A juice extractor can simplify the downstream processing of plant-derived biopharmaceutical proteins compared to blade-based homogenizers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2015.02.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Juice extraction from tobacco leaves increases protein concentrations by ∼3-fold.

  • Juice extraction reduces process volumes by 80% compared to blender extraction.

  • Total process costs can be reduced by 10–30% using juice extraction.

  • Juice extraction allows continuous processing and is easy to scale up.

  • Juice extraction is compatible with flocculation and the heat precipitation of host cell proteins.

Abstract

The production of biopharmaceutical proteins using plant-based systems has recently become economically competitive with conventional expression platforms based on microbes and mammalian cells, but downstream processing remains a significant cost factor. Here we report that, depending on the protein expression level, production costs for biopharmaceuticals made in plants can be reduced by up to 30% if a juice extractor is used instead of a blade-based homogenizer or blender. Although the extraction efficiency is lower, combining extraction and solid–liquid separation into a single operation reduces the extract volume by 80%, which achieves savings of ∼60% for downstream consumables and labor. Additionally, juice extraction can easily be scaled-up to process several tons of biomass per day and its continuous mode of operation simplifies downstream processing steps because the volume of storage tanks and the duration of hold times are reduced. The juicer setup is also compatible with flocculation and to some extent with leaf blanching, which increase the efficiency of extract clarification and product purification, respectively. The use of juicers can therefore significantly increase the competitiveness of plant-based production platforms.

Introduction

The advantages of plant-based expression systems for the manufacture of biopharmaceutical proteins include low costs, ease of process scale-up and product safety [1], [2], [3]. The relevance of product safety became evident when the Israel-based company Protalix Biotherapeutics began producing glucocerebrosidase (for the treatment of Gaucher disease) in carrot cells [4] and outcompeted the previous market leader Genzyme because the latter had to cease their production due to virus contamination [5], [6]. The upstream capacity can be increased easily by providing larger greenhouses or by open field cultivation. In contrast, downstream processing (DSP) is a major cost factor for plant-based production systems [7], [8], mainly reflecting the large number of unit operations required for clarification due to the high particle burden in extracts prepared by blade-based homogenizers, hereafter described as blenders [7], [9], [10]. The scalability of DSP equipment can also be limited by technical and economic constraints, e.g. the size of a blender is restricted by the power and maximum speed of the motor supplied with the device, which depends on the cost/benefit ratio to the manufacturer. These constraints ultimately reduce the economy of scale because scale-up becomes associated with increasing costs. Even before technical constraints apply, numbering-up may become necessary to prevent lag times and delays during processing that result from discontinuous blending steps. To avoid these drawbacks, we tested the ability of a continuously operational juice extractor to extract protein-containing plant sap from transgenic tobacco leaves expressing two model proteins (the monoclonal antibody 2G12 and the fluorescent reporter protein DsRed), thereby integrating extraction and initial solid–liquid separation in a single device. We investigated the compatibility of this method with blanching and flocculation, two techniques that facilitate the purification of recombinant proteins and the clarification of plant extracts, respectively [11], [12]. We also used a previously described cost model to evaluate the impact of juice extraction on production costs compared to the use of a conventional blender [8].

Section snippets

Plant cultivation and protein extraction

Transgenic tobacco plants expressing monoclonal antibody 2G12 and the fluorescent protein DsRed were cultivated in a greenhouse as previously described [10]. Leaves were harvested 50 days after seeding, and the intact leaves were blanched as previously described [11] if this step was included in the design-of-experiments (DoE) setup. Proteins were then released from the tissue using either a blender [10], or a bench-top juice extractor (8006 Nutrition Center Masticating Juicer, Omega,

Juicer extraction increases the protein concentration but reduces the overall yield

Transgenic tobacco leaves expressing 2G12 and DsRed were harvested from greenhouse-grown plants as previously described [10]. The concentrations of TSP, DsRed and 2G12 in the extract were 2.9, 2.4 and 1.4 times higher, respectively, when juice extraction was used instead of blending (Fig. 1a). Furthermore, the extract volume was reduced by 80% when juice extraction was used instead of blending. In contrast, the yield per unit biomass was 40–65% lower for juice extraction (Fig. 1b) and was not

A juicer setup streamlines extraction but reduces protein recovery

The higher protein concentrations in leaf extracts produced by juice extraction are advantageous, particularly for the purification of low-abundance proteins, because initial target enrichment can be as challenging as the final polishing steps [16]. The elevated concentrations reflected the absence of any diluting extraction buffer, which also reduced the time required for buffer preparation and thus labor and consumables costs. Furthermore, the lower extract volume facilitates process-scale

Conclusions

In summary, juice extraction offers an economical alternative to blenders, especially for target proteins with low expression levels, because the costs for DSP consumables and labor can be lowered by integrating the extraction and solid–liquid separation steps and reducing the extract volume that must be processed. Even for products expressed at high levels, juicers offer several advantages over blenders because of their continuous mode of operation and the larger amount of biomass they can

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Thomas Rademacher for providing the transgenic tobacco seeds and Ibrahim Al Amedi for cultivating the tobacco plants. We wish to thank Dr. Richard M Twyman for editorial assistance. This work was funded in part by the European Research Council Advanced Grant “Future-Pharma”, proposal number 269110, and the Fraunhofer-Zukunftsstiftung (Fraunhofer Future Foundation). The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References (31)

  • R. Fischer et al.

    Commercial aspects of pharmaceutical protein production in plants

    Curr Pharm Des

    (2013)
  • V. Bethencourt

    Virus stalls Genzyme plant

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2009)
  • T. Clarke

    UPDATE 3-FDA speeds access to Protalix, Shire Gaucher drugs. Reuters vol. 1

    (2009)
  • J.F. Buyel et al.

    Predictive models for transient protein expression in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) can optimize process time, yield, and downstream costs

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2012)
  • S. Hassan et al.

    Breakage of transgenic tobacco roots for monoclonal antibody release in an ultra-scale down shearing device

    Biotechnol Bioeng

    (2014)
  • Cited by (29)

    • Downstream processing of a plant-derived malaria transmission-blocking vaccine candidate

      2018, Protein Expression and Purification
      Citation Excerpt :

      The plants were irrigated with 1.0 g L−1 Ferty 2 Mega (Planta Düngemittel GmbH, Regenstauf, Germany) for 15 min h−1 during the 16-h photoperiod (140 μmol s-1 m-2, λ = 400–700 nm). After growth, whole plants were infiltrated with A. tumefaciens suspension using a vacuum infiltration method [17] and incubated for 5 d before harvest as previously described [23]. Optionally and immediately before blanching, the plants were infiltrated using the same method [17] but the A. tumefaciens suspension was replaced with either 40 mM phosphate buffer pH 8.0 (blanching buffer) or 20 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.0 with the conductivity adjusted to 15 mS cm−1 using sodium chloride (extraction buffer).

    • Expression and purification of human phosphatase and actin regulator 1 (PHACTR1) in plant-based systems

      2018, Protein Expression and Purification
      Citation Excerpt :

      The concentration of total soluble protein (TSP) was determined using the Bradford method [32]. PHACTR1 was detected by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, western blotting and densitometry as previously reported [41] but with a set of primary and secondary antibodies specific for either the c-Myc or His6 tag (Table S1). Ubiquitin-c-myc (Antibodies-online, Aachen, Germany) and fusion protein FQS-His6 [39] were used as quantification standards for the c-Myc and His6 tagged PHACTR1 proteins, respectively.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +49 241 6085 11020.

    View full text