluation of enalapril and losartan in pharmacological correction of experimental osteoporosis and fractures of its background

    J Osteoporos

    (2013)
  • CI Chen et al.

    Association between renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and future osteoporotic fracture risk in hypertensive population: a population-based cohort study in Taiwan

    Medicine

    (2017)
  • E von Elm et al.

    The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies

    PLoS Med

    (2007)
  • P Greenland et al.

    The new 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines “Up the Pressure” on diagnosis and treatment of hypertension

    JAMA

    (2017)
  • EC Benzel et al.

    Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

    J Spinal Disord

    (1991)
  • S Nurick

    The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis

    Brain

    (1972)
  • KK Revanappa et al.

    Comparison of Nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

    Eur Spine J

    (2011)
  • FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.

    Author disclosures: AP-P: Nothing to disclose. FS: Nothing to disclose. CH: Nothing to disclose. WI: Nothing to disclose. SR: Nothing to disclose. EC: Nothing to disclose. AB: Nothing to disclose. S-fLL: Research Support (Investigator Salary, Staff/Materials): Chordome Foundation (Research material, cell lines, animal models); Grants: AO Spine (C). NT: Royalties: Globus Medical (E); Depuy Synthes (E); Stock Ownership: Globus Medical (F); Consulting Globus Medical (D); Scientific Advisory Board/Other Office: Globus Medical (B); Endowments; Fellowship Support: AO North America (E). TFW: Grants: Ely Lilly and Company (D); Gordon & Marylin Macklin Foundation (F).

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    View full text