Elsevier

Polymer

Volume 54, Issue 2, 24 January 2013, Pages 685-693
Polymer

Confocal Raman imaging, FTIR spectroscopy and kinetic modelling of the zinc oxide/stearic acid reaction in a vulcanizing rubber

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2012.12.021Get rights and content

Abstract

The reaction of zinc oxide (ZnO) with stearic acid (StA) to form zinc stearate (ZnSt) has been investigated experimentally in a model matrix (unvulcanized styrene–butadiene rubber) by using confocal Raman microscopy and FTIR transmission spectroscopy. The heterogeneous nature of the reacting system has been confirmed. The Raman analysis has revealed the core–shell structure of the product, which is formed via the gradual shrinkage of the ZnO core and the concurrent formation of a surrounding ZnSt shell of increasing thickness. FTIR spectroscopy has provided information about the molecular state of aggregation of StA when dissolved in the rubber, as well as quantitative information on the reaction kinetics. The kinetic behaviour of the system has been interpreted using a semi-quantitative heterogeneous reaction model grounded on the Raman imaging results, which was able to catch the essential features of the phenomenon and to simulate reliably the experimental conversion vs time data at three different temperatures.

Introduction

Vulcanization (i.e. the cross-linking reaction by sulphur) is one of the oldest and best developed processes in the rubber industry. Since its discovery by Goodyear in 1839, it has been continuously improved by the introduction of new ingredients (accelerators, activators, retarders), in order to improve mechanical properties. Nowadays, in the tyre industry, where the process represents the core technology, a vulcanizing rubber formulation is a very complex system comprising tens of components. Most of these formulations have been developed and optimized by skilful and lengthy techniques based on trial-and-error but, owing to the complexity of the chemistry involved and the multiplicity of ingredients, the mechanism of vulcanization has not been fully elucidated yet. It is generally recognized that the vulcanizing rubber is a heterogeneous system which, in turn, gives rise to a heterogeneous vulcanizate at the end of the process. How to precisely measure the degree of heterogeneity and to control it for a rational product design, remains an open issue [1]. Another relevant problem encountered in rubber processing is represented by undesired side reactions, whose occurrence increases with the number and reactivity of the formulation components. For instance, zinc oxide is still the best known activator for sulphur vulcanization.

Zinc oxide (ZnO) is in many vulcanisation systems a precursor to zinc-derived accelerators; it reacts with most accelerators to form the highly active zinc salt [1], [2] Complex formation of the zinc ion with different accelerators is critical to get efficient curing. In addition, there is also evidence that the inclusion of ZnO in a compound reduces heat-build-up and improves abrasion resistance. Due to its high thermal conductivity, ZnO acts as a ‘heat sink’, which accepts frictional energy dissipating local heat concentrations without a large increase in internal temperature. It has also been found that ZnO improves heat resistance of the vulcanisates and their resistance to the action of dynamic loading [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Moreover, several fatty acids are employed in rubber formulations as plasticizers, but for a few of them (for instance stearic acid, StA) it has been postulated that, beside acting as an internal lubricant [7], they play a further role as co-activators [4]. By reacting with stearic acid, zinc oxide forms water and the hydrocarbon-soluble zinc stearate (ZnSt), which has been claimed to be the actual activator species [7]. In fact, when the zinc coordinates the carboxylate ligands of stearic acid, the solubility and reactivity is strongly enhanced. It has been reported [8], [8](a), [8](b), [8](c), [8](d), [8](e), [8](f), [8](g), [8](h) that, in sulphur vulcanization of rubbers, the crosslink density increases with increasing zinc stearate concentration, while the effect of stearic acid consists in increasing the initial cure and in lowering the level of polysulfidic cross-links, thus enabling a more efficient use of sulphur [9], [10]. It has also been suggested that both these effects are caused by stearic acid allowing a better dispersion of ZnO. In another study [11], it was observed that, if the vulcanizing medium contains zinc stearate but no stearic acid, the end-properties of the final products worsened.

From the above arguments it follows that a quantitative characterization of the zinc oxide/stearic acid reaction, not only in terms of overall conversion but also with respect to the heterogeneity of the system, is of paramount importance towards a deeper understanding of the vulcanization mechanism. Previous literature reports have shown that, depending on the mixing conditions, the two reactants can already form zinc stearate during the compounding of the rubber. The calorimetric (DSC) results of Kruger and McGill [12] indicated the formation of zinc stearate and its subsequent reaction with sulphur, but the phase separation of the system components was not investigated.

In the present contribution we examine the interaction between zinc oxide and stearic acid in a medium (uncrosslinked styrene–butadiene rubber, SBR) suitable to simulate the actual vulcanizing system. The dispersion of the components before and after the reaction is investigated by confocal Raman microspectroscopy. This technique offers unique advantages in the characterization of heterogeneous polymer systems: it provides good contrast due to the specificity of the spectrum, molecular-level information and the possibility to implement quantitative or semi-quantitative analysis. The limiting spatial resolution (0.8–1.0 μm in the focal plane) is adequate for the systems under scrutiny. Furthermore, the state of aggregation of stearic acid in the rubber matrix and its reaction with zinc oxide are investigated by FTIR spectroscopy, which provides information on the H-bonding interaction of the stearic acid dimer and kinetic data at different temperatures. These are used to test the reliability of a semi-quantitative kinetic model developed on the basis of the spectroscopic evidences and based on a simple heterogeneous reaction scheme.

Section snippets

Materials

Styrene–butadiene rubber (SBR) had a styrene/butadiene molar ratio of 20/80 and a trans/vynil/cis Cdouble bondC ratio of 24/56/20. Zinc oxide with a purity >99% was supplied by Bridgestone Technical Center Europe (TCE), Pomezia, Italy. The particle size distribution of ZnO, as determined by static light scattering (SLS), is reported in Fig. 1. The number average equivalent diameter (D¯n) was 1.775 μm. Reagent grade stearic acid and zinc stearate were supplied by Aldrich Co., Milan (Italy) and were used

Raman spectroscopy

In Fig. 2A–D are reported the Raman spectra of the system components.

Zinc oxide displays two sharp peaks at 437 and 98 cm−1 (E2 modes) [13] which occur in an interference-free region and provide the required spectroscopic contrast. Stearic acid also displays intense inelastic scattering and a series of peaks in a region where the rubber matrix does not interfere (see inset of Fig. 2C). The intense and sharp components at 1296, 1130 and 1062 cm−1 have been assigned, respectively, to the CH2

Conclusions

The interaction between zinc oxide and stearic acid in a medium suitable to simulate a vulcanizing system has been investigated experimentally using vibrational spectroscopy techniques and interpreted theoretically by means of a kinetic model developed on the basis of a simple heterogeneous reaction scheme.

Confocal Raman microspectroscopy revealed that, at ambient temperature, both components are phase-separated in the form of microcrystals. When the reaction temperature is reached (80 °C and

References (19)

  • A.Y. Coran

    Vulcanization in science and technology of rubber

  • Y. Ikeda et al.

    Macromolecules

    (2009)
  • A.P. Susamma et al.

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (2001)
  • C.G. Moore et al.

    Rubber Chem Technol

    (1961)
  • M.R. Kresja et al.

    The nature of sulfur vulcanization

  • L. Domka et al.

    Int Pol Sci Technol

    (1980)
  • A.B. Sullivan et al.

    Rubber division meeting

    (1991)
  • H.E. Adams et al.

    Ind Eng Chem

    (1953)
    V. Duchacek et al.

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (1993)
    M. Bravar et al.

    Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe

    (1986)
    A.Y. Coran

    Rubber Chem Technol

    (1964)
    H.Q. Xie et al.

    J Macromol Sci Phys

    (1995)
    R.H. Campbell et al.

    Rubber Chem Technol

    (1964)
    M. Zaborski et al.

    Kautschuk Gummi Kunststoffe

    (1994)
    (h)Powell CE, Preparation of rubber compositions with organoclays, US Patent Appl. 2005, n. 2005/0090584...
  • F.P. Baldwin

    Rubber Chem Technol

    (1972)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (23)

  • Revealing phase-specific properties of elastomeric blends and their molecular structure at the nanoscale by AFM

    2022, Polymer
    Citation Excerpt :

    In Fig. 7 (a), both matrix materials show a decrease in the intensity of the cis-CC vibrations (at 1664 cm−1 for PI and 1654 cm−1 for BR) when going from low (L-XLD/dashed lines) to high cross-link density (H-XLD/full line). Changes in the range of 1700–1750 cm−1 in BR samples might be related to carbonyl groups present in other ingredients of the rubber compound, such as stearic acid, which reacts with zinc oxide during curing [29]. The overlap of the characteristic peaks at this range may complicate the analysis when considering blends of PI and BR, but suggests the increasing cross-link density of the single matrix samples with the CBS and sulfur concentration.

  • Preparation of gahnite (ZnAl<inf>2</inf>O<inf>4</inf>) superhydrophobic coating on aluminum alloy with self-healing and high stability properties

    2022, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    Citation Excerpt :

    These three peaks also existed in the spectrum of the superhydrophobic coating, which indicated that the long chain of alkyl exists on the coating and stearic acid had been successfully modified on the coating. The absorption peak of -COOH in the FTIR spectrum of STA appeared at 1703 cm−1 [35]. The absorption peak of - COOH of the coating can be used to judge the existence form of STA on the coating.

  • Steel-alloy surface protection against saline attacks via the development of Zn(II)-metal-organic networks using Lemon verbena leaves extract (LVLE); Integrated surface/electrochemical explorations

    2021, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    Citation Excerpt :

    Other intense peaks were located at 1050, 1430, 1780, 1840, 2960, and 3490 cm−1 wavenumbers that were related to the C-C stretching, COO transition, C═C stretching, C═O transition, C-H stretching and O-H vibration, respectively. Besides the results of 200–600 ppm LVLE:Zn protected samples showed that the peak intensity increased at 1050 cm−1, relating to the Zn-O and another change appeared at 1430 cm−1 (Intensity increment) which can be resulted from the interaction of Zn and OH [50,51]. Besides, the overlapping from 1700 cm−1 to 1500 cm−1 confirmed the LVLE phytochemicals chelation via Zn cations [52–54].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text