Equivalent packing size of spheroidal particles: A microscopic test
Graphical abstract
Packing density of binary mixtures of spheroids (dv,e = 10 mm, and η = 0.25) and spheres of different diameters at Xs = 0.5.
Introduction
Particle packing is of fundamental importance to granular materials, where the particle-size distribution (PSD) is a key control variable [1]. In the past, a few mathematical models have been developed to predict the packing density (=1-porosity) of a mixture of particles as a function of PSD [[2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. However, these models are mainly for spherical particles. How to extend such a model from spherical to non-spherical particle packing is very challenging. One way to do so is based on the so called equivalent diameter so that a mathematical model for spherical particles can be applied to non-spherical particles. In the past, different equivalent spherical diameters have been proposed [9]. For example, the equivalent volume diameter of a non-spherical particle, dv, is defined as the diameter of a sphere with the same volume or surface area of the particle. For fluid-particle systems, it is often defined based on the interaction between a single particle with a medium such as gas or liquid, where the settling of a particle in a liquid is a good example [[9], [10], [11], [12]]. All these definitions, however, are not based on the interaction between particles, which actually control the packing of particles.
To solve this problem, the so called equivalent packing diameter is proposed [13,14]. By use of this concept, Yu and his colleagues have successfully developed mathematical models to predict the porosity of a packing of non-spherical coarse particles [15,16], or fine particles [17,18]. In their work, the equivalent packing diameter of a non-spherical particle is determined based on the similarity between spherical and non-spherical particle packings. In particular, it results from the analysis of particle-particle interactions in terms of porosity or specific volume variation. According to Yu and Standish [13], the equivalent packing size of a non-spherical particle is defined as the diameter of spheres which, when mixed with the non-spherical particles, gives the minimum packing density or zero specific volume variation. Correspondingly, it can be quantified from the study of the packing of binary mixtures of a type of non-spherical particles and spherical particles. It has been confirmed that the obtained equivalent packing diameter is independent of packing method and volume fraction of a component [14]. That is, once determined, the equivalent packing diameter of a particle can be used generally. This approach or its variants are useful in the modelling of the packing of coarse and/or fine non-spherical particles for different applications [[15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30]]. However, to date, it is not clear if the concept of equivalent packing diameter is valid from the microscopic, structural perspective.
To overcome this problem, this paper provides a study of the equivalent packing diameter in term of coordination number, the most popular parameter used to describe the packing structure of particles. It is focused on the packing of binary mixtures of spherical and spheroidal particles. Discrete element method (DEM) is used to simulate a packing process, with aspect ratio and volume fraction as variables. The results of coordination numbers will be analysed to first establish the similarity between spherical and non-spherical particle packings and then quantify the equivalent packing diameter of spheroidal particles. Finally, it is shown that the resulting equivalent packing diameters are consistent with those determined macroscopically, confirming the generality of this concept in the study of particle packing.
Section snippets
DEM simulation
The DEM originally proposed by Cundall & Strack [31] has been well established in the literature. The model has been modified or further developed to simulate particle packing under different conditions [[32], [33], [34], [35], [36]]. It has been extended to non-spherical particles, particularly for spheroids [[37], [38], [39]]. The DEM model used for the present work is the same as that used by Zhou et al. [38], where its details and applicability have been discussed. As such, it is not
Results and discussion
In this section, the results will be analysed in terms of macroscopic parameters such as packing density or specific volume V, followed in terms of coordination number which is known to be the most representative microscopic, structural parameter. Then, the macro- and micro-scopic outcomes will be compared.
Conclusions
The packing of binary mixtures of spheroidal and spherical particles has been studied by means of DEM, aiming to explore the applicability of the concept of equivalent packing diameter from a microscopic, structural viewpoint. It is found that the equivalent packing diameter of spheroidal particles can be determined in terms of macroscopic parameters such as packing density or specific volume, or in terms of microscopic parameter such as mean coordination number of a component in a mixture. The
Nomenclature
- a
radius of spheroidal particles along the polar direction, mm
- b/c
radius of spheroidal particles in the Equatorial plane (b = c), mm
- CN
overall mean coordination number
- cn
normal damping coefficient
- ct
tangential damping coefficient
- D
diameter of the cylindrical container used in simulations, mm
- dp
equivalent packing diameter, mm
- ds
diameter of spheres in binary mixtures of spheroids and spheres, mm
- dv
equivalent volume diameter of a non-spherical particle, mm
- dv,e
equivalent volume diameter of spheroids in
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Australian Research Council (ARC) and BlueScope Steel Research for the financial support of this work, and the Australian National Facility (NCI) for the support in computation.
References (41)
The porosity and contact points in multi-component random sphere packing calculated by a simple statistical geometric model
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1980)- et al.
Linear packing density of grain mixtures
Powder Technol.
(1986) - et al.
Porosity calculation of multi-component mixtures of particles
Powder Technol.
(1987) - et al.
An analytical-parametric theory of the random packing of particles
Powder Technol.
(1988) - et al.
A relation for the void fraction of randomly packed particle beds
Powder Technol.
(1995) - et al.
Characterisation of non-spherical particles from their packing behaviour
Powder Technol.
(1993) - et al.
Evaluation of the packing characteristics of mono-sized non-spherical particles
Powder Technol.
(1996) - et al.
On the modelling of the packing of fine particles
Powder Technol.
(1997) - et al.
Prediction of the porosity of multi-component mixtures of cohesive and non-cohesive particles
Chem. Eng. Sci.
(2011) - et al.
Interference of coarse and fine particles of different shape in mixed porous beds and filter cakes
Miner. Eng.
(2003)
Packing density measurement and modelling of fine aggregate and mortar
Cem. Concr. Compos.
Prediction of the packing porosity of mixtures of spherical and non-spherical particles with a geometric model
Powder Technol.
Effect of flake shape on packing characteristics of popped popcorn
J. Food Eng.
A 3-parameter packing density model for angular rock aggregate particles
Powder Technol.
Shape and size effects on the packing density of binary spherocylinders
Powder Technol.
Dynamic simulation of the centripetal packing of mono-sized spheres
Physica A
Rolling friction in the dynamic simulation of sandpile formation
Physica A
DEM simulation on the packing of fine ellipsoids
Chem. Eng. Sci.
A simulation study of the effects of dynamic variables on the packing of spheres
Powder Technol.
Particle Packing Characteristics
Cited by (13)
Void fraction for random loose packing of multi-size mixed cylindrical particles
2023, Powder TechnologyParticle flocculation in a stirred tank: A microscopic test by coupled CFD-DEM approach
2022, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringA new method to determine specific surface area and shape coefficient of a cohesionless granular medium
2020, Advanced Powder TechnologyCitation Excerpt :Further, in discrete element modeling of non-spherical particles, the contact force and the overlap information between two particles have been determined by defining the particle size as the diameter of the circumscribed circle (2D) or circumscribed sphere (3D) of the particle [28]. The equivalent diameter of irregular grains can be represented by the circle diameter with the same projected area as the grain, the sphere diameter with the equivalent area, equivalent volume, equal packing density, or the same terminal velocity of free-falling in a liquid as the grain [29–31]. In order to approximate the SSA of heterodisperse samples and a system consisting of various shapes and different sizes, the SSA is approximated as an accumulated form of the SSA of particles uniformly distributed among the sieve corresponding to the mass of each fraction.
DEM simulation on random packings of binary tetrahedron-sphere mixtures
2020, Powder TechnologyCitation Excerpt :It can also be seen that when the size ratio deviates from 1, the increasing rate of both the packing density and the specific volume variation at r > 1 is faster than that at r < 1. This phenomenon also occurred in the binary packings of spherical and spheroidal particles [26], indicating that for small particles in a binary packing, the filling of non-spherical particles can create better effect than that of spherical particles. However, the minimal ΔV is negative for each case with r being from 0.5 to 1.
Experimental and numerical investigation on the packing of binary mixtures of spheres and ellipsoids
2020, Powder TechnologyCitation Excerpt :However, such difficulty can be easily overcome by computer simulation, for example, with the use of the discrete element method (DEM) [45], which has been extensively used to study packing of particles. In this work, a three-dimensional (3D) DEM model developed for the packing of ellipsoidal particles [44] is used to study the packing of binary mixtures of spheres and ellipsoids. A validation test is carried out first to confirm that the DEM can simulate the packing of binary mixtures with non-spherical particles considered.