Technical noteThe importance of clean development mechanism for small hydro power plants
Introduction
Energy is an essential input for economic development and its demand is increasing worldwide. Human activities are directly related to the use of energy, with per capita consumption being used as an indicator of economic and social development, and developed countries showing a significantly higher energy consumption than developing countries.
In order to fulfill current human needs, 81.3% of the energy used on the planet is generated from the burning of fossil fuels, with petroleum, natural gas and coal being the main sources. It is known that this type of power generation has resulted in the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and that the accumulation of pollutants in the atmosphere is one of the probable causes of the climate changes that have been observed [1].
Brazil has a privileged potential for hydro electricity generation: 78.2% of the electricity generated in the country originates from hydro. In 2010 Brazil was the second largest producer of hydropower in the planet, with 403 TWh, taking second place to China's 722 TWh. Considering installed capacity, Brazil's 79 GW takes third place, behind China, with 171 GW, and the US, with 100 GW. Finally, considering the hydro share in total domestic electricity generation, Brazil comes second, with 78.2%, behind Norway, which has 94.7% of its domestic electricity generated by hydropower [2].
Brazil has been making new investments to expand its hydroelectric generation. Currently, more than 18.8 TWh are under construction, 11.2 TWh of which correspond to Belo Monte plant [3].
Under this scenario, the generation of energy from renewable sources such as hydropower, Small Hydro Power (SHP), biomass, wind, tidal and solar have become important to continue the development process, supplying the growing demand for energy, with the advantage of offering “cleaner” energy.
There are currently two main incentive mechanisms for SHP projects in Brazil. The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), which is international in scope, and the Incentive Program for Alternative Electric Energy Sources (PROINFA). The first is a global solution established in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol, and the latter was implemented through Brazilian Law No. 10,438, in 2002.
The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), created by the Kyoto Protocol to promote climate change mitigation, might help increase investor interest in SHPs. CDM projects enable the reduction of GHG emissions to be converted into carbon credits which can be traded in international markets. This may foster investment in SHPs, increasing their financial attractiveness, and drawing the attention of energy sector investors in the country. The usually small profitability of a SHP can be used to prove the additionality of the associated CDM project, demonstrating that an economically feasible project may obtain CERs.
A SHP, depending on details of project implementation, may be configured as a CDM, since it is an alternative for the generation of clean, renewable electric energy. Although several authors argue that SHPs cause little or no environmental impact, and might be considered a source of clean energy, Abbasi and Abbasi [4] found that, by considering the environmental impacts per kilowatt of power generated, SHPs cause environmental impacts no less significant than those of large centralized plants.
In this context, the current study investigates whether CDM can influence the outlook of SHPs in Brazil, based on official documents published by the Brazilian National Agency of Electric Energy (ANEEL), the Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MCTI), the Ministry of Mines and Energy (MME), and the CDM Executive Board (UNFCCC).
Section snippets
Small hydro as CDM in Brazil
The Designated National Authority shows 51 PDD records for CDM projects involving 92 SHPs. These represent only 22% of the power of the SHPs in operation, construction and granted in the country since 2001.
As shown in Table 1, 68 SHPs with CDM projects are in operation generating “cleaner” energy, by reducing GHG emissions to the atmosphere, thus contributing to sustainable development. The projects listed as “under construction” and “granted” still have a long wait until RCEs may be issued,
Feasibility analysis
The economic feasibility analysis described below aimed to determine the break even point of CDM projects for SHPs in Brazil. Three CER reference values were considered, all based on the period between January 2, 2008 and August 31, 2011: € 7.50, minimum historical value; € 13.59, mean value; and € 22.60, the maximum value. Information provided by the Ministry of Environment of Japan and Global Environment Centre Foundation (2006) [10] was employed to set the values of minimum, average and
Conclusions
The study evaluated the importance of CDM for the implementation of SHP in Brazil, investigating conditions under which CDM becomes feasible and financially interesting. It was noted that the number of SHPs with CDM in Brazil may increase significantly, since 339 enterprises, which started operations since 2001 or are expected to start in the near future, have not yet submitted CDM projects.
The analyses revealed that power density can be considered a limiting factor for SHP CDM projects.
References (14)
- et al.
Small hydro and the environmental implications of its extensive utilization
Renew Sustain Energy Rev
(2011) Clean development mechanism and off-grid small-scale hydropower projects: evaluation of additionality
Energy Policy
(2007)Key world energy statistics 2010
(2010)Key world energy statistics 2012
(2012)- ANEEL – The National Agency of Electric Energy. Available from:...
Monitoring of small hydropower plants with installation license
(2011)- PORTAL PCH. End of embargo releases 137 SHPs in Paraná. Available from:...
Cited by (30)
Techno-ecological synergies of hydropower plants: Insights from GHG mitigation
2022, Science of the Total EnvironmentCitation Excerpt :Additionally, to explore the CF of ecosystem restoration, we also performed a sensibility analysis on uCFER. Referring to Martins et al. (2013) and Wang et al. (2019), a sensitivity analysis was conducted with 1000 sample points. As Fig. 9 (a) shows, diesel has the largest total effect index, which means that the emission factor of diesel is the most sensitive to the uCF results.
Optimizing hydropower plants based on carbon-water-energy-ecosystem nexus
2022, Energy Conversion and ManagementFeasibility of microalgae as feedstock for alternative fuel in Malaysia: A review
2020, Energy Strategy ReviewsCitation Excerpt :However, oil remains the world's dominant fuel as the main source of energy demand, accounting for 33.6% of the total global share [5]. For this purpose, researchers are seeking the best possible use of renewables such as solar, hydro, ocean, geothermal, wind and bioenergy [6–17]. Fossil fuel depletion, which is closely associated with environmental degradation is predicted to become the biggest problem in the future.
Towards an ethnography of small hydropower in China: Rural electrification, socioeconomic development and furtive hydroscapes
2019, Energy Research and Social ScienceWind power feasibility analysis under uncertainty in the Brazilian electricity market
2017, Energy EconomicsCitation Excerpt :We employ sensitivity analysis in this work in order to define the most important variables for the project NPVs. Similar to other studies found in the literature (Arnold and Yildiz, 2015; Holdermann et al., 2014; Peña et al., 2014; Schmidt et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013; Ertürk, 2012; Martins et al., 2013; Walters and Walsh, 2011; Montes et al., 2011) that apply feasibility analysis to projects related to RES, the decision criterion employed in this study to perform the investment analysis is the NPV. Brigham and Houston (2007) state that the main advantage of using NPV is to quantify how much the project will impact the position of the capital initially invested.