Towards the structural characterization of the human methyltransferome

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2018.03.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Methyltransferases (MTases) are structurally aligned and classified.

  • Structures of the human methyltransferome are tabulated.

  • New complexes show histone readers and epigenetic mechanisms of MTase activation.

  • MTase-activator complexes show mechanisms of MTase activation beyond chromatin.

Approximately 2000 structures of methyltransferases (MTases) are currently available, displaying fifteen different folds for binding a methyl donor and providing molecular level insight into nearly half the human methyltransferome. Several MTases involved in gene expression and regulation are catalytically inefficient when isolated, and their catalytic domains often show inhibitory active site architectures. Recently reported structures of complexes that more closely reflect biological context have begun to reveal the structural basis of activation. DNA and particular histone MTases are allosterically activated by binding histone modifications using reader domains or separate reader proteins, and some MTases operating beyond chromatin are activated by binding an activator protein. In this review, we describe the structural status of the human methyltransferome and then discuss newly revealed structural mechanisms of MTase activation.

Section snippets

Structural classification and distribution

The Protein Data Bank (PDB) currently contains about 2000 structures of methyltransferases (MTases), which can be classified according to the structural fold used to bind the methyl donor. Greater than 90% of the more than 300 methylation reactions classified under EC 2.1.1 use S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) as the methyl donor. SAM-dependent methylation reactions can be further subdivided into nucleophilic substitution or radical reactions. Structural alignment and clustering of MTase catalytic

Structural characterization of the human methyltransferome

Structural coordinates for nearly half of the MTases of the putative human methyltransferome [22] are currently available (Figure 2). A total of 201 known or predicted human MTases use eight SAM-dependent and three SAM-independent fold classes. The human 7-β-strand, SET, and SPOUT classes have 125, 56, and 8 members, respectively, of which 51, 57, and 50%, respectively, have human or orthologous eukaryotic structures available for their SAM-binding folds.

Several recently reported human MTase

Epigenetic mechanisms of MTase activation

The DNA MTases DNMT1, DNMT3A, and DNMT3B silence gene transcription by catalyzing cytosine C5 methylation of CpG dinucleotides within, e.g., gene promoters. In the classical model, DNMT3A and DNMT3B are de novo MTases, whereas DNMT1 is a maintenance MTase that acts on the unmethylated strand of hemi-methylated DNA during replication [37].

Structural results show that DNMT1 binds unmethylated DNA between its zinc finger (CXXC) and catalytic domains, but the target base remains unflipped and is

MTase activation beyond chromatin

rRNA and tRNA post-transcriptional modifications provide the chemical diversity needed to form the complex structures of the ribonucleic arm of the protein translation apparatus. Although more than 100 rRNA 2′-O methylations are installed by box C/D small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins [60, 61], other RNA methylations are catalyzed by individual enzymes, a subset of which utilize one or more activator proteins [62].

A series of structural studies has been performed on fungal orthologs of four

Tip of an iceberg of MTase switches

Several of the structures discussed in this review represent milestones in MTase structural biology and have revealed new mechanisms of MTase activation important for gene expression and regulation. However, additional switches for modulating MTase activity have been discovered and a myriad more likely await discovery and structural characterization. Given the involvement of many MTases in gene expression and cancer-related pathways, further characterization of their structures and

Conflict of interest statement

Nothing declared.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • • of special interest

  • •• of outstanding interest

References (77)

  • K. Takeshita et al.

    Structural insight into maintenance methylation by mouse DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1)

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2011)
  • S.K. Ooi et al.

    DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA

    Nature

    (2007)
  • A. Kuzmichev et al.

    Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein

    Genes Dev

    (2002)
  • L.E. Moritz et al.

    Structure, mechanism, and regulation of polycomb repressive complex 2

    J Biol Chem

    (2017)
  • M.P. Guy et al.

    Two-subunit enzymes involved in eukaryotic post-transcriptional tRNA modification

    RNA Biol

    (2014)
  • M.K. Fenwick et al.

    Burkholderia glumae ToxA is a dual-specificity methyltransferase that catalyzes the last two steps of toxoflavin biosynthesis

    Biochemistry

    (2016)
  • D. Varshney et al.

    Molecular basis of RNA guanine-7 methyltransferase (RNMT) activation by RAM

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2016)
  • A.K. Boal et al.

    Structural basis for methyl transfer by a radical SAM enzyme

    Science

    (2011)
  • K. Li et al.

    Crystal structure of the homocysteine methyltransferase MmuM from Escherichia coli

    Biochem J

    (2016)
  • H.L. Schubert et al.

    The X-ray structure of a cobalamin biosynthetic enzyme, cobalt-precorrin-4 methyltransferase

    Nat Struct Biol

    (1998)
  • Q. Yao et al.

    Structure and specificity of the bacterial cysteine methyltransferase effector NleE suggests a novel substrate in human DNA repair pathway

    PLoS Pathog

    (2014)
  • J.C. Evans et al.

    Structures of the N-terminal modules imply large domain motions during catalysis by methionine synthase

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2004)
  • C.H. Hagemeier et al.

    Insight into the mechanism of biological methanol activation based on the crystal structure of the methanol-cobalamin methyltransferase complex

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2006)
  • P. Kuhn et al.

    Crystal structure of thy1, a thymidylate synthase complementing protein from Thermotoga maritima at 2.25 Å resolution

    Proteins

    (2002)
  • W.R. Montfort et al.

    Structure, multiple site binding, and segmental accommodation in thymidylate synthase on binding dUMP and an anti-folate

    Biochemistry

    (1990)
  • M.H. Moore et al.

    Crystal structure of a suicidal DNA repair protein: the Ada O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase from E. coli

    EMBO J

    (1994)
  • E. Niedzialkowska et al.

    Protein purification and crystallization artifacts: the tale usually not told

    Protein Sci

    (2016)
  • R. Pejchal et al.

    Cobalamin-independent methionine synthase (MetE): a face-to-face double barrel that evolved by gene duplication

    PLoS Biol

    (2005)
  • E.L. Schwalm et al.

    Crystallographic capture of a radical S-adenosylmethionine enzyme in the act of modifying tRNA

    Science

    (2016)
  • H.L. Schubert et al.

    Many paths to methyltransfer: a chronicle of convergence

    Trends Biochem Sci

    (2003)
  • Z.M. Zhang et al.

    Structural basis for DNMT3A-mediated de novo DNA methylation

    Nature

    (2018)
  • L. Jiao et al.

    Structural basis of histone H3K27 trimethylation by an active polycomb repressive complex 2

    Science

    (2015)
  • N. Justin et al.

    Structural basis of oncogenic histone H3K27M inhibition of human polycomb repressive complex 2

    Nat Commun

    (2016)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Structural basis for activity regulation of MLL family methyltransferases

    Nature

    (2016)
  • R.J. Liu et al.

    Structural basis for substrate binding and catalytic mechanism of a human RNA:m5C methyltransferase NSun6

    Nucleic Acids Res

    (2017)
  • J. Finer-Moore et al.

    Crystal structure of the human tRNA m(1)A58 methyltransferase-tRNA(3)(Lys) complex: refolding of substrate tRNA allows access to the methylation target

    J Mol Biol

    (2015)
  • M. Smietanski et al.

    Structural analysis of human 2′-O-ribose methyltransferases involved in mRNA cap structure formation

    Nat Commun

    (2014)
  • P.A. Boriack-Sjodin et al.

    Structural insights into ternary complex formation of human CARM1 with various substrates

    ACS Chem Biol

    (2016)
  • Cited by (6)

    • Role of protein-protein interactions in allosteric drug design for DNA methyltransferases

      2020, Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, we hope that this computational framework could be extended to probe allosteric mechanisms of more epigenetic enzymes sharing with multi-domain structures but different folds, since there are approximately 2000 human methyltransferome structures (Fenwick & Ealick, 2018).

    • Charging the code — tRNA modification complexes

      2019, Current Opinion in Structural Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The pathophysiological consequences and clinical implications of disease-causing mutations in tRNA modifiers are very well covered by recent expert reviews [14–17]. Methylations affect multiple properties of tRNA molecules, including folding dynamics, thermostability, maturation as well as protection from cleavage or priming for the synthesis of subsequent modifications [18,19]. Eukaryotic tRNA methyltransferases (TRMs) typically utilize S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) as a methyl group donor which results in formation of a S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine and a methylated product [20].

    View full text