Elsevier

Renewable Energy

Volume 161, December 2020, Pages 722-735
Renewable Energy

A global annual optimum tilt angle model for photovoltaic generation to use in the absence of local meteorological data

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.098Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Model to estimate the annual optimum tilt angle for any location worldwide.

  • Search based model based on polynomial regression, using data from 14468 sites.

  • Studied influence variables on optimum tilt: hemisphere, diffuse fraction and albedo.

  • The energy loss when the optimum tilt angle is misestimated increases with latitude.

  • An estimation of a 0.2 annual albedo is only accurate for absolute latitudes <60°.

Abstract

This manuscript proposes a series of global models to estimate optimum annual tilt angle (βopt) as a function of local variables (latitude, diffuse fraction and albedo) based on the hourly irradiance data of 14,468 sites spread across the globe from the One Building database. As a result, these models can be used for any location in the absence of local meteorological data. First, a polynomial regression model, applicable worldwide, is proposed to estimate βopt as a function of latitude. This model fits the global data considered with a 2% RMSE error. Average energy losses are estimated to be 1% for a 10° variation from βopt. A variation of 40° with respect to βopt, implies a 12–18% energy loss depending on latitude. In addition, if only latitude is considered to estimate βopt, different expressions should be used for latitudes >50° depending on the hemisphere. These variations are a result of the influence of diffuse irradiance on βopt, due to the fact that sites with higher amounts of diffuse irradiance have a lower βopt. Secondly, a polynomial surface regression model to estimate βopt as a function of latitude and the annual diffuse fraction is proposed improving the results, reaching a 0.7% RMSE error. Thirdly, a simplified polynomial surface regression model to estimate βopt as a function of latitude and albedo (without the influence of the diffuse fraction) is proposed, and finally a model gathering all three variables under study (latitude, annual diffuse fraction and albedo) to calculate the optimum tilt angle is presented.

Introduction

The performance of photovoltaic (PV) modules is highly influenced by the orientation (an azimuth or horizontal angle with respect to a reference) and tilt angle (the vertical angle with respect to the ground) for a given location. A key objective when installing a photovoltaic array (PVA) is to achieve the maximum energy output in a time period. To achieve that, a regular solution is to use tracking systems, though, in many applications, the tilt and azimuth angles are fixed or periodically and manually adjusted. Placing the PVA facing the equator at an optimum tilt angle βopt, and to correct the tilt periodically is a common practice. For this purpose, the optimum tilt should be determined at any latitude, on any day, or any period of the year. For grid-connected PV plants, the optimum orientation is computed according to site-specific weather data e.g., for the typical meteorological year (TMY) or satellite data. However, designers for medium and small PV systems, mainly in developing countries, often lack either the site-specific data or the calculation tools to benefit from it. These situations could clearly benefit from a simple and universal equation that accurately estimates the optimum tilt angle as a function of known local variables.

Technical literature shows various methods to express the optimum tilt function considering different criteria and based on latitude, time, declination, or other local characteristics, [20]. There are many studies that analyze the angle of inclination that optimizes the capture of the annual irradiation of the PV panels. To calculate βopt, different optimization criteria can be considered; maximizing the total incident solar energy on the surface, either in extraterrestrial or in atmospheric conditions, is the most applied criterion [43]. Other optimization techniques applied include the Artificial Neural Network [42]; Genetic Algorithms [8,44] or Particle-Swarm Optimization techniques [25].

To compute the irradiance on the plane of a PVA, in order to calculate βopt at a given location, the direct normal irradiance (DNI) and diffuse radiation data of a TMY type year are required. Because it is not normally easy to obtain this kind of data, available measured global horizontal irradiance (GHI) data are used, and separation methods are usually applied to determine its DNI and diffuse horizontal irradiance (DHI) components. Separation or decomposition models are typically based on the correlation between the clearness index and the diffuse fraction. The clearness index is defined as the ratio of the GHI to the extraterrestrial horizontal irradiance while the diffuse fraction is the ratio of the DHI to GHI. The relationship between the diffuse fraction and the clearness index, originally proposed by Ref. [28]; is independent of the cloud type. Models including a stability index parameter (intended to account for the effect of variable/in-homogeneous clouds) in their formulation were found to perform better than the simple Liu and Jordan based models formulation [19].

The computation of βopt requires obtaining the irradiance components on the tilted panel from DNI and DHI data. While the beam component can be computed from a simple geometric relationship with the DNI, the other two components (diffuse and albedo radiation) must be estimated from models and empirical correlations [6,15]. Moreover, an adequate transposition model must be selected in order to account for all three components at the PVA tilt angle. In the valuable review paper by Ref. [50]; the performance of 26 transposition models was evaluated and compared. Although no universal model is found, some are recommended; according to the linear ranking results on nRMSE, the top families of models are the four Perez models [[37], [38], [39],48], the Muneer model [33]; and the Hay-Davies model [12].

Many studies that calculate βopt from a specific location or region using the Perez model or another are available. Most of them have been reviewed in Ref. [11,20]. However, there are few studies that have sufficient radiation data to give a worldwide generalized expression of the βopt as a function of latitude [22,41] or as a function of latitude and other local variables. Variables that can influence the calculation of βopt in addition to latitude are, according to Ref. [27]: the longitude, the sign of latitude, the altitude of the location, temperature, humidity, diffuse fraction, or albedo radiation among others [18]. developed an analytical model of the optimum tilt angle as a function of the latitude, clearness index and day number based on long-term solar data in Iran [9]. showed that, for the US, the local clearness index could be used as a relationship factor between latitude and βopt.

The few expressions that model the annual optimum tilt angle as a function of latitude obtained by a search-based approach use databases where there are very few data locations for each latitude. In those cases, variations in βopt of up to 10% are exposed. This supports the fact that for the same latitude, the optimal angle depends on other local variables. Other studies, [5,22]; also support this idea.

The ground type on which the photovoltaic installation is located affects the proportion of radiation reflected on it. Models typically consider an albedo (ρ) default value of 0.2 across sites, based on [29]; this value is generally used all throughout the literature [36]. However, the evolution and use of anisotropic models allows for the consideration of the influence of albedo, which has been proven to be important. If the effect of ground albedo is ignored, errors can be observed, for example, in the peak of daily irradiance if the default value is used instead of the real one [43]. In Ref. [4]; effective albedo values for 22 commonly occurring surface materials in photovoltaic applications are provided. Furthermore, high-tilt-angle ground-mounted PV systems may be impacted by albedo irradiation [1,26].

Firstly, this paper proposes a simple, global, worldwide model to estimate βopt as a function of latitude. The optimization criterion used to compute βopt is the one maximizing the total incident solar energy on the surface, either in extraterrestrial or in atmospheric conditions, [43]. The [37] model is the selected transposition model. However, a small comparison between the results obtained for βopt using the Perez and Hay-Davies model is found in subsection 3.3. The model is developed by using carefully selected and treated hourly radiation data from 14,468 sites around the globe from the One Building database (subsection 2.1). Given the amount of data used to develop the model, its applicability is beyond any other existing βopt model.

Throughout this manuscript, the variables influencing βopt perceived as most relevant are considered: the sign of the latitude, relative diffuse radiation, and albedo. Any differences in βopt for sites in the northern versus southern hemisphere are studied and discussed in section 3. The influence of diffuse irradiance on βopt is quantified in section 4. A simple worldwide model for βopt as a function of latitude and the diffuse fraction is also proposed.

The concept of albedo, its variability, and estimated values are discussed in section 5. In addition, a model quantifying the influence of albedo on βopt is also proposed. The relevance of accurately estimating βopt in terms of energy loss is carefully studied for all latitudes. The impact of correctly estimating variables such as the diffuse fraction or albedo for a correct energy assessment of a site is also considered throughout the paper.

All variables under study (latitude, annual diffuse fraction and albedo) are used in section 6 to obtain a regression model that allows to compute the optimum tilt angle.

Section snippets

Methodology: Search-based method for optimal annual energy yield

The objective of this paper is to study the influence that several variables have on the annual optimum tilt angle for a given site and to propose global models that estimate βopt for those variables. The analysis is performed using a very extensive database containing high-quality location and meteorological data (subsection 2.1). The optimum tilt angle for each of the sites is computed using a search-based method (subsection 2.2), The influence that the different variables have on βopt is

Optimum tilt angle as a function of latitude and north/south hemisphere influence

The influence of a site’s latitude on βopt is studied. An analysis in order to find the best regression for the computed data is performed in subsection 3.1. The difference between southern and northern latitudes is also studied. The final goal of this analysis is to propose a global model for βopt as a function of the latitude.

The impact in terms of energy due to deviation from a site’s optimum tilt angle is studied in subsection 3.2. Furthermore, the influence that latitude has on this impact

Influence of diffuse irradiance on annual optimum tilt

There is a noticeable variability in βopt for sites with the same latitude in Fig. 3a (10° for lower latitudes and 20° for higher latitudes). The higher variability for sites further away from the equator is explained by the phenomenon described in subsection 3.2. However the fact that this variability affects all the data considered indicates that the optimum angle is also a function of variables other than latitude. The influence of the relative amount of diffuse irradiance on the optimum

Influence of albedo on the annual optimum tilt

No specific albedo values are available for the One Building data set. A default value of 0.2 is used for the sites [36]. The real ρ is thought to significantly influence the value of βopt and the annual energy yield for a given site, [18].

The influence of ρ on βopt is analysed in subsection 5.1, and a global model for βopt as a function of the latitude and a synthetic created ρ is proposed. The concept of albedo, its variability, and why it is not an easily estimated variable is introduced in

Global model for the annual optimum tilt as a function of latitude, annual diffuse fraction and annual albedo

Previously, it has been shown that an optimum annual tilt angle model that fits adequately to the used database can be obtained using only the site latitude. Next, annual diffuse fraction and albedo have been added one by one to the function to analyze their importance and performance, showing a good improvement. On this section, it is proposed a final model gathering all three variables under study (latitude, annual diffuse fraction and albedo) in Eq (8) and Table 9. To use the proposed model

Conclusion

A series of global models to estimate optimum annual tilt angle (βopt) as a function of local variables (latitude, diffuse fraction and albedo) have been proposed. These models are based on the hourly irradiance data of 14,468 sites spread across the globe from the One Building database. As a result, these models can be used for any location in the absence of local meteorological data, being to the best knowledge of the authors, the models using the largest database to date.

Firstly, a simple

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Carolina Nicolás-Martín: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. David Santos-Martín: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation, Resources, Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition. Mónica Chinchilla-Sánchez: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Investigation,

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to acknowledge the careful and extensive data processing work performed by the One Building team, [10]. Without their effort, the results of this paper could not have been reached.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (50)

  • M.Z. Jacobson et al.

    World estimates of PV optimal tilt angles and ratios of sunlight incident upon tilted and tracked PV panels relative to horizontal panels

    Sol. Energy

    (2018)
  • F. Kasten et al.

    Solar and terrestrial radiation dependent on the amount and type of cloud

    Sol. Energy

    (1980)
  • C.-N. Ko et al.

    An orthogonal-array-based particle swarm optimizer with nonlinear time-varying evolution

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2007)
  • M. Lave et al.

    Optimum fixed orientations and benefits of tracking for capturing solar radiation in the continental United States

    Renew. Energy

    (2011)
  • G. Lewis

    Optimum tilt of a solar collector

    Sol. Wind Technol.

    (1987)
  • B.Y.H. Liu et al.

    The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation

    Sol. Energy

    (1960)
  • G. Notton et al.

    Performance evaluation of various hourly slope irradiation models using Mediterranean experimental data of Ajaccio

    Energy Convers. Manag.

    (2006)
  • R. Perez et al.

    Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance

    Sol. Energy

    (1990)
  • R. Perez et al.

    A new simplified version of the Perez diffuse irradiance model for tilted surfaces

    Sol. Energy

    (1987)
  • P.I. Raptis et al.

    Measurements and model simulations of solar radiation at tilted planes, towards the maximization of energy capture

    Energy

    (2017)
  • D. Santos-Martin et al.

    SoL–A PV generation model for grid integration analysis in distribution networks

    Sol. Energy

    (2015)
  • M. Shaddel et al.

    Estimation of hourly global solar irradiation on tilted absorbers from horizontal one using artificial neural network for case study of Mashhad

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2016)
  • D. Stanciu et al.

    Mathematical links between optimum solar collector tilts in isotropic sky for intercepting maximum solar irradiance

    J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys.

    (2016)
  • R. Tang et al.

    Optimal tilt-angles for solar collectors used in China

    Appl. Energy

    (2004)
  • A. Ullah et al.

    Investigation of optimal tilt angles and effects of soiling on PV energy production in Pakistan

    Renew. Energy

    (2019)
  • Cited by (16)

    • A generalized approach for the determination of optimum tilt angle for solar photovoltaic modules with selected locations in Ethiopia as illustration examples

      2022, Scientific African
      Citation Excerpt :

      To estimate total solar radiation on an inclined surface, several studies utilize isotropic [10–14], anisotropic [15–17], or both isotropic and anisotropic models [5,18–20]. Without using local meteorological information, Nicolás-Martn [21] proposed models that calculate the annual optimal tilt angle. For the development of the optimal tilt angle models, the author considers different factors like latitude, albedo, and diffuse fraction.

    • Spatial estimation of the optimum PV tilt angles in China by incorporating ground with satellite data

      2022, Renewable Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Smith et al. [22] developed a radiative transfer method with tilting procedure to determine the horizontal irradiance, tilted irradiance, and optimum tilt angle by combining atmospheric parameters, such as, cloud, aerosol, ozone, and water vapour. Nicolás-Martín et al. [23] presented a model for the annual optimum tilt angle as a function of latitude, diffuse fraction and albedo in the absence of meteorological data. These studies revealed that coupling more atmospheric factors can achieve better performance in estimating the optimum PV tilt angles.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text