Elsevier

Journal of Sea Research

Volume 76, February 2013, Pages 211-221
Journal of Sea Research

Polychaete assemblage as surrogate for prey availability in assessing southeastern Bering Sea flatfish habitat

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seares.2012.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The flatfish yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera), northern rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra), and Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus) in the southeastern Bering Sea prey mainly on infauna. Spatial correspondence between their stomach contents and infauna assemblages across habitat types was examined to identify indices of prey availability for flatfish habitat characterization and quality assessment. Benthic samples and flatfish stomachs were collected in 2009 near the Alaska Peninsula in the southeastern Bering Sea. Polychaetes and bivalves were the most dominant infauna groups, each comprising 35–60% by weight in each infauna sample. These two were also the only prey groups that frequently averaged > 50% of stomach content by weight. Bivalves dominated the infauna biomass on the relatively sandy inner shelf (0–50 m depth). The muddier middle shelf (50–100 m) had the highest infauna biomass, which was dominated by polychaetes. Diet compositions of the flatfish varied spatially in correspondence with the infauna assemblage. Polychaetes were prevalent in all flatfish diets on the middle shelf, even yellowfin sole whose typical primary prey are amphipods and bivalves. Polychaete-rich habitats are potentially prime for flatfish as polychaetes are readily utilized where available and generally have high nutritional value. Flatfish did not select for specific polychaete taxa, so an index of habitat quality could be based on the biomass of aggregate polychaetes or on dominant polychaete families of the region. Under normal environmental conditions, the three flatfish have slightly-offset spatial distributions, enabling each to utilize different infauna assemblages across the shelf. However, during cold phases in the Bering Sea ecosystem, as when this study was conducted, a cold pool of < 2 °C bottom water from the spring ice melt extends over the middle shelf in summer. This physiological barrier displaces all three flatfish to the inner shelf, intensifying competition for prey resources.

Highlights

► Polychaetes, where available, are readily consumed by small-mouthed flatfish. ► High abundance, biomass and nutritional value of polychaetes render them prime prey. ► Biomass of polychaetes could be used as an index of habitat quality for flatfish. ► Interspecific competition may reduce polychaete consumption in some flatfish species. ► Cold phases in the ecosystem may intensify competition.

Introduction

The southeastern Bering Sea (SEBS) continental shelf accounts for approximately half of the total US fishery production (National Research Council, 1996). The flat, shallow shelf ranges from 500 to over 800 km wide from shore to the shelf break at about the 170-m isobath, with an average cross-shelf gradient of 0.2 m km 1 (Kinder and Schumacher, 1981). Surficial sediment becomes finer with distance from shore and water depth (Sharma, 1979). Most of the surficial sediment can be characterized as predominantly sandy, except for nearshore areas of mixed sand and gravel, and mixed sand and mud further offshore (Smith and McConnaughey, 1999). Oceanographic fronts during the summer are defining features. The Inner Front located near the 50-m isobath and the broad Middle Front about the 100-m isobath divide the shelf into the inner, middle, and outer domains of different hydrographic conditions and productivity (Coyle et al., 2007, Kinder and Schumacher, 1981, Stabeno and Hunt, 2002). Another dominant hydrographic feature on the shelf is the “cold pool” — a tongue of cold bottom water < 2 °C formed by the spring melting of sea ice that normally extends southward over the middle shelf. The extent and intensity of the cold pool are driven by the Bering Sea climate regime (Overland and Stabeno, 2004).

Flatfish are a major fishery resource in the SEBS. Yellowfin sole (Limanda aspera), northern rock sole (Lepidopsetta polyxystra), and Alaska plaice (Pleuronectes quadrituberculatus) are relatively small-sized species among the seven ecologically and commercially important flatfish in the SEBS (Lee et al., 2010). These benthivores have overlapping distributions in depths of ≤ 110 m. Yellowfin sole has the highest biomass among flatfish in the SEBS, and supports the largest flatfish fishery in the world (Wildebuer et al., 2005).

Understanding the ecological linkages that define suitable or essential fish habitat is crucial for ecosystem-based fishery management (Link et al., 2002, Shucksmith et al., 2006). Habitat definitions are theoretically as complex and dynamic as ecological linkages, but in fact most are simply based on observed fish distributions and environmental variables (DeLong and Collie, 2004, Norse, 2005). Environmental variables that are relatively easy to measure and spatially contiguous (e.g. surficial sediment type, water temperature, salinity, and water depth) have been most useful in explaining fish distributions.

On the gently-graded and mostly featureless SEBS shelf, sediment grain size distribution or substrate type is the main physical characteristic of flatfish habitat. It is often the variable with the highest correlations with flatfish distribution in soft-sediment habitats (Amezcua et al., 2003, McConnaughey and Smith, 2000, Yeung and McConnaughey, 2008). Flatfish generally prefer fine sediments for efficient burial, as demonstrated in laboratory experiments (Moles and Norcross, 1995). Granulometry also influences the availability of suitable prey (Able et al., 2005, Stoner and Ottmar, 2003). Finer sediments usually have higher organic content (Sharma, 1979) that favors higher total benthic biomass (Feder et al., 2007, Grebmeier et al., 1989), but hydrography and sea ice climatology are the principal drivers of pelagic primary production — the main supplier of organic matter to the benthos (Grebmeier et al., 1988, Overland and Stabeno, 2004, Stabeno and Hunt, 2002).

Yellowfin sole, northern rock sole, and Alaska plaice have small mouths suited for feeding on benthic infauna (Link et al., 2002, Yeung et al., 2010), particularly polychaetes, which comprise the bulk of the SEBS infauna (Haflinger, 1981, Stoker, 1981). The proportion of polychaetes in the diet by weight averaged 26% for yellowfin sole, and as high as 60% for northern rock sole and Alaska plaice (Yeung et al., 2010). Adult plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) abundance in the English Channel was related to the density of polychaete tubes (Shucksmith et al., 2006). The condition of adult plaice in the Irish Sea was related to the production of suitable-sized infauna (Hiddink et al., 2011). Polychaete density was found to be a significant habitat suitability variable for juvenile sole (Solea senegalensis) in the Tagus estuary, Portugal (Vinagre et al., 2008a). In the SEBS, the relationships of substrate to prey availability and prey demand have not been quantitatively defined. Prey availability is certainly an ecological basis for habitat selection, but is difficult and expensive to measure, particularly of the diverse infauna prey of many flatfish. In this study, we examined prey availability to the three flatfish in different SEBS habitats as defined mainly by sediment properties. We examined differences in the infauna assemblages among habitats and the spatial correspondence between flatfish diets and infauna assemblages. The ultimate goal is to identify potential quantitative indices of prey availability for flatfish habitat characterization and quality assessment.

Section snippets

Benthic sampling and stomach collection

Three cross-shelf transects were surveyed with acoustic sonars on the NOAA ship Fairweather in July–August 2009 as part of an ongoing SEBS habitat mapping project (Yeung et al., 2010). Each transect spanned over 500 km and depths between 15 and 150 m. The transects intersected 31 of the many fixed bottom-trawl survey stations (Fig. 1a) that are sampled annually by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center (AFSC) bottom-trawl survey (Lauth, 2010). Each trawl station is located at the center of a 20 × 20

Habitat

Gravel was absent in all samples. Since percentage weights of sand and mud then summed to 100% in each sample, only one of the two variables (mud) was used in analysis to define substrate habitat. The spatial patterns of habitat variables are depicted in Fig. 1. The content of mud, total organic carbon and total nitrogen in the sediment increased with water depth. The ratio of organic carbon to nitrogen (C/N ratio, not shown) ranged from 6 to 8 at all stations except the inner-shelf station J10

Discussion

Sediment grain size is the main structuring factor of SEBS infauna community, thus one of the most significant correlates with flatfish distribution (McConnaughey and Smith, 2000, Yeung and McConnaughey, 2008). Finer sediment on the middle and outer shelves has higher organic content favoring higher total benthic biomass (Feder et al., 2007, Grebmeier et al., 1989). Grain size also determines the physical limit for infauna size, shape, and feeding mode (Jumars and Fauchald, 1977).

Advection of

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Dean Stockwell, Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska Fairbanks (IMS/UAF), who analyzed chlorophyll-a from the sediment samples; invertebrate taxonomist Mr. Max K. Hoberg, IMS/UAF, who conducted the infauna taxonomy from the grab samples; Ms. Caroline Robinson and Ms. Kimberly Sawyer, who analyzed stomach contents; the RACE Groundfish and Shellfish Assessment Programs of the National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska Fisheries Science Center, the crew of the FV Aldebaran,

References (62)

  • F. Amezcua et al.

    Feeding habits of the Order Pleuronectiformes and its relation to the sediment type in the north Irish Sea

    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

    (2003)
  • R.G. Bakkala

    Population characteristics and ecology of yellowfin sole

  • H. Barnes

    Apparatus and methods of oceanography

    Part 1. Chemical

    (1959)
  • H.N. Cabral et al.

    Trophic niche overlap between flatfishes in a nursery area on the Portuguese coast

    Scientia Marina

    (2002)
  • F. De Raedemaecker et al.

    Spatial variability in diet, condition and growth of juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) at sandy beach nursery grounds on the south-west coast of Ireland

    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

    (2011)
  • A. DeLong et al.
  • V. Díaz-Castaňeda et al.

    Polychaetes in environmental studies

  • M. Dufrêne et al.

    Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach

    Ecological Monographs

    (1997)
  • K. Fauchald et al.

    The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding guilds

    Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review

    (1979)
  • H.M. Feder et al.

    Southeastern Chukchi Sea (Alaska) macrobenthos

    Polar Biology

    (2007)
  • D.E. Gershanovich

    Donyye otlozheniya tsentrl'nykh I vostochnykh oblastey Beringova morya

  • J.S. Gray et al.

    Ecology of Marine Sediments: From Science to Management

    (2009)
  • J. Grebmeier et al.

    Pelagic–benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. I. Food supply source and benthic biomass

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (1988)
  • J.M. Grebmeier et al.

    Pelagic–benthic coupling on the shelf of the northern Bering and Chukchi Seas. II. Benthic community structure

    Marine Ecology Progress Series

    (1989)
  • M.B. Griffith et al.

    Analysis of macroinvertebrate assemblages in relation to environmental gradients in rocky mountain streams

    Ecological Applications

    (2001)
  • K. Haflinger

    A survey of benthic infaunal communities of the southeastern Bering Sea shelf

  • J.G. Hiddink et al.

    Could our fisheries be more productive? Indirect negative effects of bottom trawl fisheries on fish condition

    Journal of Applied Ecology

    (2011)
  • P. Jumars et al.

    Between-community contrasts in successful polychaete feeding strategies

  • T.H. Kinder et al.

    Hydrographic structure over the continental shelf of the southeastern Bering Sea

  • G.M. Lang et al.

    Food habits of three congeneric flatfishes: yellowfin sole (Pleuronectes asper), rock sole (P. bilineatus), and Alaska plaice (P. quadrituberculatus), in the eastern Bering Sea

  • R.R. Lauth

    Results of the 2009 Eastern Bering Sea Continental Shelf Bottom Trawl Survey of Groundfish and Invertebrate Resources

    U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-AFSC-204

    (2010)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Spatial variation in habitat quality for juvenile flatfish in the southeastern Bering Sea and its implications for productivity in a warming ecosystem

      2018, Journal of Sea Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Zhang (1988) proposed that NRS and YFS (≥22 cm TL) have different diets due to different eye, mouth, and digestive morphology: NRS are benthivores adept at excavating and extracting prey, whereas YFS are benthopelagivores and active searcher-pursuers. These feeding strategies agree with their respective primary prey on the inner shelf: polychaetes that mostly live in sediment for NRS, and amphipods that mostly live on the sediment for YFS (Yeung et al., 2013). This diet partitioning may reduce interspecific competition.

    • Habitat quality of the coastal southeastern Bering Sea for juvenile flatfishes from the relationships between diet, body condition and prey availability

      2017, Journal of Sea Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The juveniles in this study were late-juveniles (NRS – 16 cm; YFS – 15 cm) that may no longer be limited by morphology or by mobility in their prey selection, and the diet of the adults is flexible and may be influenced more strongly by prey availability and density-dependent factors such as competition. For example, although adult YFS is generally characterized as preferring amphipods in the EBS (Yeung et al., 2013), in this study area of the coastal south-EBS their primary prey was a mix of “other” infauna. We did not find a significantly strong relationship between prey quantity and composition and the distribution and condition of juvenile flatfishes in the coastal south-EBS.

    • Using species distribution models to describe essential fish habitat in alaska

      2018, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text