Risk factors for Salmonella spp in Portuguese breeding pigs using a multilevel analysis
Introduction
Salmonella has been reported as the second most frequent cause of foodborne illness in the European Union (EU) in the past ten years (EFSA, 2010). The contribution of pork products to the total burden of human salmonellosis cases varies between countries but it is estimated to be around 10% (Pires et al., 2010). The EU Regulation (EU Regulation No 2160/2003) imposes to the Member States (MS) implementation of a control programme to reduce the prevalence in food production species including pigs. To set the reduction target each MS carried out baseline surveys to estimate the Salmonella spp. prevalence in some food production animals. The objective of the surveys was to obtain comparable data for all MS through harmonized sampling and testing schemes. In pigs the baseline study was done at abattoir level (collection of lymph nodes of pigs slaughtered) and at herd level (collection of pen fecal samples of breeding pigs). These cross-sectional studies also collected information regarding herd management practices and potential risk factors linked to this agent. After the specification of the reduction target each MS will have the responsibility to establish an effective national control programme adjusted for the country-specific characteristics, such as the risk factors, the disease prevalence and the financial implications for stakeholders.
It was expected that the baseline surveys supplied enough data to enable the identification and quantification of potential risk factors to be used in the development of programmes and procedures that reduces Salmonella shedding in pig herds economically and effectively. It is important that this information is available before Salmonella reduction programmes are implemented at the herd level to enable farmers to make informed choices, enhance public health and avoid unnecessary costs (Bahnson et al., 2006).
Some of the known risk factors already identified were linked to: (1) biosecurity measures (Baptista et al., 2010) such as potential biological vectors (as rodents) (Letellier et al., 1999, Meerburg and Kijlstra, 2007, Skov et al., 2008), hygiene of hands, equipment and facilities (Lo Fo Wong et al., 2004), purchase of animals from different suppliers (Lo Fo Wong et al., 2004), (2) herd management, such as herd size (Poljak et al., 2008), batch production system (Funk and Gebreyes, 2004), housing – type of floor (partial slatted floor) (Nollet et al., 2004, Rossel et al., 2006), type of pen separations (Lo Fo Wong et al., 2004), (3) feeding practices such as dry feed (Bahnson et al., 2006), purchase of feed (Benschop et al., 2008), adding organic acids to feed (Funk and Gebreyes, 2004), (4) the use of antibiotics (Beloeil et al., 2007, Funk et al., 2007), parasite infestations (van der Wolf et al., 2001, Beloeil et al., 2004), and health status of the herd (Funk and Gebreyes, 2004) among others (Fosse et al., 2009).
The data used in the present study were collected as part of the Baseline Survey on the Prevalence of Salmonella in Breeding Pigs in Portugal. The aim of the study was to identify risk factors for the presence of Salmonella in herds with breeding pigs.
Section snippets
Sampling and samples collection and analysis
The data used in this study were transferred to the authors by the Portuguese Veterinary Authorities (PVA) and they are derived from the baseline study for Salmonella in Breeding Pigs in Portugal. This study was carried out by the PVA in the context of the Commission Decision 2008/55/EC. The authors were not involved in the baseline study and the data collection methodology described below is of the entire responsibility of the PVA.
The sampling frame, the diagnostic testing methods, the sample
Results
A total of 1670 fecal pen samples (level 1) belonging to 167 herds (level 2), that responded to the questionnaire, were tested. Among the samples tested 170 from 76 herds were positive to Salmonella. Salmonella Typhimurium, followed by Salmonella Rissen were the most frequent serotypes found in the positive samples.
In the 167 herds there were 33 breeding holdings (45.45% had at least one sample positive to Salmonella, CI: 37.9–53.1%) and 134 productions holdings (45.45% had at least one sample
Discussion
In this study a representative sample of the herds with breeding pigs in Portugal was used. The herds sampled were obtained using a sampling frame assembled by the PVA. The sample was representative of the country and took into consideration the different number of herds per region. The herds were randomly allocated to the study. The risk factors were assessed using data from a questionnaire filled by the herd veterinarian which were also responsible for the collection of the feces samples. The
Conclusion
The risks highlighted in this study are epidemiologically and biologically consistent and they are representative of the breeding pigs system currently used in Portugal. It is noticeable the identification of risks associated with semen and boars purchasing: this reinforces that attention should be paid to these factors when conceiving herd biosecurity programmes; also noticeable and important is the fact that these risk factors have not been highlighted before. Our findings are of high
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank FCT for the PhD scholarship (SFRH/BD/40932/2007) and the Portuguese official veterinary authority (DGV) for supplying the data from the Baseline Survey on the Prevalence of Salmonella in Breeding Pigs.
References (29)
- et al.
Herd-level risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in U.S. market pigs
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2006) - et al.
Risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica shedding by market-age pigs in French farrow-to-finish herds
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2004) - et al.
Towards incorporating spatial risk analysis for Salmonella sero-positivity into the Danish swine surveillance programme
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2008) - et al.
Evaluation of stocking density and subtherapeutic chlortetracycline on Salmonella enterica subsp enterica shedding in growing swine
Vet. Microbiol.
(2007) - et al.
Distribution of Salmonella in swine herds in Québec
Vet. Microbiol.
(1999) - et al.
Herd-level risk factors for subclinical Salmonella infection in European finishing-pig herds
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2004) - et al.
Risk factors for the herd-level bacteriologic prevalence of Salmonella in Belgian slaughter pigs
Prev. Vet. Med.
(2004) - et al.
Herd level husbandry factors associated with the serological Salmonella prevalence in finishing pig herds in The Netherlands
Vet. Microbiol.
(2001) Report of the Task Force on Zoonoses Data Collection on a proposal for technical specifications for a baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in breeding pigs
EFSA J.
(2007)- et al.
A modelling approach to estimate the sensitivity of pooled faecal samples for isolation of Salmonella in pigs
J. R. Soc. Interface
(2005)
Estimation of sample sizes for pooled faecal sampling for detection of Salmonella in pigs
Epidemiol. Infect.
Use of herd information for predicting Salmonella status in pig herds
Zoonoses Public Health
Risk factors for Salmonella seroconversion of fattening pigs in farrow-to-finish herds
Vet. Res.
Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models
JASA
Cited by (7)
Salmonella
2017, Foodborne Diseases: Third EditionAssessing pig farm biosecurity measures for the control of Salmonella on European farms
2023, Epidemiology and InfectionSpatial distribution and risk factors associated with Salmonella enterica in pigs
2017, Epidemiology and InfectionBiosecurity Measures to Control Salmonella and Other Infectious Agents in Pig Farms: A Review
2015, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food SafetyPrevalence and risk factors for lawsonia intracellularis, brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Salmonella spp. in finishing pigs in Polish farrow-to-finish swine herds
2015, Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences