Elsevier

Small Ruminant Research

Volume 133, December 2015, Pages 128-134
Small Ruminant Research

Feeding behavior of sheep and goats in a deciduous tropical forest during the dry season: The same menu consumed differently

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2015.08.020Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sheep and goats harvest similar plant species in the tropical deciduous forest during dry season.

  • Sheep performed significantly fewer bites/day than goats and bites were also smaller and lighter.

  • In the same browsing area and time, sheep harvested fewer nutrients per day than goats.

  • The TDF is a source of protein rich feed with low digestibility and poor energy content.

Abstract

The sustainable use of the tropical deciduous forest (TDF) during co-grazing of sheep and goats is a complex paradigm. To unveil the latter, an important step is to identify which plants of the TDF are consumed by different ruminant species. Such information must consider the rainy and dry seasons because of the deciduous nature of the TDF, which imply great changes in biomass availability and species dominance. This study aimed at (a) describing the feeding behavior of sheep and goats in the TDF during the dry season, and (b) calculating the quantity of macronutrients harvested in the vegetation by sheep and goats. An observational study was implemented during dry season in the TDF of Yucatan, Mexico. The direct observation method was applied on 3 sheep and 3 goats (adult, non-pregnant females) to record the species of plants consumed, bite categories (BC) and the nutritional quality of different BC. Grazing circuits lasted 4 h daily. Twelve days of observations were performed for each ruminant species according to a Latin-square design implemented to equally distribute variability due to routes of grazing, environmental conditions and shepherds between days. Feeding behavior of sheep and goats was similar in terms of plant species consumed (29 of 33 species). However, sheep obtained most of their DM from Acacia pennatula pods, whereas goats consumed mainly foliage from shrubs. Sheep performed fewer bites per day than goats (median of 2854 vs. 3634; P < 0.05) and bites were smaller and lighter (P < 0.05). Consequently, sheep harvested less DM/day than goats (median of 358.5 vs. 514.7 g respectively; P < 0.05). Furthermore, goats performed several BC that were exclusive of their behavior. Irrespective of differences between ruminant species, both covered approximately 50% of the DM and the metabolizable energy maintenance requirements after 4 h of browsing. Meanwhile, crude protein maintenance requirements were covered by 76% and 141% in sheep and goats, respectively. Thus, the TDF is an important source of protein rich fodder during dry season, while dietary energy is a limiting factor for small ruminant’s performance.

Introduction

The heterogeneous vegetation of the tropical deciduous forest (TDF) of Yucatan, Mexico, provides several environmental services and a rich botanical diversity (Mizrahi et al., 1997, Trejo and Dirzo, 2002). This vegetation may also serve as the basis of a complex diet for ruminants as reported in other latitudes (Gautier and Moulin, 2004). Nevertheless, the rational use of such vegetation through co-grazing of different small ruminant species remains a complex paradigm. Proposals for the rational use of the heterogeneous vegetation must emerge from the knowledge of those plant resources used as feed, its nutritional value and the feeding behavior of the relevant ruminant species (Pontes et al., 2010). The latter emphasize the importance of linking the ruminant feeding behavior with plant diversity considering both interdependent processes (Agreil et al., 2010).

At present, several authors have listed plant species used as fodder by grazing ruminants in the TDF (Hernández-Hernández et al., 2009, Flores and Bautista, 2012), and some authors included partial information about nutrients harvested from the TDF (Ortega-Reyes, 1985, Rios and Riley, 1985a). No information is available on the quantitative feeding behavior of ruminants in the TDF. The continuous bite monitoring through the direct observation method (DOM) (Agreil and Meuret, 2004) could help to link the botanical component of a given ecosystem with the grazing behavior of ruminants, including their nutrient intake. This methodology is particularly adapted for heterogeneous vegetation and free grazing animals (Bonnet et al., 2015). Recently, the DOM was adapted to the vegetation of the TDF by González-Pech et al. (2014). The latter resulted in a coding grid of bite categories (BC) that included plants of different habits including shrubs, dicot herbaceous, creepers/climbers and grasses. The new coding grid can be used to further explore the feeding behavior of sheep and goats in the TDF. Thus, the present study aimed to describe the feeding behavior of sheep and goats in a TDF during the co-grazing in the dry season, and to quantify the macro-nutrients harvested.

Section snippets

Study site

The study was conducted from March to May 2012 (dry season) in the small ruminant farm of the Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán located in Mérida, Yucatán, México (20° 52′7″N; 89° 37′24″W). The climate of the area is classified as tropical warm sub-humid with summer rainfall. The accumulated rainfall during the study was 82 mm, and the mean temperature was 22 °C (maximum 36 °C and minimum 18 °C). The study area comprised 112 ha of TDF with more than 260 plant species and a large proportion of legumes (

Plants consumed

A total of 33 plant species were harvested from the TDF by sheep or goats, from which 29 were consumed by both ruminant species. It includes 17 shrubs, 6 dicots herbaceous plants, 3 grasses and 3 creeper/climbers (Table 1). Additionally, only sheep harvested two creeper/climber species (fruit of Passiflora foetida and foliage of Cardiospermum corindum). Meanwhile, only goats harvested two dicot herbaceous plants (Morinda royoc and Tetramerium nervosum).

Plant contribution to the daily DMI

Fifteen feed materials from the commonly

Plants consumed

The study showed that sheep and goats co-grazing the TDF harvested almost the same plant species during the dry season. Also, five plant species were identified for the first time as feed for sheep and goats (B. swartziana, C. alliodora, Althernantera flavescens, Bourreria pulchra, Solanum tridynamum) and two plant species (G. floribundum, N. emarginata), previously reported as edible for white-tailed deer (Mandujano, 1991), were also identified as feed for sheep and goats.

Plant contribution to the daily DMI

Sheep and goats

Conclusion

Feeding behavior of sheep and goats in the TDF during the dry season seemed similar in terms of the plant species consumed (29 of 33 species) and the proportion of DMI provided by these plant materials. Nevertheless, sheep obtained most of their DMI from A. pennatula pods, whereas goats consumed more foliage from shrubs. Also, sheep performed fewer bites per day than goats and bites were smaller and lighter. Consequently, sheep harvested fewer nutrients per day than goats in the same area and

Conflict of interest

The authors confirm that they have no conflict of interest that could inappropriately influence or be perceived to influence the work included in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work received the financial support from the project No. CB-2008-01/106146 and the postdoctoral grant No. 290662, both from CONACYT, Mexico. We also thank the financial support of IEPAC project (FEDER Convention No. 31439—Programme INTERREG IV CARAIBES 2007–2013—No. 41000140). The authors would like to sincerely thank the Agroecology students from the FMVZ-UADY, K. Baas, R. Cetina, E. Cocom, R. Dorantes, H. Puc, and M. Ventura for their committed help during the fieldwork performed for

References (43)

  • J.F.J. Torres-Acosta et al.

    Improving resilience against natural gastrointestinal nematode infections in browsing kids during the dry season in tropical Mexico

    Vet. Parasitol.

    (2006)
  • P.J. Van Soest et al.

    Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharide in relation to animal nutrition

    J. Dairy Sci.

    (1991)
  • M.D. Yiakoulaki et al.

    Intake by goats grazing kermes oaks shrublands with varying cover in Northern Greece

    Small Rumin. Res.

    (1995)
  • C. Agreil et al.

    Linking the dynamics of ruminant feeding behavior and dominant shrub responses on rangeland: forage resources renewal and biodiversity conservation

    Environ. Res. J.

    (2010)
  • J. Altman

    Observational study of behavior: sampling methods

    Behaviour

    (1974)
  • Aoac

    Official Methods of Analysis

    (1980)
  • A. Ayala-Burgos et al.

    Composición Química Nutricional De Árboles Forrajeros. Compilación De Análisis De Laboratorio De Nutrición Animal

    (2006)
  • M. Barros-Rodríguez et al.

    Productive performance and urinary excretion of mimosine metabolites by hair sheep grazing in a silvopastoral system with high densities of Leucaena leucocephala

    Trop. Anim. Health Prod.

    (2012)
  • O.J.F. Bonnet et al.

    Continuous bite monitoring; a method to asses the foraging dynamics of herbivores in natural grazing conditions

    Anim. Prod. Sci.

    (2015)
  • Y. Chen et al.

    Effect of restricted grazing time on the foraging behavior and movement of Tan sheep grazed on desert steppe

    Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci.

    (2013)
  • M.H. Esqueda-Coronado et al.

    Producción de Ovinos de Pelo Bajo Condiciones de Pastoreo Extensivo en el Norte de México

    (2009)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Comparing the browsing behavior of inexperienced kids versus adult goats on heterogeneous vegetation

      2021, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Other important factors include nitrogen recycling mechanisms (Silanikove, 2000) and, in some goat breeds, resistance/resilience to gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infections (Zvinorova et al., 2016; Gárate-Gallardo et al., 2015). Behavioral characteristics also enable goats to take advantage of heterogeneous vegetation (González-Pech et al., 2015; Ventura-Cordero et al., 2019), such as adopting a bipedal position while browsing (Daramola and Adeloye, 2009) and intermediate (Van Soest, 1994) or opportunistic (Kronberg and Malechek, 1997) behaviors in the consumption of vines, dicot-herbaceous plants and grasses. When confronted with heterogeneous vegetation, the feeding behaviors of inexperienced kids raised indoors may differ from those of goats with browsing experience.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text