Real options valuation of photovoltaic power investments in existing buildings
Introduction
General public, researchers, companies, and regulatory agencies have focused their attention on clean and sustainable energy sources because of environmental concerns and the large and paradigmatic structural changes faced by the electric industry over the last decade. Presently, fossil fuels count for a major fraction of global electricity generation and therefore they are a main anthropogenic source of carbon dioxide emissions. In this context, renewable generation technologies are regarded by policymakers as the main strategic instruments for substituting fossil fuels from the generation mix in order to meet energy sustainability and emission targets at a global scale. Photovoltaic (PV) generation is now a safe and mature technology among renewable generation types. Moreover, in many countries, solar power is currently supplying a significant part of the total electricity demand, especially in Europe [1], where it is claimed that at the end of 2020, global PV generation capacity has been estimated in 613 GW, growing at a mean annual rate of 22 over the last five years.
Buildings located in cities are the cause of near of global energy consumption and therefore, they play an important role in the energy market. Buildings’ energy demand seems to keep growing worldwide in the coming years [2]. Thus, the building sector represents a huge opportunity for cutting emissions by means of energy efficiency measures and the deployment of distributed renewable generation, such as rooftop PV systems. In this context, distributed renewable energy generation, such as rooftop solar photovoltaic, has grown exponentially over the past few years [1].
Renewable projects are typically capital-intensive investments also exhibiting substantial irreversibility, as assets under unfavorable scenarios can only be recovered by assuming a large or total loss in value. However, most renewable projects have some degree of strategic flexibility to decide the time to proceed with the investment. Consequently, the big challenge for decision-makers is dealing with the intricate puzzle of uncertainty, irreversibility and flexibility embedded in the PV project.
Only suboptimal investment decisions can be derived from the NPV rule when a decision-making process is characterized by irreversibility, uncertainty, and embedded flexibility [[3], [4], [5]]. Hence, the Real Option Valuation (ROV) method has been successfully used to support decision-making facing highly uncertain environments with managerial flexibility since it assesses the implied value of flexibility [6]. Strategic flexibility allows decision-makers to modify or defer investment plans in response to the arrival of new information (though never complete) that reduces the uncertainty.
The power industry is a classic example of a sector with capital-intensive investments. This fact and the increasing uncertainties introduced with deregulation of electricity markets have become the ROV a particularly suitable framework for assessing investments in power infrastructure. Hence, ROV has been successfully applied to generation projects considering different types of options and uncertainties. In fact, flexible investments in nuclear power stations, hydroelectric plants and renewable energy projects have been appraised by ROV [[7], [8], [9]]. In addition, ROV are used in selecting generation technologies and in the optimal scheduling of multi-fuel power plants [[10], [11], [12], [13]]. Although this technique has grown in importance, the use of ROV in the context of renewable generation investments is still limited. Literature on the application of ROV to PV investments is even sparser.
Thus, the latest and highest quality articles have explored the use of the ROV approach in transmission planning decisions [14,15], and in generation expansion investments. Accordingly, authors in Ref. [16] have provided a survey of the ROV method applied to electricity generation projects. In addition, one of the most recent papers [17] carries out an exploration of the ROV method to support renewable generation decision-making in developing countries. Particularly, this work provides a state-of-the-art survey about ROV applied to renewable energy generation. Important and recent research applications of ROV to generation technologies includes: hydroelectric projects [16,18,19], wind power [[20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]] and photovoltaic energy [26,27].
In addition, the work in Ref. [28] presents an investment planning model that integrates learning curve information on renewable power generation technologies into a dynamic programming formulation featuring real option analysis, in which the empirical analysis is based on data for the Turkish electricity supply industry. In Ref. [25], an analysis of investments in wind generation at the Baltic Sea was conducted, in which three different incentive schemes were considered (feed-in tariffs, feed-in premiums and tradable green certificates). Moreover, authors in Ref. [20] applied ROV to a wind generation project considering the electricity price, the amount of energy and government subsidies in the UK. Similarly, the proposal in Ref. [29] applied ROV to a wind generation project in Taiwan from which they conclude that the investment value increases as a result of an increase in the length of time taken to exercise the option, the risk-free discount rate, the price of the underlying asset and volatility. In Ref. [23], a ROV-based method to valuate small wind turbine generation was proposed.
Furthermore, in order to find a price for encouraging hydro-power projects in Norway, an ROV-based model was developed by Bockman [18]. Likewise, in Ref. [19] the ROV method has been applied for a hydroelectric generation project to estimate the value of the investment opportunity and also to find the incentive-price based on a price forecast.
Even though there is a significant amount of research that applies the ROV method in the context of renewable energy investments, the contributions to the field of photovoltaic projects based on ROV are still scarse. Moreover, financial analyses are developed considering specific countries with different policy regulations, therefore limiting the generalization. In addition, according to Ref. [30], distributed photovoltaic generation does not compete for land use and therefore, it should be analyzed from the standpoint of the final consumer who perceives electricity prices rather than electricity generation costs. Incorporating PV to existing buildings is one case belonging to this category, which will be addressed in this work.
One of the latest papers [31] suggests an ROV-based model for evaluating large-scale photovoltaic generation plants in China, considering tariffs, investment cost, conventional energy cost and changes of unit generating capacity. Additionally, in Ref. [32] an optimal level of feed-in tariffs policy in 30 provinces of China for photovoltaic power generation is estimated based on ROV, but not for residential users. Also, Gomes [33] addresses a DCF-based technical-economic analysis considering a policy for the integration of PV systems in Brazil, and the potential penetration of PV-based distributed generation in residential buildings is estimated.
Going deeper into the analysis of photovoltaic project valuation, in Ref. [26] the authors argue that investors find more attractive to delay the investment in PV technologies while preparing Solar Ready Buildings in order to adopt PV technologies in the future when their prices are lower, energy prices are higher, or stricter environmental regulations are in place. However, this work uses a binomial tree for solving the option valuation problem, with the consequent limitations and simplifications inherent to this method. Drawbacks of this analytical approach to option valuation are overcome by advanced numerical techniques based on stochastic simulation, such as the well-known Least-Square Monte Carlo (LSM) method [34]. According to Ref. [35], complex real investments with embedded real options and multiple uncertain state variables can be economically evaluated by extending the LSM method, despite the fact that it was originally thought for valuing American financial options. The LSM approach has been successfully applied in various industries such as R D projects [36], Internet companies [37] and pharmaceutical companies [38]. In fact, assessing ROV in power investments by using the LSM method is a recent development and the review of the literature in the field reflects a still limited use of this valuation tool. Works like [[39], [40], [41]] have applied LSM to the power generation sector while in the power transmission sector, LSM has been used by Refs. [42,43] for assessing investments in flexible AC transmission devices (FACTS). Additionally, a recent work [44] has conducted an economic research based on LSM for investment decisions faced by solar panels producers.
In addition, research on the economic benefits of installing PV generation on existing buildings that were not originally designed for PV generation should be conducted. Authors in Ref. [45] have contributed by using the ROV method to estimate the opportunity cost of designing a building with the capability of install mechanical cooling in the future only if natural ventilation is not sufficient. Additionally, authors in Ref. [46] have conducted research with the aim of finding the social acceptance (public perceptions) of different renewable energy technologies for buildings in Helsinki. However, adopting onsite renewable generation in existing buildings has not been properly analyzed, not only from a technical perspective, but also in terms of the regulatory policies, the financial aspects, and the long-term uncertainties. Moreover, research on the photovoltaic investment decision-making process in existing buildings based on ROV is not readily available in the literature and finding ROV properly solved by using the LSM approach is even more infrequent.
Review of the current literature reveals a considerable gap between modern finance methods and conventional decision frameworks used by practitioners when assessing PV projects for self-generation. Because of this, many onsite PV generation projects might be being discarded too early. Accordingly, research focused on reducing this gap is urgently needed in order to improve allocation of capital resources, reduce overall supply costs, and enhance reliability and sustainability of current energy systems.
Finally, Fig. 1 graphically illustrates a summarized classification of the surveyed literature in order to facilitate the analysis of the overlapping fields of renewable energy, sustainable buildings and valuation methods according to the applications and the methods used.
In order to make a contribution to the field of valuation of distributed renewable energy systems and aid in decision-making, in this work we introduce a methodological framework to assess rooftop solar photovoltaic investment projects in existing buildings based on the ROV approach. The option valuation problem is solved by means of the LSM method. Uncertainties regarding tariff prices and investment costs were incorporated by specifying suitable stochastic processes and applying Monte Carlo simulation. The option to defer the rooftop PV investment was taken into account; therefore, the question of when to invest is answered after a real options analysis. In addition, a discussion of capital cost and option expiration time is examined by a sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis performed allows creating decision regions and determining threshold values for triggering immediate investments. This framework also provides quantitative support for the decision-making process as concerns the best timing for the investment. To demonstrate the numerical practicability of the proposed approach, the assessment of a PV project deployed on the rooftop of a large government office building was taken as an exemplary case study.
In the next section, background on concepts and methods in Real Option valuations is summarized. Also, the advantages of simulative techniques over analytical valuation methods are highlighted. In Section 3, the stochastic simulation method is introduced and a framework for evaluating solar generation investments in buildings is proposed. Section 4 presents a numerical example of a PV project installed on the rooftop of an existing large office building in order to test the option-based valuation methodology proposed in this work. Quantitative results and a sensitivity analysis are provided in order to demonstrate the feasibility and usefulness of the proposed valuation method. Finally, the discussion provided in Section 5 concludes the article.
Section snippets
Investment valuation
Future market conditions, development costs, and competitor behavior are highly uncertain in electricity markets. Therefore, strategic investment decisions are critical nowadays for managing long-term risks. Managers can invest in stages, abandon projects, and acquire licenses or patents in order to wait for better information. Although managers usually make contingent decisions based upon an intuitive awareness of the existence of optionality embedded in investment projects, in practice they
Methodology
The market value of an investment project should be assessed as the standard NPV plus the value of the embedded managerial options (see Fig. 2). Therefore, the equation describing a project's cash flow and investment costs needs to be addressed.
Results and discussions
In order to demonstrate the practicability and usefulness of the proposed valuation framework, a numerical example is provided in the following subsections. Without losing generality, the exemplary case considers the valuation of an investment project that entails the construction of a solar generation facility on the rooftop of an existing building. Uncertainties on driving variables and time flexibility in decision-making are explicitly accounted for. The benefits of real options analysis
Conclusions
Renewable generation is a cornerstone of the technological transition to a low carbon future and to attain energy sustainability. In fact, renewable energy technologies are deemed main pillars for meeting global emissions targets. In this context, rooftop PV systems on existing buildings may play a significant role in the abatement of greenhouse emissions in the near future.
Distinctive features of renewable generation technologies are the very low operating costs and negligible emissions.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), the National University of San Juan (UNSJ) and the National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion (ANPCyT).
References (63)
- et al.
A global review of energy consumption, co2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten co2 emitting countries)
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2015) - et al.
Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: valuing modularity
Energy Econ
(2005) - et al.
Flexibility and technology choice in gas fired power plant investments
Rev Financ Econ
(2005) - et al.
What is the value of the option to defer an investment in transmission expansion planning? an estimation using real options
Energy Econ
(2017) - et al.
Real option valuation of power transmission investments by stochastic simulation
Energy Econ
(2015) - et al.
Real options analysis for renewable energy investment decisions in developing countries
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2017) - et al.
Investment timing and optimal capacity choice for small hydropower projects
Eur J Oper Res
(2008) A real option analysis of investments in hydropower–the case of Norway
Energy Policy
(2007)- et al.
Renewable energy sources project appraisal under uncertainty: the case of wind energy exploitation within a changing energy market environment
Energy Policy
(2002) - et al.
A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes
Appl Energy
(2017)
A real options evaluation model for the diffusion prospects of new renewable power generation technologies
Energy Econ
Using real option analysis for highly uncertain technology investments: the case of wind energy technology
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
Technical-economic potential of pv systems on brazilian rooftops
Renew Energy
A real options model for renewable energy investment with application to solar photovoltaic power generation in China
Energy Econ
Optimal feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic power generation in China: a real options analysis
Energy Policy
Valuing flexibility: the case of an integrated gasification combined cycle power plant
Energy Econ
A real options-based ccs investment evaluation model: case study of China's power generation sector
Appl Energy
A simulation based real options approach for the investment evaluation of nuclear power
Comput Ind Eng
Flexible investment decisions in the european interconnected transmission system
Electr Power Syst Res
Social acceptance of renewable energy technologies for buildings in the helsinki metropolitan area of Finland
Renew Energy
Option pricing: a simplified approach
J Financ Econ
Timing residential photovoltaic investments in the presence of demand uncertainties
Sustain Cities Soc
Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous
J Financ Econ
Option game with Poisson jump process in company radical technological innovation
Technol Forecast Soc Chang
Designing regulatory frameworks for merchant transmission investments by real options analysis
Energy Policy
Real options: managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation
Uncertainty: the new rules for strategy
J Bus Strat
Optimal strategies for investment in generation of electric energy through real options
Cited by (45)
Real options valuation of photovoltaic investments: A case from Turkey
2024, Renewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSystem planning with demand assets in balancing markets
2024, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy SystemsRegional feed-in tariff mechanism for photovoltaic power generation in China considering tradable green certificate revenue
2024, Journal of Cleaner ProductionStranded asset risk assessment on ship investments
2023, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment