Application of response surface methodology for determination of methyl red in water samples by spectrophotometry method

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2014.04.119Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A simple method for the extraction of methyl red by using chemometrics was developed.

  • The significant variables were optimized by using a BBD combined with DF.

  • This technique provides good repeatability and high extraction recovery.

Abstract

In this study a rapid and effective method (dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME)) was developed for extraction of methyl red (MR) prior to its determination by UV–Vis spectrophotometry. Influence variables on DLLME such as volume of chloroform (as extractant solvent) and methanol (as dispersive solvent), pH and ionic strength and extraction time were investigated. Then significant variables were optimized by using a Box–Behnken design (BBD) and desirability function (DF). The optimized conditions (100 μL of chloroform, 1.3 mL of ethanol, pH 4 and 4% (w/v) NaCl) resulted in a linear calibration graph in the range of 0.015–10.0 mg mL−1 of MR in initial solution with R2 = 0.995 (n = 5). The limits of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.005 and 0.015 mg mL−1, respectively. Finally, the DLLME method was applied for determination of MR in different water samples with relative standard deviation (RSD) less than 5% (n = 5).

Introduction

Dye and dye stuffs are extensively used in various areas such as textile, plastic, food, cosmetic, carpet and paper industries [1], [2]. Wastewaters of these industries contain dye with metals, salts, and other chemicals which may be toxic to aquatic environment [3], [4], [5]. The release of colored wastewater from industry may produce an eco-toxic hazard and introduce potential danger of bioaccumulation, which may eventually affect humans through the food chain [1]. Azo dyes are the largest group of dyes used in industry [2]. The term azo dye is applied to synthetic organic colorants that are characterized by a nitrogen-to-nitrogen double bond: single bondNdouble bondNsingle bond [6]. Durability of azo dyes causes pollution to the environment. Besides, some azo dyes are toxic and mutagenic [7]. It is well known that methyl red (MR) dye has been used in paper printing and textile dyeing [8], [9] and it causes irritation of the eye, skin and digestive tract if inhaled/swallowed [10].

Sample preparation is an important step in analytical methods for determination of analytes in various matrices. So a combination of instruments with novel sample preparation methods has enabled analysis of trace amounts of analytes with higher accuracy. In the last decades design and development of miniaturized alternative methods to the older sample preparation techniques has been one of the most important challenges for analysts [11]. Liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) and Solid Phase Extraction (SPE) as the most commonly used techniques for sample preparation suffers from the disadvantages including time consuming, high cost, and need large volumes of samples and toxic organic solvents. Microextraction methods such as Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) [12] and Liquid Phase Microextraction (LPME) [13], [14] have attracted much attention in recent years as alternatives for classic liquid–liquid and solvent extraction procedures. These techniques are simple and fast, miniaturize sample pretreatment processes and minimize the use of organic solvents. However, these techniques suffer from some problems such as sample carry-over, relatively high cost, fiber fragility and relatively low precisions [15]. Dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) was developed to overcome these limitations [16], [17]. It is based on a ternary component solvent system like homogeneous LLE and Cloud Point Extraction (CPE) [18]. In this method, the appropriate mixture of extraction and dispersive solvents are injected rapidly into aqueous sample by syringe, and a cloudy solution is formed. The analyte in the sample is extracted into fine droplets of extraction solvent. After extraction, phase separation is performed by centrifugation and the enriched analyte in the sediment phase is determined by various methods. From commercial, economical and environmental point of view, DLLME offers several important advantages over conventional solvent extraction methods: faster operation, easier manipulation, no need of large amounts of organic extraction solvents, low time and cost, high extraction recovery and enrichment factor [19], [20], [21]. There are several experimental variables affecting the DLLME procedure that must be optimized [22], [23].

In recent years, chemometric tools such as response surface methodology (RSM) based on statistical Design of Experiments (DOEs) have been frequently applied to the optimization of analytical methods. Such statistical analyses are more efficient, since they account for interaction effects between the studied variables and determine more accurately the combination of levels that produces the optimum of the process [19], [22]. If there is significant interaction affects between variables, the optimal conditions indicated by the univariate studies will be different from the correct results of the multivariate optimization. So the univariate procedure may fail since the effect of one variable can be dependent on the level of the others involved in the optimization process. That is why multivariate optimization schemes involve designs for which the levels of all the variables are changed simultaneously. These methods have advantages such as a reduction in the number of experiments that need be executed resulting in lower reagent consumption and considerably less laboratory work. A structured experiment design that could simultaneously take into account several variables seems a more convenient approach searching for the optimal operational conditions in a reasonable number experimental runs [24], [25].

The Box–Behnken design (BBD) is a second-order multivariate technique based on three-level incomplete factorial designs that received a wide application for assessment of critical experimental conditions, that is, maximum or minimum of response function. BBD, a spherical and revolving design, has been applied in optimization of chemical and physical processes because of its reasoning design and excellent outcomes [22], [23], [24].

In the present work, DLLME followed by UV–Vis detection was applied for extraction and determination of the MR in water samples. Influence of important DLLME variables such as the kind and volume of extraction and disperser solvent, pH of the sample solution, extraction time and salt effect were investigated and optimized by BBD and desirability function (DF). The applicability of presented method for the analysis of water samples has also been investigated.

Section snippets

Reagents and instrumentation

All chemicals that used in this work were of analytical reagent grade and were used without further purification. Double distilled deionized water was used throughout which was produced by a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, dichloromethane, methanol, acetonitrile (HPLC grade), acetone and tetrahydrofuran (for spectroscopy) were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). The methyl red (MR) (Fig. 1) and sodium chloride were purchased from Merck. A

Results and discussion

In DLLME several variables such as volume of extraction and disperser solvents, salt effect, extraction time and pH of sample solution affect the ER of MR. In order to obtain the optimum condition for extraction of MR from the water samples. BBD and DF were used for searching the optimal experimental conditions. RSM is an empirical modeling technique used to evaluate the relationship between a set of controllable experimental factors and observed results. This optimization process involves

Conclusion

This work investigated the determination of MR in water samples. Experiments were made as a function of different variables (volume of extraction and dispersive solvents, pH and ionic strength of sample solution). response surface methodology (RSM) by the Box–Behnken model was used to examine the role of four process variables on MR determination. It was shown that a second-order polynomial regression model could properly interpret the experimental data with coefficient of determination (R2)

Acknowledgment

The author expresses their appreciation to the Yasouj University, Yasouj, Iran for financial support of this work.

References (28)

  • J.X. Lin et al.

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2008)
  • Z.A. ALOthman et al.

    Food Chem. Toxicol.

    (2012)
  • S. Khodadoust et al.

    Spectrochim. Acta, Part A

    (2012)
  • C. Sahoo et al.

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • H. Lachheb et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2002)
  • Y. Badr et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2008)
  • E. Psillakis et al.

    Trends Anal. Chem.

    (2003)
  • L. Zhao et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2001)
  • F. Ahmadi et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2006)
  • W. Li et al.

    Spectrochim. Acta, Part A

    (2014)
  • M.K. Purkait et al.

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2006)
  • S. Khodadoust et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2011)
  • R. Khani et al.

    Spectrochim. Acta, Part A

    (2014)
  • S. Khodadoust et al.

    Talanta

    (2013)
  • Cited by (38)

    • UV–Vis studies of methyl red in the presence of sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate/acetone and sodium dioctylsulfosuccinate/acetone/water

      2021, Spectrochimica Acta - Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      At this point, the total absorbance of the MR solution is independent of the relative concentration of the anionic form and zwitterionic form of MR, but transparently dependent on the total MR solution. Although we found few literature on the interaction of methyl red with different surfactants and surrounding molecules [29–36], there are limited studies of the interaction of methyl red with AOT [23,37–39]. In detail, we have observed the spectra of methyl red in the presence of AOT in the literature [23] by the methods of the absorbance and fluorescence in 10% ethanol in water.

    • A simple and effective determination of methyl red in wastewater samples by UV–Vis spectrophotometer with matrix matching calibration strategy after vortex assisted deep eutectic solvent based liquid phase extraction and evaluation of green profile

      2021, Microchemical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      These drawbacks can be altered by applying an appropriate sample treatment process before analysis to mitigate the interferants and preconcentrate the target analyte(s) [20]. Extraction methods such as liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) [23], solid phase extraction (SPE) [24], cloud point extraction (CPE) [25], solid phase microextraction (SPME) [26], dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction [6], and silica coated magnetic nanoparticles [27] have been used in the determination of dyes in different matrices. Different studies have reported the toxicity of organic solvents and their harmful effects to the environment and humans [28,29].

    • In-situ exfoliation of graphitic carbon nitride with metal-organic framework via a sonication-assisted approach for dispersive solid-phase extraction of perfluorinated compounds in drinking water samples

      2020, Journal of Chromatography A
      Citation Excerpt :

      During the dSPE process, several factors affect the adsorption and desorption kinetics. Herein, extraction time, pH and sorbent dosage were systematically investigated during the adsorption process by the Box–Behnken design (BBD) [22]. The designed matrix for the combination of various factors is given in Table S2, in which 17 runs were executed in order to examine the extraction performance during the dSPE process.

    • Application of Box-Behnken design in response surface methodology for the molecularly imprinted polymer pipette-tip solid phase extraction of methyl red from seawater samples and its determination by spectrophotometery

      2018, Marine Pollution Bulletin
      Citation Excerpt :

      These compounds are the main pollutants of water and the marine environment and they may be found in trace quantities in effluents. Nowadays, dye and dye stuffs are extensively used in many industries including textile, cosmetic, food, plastic, carpet and paper production (Khodadoust and Ghaedi, 2014; El-Qada et al., 2006). These compounds are inherently highly visible and may cause abnormal coloration of environmental even by a minor release.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text