Dental TechniqueA digital implant custom tray fabrication method using the design process for simulating the position of the impression copings and 3D printing technology
Section snippets
Technique
- 1.
After connecting the implant healing abutment (Healing abutment; Dentium) and the laboratory analog (Fixture analog; Dentium), generate the healing abutment library data using a tabletop scanner (Identica Blue; Medit) (Fig. 1A).
- 2.
Connect the implant impression coping (Impression Coping Pick-up; Dentium) and the laboratory analog (Coping-lab) and scan the assembly.
- 3.
Construct a library by scanning the healing abutments and impression copings that have varying diameters and heights (Fig. 1B).
- 4.
Save the
Discussion
Healing abutments and impression copings of varying diameters and heights were connected to laboratory analogs and scanned to construct the library, which was then used to fabricate implant custom trays. When making a preliminary impression with only the intraoral healing abutment connected, it is possible to simulate the connection of the coping to the implant fixture. Therefore, the CAD software can be used to control the area and amount of impression material so that it can evenly cover not
Summary
The technique presented allows an implant custom tray to be manufactured based on the prediction of impression copings already installed. The manufacturing method allows control over the even covering of impression material around the impression copings.
References (12)
- et al.
Comparison of elastomeric impression materials used in fixed prosthodontics
J Prosthet Dent
(1981) Now is the time to change to custom impression trays
J Am Dent Assoc
(1994)- et al.
The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials
J Prosthet Dent
(1990) - et al.
Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays
J Prosthet Dent
(2003) - et al.
Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible
Int J Prosthodont
(2003) - et al.
Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prosthesis attached to osseointegrated implants
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
(1994)
Cited by (7)
Accuracy and feasibility of 3D-printed custom open trays for impressions of multiple implants: A self-controlled clinical trial
2022, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryCitation Excerpt :In view of the design of a 3D-printed custom tray, the workflow in the present study was simplified and time-efficient, taking a skilled operator about 3 to 7 minutes with the dedicated software program. In previous reports,33-35 the preliminary impression needed pouring and the custom open tray design made with the physical diagnostic cast. Moreover, the procedures used in those reports required switching between different sophisticated software programs, additional time, and a longer learning curve.
Fabricating a custom tray for an impression of multiple abutment teeth by using an open-source software program
2021, Journal of Prosthetic DentistryAdvances in bioprinting using additive manufacturing
2020, European Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesCitation Excerpt :A biomimetic plywood design was adopted to improve elastic modulus, plastic deformation, fracturing and buckling. Dental implant abutments were 3D printed using plastic and metal (Kalman, 2018; Kim et al., 2019b). Presotto et al. (2019) compared the standard casting techniques to selective laser melting and found the 3D printed casts to be the most precise fit for fixed partial dentures (FPD).
Additive manufacturing technologies in the oral implant clinic: A review of current applications and progress
2023, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
This work was supported by the Advanced Technology Center (ATC) Program funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea) (10077361; Integrated System for Dental Diagnosis, Treatment Simulation & Patient Specific Instrument [PSI] Design).