Elsevier

Renewable Energy

Volume 55, July 2013, Pages 490-500
Renewable Energy

Integration of a municipal solid waste gasification plant with solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.016Get rights and content

Abstract

An interesting source of producing energy with low pollutants emission and reduced environmental impact are the biomasses; particularly using Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as fuel, can be a competitive solution not only to produce energy with negligible costs but also to decrease the storage in landfills. A Municipal Solid Waste Gasification Plant Integrated with Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) and Gas Turbine (GT) has been studied and the plant is called IGSG (Integrated Gasification SOFC and GT). Gasification plant is fed by MSW to produce syngas by which the anode side of an SOFC is fed wherein it reacts with air and produces electricity. The exhausted gases out of the SOFC enter a burner for further fuel combusting and finally the off-gases are sent to a gas turbine to produce additional electricity. Different plant configurations have been studied and the best one found to be a regenerative gas turbine. Under optimized condition, the thermodynamic efficiency of 52% is achieved. Variations of the most critical parameters have been studied and analyzed to evaluate plant features and find out an optimized configuration.

Highlights

► Integration of municipal solid waste gasification with SOFC (Solid Oxide fuel Cell) and gas turbine. ► System performance and thermoeconomic analysis. ► Exergy analysis of the system. ► Final produced electricity price and its competitiveness.

Introduction

The word “Biomass” refers to vegetables and animals substances, not from fossil origin; these can be used as fuel in a power plant for the production of electrical energy. Biomasses derive from living or recently living biological organisms and can be considered as a particular kind of renewable energy source, because the carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere by their use derives from the carbon amount absorbed during their life. In this way, the most important pollutants linked to biomass utilizations are related to transport, manufacture and transformation processes.

Municipal Solid Waste can be considered a valid biomass to use in a power plant. Some advantages can be obtained; the principal is the reduction of pollutants and greenhouse gases emissions. Another advantage is that by their use it is possible to reduce the storage in landfills and devote these spaces to other human activities.

It is also important to point out that this kind of renewable energy suffers significantly less availability which characterizes other type of renewable energy sources such as in wind and solar energy.

As proposed in Morris et al. [1], with a well management of waste, the following points should be considered:

  • -

    prevention of waste generation;

  • -

    recycling of waste materials;

  • -

    reduction at minimum of landfilling disposal;

  • -

    incineration with energy recovery at efficiencies comparable with alternative technologies and sophisticated exhaust gas cleaning equipment;

  • -

    gasification processes.

In a gasification process, waste is subject to chemical treatments through air or steam utilization; the result is a synthesis gas, called “Syngas” which is principally composed of hydrogen and carbon monoxide. Traces of hydrogen sulphide could also be present which can easily be separated in a desulphurisation reactor. The gasification process is usually based on an atmospheric-pressure circulating fluidized bed gasifier coupled to a tar-cracking vessel; the gas produced is then cooled and cleaned. Syngas can be used as fuel in different kind of power plant such as gas turbine cycle, steam cycle, combined cycle, internal and external combustion engine and Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC).

SOFC based power plants are known as efficient power generators not only as stands alone (about 50% thermal efficiency) but also in hybrid cycles, where SOFC is integrated with another plants, such as gas turbine or Rankine cycle (above 60% thermal efficiency). SOFC plants are also flexible in using different kind of fuels after minor fuel pre-treatment such as desulphurisation. SOFC based power plants have been studied in the past and some manufacturer are trying to realize such systems for CHP (combined heat and power) applications [2]. In literature it is possible to find studies about SOFC plant combined with CC (combined cycles) to achieve ultra-high electrical efficiencies [3], [4]. SOFC and gas turbine integrated systems have been extensively studied for CHP applications [5] and with biomass gasification [6], [7]. In Refs. [8], [9], the characterization, quantification and optimization of hybrid SOFC–GT systems have been studied. The dynamics and control concept of a pressurized SOFC–GT hybrid system has also been studied in Ref. [10]. In Ref. [11] modeling results were compared with measured data for a 220 kW SOFC–GT integrated plant, while details of the design, dynamics and startup of such hybrid power plants are studied in Ref. [12]. Part-load characteristics of an SOFC–micro GT were also studied in Ref. [13].

In the current study a gasification plant is considered which is modeled and compared with a gasifier named Viking gasifier. This biomass gasifier is an autothermal (air blown) fixed bed gasifier situated located at Technical University of Denmark, see e.g. Refs. [14], [15]. Hofmann et al. [16] had operated an SOFC on cleaned syngas from the Viking gasifier without noticing any degradation. They concluded that their gasification plant provided a biogas which could directly be fed into a solid oxide fuel cell. It shall be mentioned that the Viking gasifier has not been used with Municipal Solid Waste and its' functionality remains unknown. However, the mathematical model developed here is general and can be used with almost any type of gasifier unless the adjusting parameter to be decided, see below.

In the present study, a Municipal Solid Waste gasification plant integrated with SOFC is combined with a gas turbine to recover the energy of the off-gases from the topping SOFC cycle. In addition, a regenerative gas turbine has been introduced to recover more energy from the off-gases. The latter configuration has been compared with the one without regeneration; hybrid recuperator was shown to be very efficient and could increase significantly the plant efficiency. In addition, some relevant parameters have been studied to optimize the plant efficiency in terms of operating conditions. Compared with modern waste incinerators with heat recovery, the gasification process integrated with SOFC and gas turbine permits an increase in electricity output up of 50%, see e.g. Refs. [1]., thus solid waste gasification process can compete with incineration technology. Moreover waste incinerators require the installation of sophisticated exhaust gas cleaning equipment that can be large and expensive; these systems are not necessary in the studied plant.

No investigation on Municipal Solid Waste Gasification plant integrated with SOFC and GT has been found in the open literature, and therefore, the current investigation seems to be completely novel and might bring up new ideas on designing new energy system configurations for future applications.

Section snippets

Plant model

The plant studied in this investigation is represented through the following block scheme:

The principal components of the plant are the Gasification plant, the SOFC plant and the Gas Turbine. Through the Gasification plant, Municipal Solid Waste is converted into syngas; a mixture of H2, N2, CO, CO2, H2O, CH4 and Ar. The produced syngas is previously cleaned to remove tracks of H2S that could poison the SOFC.

The cleaned syngas is then sent to the SOFC plant to produce electricity. The SOFC

Plant configurations

Waste enters the gasification plant to obtain a synthesis gas known as “syngas”, which after a cleaning process to remove H2S tracks, is used for a SOFC plant. The off-fuel and the off-air which come from the anode and cathode side respectively are then sent to a burner for complete combustion. To recover more energy, the flue gases from the burner are expanded in a gas turbine to obtain additional electric power.

Two different configurations have been studied; the second one includes a

Results and discussions

Simulations, calculations and analysis have been carried out using DNA (Dynamic Network Analysis), an in-house component-based code for energy systems analysis developed at the DTU Thermal Energy Systems department. The solution is provided solving a system of nonlinear equations through the Newton–Raphson modified algorithm, see e.g. Rokni [19].

Ahrenfeldt et al. [15] report that the “Viking gasifier” offers some interesting features such as low tar content in produced syngas (<5 [mg/Nm3]),

Exergy analysis

Lost and Destroyed exergy for each component have been calculated through a system of equation for which the solution has been provided through EES (Engineering Equation Solver). The following parameters have been evaluated for each component of the plant:

  • -

    Destroyed exergetic efficiency defined as εD

εD=EDEFuel
  • -

    Lost exergetic efficiency; εL

εL=ELEFuel
  • -

    Total exergetic efficiency; εTOT

εTOT=εD+εLwhere ED, EL and EFuel are respectively the destroyed, the lost and the fuel exergy of the i-th

Thermoeconomic analysis

Thermoeconomic analysis aims to build a system of equations through the costs balances for each component; the unknown variables are the Unitary Costs c [€/kWh] for each node. Once the exergy value of each node is known, then it would possible to calculate the thermoeconomic cost of the kth node in terms of cost rate (cost per hour), as follows:Ck=ckEk[/h]

For the thermoeconomic analysis of the plant, appropriate cost functions must firstly be formulated to include the purchase cost for each

Conclusions

Gasification technology allows using biomass energy with high efficiency; in particular through Municipal Solid Waste gasification in which energy is obtained from a “low-cost” fuel instead of incinerating and/or throwing it in the landfills. Integration of such gasification plant with a hybrid SOFC – GT plant permits to achieve an efficiency of 52% in an optimized configuration which is very high plant efficiency without presence of any dangerous pollutants in the off-gases.

The best

Glossary

Aij
number of atoms of element j in each molecule of leaving compound m
Amj
number of atoms of element j in each molecule of entering compound i
cF
Fuel Unitary cost, €/kWh
ck
Unitary cost for the kth node, €/kWh
cp
Product Unitary cost, €/kWh
Ck
Thermoeconomic Cost for the kth node, €/h
E
Nernst ideal reversible voltage, V
ED
Destroyed Exergy
Ek
Exergy for the kth node, kW
EL
Lost Exergy
EFuel
Fuel Exergy
f
annuity factor
fk
Exergoeconomic factor for the kth component
F
Faradays constant, C/mol
G
Gibbs free energy, J
g0

References (34)

Cited by (78)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text