Elsevier

Radiotherapy and Oncology

Volume 130, January 2019, Pages 89-96
Radiotherapy and Oncology

Original article
Influence of tumor-associated macrophages and HLA class I expression according to HPV status in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemo/bioradiotherapy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.08.013Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Intraepithelial macrophage density was associated with favorable progression-free survival.

  • HLA class I down-regulation was not an independent prognostic factor.

  • Stromal M2 density may potentially be used to guide treatment selection.

Abstract

Background and purpose

To investigate the prognostic value of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and HLA class I expression according to HPV status in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy combining cisplatin (CRT) or cetuximab (BRT).

Material and methods

Ninety-five patients were enrolled. The density of CD68+ cells and CD68+ CD163+ cells (further referred as M2) in the intraepithelial and the stromal compartments, respectively, as well as HLA class I expression in tumor cells, were evaluated semi-quantitatively. Correlations between biomarker expression and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Multivariate analysis showed that the intraepithelial macrophage density (IEMD) was prognostic for favorable progression-free survival (PFS) and there was a non-significant trend for improved overall survival (OS). HLA class I down-regulation was not an independent prognostic factor. Subgroup analysis showed that in p16+ population, patients with high IEMD had improved 5-year PFS vs. patients with low IEMD (81.2% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001), while in p16− population, no difference was observed. Similarly, when stratified by primary tumor site, IEMD showed prognostic value in oropharyngeal cancer patients (OPC) but not non-OPC patients. Five-year PFS of patients with low stromal M2 macrophage density treated with CRT was significantly improved vs. those with BRT (54.5% vs. 36.1%, p = 0.03), while in tumors with high M2, there was no significant difference (50.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.67).

Conclusions

The prognostic role of TAM phenotype and distribution depends on HPV status and might predict treatment response. They prompt further validation in prospective studies.

Section snippets

Patients and tissues

Patients were selected from the former study cohort of 265 patients with histologically confirmed HNSCC, diagnosed between 2006 and 2012 in our institute (CRT: n = 194, BRT: n = 71) [17], [18]. Patients with stage III–IVb disease according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC)/International Union for Cancer Control (UICC) TNM classification 2010, received total radiation dose of 70 Gy, ≥2 cycles of concurrent cisplatin or ≥3 cycles of concurrent cetuximab were selected from the initial

Patient characteristics

The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients included in this study are summarized in Table 1. The age of the study population ranged from 38 to 81 years (median, 60 years). Most (80%) patients were male. Sixty-four (67%) patients were never/former smokers and 31 (33%) were current smokers. With regard to HPV status, 27 (28%) patients had p16+ tumors and 68 (72%) had p16− tumors. All patients with p16+ tumors were oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) patients. Information on p16 status

Discussion

Tumor microenvironment consists of various host components including stromal cells, blood vessels and inflammatory infiltrates. It plays an important role in carcinogenesis, tumor progression and response to therapeutic interventions [21]. In the present study, although macrophage density and HLA class I expression were not identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis, subgroup analysis showed that intraepithelial macrophage density may play different roles in HPV+ as

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by EU 7th framework program (ARTFORCE), No grant number is applicable; and China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201406105021 to D. O.].

References (43)

  • P.J. Murray et al.

    Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines

    Immunity

    (2014)
  • L. Galluzzi et al.

    Immunological effects of conventional chemotherapy and targeted anticancer agents

    Cancer Cell

    (2015)
  • J. Li et al.

    Cetuximab ameliorates suppressive phenotypes of myeloid antigen presenting cells in head and neck cancer patients

    J Immunother Cancer

    (2015)
  • Y. Tao et al.

    Advances in radiotherapy of head and neck cancers

    Curr Opin Oncol

    (2010)
  • L.Q. Chow et al.

    Antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in biomarker-unselected patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: results from the phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 expansion cohort

    J Clin Oncol

    (2016)
  • K.K. Ang et al.

    Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • P. Italiani et al.

    From monocytes to M1/M2 macrophages: phenotypical vs functional differentiation

    Front Immunol

    (2014)
  • C. Li et al.

    Infiltration of tumor-associated macrophages in human oral squamous cell carcinoma

    Oncol Rep

    (2002)
  • S.K. Lau et al.

    CD163: a specific marker of macrophages in paraffin-embedded tissue samples

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (2004)
  • N. Fujii et al.

    Cancer-associated fibroblasts and CD163-positive macrophages in oral squamous cell carcinoma: their clinicopathological and prognostic significance

    J Oral Pathol Med

    (2012)
  • B. Seliger

    Molecular mechanisms of HLA class I-mediated immune evasion of human tumors and their role in resistance to immunotherapies: HLA class I-mediated immune escape in tumors

    HLA

    (2016)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Tumor associated macrophage in HPV<sup>+</sup> tumors: Between immunosuppression and inflammation

      2023, Seminars in Immunology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, in a multivariate analysis, the authors showed that HPV-16 was required to increase intraepithelial macrophage density and HLA-class I expression, which leads to a better 5-year progression free survival in oropharyngeal patients (Table 1). However, the macrophage phenotype was not described in this study and therefore avoid any comparison with studies showing poorer prognosis in TAM infiltrated HNSCC [81]. Interestingly, HPV strains are able to favor certain types of TAM to rise and participate to the TME.

    • The prognostic role of tumor associated macrophages in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A systematic review and meta-analysis

      2022, Oral Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pooled meta-analysis of the final ten studies investigating the relationship between CD68+TAMs and OS showed that a low number of CD68+TAMs correlated to a better OS (HR 1.36 95 %CI (1.07–1.72) P = .01, Figure 2b). In the univariate and multivariate pooled analysis, a total of four studies assessed CD68 in both tumor epithelium and tumor stroma.[21,25,37,43] Kikuchi et al. (2020) reported a trend that low CD68+TAMs correlated to better OS in the tumor epithelium.

    • High throughput profiling of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas identifies two main subgroups with distinct immune profile, clinical outcome and sensitivity to targeted therapies

      2020, EBioMedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Amplification and detection steps were performed with an Ultraview kit and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine was used as a chromogen. CD68/CD163 double staining was performed on a Ventana Discovery Ultra platform (Roche, Bâle, Switzerland) and image analysis as described previously [13]. Image analysis was performed under the supervision of a pathologist (JA) to detect the density of CD8 and PD-1 positive cells in the tumor areas and the proportion of IDO1, CD68 and CD163 stained surface of tumor slides or spots, as previously described [14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text