Two-phase closed thermosyphons: A review of studies and solar applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.002Get rights and content

Abstract

The use of the two-phase closed thermosyphons (TPCTs) is increasing for many heat transfer applications. This paper reviews the most recent published experimental and theoretical studies on the TPCT. After a description of the TPCT operating principle and the performance characteristics, the heat transfer analysis in condenser and evaporator sections that depends on the complex two-phase process are described. The influence of the affecting parameters on the performance of TPCTs such as the geometry (diameter, shape and length), the inclination angle, the filling ratio (FR), the working fluid, the operating temperature and pressure analyzed by various researchers is discussed. The various operating limits occurring in a thermosyphon includes viscous, sonic, dryout, boiling and flooding are also analyzed. Considering the application of TPCTs, the paper presents a review of experimental tests and applications. This paper can be used as the starting point for the researcher interested in the TPCTs and their renewable energy applications.

Introduction

Heat pipes (HPs) have emerged as the most appropriate technology and cost effective thermal control solution due to their excellent heat transfer capabilities [1], [2]. Interesting connection can be evidenced in the literature between HPs and thermal engineering applications [3]. A special HP where the condensed liquid moves to the condenser by gravity is two-phase closed thermosyphon (TPCT). In this device no capillary structure is present and it works in a two-phase close cycle where latent heat of evaporation and condensation is used to transfer heat. The TPCT can work in gravity [4] or antigravity mode with the condenser above the evaporator [5]. In this last case the system operates in an unsteady, e.g. periodic regime. There are other kinds of two-phase thermosyphon systems such as two-phase closed loop thermosyphons (TPCLTs) [6] and two-phase microchannel thermosyphon [7].

A TPCT can be used in much wider thermal and temperature ranges than a wicked HP, since it does not have the large flow resistance or low boiling limit inside the wick, as the condensate liquid in the TPCT is returned to the heated side of the system under the effect of gravity, instead of capillary forces in wicked HPs [8]. However, TPCTs have major limits on the maximum amount of thermal energy that can be transferred due to viscous, sonic, dryout, flooding and entrainment limits [9].

The TPCT technology has found increasing interest of the researchers in a wide range of applications from small-scale to large-scale systems. TPCTs are used in chemical and petroleum industries applications [10], electronic cooling [11], [12], telecommunication devices [13], energy storage systems [14], the railway transportation systems [15], thermoelectric power generators [16], seasonal cooling load reduction of buildings [17], cooling of super conducting bearings [18] and various heating and cooling applications [19]. TPCTs can be also used for thermal control in particular in connection with solar energy systems like solar collectors [20] or photovoltaic systems [21]. A general description of TPCT systems is reported in Fig. 1.

The widely spread use of TPCTs has led to increase the demand for analytical and numerical models and predictive tools that would allow the thermal engineers to predict their performance. There are experimental studies which have tried to predict the complex mechanism inside the TPCT. Although considerable studies have been undertaken to investigate the behavior of the TPCT in steady operating conditions, there still exists considerable uncertainty in the description of the complex physical phenomena of TPCTs. The heat and mass transfer through a TPCT is, in fact, significantly affected by different parameters and design variables such as: geometry, inclination angle, filling ratio (FR), thermophysical properties of working fluid, and vapor temperature and pressure. The large number of physical parameters affecting the TPCT performances has, therefore, prevented a complete understanding of the mechanisms of the heat and mass transfer in the TPCT and the possibility of analyzing the system performance under a variety of operating conditions and design variables. This complex mechanisms include: wall and interfacial heat transfer; thin film flows, interfacial mass transfer, compressible vapor effects and phase-change phenomena (boiling, condensation and evaporation). Considering the above, the present review outlines the state-of-the-art of TPCT technology, design methodologies and applications. The paper is organized into two main sections: thermal analysis of TPCTs and applications. The first section is divided into five different parts: background and operating principle, heat transfer analysis, analytical and numerical approaches, operating limit, and experimental devices. The second section analyzes the applications with specific attention to recent published renewable energy application including: solar applications and air to air heat exchangers.

Section snippets

TPCT: Background and operating principle

The main physical mechanisms of a TPCT are easily understood by using the scheme shown in Fig. 2(a). Basically, TPCTs consist of three different sections: an evaporator, a condenser and an adiabatic section. To determine the TPCT performance, it is necessary to know the thermal-fluid phenomena occurring inside it. In such a device, the input power is supplied through the evaporator wall to the working fluid and the liquid contained in the pool inside the evaporator starts to evaporate. Vapor

TPCT: Heat transfer analysis

Before analyzing the analytical and numerical study on the TPCTs, the evaporation and condensation phenomena need to be described. The good performance of TPCTs mainly depends on the behaviour in evaporation and condensation sections. In this section, detailed analysis of condensation and evaporation heat transfer is presented. The most important published semi-empirical correlations for the definition of the HTC are analyzed and compared with the experimental data available in the literature.

TPCT: operating limit

Although TPCTs are very effective heat transfer devices, they are subject to a well-known number of operating limits: viscous, sonic, dryout, boiling and flooding and other phenomena called geyser boiling.

Sonic limit: For liquid metals as a working fluid, the vapor velocity can reach sonic levels in start-up or in steady-state conditions. If the sonic speed is reached, the vapor usually located in thermosyphon core experiences a shock wave. This specific limit is considered in [1], but a

TPCT: Analytical and numerical approaches

The possible use of TPCTs for various heat transfer applications has led to an increased demand for complete predictive tools that would allow the thermal engineers to perform preliminary design and analysis of behaviour of TPCTs. In an effort to meet this demand, some investigators attempted to present modeling tools, ranging from the simple lumped capacity models up to complex transient multi-dimensional simulation. To determine the heat capability through a TPCT and performance

TPCT: experimental devices

In this section the relevant experimental analysis on the TPCTs are reported. One of the important parameter affecting the TPCTs performance is the working fluid and the related filling ratio. Ong and Alalhi [77] investigated experimentally the effects of FR and ratio of evaporator on condenser lengths of a TPCT (di=25 mm and L=780 mm) using R-22, R-134a and water as working fluids. It was concluded that R-22 performs better than R-134a for low operating temperature difference. Also, water

TPCT: Applications

The TPCTs can be applied for several thermal control and energy storage applications. Interesting applications can be evidenced in the literature between solar collector and TPCTs. Fig. 8(a) and (b) show a flat plate and a concentrating solar collector, respectively where the TPCT is applied for heat transfer from a solid (absorbed solar radiation) to an external fluid flow as thermal energy. Abreu and Colle [18] focused on the experimental analysis of the thermal behaviour of TPCTs. The

Conclusions

This paper presents the state of the art of TPCTs from different points of view: analytical, numerical and experimental. TPCTs can provide reliable and effective thermal control for energy conservation, energy recovery and renewable energy applications. Even if there are several advantages associated with using TPCTs in the energy field, TPCTs are under-investigated and analyzed especially in the case of compact and solar equipment. Analytical and numerical analysis of the TPCT is well

References (123)

  • H. Jouhara et al.

    Experimental investigation of small diameter two phase closed thermosyphons charged with water, FC-84, FC-77 and FC-3283

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2010)
  • R.A. Seban et al.

    Film condensation in a vertical tube with a closed top

    Int J Heat Mass transf

    (1984)
  • S.J. Chen et al.

    Reflux condensation in a two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1984)
  • U. Gross

    Reflux condensation heat transfer inside a closed thermosyphon

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1992)
  • S. Fiedler et al.

    Experimental and theoretical investigation of reflux condensation in an inclined small diameter tube

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2004)
  • H.M.S. Hussein et al.

    Theoretical analysis of laminar-film condensation heat transfer inside inclined wickless heat pipes flat-plate solar collector

    Renew Energy

    (2001)
  • S. Oh et al.

    Complete condensation in a vertical tube passive condenser

    Int Commun Heat Mass Transf

    (2005)
  • U. Gross et al.

    Conjugated shear stress and Prandtl number effects on reflux condensation heat transfer inside a vertical tube

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2006)
  • Q. Baojin et al.

    Heat transfer characteristics of titanium/water two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Energy Convers Manag

    (2009)
  • M.S. EL-Genk et al.

    Heat transfer correlations for small, uniformly heated liquid pools

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1998)
  • K. Stephan et al.

    Heat transfer correlation for natural convection boiling

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1980)
  • H. Imura et al.

    Critical heat flux in a closed two-phase thermosyphon

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1983)
  • H. Shabgard et al.

    Thermal characteristics of a closed thermosyphon under various filling conditions

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2014)
  • Y.J. Park et al.

    Heat transfer characteristics of a two phase closed thermosyphon to fill charge ratio

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2002)
  • S.H. Noie

    Heat transfer characteristics of a two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2005)
  • W. Guo et al.

    An experimental study of axial conduction through a thermosyphon pipe wall

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2009)
  • I.L. Pioro

    Experimental evaluation of constants for the Rohsenow pool boiling correlation

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1999)
  • I.L. Pioro et al.

    Nucleate pool-boiling heat transfer. II: assessment of prediction methods

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2004)
  • S. Filippeschi et al.

    Transient analysis of boiling heat transfer in periodic drying out miniature pools

    Int J Multiphase Flow

    (2008)
  • M.S. El-Genk et al.

    Determination of operation envelopes for closed, two-phase thermosyphons

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1999)
  • T.F. Lin et al.

    Experimental investigation of geyser boiling in an annular two phase closed thermosyphon

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1995)
  • I. Khazaee et al.

    Experimental investigation of effective parameters and correlation of geyser boiling in a two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2010)
  • B. Jiao et al.

    Investigation on the effect of filling ratio on the steady state heat transfer performance of a vertical two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2008)
  • Y. Katto et al.

    Critical heat flux of counter-flow boiling in a uniformly heated vertical tube with a closed bottom

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1991)
  • I. Golobic et al.

    Corresponding states correlation for maximum heat flux in two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Int J Ref

    (1997)
  • A. Nakano et al.

    An experimental study of heat transfer characteristics of a two-phase nitrogen thermosyphon over a large dynamic range operation

    Cryogenics

    (1998)
  • T. Payakaruk et al.

    Correlations to predict heat transfer characteristic of an inclined closed two-phase thermosyphon at normal operating conditions

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2000)
  • S. Rittidech et al.

    Correlation to predict heat-transfer characteristics of a vertical flat thermosyphon (VFT) at normal operating conditions

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (2010)
  • Z.Q. Long et al.

    Experimental investigation of the heat transfer characteristics of a helium cryogenic thermosyphon

    Cryogenics

    (2013)
  • F. Dobran

    Steady-state characteristics and stability thresholds of a closed two-phase thermosyphon

    Int J Heat Mass Transf

    (1985)
  • H. Farsi et al.

    An experimental and theoretical investigation of the transient behavior of a two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2003)
  • Y. Pan

    Condensation heat transfer characteristics and concept of sub-flooding limit in a two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Int Commun Heat Mass Transf

    (2001)
  • B. Fadhl et al.

    Numerical modelling of the temperature distribution in a two-phase closed thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2013)
  • K.S. Ong et al.

    Experimental investigation on hysteresis effect in vertical two phase closed thermosyphons

    Appl Therm Eng

    (1999)
  • H.Z. Abou-Ziyan et al.

    Performance of stationary and vibrated thermosyphon working with water and R134a

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2001)
  • P. Amatachaya et al.

    Comparative heat transfer characteristics of a flat two-phase closed thermosyphon (FTPCT) and a conventional two-phase closed thermosyphon (CTPCT)

    Int Commun Heat Mass Transf

    (2010)
  • A. Ordaz-Flores et al.

    Experimental characterisation and technical feasibility of a closed two-phase vs a conventional solar water heating thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2011)
  • R.W. MacGregor et al.

    Investigation of low global warming potential working fluids for a closed two-phase thermosyphon

    Appl Therm Eng

    (2013)
  • H. Jouhara et al.

    Experimental investigation of an inclined-condenser wickless heat pipe charged with water and an ethanolewater azeotropic mixture

    Energy

    (2013)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Reducing heat loss of fluids in heavy oil wellbore using two-phase closed thermosyphon sucker rod

    Energy

    (2013)
  • Cited by (235)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text