Elsevier

Plant Science

Volumes 193–194, September 2012, Pages 70-84
Plant Science

Review
Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: An unappreciated central player in photosynthesis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2 is a key photosynthetic trait that has been studied intensively in the past years. The intention of the present review is to update knowledge of gm, and highlight the important unknown and controversial aspects that require future work. The photosynthetic limitation imposed by mesophyll conductance is large, and under certain conditions can be the most significant photosynthetic limitation. New evidence shows that anatomical traits, such as cell wall thickness and chloroplast distribution are amongst the stronger determinants of mesophyll conductance, although rapid variations in response to environmental changes might be regulated by other factors such as aquaporin conductance.

Gaps in knowledge that should be research priorities for the near future include: how different is mesophyll conductance among phylogenetically distant groups and how has it evolved? Can mesophyll conductance be uncoupled from regulation of the water path? What are the main drivers of mesophyll conductance? The need for mechanistic and phenomenological models of mesophyll conductance and its incorporation in process-based photosynthesis models is also highlighted.

Highlights

► The intention of the present review is to update the consensus knowledge on gm. ► Gaps in knowledge and research priorities are indicated for the near future. ► In particular, how has gm evolved among phylogenetically distant groups? ► Can gm be uncoupled from the water path regulation? ► Mechanistic models of gm incorpored in photosynthesis models are needed.

Introduction

Photosynthesis in plants has been considered for decades to be limited only by two factors: the velocity of diffusion of CO2 through stomata and the capacity of photosynthetic machinery to convert light energy to biochemical energy and fix CO2 into sugars. Diffusion is a passive physical process, but in plants can be regulated. According to Fick's law, diffusion depends on substance (e.g. CO2) diffusivity, temperature, the nature (mainly viscosity) of the media in which diffusion occurs (e.g. water, air, etc.), and the distance of diffusion. The mesophyll pathway comprises a series of ‘physical barriers’ to CO2 diffusion, including air, cell walls, lipid membranes and liquid cytoplasm and stroma. The ‘physical barriers’ differ in nature and size (i.e. ‘distance’) among leaves, and thus there is a large variation among leaves in diffusion conductance to CO2 in the mesophyll (gm).

Early studies already suggested that the diffusion of CO2 from sub-stomatal cavities to the sites of carboxylation inside chloroplasts could limit photosynthesis (e.g., [1], [2], [3]). These early studies and most subsequent examinations of gm are dependent on several methods for the estimation of gm – including a method based on 13C-discrimination during photosynthesis[4], a method combining chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange measurements [5], [6] and model-based methods [6], [7], [8]. For details on methods for gm estimation, the required precautions when using them and specific strategies of adjustment, see references [9], [10], [11]. The pioneering early studies [1], [2], [3] and a raft of subsequent studies have highlighted that gm is the third major player in the process of photosynthesis, together with stomatal conductance and biochemical capacity.

The current understanding on gm has been recently reviewed [12]. In addition, specific reviews on the mechanisms regulating gm [13], and on the ecophysiological and ecological significance of gm [14], [15], [16] have been published. These papers are recommended as the best introduction to the importance of gm in plant physiology. As there has been rapid gain in understanding of gm, the aims of the present paper are: (1) to update information accumulated after the recent reviews; (2) to discuss the most obscure/controversial aspects on gm function and regulation, such as its response to CO2, or how much it limits photosynthesis; and (3) to highlight the obvious gaps in knowledge on this subject and the future research needs.

Section snippets

How different is gm among phylogenetically distant groups and how have mechanisms controlling gm evolved?

The rate of diffusion conductance to CO2 in the mesophyll (gm) has now been estimated for more than 100 species, and it is now possible to search for phylogenetic/evolutionary patterns. The vast majority of estimates of gm are for Spermatophytes [14] (angiosperms and gymnosperms), with only very few data for liverworts and hornworts [17]. Most surprisingly there are no measurements available for phylogenetically intermediate groups such as mosses, lycophytes, equisetophytes, or ferns. This

Changing the nature of the diffusing molecule: Carbonic anhydrases

CO2 molecules passing from sub-stomatal cavities to chloroplasts diffuse through the gas-phase in leaf intercellular air spaces, and the liquid phase in cell walls, cytosol and chloroplast stroma and lipid phase in plasmalemma and chloroplast envelope membranes (Fig. 2). The rate of diffusion through the composite segments of the diffusion pathway depends on the effective thickness and diffusivity of each component section [16]. “Effective” denotes the circumstance that the diffusion path

Which environmental conditions affect gm?

Mesophyll conductance to CO2 responds to environmental factors either in the long term or rapidly, i.e. in minutes-hours [10]. Recent reviews have already highlighted the incidence of varying environmental conditions such as soil water availability, salinity, growth irradiance and temperature on gm [12], [14]. In the recent years, the important contribution of gm in limiting photosynthesis during drought and salinity has been emphasized, knowledge has improved for the effects of nutrient stress

Photosynthesis limitations in response to environmental variables

Once it was demonstrated and accepted by most of the scientific community that gm is finite, and possibly dynamically regulated, it became important to quantify how much mesophyll diffusion limits photosynthesis. In the 1990s and beginning of this century, photosynthesis limitation by gm was ignored – for simplicity and because of the difficulty to estimate gm with methods available – despite the early warnings that gm was finite, variable and limiting photosynthesis [3], [97]. Recently, a

Modeling and including gm in photosynthesis models

Mesophyll diffusion of CO2 must be taken into account in leaf gas exchange models, since considering an infinite gm is not correct. The difficulty arises when deciding a value of gm to be applied in each specific scenario, and as a function of how gm varies in space and time. Currently, we are not able to incorporate gm in models with a mechanistic basis due to the lack of sufficient knowledge on the mechanisms involved in the regulation of gm. This being said, there have been several attempts

Co-regulation of gm and stomatal conductance

The previous sections have demonstrated that gm and gs are very often co-regulated, although not under all instances. Some degree of co-regulation has been suggested between gm and plant hydraulics. Water vapor and CO2 share at least a part of their pathways in leaves. Both gases are exchanged with the atmosphere through stomata and cross the aerial sub-stomatal cavity. Additionally, after leaving the leaf xylem, liquid water not only moves along apoplastic pathways but also (partly mediated by

Concluding remarks and future prospects

The share of overall photosynthetic limitation by mesophyll conductance is large and can be the most significant factor limiting photosynthesis under certain conditions and certain plant functional types. This statement is backed up by ample evidence, and we argue that gm should be included in any study analyzing limitations to photosynthesis, as well as in models for predicting rates of photosynthesis.

Significant progress has recently been made in quantitatively linking gm to foliage

Acknowledgements

We thank Ichiro Terashima and Yusuke Mizokami for insightful suggestions on the MS and editor plus five additional anonymous reviewers for numerous useful improvements. The study was financially supported by the Estonian Ministry of Science and Education (grant SF1090065s07), the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through projects BFU2008-01072 (MEFORE), AGL2009-11310/AGR, BFU2011-23294 (MECOME) and CGL2009-13079-C02-01 (PALEOISOTREE), and the European Commission through European

References (157)

  • P.S. Nobel

    Biophysical Plant Physiology and Ecology

    (1983)
  • P. Gaastra
    (1959)
  • J.R. Evans et al.

    Carbon isotope discrimination measured concurrently with gas exchange to investigate CO2 diffusion in leaves of higher plants

    Functional Plant Biology

    (1986)
  • P.C. Harley et al.

    Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO2 Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO2

    Plant Physiology

    (1992)
  • G. Bongi et al.

    Gas-exchange properties of salt-stressed olive (Olea europaea L.) leaves

    Plant Physiology

    (1989)
  • G.J. Ethier et al.

    On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2004)
  • Ü. Niinemets et al.

    Leaf internal diffusion conductance limits photosynthesis more strongly in older leaves of Mediterranean evergreen broad-leaved species

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2005)
  • C. Warren

    Estimating the internal conductance to CO2 movement

    Functional Plant Biology

    (2006)
  • T.L. Pons et al.

    Estimating mesophyll conductance to CO2: Methodology, potential errors, and recommendations

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2009)
  • X. Yin et al.

    Theoretical reconsiderations when estimating the mesophyll conductance to CO2 diffusion in leaves of C3 plants by analysis of combined gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2009)
  • J. Flexas et al.

    Mesophyll conductance to CO2: Current knowledge and future prospects

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2008)
  • J.R. Evans et al.

    Resistances along the CO2 diffusion pathway inside leaves

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2009)
  • U. Niinemets et al.

    Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2009)
  • T. Tosens et al.

    Developmental changes in mesophyll diffusion conductance and photosynthetic capacity under different light and water availabilities in Populus tremula: How structure constrains function

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2012)
  • I. Terashima et al.

    Leaf functional anatomy in relation to photosynthesis

    Plant Physiology

    (2011)
  • M. Meyer et al.

    To concentrate or ventilate? Carbon acquisition, isotope discrimination and physiological ecology of early land plant life forms

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

    (2008)
  • T.S. Feild et al.

    Fossil evidence for Cretaceous escalation in angiosperm leaf vein evolution

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

    (2011)
  • J.S. Boyer et al.

    CO2 and water vapor exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials

    Plant Physiology

    (1997)
  • Ü. Niinemets et al.

    Controls on the emission of plant volatiles through stomata: A sensitivity analysis

    Journal of Geophysical Research, Atmospheres

    (2003)
  • D. Price et al.

    Specific reduction of chloroplast carbonic anhydrase activity by antisense RNA in transgenic tobacco plants has a minor effect on photosynthetic CO2 assimilation

    Planta

    (1994)
  • T.G. Williams et al.

    Photosynthetic gas exchange and discrimination against 13CO2, and C18O16O in tobacco plants modified by an antisense construct to have low chloroplastic carbonic anhydrase

    Plant Physiology

    (1996)
  • J.S. Gillon et al.

    Internal conductance to CO2 diffusion and C18OO discrimination in C3 leaves

    Plant Physiology

    (2000)
  • N. Fabre et al.

    Characterization and expression analysis of genes encoding α and β carbonic anhydrases in Arabidopsis

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2007)
  • W.F. Boron et al.

    Intrinsic CO2 permeability of cell membranes and potential biological relevance of CO2 channels

    ChemPhysChem

    (2011)
  • B.L. de Groot et al.

    A decade of debate: Significance of CO2 permeation through membrane channels still controversial

    ChemPhysChem

    (2011)
  • G.J. Cooper et al.

    Effect of PCMBS on CO2 permeability of Xenopus oocytes expressing aquaporin 1 or its C189S mutant

    American Journal of Physiology

    (1998)
  • V. Endeward et al.

    Evidence that aquaporin 1 is a major pathway for CO2 transport across the human erythrocyte membrane

    FASEB Journal

    (2006)
  • N.L. Nakhoul et al.

    Effect of expressing the water channel aquaporin-1 on the CO2 permeability of Xenopus oocytes

    American Journal of Physiology

    (1998)
  • M. Heckwolf et al.

    The Arabidopsis thaliana aquaporin AtPIP1;2 is a physiologically relevant CO2 transport facilitator

    Plant Journal

    (2011)
  • N. Uehlein et al.

    Function of Nicotiana tabacum aquaporins as chloroplast gas pores challenges the concept of membrane CO2 permeability

    Plant Cell

    (2008)
  • N. Uehlein et al.

    The tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is a membrane CO2 pore with physiological functions

    Nature

    (2003)
  • J. Flexas et al.

    Tobacco aquaporin NtAQP1 is involved in mesophyll conductance to CO2 in vivo

    Plant Journal

    (2006)
  • Y.T. Hanba et al.

    Overexpression of the barley aquaporin HvPIP2;1 increases internal CO2 conductance and CO2 assimilation in the leaves of transgenic rice plants

    Plant and Cell Physiology

    (2004)
  • S.-I. Miyazawa et al.

    Relationship between mesophyll conductance to CO2 diffusion and contents of aquaporin localized at plasma membrane in tobacco plants grown under drought conditions

  • S.-I. Miyazawa et al.

    Deactivation of aquaporins decreases internal conductance to CO2 diffusion in tobacco leaves grown under long-term drought

    Functional Plant Biology

    (2008)
  • I. Terashima et al.

    Effects of HgCl2 on CO2 dependence of leaf photosynthesis: evidence indicating involvement of aquaporins in CO2 diffusion across the plasma membrane

    Plant and Cell Physiology

    (2002)
  • R. Aharon et al.

    Overexpression of a plasma membrane aquaporin in transgenic tobacco improves plant vigor under favorable growth conditions but not under drought or salt stress

    Plant Cell

    (2003)
  • U. Niinemets et al.

    Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (2009)
  • G. Grassi et al.

    Stomatal, mesophyll conductance and biochemical limitations to photosynthesis as affected by drought and leaf ontogeny in ash and oak trees

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (2005)
  • Ü. Niinemets et al.

    Interactive effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on the acclimation potential of foliage photosynthetic properties of cork oak, Quercus suber, to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations

    Global Change Biology

    (1999)
  • Cited by (565)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text