Review ForumReading Gerry Kearns’ Geopolitics and Empire: The Legacy of Halford MackinderGeopolitics and Empire: the Legacy of Halford Mackinder, , Oxford University Press, New York (2009), xiv + 344 pp.; bibliog., index. US $100.00 (cloth), ISBN: 9780199230112
Introduction
John Agnew
Halford Mackinder has had a posthumous existence that many of us might envy. Long after his earthly demise, some of his ideas, particularly that of the “geographical pivot of history,” keep coming back to life. Currently, some well-known pundits in US foreign-policy circles, typically thought of as neo-conservative and keen on a “muscular” US military presence around the world, have re-discovered Mackinder’s geographical determinism as providing a seemingly naturalistic account for the approaching rebirth of the “yellow peril” (the rise of China) and offering as it did at the turn of the last century a timeless rendering of the challenges to the democratic maritime powers from the despotic land powers of Eurasia. The widely cited American journalist Robert Kaplan (2010: 22), for example, frames the emerging “geography” of China’s power almost entirely in these terms. It is timely, therefore, to have a new intellectual biography of Mackinder that not only critically engages with the central themes of his geopolitics but that does so by both situating them in the historical context of the early twentieth century and showing why they remain attractive in some quarters by dint of their effective depoliticization of the very world politics that they underwrite. This book matters, therefore, in a number of distinctive ways. That was why a session devoted to it was so worth organizing at the Washington DC AAG Annual Meeting in April 2010.
When I first heard from Gerry Kearns that he was planning to write a book focused on Mackinder and his geopolitics I must admit to having been less than enthusiastic. I have spent some time and energy down the years trying to expropriate the word “geopolitics” for uses other than those ascribed to Mackinder and his ilk of early twentieth century imperialists. But I erred. Gerry has done much more than write a conventional biography of Mackinder. A very serviceable one by Brian Blouet (1987) already exists. The various commentaries that follow this Introduction outline what the book does across the course of its nine chapters. More critically they also show how the book contributes to our understanding of both why it was Mackinder’s ideas and not those of some contemporaries that tended to win out and why these ideas have had a continuing resonance, particularly in policy-making circles in certain foreign ministries, years after the immediate historical context in which Mackinder lived has long disappeared. What is important to emphasize above all as its leitmotif is that this book is illustrative of a successful use of the biography of a singularly influential geopolitical thinker to show how alternative geopolitical scenarios and futures have always been and still are possible.
Mackinder never used the word geopolitics. Yet, at least in the English-speaking world, it is to him and a couple of other writers from around his lifetime (Mahan, for example) that the term is frequently ascribed. In lodging the geo into politics as a causal term, the compound word conveys exactly the combined sense of geographical determinism and prophetic understanding to which the geopolitician aspires. He (it is almost always so) tells us what is determining and, presumably, in having this expert knowledge, can warn us (those of us on the wrong side of the geography) before it is too late. The contradiction here, of course, is that if we can aspire to do something in the face of geographical determinism then the determinism cannot be absolute but must be also contingent in its effects. Obviously, noting such irony was not Mackinder’s strong point, neither is it of his apostles. Gerry Kearns fills us in on how this happened and, more importantly perhaps, on how it can be exploited to create a very different approach to geopolitics in which it is the very contingencies of political economy and geopolitical imagination that become its determining elements.
Section snippets
Masculinity, “impact” and Mackinder’s geopolitics
Matthew G. Hannah
Gerry Kearns’ book is a model of critical scholarship. As critique, it does political geographers and international relations scholars the considerable service of placing those iconic ideas of Mackinder at least schematically familiar to most of us (the geographical pivot of history, heartland and rimland, etc.) within the geopolitical, intellectual and more broadly cultural contexts of Mackinder’s day. We see just how deeply Mackinder’s assumptions about the geopolitical world
Situating progressive geopolitics: culture, politics and language
Joanne Sharp
This is an important book that challenges the inevitability in conventional historical accounts of the development of dominant ideas – here Mackinder’s geopolitics – by juxtaposing these ideas with those of contemporaries whose understandings of the world, and their normative visions for how it might be better, promised another way.
Kearns’ book develops toward his vision of Progressive Geopolitics, an alternative to Mackinder-inspired Conservative Geopolitics. For Kearns,
Mackinder’s legacy!
Peter J. Hugill
In his preface to this landmark book Kearns sets out both his crucial intellectual contribution and the crucial intellectual tensions it embodies. He does so via Christopher GoGwilt’s work on Joseph Conrad, which operates at the intersection of literature, culture, and the intellectual and geopolitical histories of the turn of the 1900s. For GoGwilt, “Conrad’s work reveals a double-mapping, whereby a newly European idea of the West—borrowed from the terms of Russian
What would Mackinder think of the state of geography today?
Lorraine Dowler
As I started to write this essay I realized that it was going to be a far greater challenge than I realized. As I read Kearns book, I appreciated how little I really knew about the life of Halford Mackinder. However, my reading prompted me to reflect on the current state of discipline and question what Halford Mackinder would think of it today. Therefore this essay offers a set of reflections rather than a scholarly intervention. As I read I wondered if Mackinder would have been
Progressive historiography
Gerry Kearns
Hannah, Sharp, Hugill, and Dowler pay me the compliment of identifying important issues with which my book engages and each also reminds me of work of their own that takes up these matters in ways that either complement or challenge my own emphases. I am grateful for the opportunity to elaborate on some of the methodological choices that I left implicit within the book itself.
I adopt what Berdoulay calls a contextual approach and try to produce what Dean refers to as critical and
References (46)
Geopolitics of gender and violence ‘from below’
Political Geography
(2009)Geopolitics: Re-visioning world politics
(2003)- et al.
Mastering space: Hegemony, territory and international political economy
(1995) Annual general meeting and medal and awards celebration
Geographical Journal
(2010)The contextual approach
Halford Mackinder: A biography
(1987)- et al.
Indigenous knowledges and development: a postcolonial caution
Third World Quarterly
(2004) Critical and effective histories. Foucault’s methods and historical sociology
(1994)Imperial brotherhood: Gender and the making of Cold War foreign policy
(2001)