Short communication
Risk of seroconversion to peste des petits ruminants (PPR) and its association with species, sex, age and migration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.10.009Get rights and content

Abstract

The present investigation included a detailed description of risk of PPR in small ruminants and its association with various host and environmental factors. A total of 432 serum samples comprising of 216 samples (108 sheep and 108 goats) from migratory and 216 samples (108 sheep and108 goats) from non-migratory flocks of sheep and goat were screened for PPR antibodies using competitive-ELISA. The overall seroprevalence of PPR in migratory flocks (33.79%) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher as compared to non-migratory flocks (24.07%). The seroprevalence of PPR in sheep (29.16%) was higher than that of goat (28.70%) but the difference was non-significant, age wise seroprevalence was significantly (p < 0.05) higher in >12 months age group (39.58%) followed by 8–12 months (26.38%) and 4–8 months (20.83%) age group. On risk factor analysis, it was observed that at 95% confidence interval, odd ratio was higher in migratory (1.610) than non-migratory (0.612) flocks, in sheep (1.023) than goats (0.978), the value of odd ratio was higher in >12 months age group (2.490 and 1.828) as compared to 4–8 months and 8–12 months, respectively. The overall sex wise seroprevalence in males (33.33%) was significantly (p < 0.05) higher than in females (24.53%) and also risk factor analysis revealed a higher odd ratio in males (1.538, overall; 1.581, migratory and 1.503, non-migratory) than in females (0.650, overall; 0.633, migratory and 0.655 non-migratory). The present study relates the variation of PPR risk in association with species, age, sex, sheep and goat husbandry practices.

Introduction

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR), which literally means “Plague of small ruminants”, is an acute viral disease of small ruminants caused by a Morbillivirus belonging to the family Paramyxoviridae (Gibbs et al., 1979) and is related to Canine distemper, Rinderpest and Measles virus (Van mol et al., 1995), The natural disease affects mainly goats and sheep, but it is usually more severe in goats where, it causes severe morbidity and mortality and is only occasionally severe in sheep (Raghavendra et al., 2000). The course of disease is about 2 weeks and generally death occurs within 10–12 days after infection (Lefevre and Diallo, 1990). Disease is characterized by high rise of temperature, oral and oculo-nasal discharges, necrotic stomatitis, severe pneumonia, dyspnoea, coughing, enteritis and severe diarrhoea followed by death (Roeder and Obi, 1999, Pawaiya et al., 2004). The disease is endemic in India and is a major threat to about 200 million small ruminant population of the country (Dhar et al., 2002), causing an economic loss of about 1800 million Indian rupees annually (Bhadyopadhyay, 2002). Close contact is the most important way of transmitting the disease. It is suspected that the infectious materials can also contaminate water, feed troughs and bedding, turning them into additional sources of the infection. These are however short term sources, since the PPRV, like its close relative the Rinderpest virus, would not be expected to survive for a long time outside the host (Diallo, 2003). In addition to these sources of infection movement of animals across the boundaries of states commonly acts as source of PPR epidemics. There is no known carrier state in PPR and the infected animal may transmit the disease itself during the stage of incubation period. However, the PPR infected animal's sero-convert and become immune to PPR and RP viruses (Sudarshan et al., 1995). Singh et al. (2004a) discussed the relation of migration of animals with that of maintenance and transmission of PPRV in nature. The close relations between PPR outbreaks and transportation of sheep and goats flocks have been reported (Boniwell, 1980, Dhand et al., 2002, Kataria et al., 2007, Shankar et al., 1998). Migration may also spread infection to cattle (Shaila et al., 1989). In India, animal rearing is practiced in two major ways: one is unorganized back yard rearing (where 5–10 sheep or goats are reared in backyards and fed up on the agriculture byproduct) and the other is the traditional rearing of sheep and goats by nomadic communities (where the animals are fed on pasture lands and uncultivated or barren fields during the course of migration). Most of the earlier studies from India were conducted on sheep and goats of non-migratory flock (Singh et al., 1996, Singh et al., 2004a, Kataria et al., 2007, Bhanuprakash et al., 2008) but the present study covered animals of both migratory and non-migratory flocks. The study was conducted with the prime aim to assess the risk of PPR in unvaccinated animals in relation to the various host factors and migration. This may prove to be helpful in rational decision making for formulating preventive and control strategies against PPR.

Section snippets

Study area

The present study was conducted during the year 2009–2010 in state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) India. A total of 6 major migratory routes used by nomadic community were selected for migratory flocks of sheep and goats. For studying non-migratory flocks, villages from 6 districts of J&K were selected randomly. A pre-designed questionnaire was used to interview the owners of the flocks. Data related to species, age, sex and route of migration was gathered to ascertain the difference in

Flock wise seroprevalence and risk of PPR

The seroprevalence of PPR in migratory flocks were significantly (p < 0.05) higher (33.79%) than in non-migratory (24.07%) flocks of different districts (Table 1).

Species wise seroprevalence and risk of PPR

The seroprevalence of PPR in sheep (29.16%) was higher than that of goat (28.70%) but the differences were non-significant in both migratory and non-migratory flocks. Similarly the odd ratio was higher in sheep (1.023) as compared to goats (0.978). Further detailed statistical analysis has been shown in Table 2.

Age wise seroprevalence and risk of PPR

Age wise analysis of data

Discussion

The primary base of any disease control program is its monitoring and diagnosis. Three methods may be used to diagnose and monitor the distribution and prevalence of PPR: case recording of PPR outbreaks, serological detection of PPR specific antibodies and detection of the virus. Although, case recording of PPR outbreaks could give some clues in the areas where the disease is endemic, laboratory diagnosis is essential for confirmation. The development of MAb-based competitive ELISA kit for PPRV

Conclusion

In nutshell it can be concluded that PPR is widely prevalent in sheep and goats of J&K state of India. The study shows the evidences of natural transmission of PPR in sheep and goats of J&K with considerable variation in risk of PPR between species whereas within species the risk of PPR varies considerably with age and sex and type of flock viz., migratory or non-migratory. It is important that the increase in seroprevalence or seroconversion should not be misinterpreted for the increased

References (41)

  • S.R. Bhaskar et al.

    Seroprevalence of peste des petits ruminants in Maharashtra

    Indian J. Anim. Res.

    (2009)
  • M.A. Boniwell

    The use of Tissue Culture Rinderpest Vaccine to protect sheep and goats against peste des petits ruminants in the Ashanti region of Ghana

    Bull. Off. Int. Epiz.

    (1980)
  • N.K. Dhand et al.

    Outbreaks of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in Punjab

    Indian J. Anim. Sci.

    (2002)
  • P. Dhar et al.

    Recent epidemiology of peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV)

    Vet. Microbiol.

    (2002)
  • Diallo, A., 2003. Featured Articles....
  • E.P.J. Gibbs et al.

    Classification of the peste des petits ruminants virus as the fourth member of the genus Morbillivirus

    Intervirology

    (1979)
  • B. Goossens et al.

    Abattoir survey of sheep and goats in the Gambia

    Vet. Rec.

    (1998)
  • M.H. Jeggo et al.

    FAO/IAEA ELISA external quality assurance programme for the IAEA competitive ELISA

  • V.B. Joshi et al.

    Pestedes-petits ruminants (PPR) among gaddi sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh

    Indian J. Anim. Sci.

    (1996)
  • A.K. Kataria et al.

    Large scale outbreak Peste des Petits Ruminants in sheep and goats in Thar desert of India

    Slov. Vet. Res.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Risk factors and distribution for peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in Mainland China

      2018, Small Ruminant Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data were collected from 0.5° × 0.5° grid meteorological datasets and data can be assigned to each village (Zhang et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2014). Other potential risk factors considered in this study were age (ratio of animals in the herd that were younger than 4 months, aged 4–8 months, 8–12 months or older than 12 months), species (ratio of sheep in herd), sex (ratio of males and females in herd), total number of animals per herd, number of live animal markets per county and quantum of trade per county (purchases of live sheep/goats and their products) (Al-Majali et al., 2008; Mahajan et al., 2012; Mbyuzi et al., 2014; Kardjadj et al., 2015). The corresponding data was collected from the local agricultural statistical yearbook.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text