Long-term exposure of a free-living freshwater micro- and meiobenthos community to microplastic mixtures in microcosms
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Microplastics (MPs; <5 mm) pollution poses a threat to ecosystems worldwide (Silva et al., 2018). After entering aquatic environments, MPs undergo biofouling/sedimentation, which alters their specific densities (e.g., Galloway et al., 2017; Leiser et al., 2020) such that even MPs made up low-density polymer types (Hidalgo-Ruz et al., 2012), including polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP), can sink down to the sediment. Indeed, MPs concentrations in riverine sediments can be up to 600,000-fold higher than in the water phase (Scherer et al., 2020). In a recent study of the Elbe River, the average and maximal concentrations of MPs (125–5000 μm) was 2080 and 14,100 particles/kg sediment (Scherer et al., 2020). Reliable data on particles <125 μm are currently lacking, partly because no uniformly standardized sample protocols are used limiting the comparability of different studies (Lindeque et al., 2020; Nguyen et al., 2019). However, it can be assumed that numbers for smaller particles (1–125 μm) are two to three orders of magnitude higher (Lenz et al., 2016). MPs in the sediment in general are also characterized by a larger diversity of polymer types than in the water (e.g., Horton et al., 2017; Klein et al., 2015; Scherer et al., 2020) and are mainly present as spheres, fibers, and fragments (Blair et al., 2019; Hurley et al., 2018; Tibbetts et al., 2018). Sediments thus represent a sink for MPs (Cera et al., 2020) and in turn a greater potential risk for sediment-dwelling benthic invertebrates (Frei et al., 2019; Haegerbaeumer et al., 2019a; Walkinshaw et al., 2020).
Due to their high structural and functional diversity and abundance (Giere, 2009), meiobenthos (or meiofauna; defined by their body size, that pass through a 500-μm mesh but are retained on a 44-μm mesh; Giere, 2009) occupy an important role in benthic food webs, as they connect lower and higher trophic levels (e.g., Majdi and Traunspurger, 2015). Changes in meiobenthic communities, such as in response to pollution, can thus be expected to impact the freshwater environment overall and nematodes in particular, as they comprise up to 90% of the meiobenthic community (e.g., Traunspurger et al., 2020; Traunspurger, 2021).
Benthic organisms (ciliates, flagellates, rotifers, annelids, nematodes, crustaceans) are able to ingest MPs of different sizes, shapes, and polymer types (reviews, e.g., by Adam et al., 2019; Scherer et al., 2018; Triebskorn et al., 2019; studies, e.g., by Fueser et al., 2019; Fueser et al., 2020a, Fueser et al., 2020b). However, despite the ecological relevance of meiobenthic organisms in MPs research (Giere, 2019), the ecotoxicological effects of MPs on nematodes have scarcely been investigated (Haegerbaeumer et al., 2019a). Most studies on the effects of MPs on nematodes made use of the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans and examined toxicity endpoints such as oxidative stress, mobility, and survival (reviewed by Bhagat et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2020), but large deviations in the effect levels were determined (Bhagat et al., 2021). For example, in water and sediments, a 50% inhibition of C. elegans reproduction was observed after 96 h at PS bead concentrations of 0.57 mg 1-μm PS beads/ml (Mueller et al., 2020b) and 4.8–11.3 mg 1-μm PS beads/g sediment dry weight (dw) (Höss et al., 2022 in press). Moreover, long-term multigenerational tests (21-day exposure) assessing the population growth of C. elegans showed a 100-fold higher susceptibility (Mueller et al., 2020a). Whether species-specific population growth responses translate into a shift in nematode species composition under more realistic exposure scenarios remains to be tested using model ecosystems (Prokić et al., 2021; de Sá et al., 2018; Stanković et al., 2021).
Model ecosystems are appropriate tools for higher-tier risk assessments of chemicals in sediments (Diepens et al., 2017; EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2013). They include the use of microcosms containing samples from natural ecosystems but with the tests run under controlled conditions (Brock et al., 2015). Compared to standardized single-species tests, the main advantage of microcosm studies in environmental risk assessments is that intra- and interspecific interactions within a community can be investigated over the long-term (Brock et al., 2015). With this approach, both direct and indirect effects of the substances of interest at the population and community level can be taken into account (van den Brink et al., 2009). Up to now, microcosms have been used in studies of the effects of different substances on freshwater meiobenthos, especially nematodes (summarized in Höss, 2021).
The impacts of MPs on benthic invertebrates (meio- and macrofauna) and benthic ecosystem functioning have been addressed in only a few studies, conducted in outdoor (Lin et al., 2020; Redondo-Hasselerharm et al., 2020; Stanković et al., 2021) and laboratory (Huang et al., 2021; López-Rojo et al., 2020; Silva et al., 2022; Wakkaf et al., 2020; You et al., 2020) microcosm set-ups, but none have included protozoa. Although the comparability of those studies is limited, given their differences with respect to the studied environment (marine, freshwater, soil) and polymer type (single polymers: PE, polyethylene terephthalate [PET], polyvinyl chloride [PVC], PS, or polymer mixtures), deleterious effects of MPs were observed for several endpoints. For example, these included changes in leaf litter composition and an increase in the mortality of the detritivore caddisfly Sericostoma pyrenaicum after exposure to 10-μm PS microspheres (at 1 μg PS microspheres/ml; López-Rojo et al., 2020). However, MPs at a concentration of 0.05–50 g/kg sediment dw were shown to exert both positive and negative effects on recolonization by macroinvertebrates (Redondo-Hasselerharm et al., 2020). The effects of a realistic MPs composition in terms of size and shape on a native benthic meiobenthic community sampled from a freshwater sediment has yet to be analyzed in long-term experiments conducted under controlled conditions.
To fill this research gap, we examined the impact of a mixture of MPs, differing in their shape and polymer type (50% PS beads, 37% PET fragments, 13% polyamide [PA] fibers) and provided at low (4.11 × 105 MPs number or 9.68 mg MPs per kg sediment) and high (4.11 × 107 MPs number or 968 mg MPs per kg sediment) concentrations, on the micro- and meiobenthic communities in a freshwater sediment. The microcosms were filled with field-collected sediment that included the native fauna and were subsequently spiked with the MPs mixtures. After 4 and 12 weeks, protozoans (flagellates and ciliates) and meiobenthic invertebrates (nematodes, rotifers, oligochaetes, harpacticoid copepods, gastrotrichs and nauplii) were sampled and their abundance and biomass were measured. Nematodes, as the most abundant group, were identified to the species level, which allowed their structural and functional diversity as well as a specific pollution index to be determined.
Previous ecotoxicological studies obtained conflicting results on the sensitivity of benthic invertebrates, especially nematodes, to MPs (Haegerbaeumer et al., 2019a). Our interest here was to monitor the response of micro- and meiobenthic communities to MPs under a realistic, long-term exposure scenario. We hypothesized that direct toxic effects on protozoa and meiobenthos were unlikely but that MPs interference with food consumption (Rauchschwalbe et al., 2021) would result in indirect food web effects evidenced as changes in community structure.
Section snippets
Collecting site and site properties
Sediment containing the indigenous meiobenthic community was collected in June 2020 from the Lippe stream (51°41′21.4″N 7°49′37.6″E), located in the city of Hamm in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The flow velocity was 0.125 ± 0.05 m/s (n = 4), as measured with a hand-held velocity meter (Schiltknecht MC20). The sediment of the Lippe is fine-grained, with 4.2% clay (>2 μm), 28.4% fine silt (2–20 μm), 29.0% coarse silt (20–63 μm), and 38.4% sand (63–2000 μm).
Sediment (0.566 l per microcosm; in
Protozoa
Within the course of the experiment, absolute abundances of ciliates and flagellates considerably changed with time, with a decrease of ciliates within the first four weeks, and a transient increase of flagellates (Table 2). However, a two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences in flagellates' abundances for the factor time (F = 15.516, p < 0.001), but no significant differences for ciliates (F = 0.502, p < 0.488). No treatment-related effects over time were observed for flagellates (F =
Discussion
This is the first study to employ microcosms to address the long-term impacts of environmentally relevant MPs mixtures on freshwater micro- and meiobenthic communities. Whereas MPs exposure did not significantly alter the abundance of ciliates and flagellates, the absolute abundance and biomass of harpacticoid copepods increased significantly over time in the lower concentrated MPs treatment compared to the control. However, these effects should be regarded with caution as (1) the subtle
Conclusion and future studies
In conclusion, a mixture of MPs induced effects on the benthic community in freshwater microcosms (abundance and biomass data), at relatively high MPs concentrations (100-fold higher than expected environmental realistic concentrations; based on extrapolations; Lenz et al., 2016). The observed shifts in the meiobenthos and in nematode community structures might be explained by indirect food web effects rather than by direct MPs toxicity. The NemaSPEAR[%]-index was used to interpret the observed
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Marie-Theres Rauchschwalbe – data curation, writing - original draft, review & editing.
Sebastian Höss – conceptualization, supervision, writing - review & editing.
Arne Haegerbaeumer – conceptualization, methodology, investigation, writing - review & editing.
Walter Traunspurger – conceptualization, investigation, supervision, writing - review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) as part of the project MikroPlaTaS – Microplastics in Dams and Reservoirs: Sedimentation, Spread, Effects (BMBF grant no. 02WPL1448D and 02WPL1448E). We are grateful to the Department of Lake Research (Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Magdeburg) for measuring and calculating the sediment characteristics and to the Institute of Landscape Ecology (University of Münster) for measuring the flow
References (70)
- et al.
Worming into a robust model to unravel the micro/nanoplastic toxicity in soil: a review on Caenorhabditis elegans
Trends Anal. Chem.
(2021) - et al.
Studies of the effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: what do we know and where should we focus our efforts in the future?
Sci. Total Environ.
(2018) - et al.
Ingestion of microplastics by nematodes depends on feeding strategy and buccal cavity size
Environ. Pollut.
(2019) - et al.
Ingestion of microplastics by meiobenthic communities in small-scale microcosm experiments
Sci. Total Environ.
(2020) - et al.
Rapid ingestion and egestion of spherical microplastics by bacteria-feeding nematodes
Chemosphere
(2020) - et al.
Comparing the effects of fludioxonil on non-target soil invertebrates using ecotoxicological methods from single-species bioassays to model ecosystems
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
(2019) - et al.
Large microplastic particles in sediments of tributaries of the river Thames, UK - abundance, sources and methods for effective quantification
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
(2017) - et al.
Nematode species at risk–a metric to assess pollution in soft sediments of freshwaters
Environ. Int.
(2011) - et al.
Validating the NemaSPEAR[%]-index for assessing sediment quality regarding chemical-induced effects on benthic communities in rivers
Ecol. Indic.
(2017) - et al.
Response of a nematode community to the fungicide fludioxonil in sediments of outdoor freshwater microcosms compared to a single species toxicity test
Sci. Total Environ.
(2020)
On the balance between practical relevance and standardization - testing the effects of zinc and pyrene on native nematode communities in soil microcosms
Sci. Total Environ.
Effect of microplastics on ecosystem functioning: microbial nitrogen removal mediated by benthic invertebrates
Sci. Total Environ.
Biofouling, metal sorption and aggregation are related to sinking of microplastics in a stratified reservoir
Water Res.
Microplastics have lethal and sublethal effects on stream invertebrates and affect stream ecosystem functioning
Environ. Pollut.
Species-specific effects of long-term microplastic exposure on the population growth of nematodes, with a focus on microplastic ingestion
Ecol. Indic.
Studying microplastics: lessons from evaluated literature on animal model organisms and experimental approaches
J. Hazard. Mater.
Bacterial consumption by nematodes is disturbed by the presence of polystyrene beads: the roles of food dilution and pharyngeal pumping
Environ. Pollut.
Evaluation of toxicity reduction of sodium dodecyl sulfate submitted to electron beam radiation
Radiat. Phys. Chem.
Comparative assessment of microplastics in water and sediment of a large european river
Sci. Total Environ.
Microplastics in the environment: challenges in analytical chemistry – a review
Anal. Chim. Acta
Microplastics in freshwater sediments: effects on benthic invertebrate communities and ecosystem functioning assessed in artificial streams
Sci. Total Environ.
Relevance of nano- and microplastics for freshwater ecosystems: a critical review
Trends Anal. Chem.
The individual and combined effects of cadmium, polyvinyl chloride (PVC) microplastics and their polyalkylamines modified forms on meiobenthic features in a microcosm
Environmental Pollution
Microplastics and seafood: lower trophic organisms at highest risk of contamination
Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.
The impacts of polyethylene terephthalate microplastics (mPETs) on ecosystem functionality in marine sediment
Mar. Pollut. Bull.
Toward an ecotoxicological risk assessment of microplastics: comparison of available hazard and exposure data in freshwaters
Environ. Toxicol. Chem.
Microplastic contamination in freshwater environments: a review, focusing on interactions with sediments and benthic organisms
Environments
Microscopy and elemental analysis characterisation of microplastics in sediment of a freshwater urban river in Scotland, UK
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
The minimum detectable difference (MDD) and the interpretation of treatment-related effects of pesticides in experimental ecosystems
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
Meiofauna in stream habitats: temporal dynamics of abundance, biomass and secondary production in different substrate microhabitats in a first-order stream
Aquat. Ecol.
Microplastics in freshwater: what is the news from the World?
Diversity
Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis And Interpretation
Prospective environmental risk assessment for sediment-bound organic chemicals: a proposal for tiered effect assessment
Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge-of-field surface waters
EFSA J.
Energetics
Cited by (11)
Microplastic Fibers in Different Environmental Matrices from Synthetic Textiles: Ecotoxicological Risk, Mitigation Strategies, and Policy Perspective
2024, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringMicroplastic pollution on historic facades: Hidden ‘sink' or urban threat?
2024, Environmental PollutionNo Effect of Realistic Concentrations of Polyester Microplastic Fibers on Freshwater Zooplankton Communities
2024, Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryAn analysis of meiofauna knowledge generated by Latin American researchers
2024, Ocean and Coastal Research
- 1
Present address: LcM GmbH, Siemensstr. 26-28, 32120 Hiddenhausen, Germany.