Simultaneous hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide removal from biogas by water–swollen reverse osmosis membrane

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.041Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Agro-biogas upgrading.

  • Water–swollen membrane.

  • Carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide removal.

  • Membrane choice based on its basic characteristics.

Abstract

Biogas is a suitable alternative fuel if unwanted impurities are removed to avoid corrosion of the inner parts of an engine. A recent breakthrough in biogas purification showed that a thin hydrophilic composite membrane can create the selective water swollen barrier able to remove unwanted sour gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide owing to significantly higher water solubility of the latter in comparison to methane. This work presents the use of water–swollen membranes for the simultaneous removal of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide and water vapour from agro-biogas. Up to 82 vol.% of carbon dioxide and 77 vol.% of hydrogen sulphide were successfully removed from the feed stream at a pressure of 220 kPa. The selection of the most suitable thin hydrophilic composite membrane based on the knowledge of its basic characteristics is discussed. SEM analysis showed that the surface of the best performing composites changed significantly upon swelling by water. It was found that a compact structure of the upper selective thin layer after the swelling by water is fundamental for obtaining a selective water–swollen membrane. The next key factor is a high porosity of the membrane support. A detailed comparison of various systems and their performance is presented.

Introduction

In spite of the increasing attention for alternative sources such as wind and solar energy, classical combustible energy carriers still play an essential role in the current society. The energy consumption has continuously risen [1], [2], [3] and the energy supply plays a fundamental role for the sustainability of the modern age to ensure the current quality of the human life [3], [4]. Nowadays, the energy demand is supplied by fossil fuels for approximately 88% [5]. However, fossil fuels pollute the atmosphere by emissions of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, sulphur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides [6]. Fossil fuels reserves are limited resources. In this context, an intensive search for alternative renewable fuels is needed to find a solution to the growing energy challenges [3], [7], [8] from the economic as well as the environmental point of view [9]. A biowaste such as a wastewater contains a lot of energy that might be exploited in the form of methane [10], [11]. Biomass has also been recognized as a possible renewable energy source [6]. Biogas, an example of a gaseous biofuel, which can be obtained from biomass via a biochemical way, seems to be a very good candidate for the replacement of fossil fuels [12]. For example, natural gas can be replaced directly by biogas if the latter contains a sufficiently high amount of methane [5].

Raw biogas consists mainly of methane, carbon dioxide, and a small amount of various residual compounds, such as water vapour, hydrogen sulphide, ammonia, siloxanes, and mercaptanes [7]. Biogas contains typically 50–70 vol.% of methane and 30–50 vol.% of carbon dioxide, depending on its origin and on the season [7]. Biogas thus needs to be purified to become the “energy of the future” at engine-fuel quality [1]. Many different methods for carbon dioxide removal from biogas exist, namely water scrubbing, polyethylene glycol scrubbing, absorption of contaminants using molecular sieves, or pressure-swing absorption [7]. Carbon dioxide removal is an important operation to enhance the heating value of the gas [13]. Further, hydrogen sulphide has to be captured from biogas (i.e. by absorption or using active coal) both because of its high toxicity and because of its corrosive effect [7], [13].

Newly, biogas purification can be realized by the membrane separation technology [7], [13], [14]. The tested polymeric membranes have been made from silicone rubber, cellulose acetate, and polyimide [7], [13], [14], [15], [16]. At the current state of the art, upgrading of biogas with polymeric membranes is commercially competitive with the conventional technologies for carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide removal, such as pressure swing adsorption, temperature swing adsorption or amine scrubbing [17], [18]. However, most of the membranes suffer damage by aggressive gases [7], [13], [14], [18], [19] and it is necessary to pre-treat the raw biogas and remove water vapour and also the potentially harmful compounds, namely hydrogen sulphide, ammonia and siloxanes.

The need to minimize the costs of biogas upgrading leads a continuous search for new and more effective membrane materials [19]. One of the possibilities is the use of water–swollen membrane for simultaneous carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide removal from the biogas stream [7], [8]. Conventional biogas purification methods require removal of water vapour from the biogas stream. However, it is well known that the solubility of quadrupolar carbon dioxide and polar gases in water is significantly higher than that of methane. Under appropriate conditions the polyamide layer of thin film composite reverse osmosis membranes is able to create a thin film of water, which can then perform as a perfect selective membrane for separation of polar gasses from methane [8]. The great advantage of this membrane separation is that unwanted and toxic gases, including water vapour itself, are removed from its continuously refreshed surface, thus avoiding contamination of the permselective membrane. Furthermore, the condensed water passing through the membrane ensures good permselectivity of the whole separation [8].

This method of biogas upgrading has been patented recently [20]. The contact of the thin hydrophilic composite (TFC) membrane surface with water causes swelling of the polyamide thin film. In order to achieve the spontaneous condensation of water, the temperature of the TFC membrane must be below the dew point of the raw biogas feed. Interestingly, the heat of evaporation of the liquid phase from the permeate side of the membrane helps to cool the membrane surface. The function of the water–swollen thin film composite membrane was previously proven for the high-pressure type of RO membrane and the subject of the present manuscript is to test also a low-pressure membrane meant for brackish water (much less expensive compression work would be used) and to compare the results. In particular, the possibility to use the polyamide composite membranes for simultaneous removal of both carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide from agro-biogas has been experimentally studied in the present manuscript.

Section snippets

Materials and membrane preparation

Commercial TFCs Reverse Osmosis (RO) membranes of two suppliers were tested. The TFC membrane specifications are displayed in Table 1. The first two TFCs supplied by Sterlitech Corporation (further denoted as Sterlitech I and Sterlitech II) were used for preliminary tests with binary mixtures of methane and carbon dioxide. The third TFC membrane supplied by Sterlitech Corporation was denoted as the low pressure RO membrane and was originally produced for low pressure brackish water

EDX and SEM analysis

The main atoms present in the TFC membranes, namely C, O, S, and N, were determined by EDX analysis (Table 3). The atomic percentages were determined for both the surface and the cross section. The EDX analysis was done in at least five different places at the composite membranes.

No nitrogen was found by the elementary analyses in the upper layer of Sterlitech I and Sterlitech II membranes although all used TFC membranes were stated to be polyamides by the supplier. Since the EDX analysis

Conclusion

The simultaneous removal of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide was studied for agro-biogas pre-treatment, using water–swollen hydrophilic thin film composites based on membranes supplied by two industrial producers. The hydrogen sulphide permeance was higher than that of carbon dioxide, owing to its higher solubility in water. The advantage of this membrane separation is that no pre-treatment of the feed gas is needed to remove the water vapour before the gas separation step, unlike other for

Acknowledgements

P. Izák would like to acknowledge the financial support from the Czech Science Foundation by the grant No. 14-12695S. Z. Sedláková would like to acknowledge the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic (project TE01020080) and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (project LH-14006). All gases were financed from the Grant Fecundus (RFCRCT-2010-00009) – Research Fund for Coal and Steel of EC and MŠMT (Ministry for Education, Youth and Sport) No.: 7C11009 and some parts in the equipment were

References (32)

Cited by (0)

View full text