Short communication
Polyphenolic compounds interfere with quantification of protein in soil extracts using the Bradford method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.08.012Get rights and content

Abstract

 The Bradford protein quantification assay is based on an absorbance shift in Coomassie brilliant blue G-250 (CBB). Samples extracted for glomalin, a protein produced by arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, are quantified using the Bradford assay. CBB is known to react with polyphenolic substances, and co-extraction of glomalin and humic substances is known to occur. The effects of increasing concentrations polyphenolic compounds were measured. The addition of any amount of polyphenolic compounds increased the Bradford reactive fraction (BRF) of soil extract. Caution is required when interpreting BRF data, as comparison of BRF data from different studies or different field sites is problematic. The BRF may represent recalcitrant organic material in soil, though its relationship to AM fungi remains unclear.

Section snippets

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. David Nehl for his editing and analysis advice. Thank you to the New South Wales National Parks and Wildlife Service and State Forests of New South Wales for permission to collect samples at the BNR and JC field sites. This work has been supported by the Cotton Catchment Communities CRC, Australia.

References (26)

  • C. Steelink

    What is humic acid? A perspective of the past forty years

  • D.S. Feeney et al.

    Does the presence of glomalin relate to reduced water infiltration through hydrophobicity?

    Canadian Journal of Soil Science

    (2004)
  • M.J. Harner et al.

    Protein accumulation and distribution in floodplain soils and river foam

    Ecology Letters

    (2004)
  • Cited by (73)

    • Glycoproteins of arbuscular mycorrhiza for soil carbon sequestration: Review of mechanisms and controls

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      The covalent bonds generated between proteins and polyphenolic compounds during extraction make GRSP extraction and quantification difficult and partly uncertain (Jorge-Araújo et al., 2015). The GRSP measured through the Bradford protein is discussed in terms of fungal origin and the age of the EE and T-GRSP pools (Staunton et al., 2020; Whiffen et al., 2007). GRSP are operationally defined based on the extraction method and therefore recent studies have refined the terms such as autoclaved citrate extractable (ACE) protein and citrate extractable soil proteins (CESP) as more appropriate to designate GRSP (Holátko et al., 2021; Hurisso et al., 2018) (Table 1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text