Elsevier

Schizophrenia Research

Volume 78, Issue 1, 1 October 2005, Pages 95-106
Schizophrenia Research

Are auditory–verbal hallucinations associated with auditory affective processing deficits?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2005.06.002Get rights and content

Abstract

We investigated whether the presence of auditory–verbal hallucinations (AVH) was associated with impaired auditory affect perception. Controls, schizophrenia patients with a history of AVH (AVH) or with no history of AVH (NAVH) completed four perceptual auditory affect tasks. The tasks used either non-verbal/non-semantic or verbal/semantic stimuli. AVH patients showed significant impairments on a non-verbal task requiring the recognition of environmental sounds, this was particularly so for the affective stimuli and not the neutral valance stimuli. Thus, confirming auditory affect deficits in AVH patients. AVH patients also showed reduced right ear performance on a dichotic listening task. Conversely, both patient groups showed impairments on auditory affect tasks that used verbal/semantic stimuli; as these tasks require proficient semantic processing we speculated that significant semantic impairments in schizophrenia masked the additional auditory affect deficits present in the AVH group. The overall results support the notion that patients with AVH have increased liability for auditory affect perception deficits.

Introduction

A symptom experienced by many people with schizophrenia is the auditory–verbal hallucination (AVH); the experience is of some unknown person speaking to the patient, often critically or commandingly (i.e. charged with emotion). Phenomenological surveys have confirmed the importance of the content of hallucinations and their meaning to the voice-hearer. The AVHs are characterised as voice/s addressing the hearer in the third or second person in variable emotive tones, i.e. angry, frightening or pleasant etc (Nayani and David, 1996). Furthermore, it has long been recognised that disturbances of affect are one of the most pervasive and cardinal features of schizophrenia; however, the specificity, extent, and nature of these affective deficits are unclear, especially their relationship with AVH.

There have been relatively few studies examining auditory affect perception in schizophrenia. There is a small literature on verbal affective auditory perception using affective prosody tasks, and no known study using non-verbal auditory affective tasks. Affective prosody is defined as a linguistic/neuropsychological function that encompasses all nonverbal aspects of language that are necessary for recognising and conveying emotions in communication, and reflects the detection of different speech intonations. Edwards et al. (2002) recently published a review of seven affective prosody studies in schizophrenia, concluding that inpatients with chronic schizophrenia do less well than normal controls. There was some suggestion that more errors occur for sad stimuli, although, there is an argument that negative emotions are generally harder to recognise. To date, there has been no empirical evidence of a relationship between affective prosody recognition and the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

Work on affective prosody in patients with schizophrenia has used sentences or words read in different emotions as stimuli (see Edwards et al., 2002). Only one study attempted to control for the meanings of the sentences and presented subjects with sentences devoid of semantic content (Bazhin et al., 1978), i.e. by presenting different speech intonations with no actual words. There is a myriad of research to have shown disordered associative or semantic processes are central to cognitive deficits in patients with schizophrenia (e.g. Elvevåg et al., 2002b, Rossell et al., 1999, Rossell et al., 2000). It is, therefore, vital that semantic processes are kept to a minimum when studying affect perception.

To date, there has been no study to investigate auditory affect perception in patients who experience auditory hallucinations. This dearth is perplexing considering first, AVH are auditory perceptions (probably of misattributed inner speech, Frith and Done, 1988), and are frequently emotive in content. Secondly, there are well-established links with central auditory processing difficulties and AVH (Hoffman et al., 1999, McKay et al., 2000, Wexler et al., 1991), and last, eminent authors in the field, like Woodruff (2004), have questioned whether emotional aspects of speech are disturbed in individuals predisposed to AVH, and whether such disturbances increase a person's liability to experience AVH.

The aim of this research was to complete the first known comprehensive study of auditory affect perception in both verbal/semantic and non-verbal/non-semantic modalities in schizophrenia, and thus to examine whether poor auditory affective processing might be associated with the presence of AVH. This study investigated auditory affective processing using five different tasks. Two of the tasks examined perception of affective prosody using sentences read in a range of affective tones, thus contained verbal/semantic information. The third task examined the perception of non-word sounds, i.e. da, presented in a range of affective tones, thus contained limited semantic information. The forth task examined the perception of sounds presented in a range of affective tones and were non-verbal/non-semantic. The last task examined production of verbal information including some affectively valenced categories. There is a large literature on verbal production deficits in schizophrenia; no study to date has suggested that patients with AVH have poor verbal production. Reduced verbal production is typically found in patients with negative as opposed to positive symptoms of schizophrenia (e.g. Allen and Frith, 1983).

Two groups of patients were recruited for the study, those with a history of hallucinations and those with no history, and a group of normal controls. It was predicted that patients with schizophrenia with a history of auditory hallucinations would perform more poorly on the four perception tasks than patients with schizophrenia with no such history of auditory hallucinations. It was further predicted that both groups with schizophrenia compared with normal controls would perform poorly on the verbal production task and on a control facial affect perception task. Consequently, any differences reported between AVH and NAVH groups would be specific to the perception of auditory affective and not found in the language production or visual affect perception domains.

Section snippets

Participants

Forty patients with schizophrenia were recruited from Liverpool Hospital, Sydney and a participant register held at MACCS, Macquarie University, Sydney. All patients were diagnosed as suffering from schizophrenia or schizo-affective disorder according to DSM-IV criteria on the basis of interview (Diagnostic Interview for Psychosis: Castle et al., 1997). Patients with a history of traumatic brain injury, alcohol or substance abuse or other neurological conditions were excluded, as were

DANVA

The accuracy data in Table 2 shows patients with AVH had worse overall accuracy scores than controls and NAVH in both the prosody and the face conditions. Using the % correct in each affective category scores a repeated measures group (controls, NAVH and AVH) × DANVA condition (affective prosody and faces) × affective category (happy, sad, fear and anger) ANOVA revealed a main effect of group, F(2,63) = 6.9 p < .002. Planned contrasts using student Newman–Kuels at p < .05 showed the AVH patients were

Discussion

This is the first known study to assess auditory affect processing in AVH and NAVH patient groups. The data demonstrated that patients with AVH are impaired compared to NAVH and controls on one of the affective prosody tasks, the DANVA, but not the new 7 choice version, and showed greater deficits on dichotic listening according to ear advantage and on the non-linguistic sounds tasks, as shown in Table 6. As predicted all patients with schizophrenia showed reduced verbal fluency production and

Acknowledgements

Special thanks go to Prof Max Coltheart and MACCS for providing the authors with funding for this project and for commenting on earlier drafts of the manuscript. All sound stimuli were recorded with the help of Chris Callaghan, Macquarie University Linguistics department. Our thanks also to A/Prof Philip Ward at the Schizophrenia Research Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney for allowing access to research participants at the hospital, and to Dr Melissa Green, Dr Robyn Langdon and Mr Ryan McKay at

References (32)

  • H.A. Allen et al.

    Selective retrieval and free emission of category exemplars in schizophrenia

    British Journal of Psychology

    (1983)
  • N.C. Andreasen et al.

    Negative vs. positive schizophrenia: definition and validation

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1982)
  • E.F. Bazhin et al.

    The ability of emotional perception in schizophrenia patients

    Zhurnalnevropatolo gii psikhiatrii im S.S. Korsakova

    (1978)
  • R.P. Bentall

    The illusion of reality: a psychological model of hallucinations

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1990)
  • G. Bruder et al.

    Smaller right ear (left hemisphere) advantage for dichotic fused words in patients with schizophrenia

    American Journal of Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • A.S. David

    The cognitive neuropsychiatry of auditory verbal hallucinations: an overview

    Cognitive Neuropsychiatry

    (2004)
  • Cited by (63)

    • Attention to voices is increased in non-clinical auditory verbal hallucinations irrespective of salience

      2021, Neuropsychologia
      Citation Excerpt :

      Altered perception of vocal emotions has been proposed to contribute to the formation of AVH, potentially via disruption of a common mechanism underpinning voice processing (Alba-Ferrara et al., 2012). Specifically, patients tend to describe their hallucinated voices as emotionally negative (Daalman et al., 2011; de Leede-Smith and Barkus, 2013; Nayani and David, 1996), and to be less accurate at recognizing negative vocal emotions (Pinheiro et al., 2013, 2014; Rossell and Boundy, 2005). Furthermore, negative AVH tend to be perceived as less controllable than AVH with positive content (Birchwood and Chadwick, 1997).

    • Auditory emotion recognition deficits in schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2021, Asian Journal of Psychiatry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, 18 studies were included in the systematic review and qualified for the meta-analysis (Fig. 1). This meta-analysis included 18 case-control studies (Bach et al., 2009a, 2009b; Bozikas et al., 2006; Chaturvedi et al., 2020; Dondaine et al., 2014; Du et al., 2020; Gold et al., 2012; Jahshan et al., 2013; Kantrowitz et al., 2014; Kucharska-Pietura et al., 2005; Leitman et al., 2010, 2011; Pijnenborg et al., 2007; Pinheiro et al., 2013, 2014; Rossell and Boundy, 2005; Shea et al., 2007; Vogel et al., 2016) involving 615 patients with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (mean age ranged from 30 to 49.73 years) and 488 healthy control participants (Table 1). Thirteen studies identified patients according to DSM-Ⅳ (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) criteria, two used the ICD-10, one used MINI (Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview), one combined DSM-Ⅳ and MINI, and one did not mention the diagnosis method (Leitman et al., 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text