Dark matter candidate from torsion

The stable pseudo-scalar degree of freedom of the quadratic Poincar\'e Gauge theory of gravity is shown to be a suitable dark matter candidate. We find the parameter space of the theory which can account for all the predicted cold dark matter, and constrain such parameters with astrophysical observations.

Introduction.-Several cosmological and astrophysical phenomena cannot be explained resorting to General Relativity (GR) and the matter content of the Standard Model of Particles (SM). For instance, the present day accelerated expansion of the Universe [1], and the rotational curves of galaxies do not fit the GR predictions with baryonic matter [2]. These problems are solved assuming GR as the correct gravitational framework and modelling the accelerated expansion with a new form of energy (dark energy) encoded in a cosmological constant Λ [3], and the rotation curves by adding a new form of matter known as cold dark matter (CDM). The mentioned approach suffers from some shortcomings: the theoretical value of Λ exceeds the observational value by 120 orders of magnitude [4], and there is no direct nor conclusive evidence of the CDM particles besides their gravitational effects at astrophysical scales [5].
Another approach is to investigate if both the accelerated expansion and the rotation curves can be understood from modifications of GR. Any Lorentz invariant four-dimensional local modification of the Einstein-Hilbert action of GR necessarily introduces new degrees of freedom (d.o.f.s). Then, we can ask if such d.o.f.s can be used to model dark matter and/or dark energy. This line of thought has been explored in the literature for some modifications of GR (see [6][7][8]) . We shall work with the Poincaré Gauge modification of GR. This theory arises naturally when promoting the global Poincaré symmetry to a local one, following the gauge procedure. Then, the torsion tensor T ρ µν , which is the antisymmetric part of the spacetime connection Γ ρ µν , can be identified as the gauge field strength of spacetime translations T (4). Also, the Riemann tensor R µ νρσ is given as the gauge field strength of the homogeneous Lorentz group SO(1, 3). As usual in Yang-Mills theories, one can construct the Lagrangian considering up to quadratic terms in the field strengths, which is known as Poincaré Gauge Gravity (PGG) [9,10].
We know from [11] that, apart from the usual graviton, the matter content of PGG consists of two massive spin-2, two massive spin-1 and two spin-0 fields. In [12][13][14] authors found that the only modes that could propagate safely were the two spin-0 with different parity.
In this letter we study the pseudo-scalar mode and show that it behaves like an axion-like particle (ALP). Then, we find the experimental constraints from the interaction of such a mode with the SM sector. Finally, we give the conditions for which the pseudo-scalar mode of PGG can describe the predicted CDM density.
Introducing an auxiliary fieldφ, one rewrites (2) as The massless theory with m 2 T = m 2 S = 0 and without theφ 2 potential was first considered in [17]. Independently, such a theory was proposed as an extension of GR inspired by Loop Quantum Gravity [18][19][20][21].
From (3), the effective action of the pseudo-scalar can be constructed. First, we need to take into account the couplings to matter for such a Lagrangian, which in the minimal coupling prescription is just given by the coupling of the axial torsion vector S µ to the axial current of fermions ∆ µ [22]. Secondly, by resorting to the field equations for the trace and axial vectors we can isolate such vectors with respect to the rest of variables. Plug-ging that back to (3) we find (see [14] for details): Due to the characteristic derivative coupling to a current, this pseudo-scalar d.o.f.φ can be identified as an ALP [23]. At tree-level the pseudo-scalar couples to fermionic particles only through a derivative coupling. When considering quantum corrections, new interactions arise due to the so-called axial anomaly [24]. In the case of a curved spacetime, such an anomaly can be expressed as [25] where e is the electron charge, F µν denotes the usual electromagnetic tensor,F µν = 1 2 µνρσ F ρσ refers to its dual, and K 2 = µνρσRαβ µνRαβρσ is known as the Chern-Pontryagin scalar.
In order to find the couplings of the pseudo-scalar, we first canonically normalise the Lagrangian by making the transformation φ = 2α Depending on the signs of m 2 T and m 2 S , the normalised effective Lagrangian would be different. In all the relevant cases, after having taken into account the axial anomaly by integrating by parts the anomalous part of the derivative coupling term in the Lagrangian, the Lagrangian for the pseudo-scalar becomes where ∆ µ N is the non-anomalous part of the axial current. The meaning of functions H 1,2,3 depending on the sign of the {m S , m T } parameters has been summarised in Table  I. For all the cases presented in Table I, the weak field limit φ m T for (7) renders  (7) depend on the sign of m 2 T and m 2 S . The case m 2 S < 0, m 2 T > 0 has not been considered since it renders the pseudo-scalar to be unstable [14]. Also, the case m 2 S , m 2 T < 0 is not given below since it lacks a well-defined weak-field limit.
which has the form of the usual ALP Lagrangian plus a four-fermion contact interaction ∆ µ ∆ µ and the Chern-Simons term K 2 . Let us note that for a bounded field φ we can always choose a value of m T such that the weak-field approximation is valid. Finally, it can be observed that the predicted mass of the ALP given by the quadratic potential term in (8) Experimental constraints.-Given those four interactions of the pseudo-scalar with the SM sector, we can set constraints from experiments. Four different kinds of constraints are considered herein: 1) the ones from the axial-axial interaction, i.e., four-fermion contact interaction, 2) the ones from the Chern-Pontryagin coupling to the pseudo-scalar field, 3) the ones deriving from the coupling with the electromagnetic sector, and 4) the ones from the coupling to the axial current. Since the weakfield approximation can be met by tuning m T , we shall use this parameter to set the constraints.
1) The four-fermion contact interaction is constrained by particle-physics observables that would be affected by the addition of such an interaction. Paradigmatic examples of such experiments include HERA, LEP, and the Tevatron. We shall use the constraint set by a global analysis of the results of the aforementioned experiments in reference [26]. We have focused on those ones coming from assuming the exchange of purely axial-vector couplings, which is the case of the contact interaction induced by torsion. Authors in [26] found that the coefficient regulating the contact interaction should be lower than 0.055 TeV −2 . Since such a limit must be true for φ = 0, we can find a lower bound m S > 0.166 TeV.
2) The Chern-Simons modification of GR is an extension based on the addition of the Chern-Pontryagin term coupled to a scalar field [27]. Such a theory is inspired by either the aforementioned gravitational anomaly, or String Theory, or Loop Quantum Gravity. The fact that the gravitational coupling term induced by the anomaly is part of a well-known modified gravity theory, allows us to use the constraints already set in the literature. Such constraints are based on gravitational-wave measures [28], binary pulsars [29], and frame-dragging ef-fects [30]. Nevertheless they are really mild constraints when compared to the ones already obtained from the four-fermion contact interaction. In fact, the constraints on the parameter mediating the interaction, in our case (384πm S ) −1 , are of the order of 10 4 km, which in natural units translates to 0.507 eV −1 . This gives a lower limit on m S of 1.63 meV. Hence, it is clear that even with near future surveys on the mentioned measures, the constraints obtained from the contact interaction would be much stronger.
3) The coupling of ALPs with the electromagnetic sector, i.e. g φγγ φF µνF µν , has motivated most of the experimental searches for these kinds of particles, since such an interaction predicts the interconversion with photons in the presence of a background magnetic field [31]. The effects of this conversion can in principle be measured by several telescopes and ground-based experiments. Paradigmatic examples include (see [32]): Helioscopes: These kinds of constraints are based on the assumption that the ALP is a constituent of our galactic halo. Hence, the Sun would be able to produce them, and the photons produced by passing a magnetic field would be detectable on Earth on the X-ray region. Following this reasoning, the most stringent values have been provided by the CERN experiment CAST, which gives an upper bound of the ALP-photon coupling g φγγ of 6.6 · 10 −11 GeV −1 for a mass m φ 0.02 eV.
Haloscopes: These detectors are designed to measure microwave-photon signals from axions in our galactic halo. They are able to set the best constraints on the microwave range. Some experiments under this classification include RBF-UF, ADMX, HAYSTAC, CAPP, and for low-mass searches, ABRACADABRA and SHAFT.
Astrophysical measures: here we include the astrophysical observations that would be affected by ALPs. The study of globular clusters gives one of the strongest constraints for the large-mass range. The number count of Horizontal Branch stars (HB), which can produce axions by the Primakoff process, unlike the red giants, which are not affected by these losses, gives a bound of 6.6 · 10 −11 GeV −1 to the ALP-photon coupling in a wide mass range [33]. For small masses, the measure of X-ray sources with Chandra, gives one of the most stringent constraints. Also, the study of gamma rays from SN 1987A, and the active galactic nuclei of AGN PKS 2155-304 and NGC 1275 (by the HESS and Fermi-LAT collaborations respectively), gives comparable constraints. Finally, for large masses the best bounds are given by the spectroscopic observations of the dwarf spheroidal galaxy Leo T using the MUSE survey, in order to find ALP radiative decay, and of galaxy clusters Abell 2667 and 2390, using spectra from VIMOS.
A representation of the constraints above and the pertinent references to the experiments can be found in [32]. By using the relation between g φγγ and m S , it can be easily seen that the limits imposed on m S in these studies turn to be stronger than the ones from the four-fermion contact interaction. We represent the experimental constraints derived from the electromagnetic coupling in the m S − α parameter space in Figure 1.
4) The coupling of ALPs to fermions, i.e., g φf f ∆ µ N ∂ µ φ, produce spin flips in a magnetic sample placed inside a static magnetic field. Such spin flips would then emit radio-frequency photons that can be detected by a suitable quantum counter in an ultra-cryogenic environment [34]. Based on this effect,the QUAX experiments has put the strongest constraints on the strength of this coupling [35]. In particular, a constraint of g φf f < 1.66 · 10 −5 TeV −1 is found for masses in the interval 42.4 − 43.1 µeV. This translates in a lower limit of 6.02 · 10 4 TeV for m S for the mentioned ALP mass range.
Finally, let us focus on ALPs constraints for ultralight and heavy masses. On the one hand, recent analysis of the Lyman-alpha forest searching for suppressed cosmic structure growth, have shown a lower limit on the mass of ultra-light axions of 2 · 10 −20 eV [36]. On the other hand, the upper limits on the mass of the particle are found based on decays to SM particles. Such a decay affects the abundance of light elements in the Universe, and hence it may affect the cosmological evolution. The ALP coupling with the electromagnetic sector allows ALPs to decay into two photons, with a lifetime [24] τ φγγ = 4π m If τ φγγ τ univ , where τ univ is the age of the Universe, then the ALP would be stable for the lifetime of the Universe. In the m S − α parameter space, such a condition translates to α [TeV] 1.82·10 12 m S TeV 4 3 . Otherwise, the decay of the ALP would affect the cosmological evolution, and hence constraints can be imposed. In particular, it is found that the ALPs with the following range of masses and lifetimes are excluded [24]: 1 keV m φ 1 GeV, 10 −4 s τ φγγ 10 6 s. (10) Such constraints have been translated to the m S − α parameter space in Figure 2.
Describing CDM.-As we have established, the Poincaré Gauge gravity pseudo-scalar d.o.f. is an ALP. Provided that the experimental constraints are fulfilled, this predicted particle could serve as a DM candidate. Nevertheless, we have to make sure that the early Universe production of such a particle can account for the DM density measured by observations [37]. In order to perform the density calculation we assume that the production of the ALP is done via the misalignment mechanism. Such a mechanism relies on the fact that fields in the early Universe have a random initial state. After the mass of the particle is comparable to the Hubble parameter, the fields respond by attempting to minimise their potential, hence oscillating around the minimum. These oscillations can behave as CDM since their energy density is diluted by the expansion of the Universe as ρ ∼ a −3 [38]. After studying the pseudo-scalar evolution in a Friedman-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) background, one can show that the production mechanism starts when m φ 3H (T ). Hence, the relation between the Hubble parameter H and the temperature T in the radiation dominated era can be used to find the temperature at which the mechanism starts. Thus, knowing the temperature at which the mechanism begins to take place T mis , we can calculate the expected density today from this production as [38] Ω φ h 2 = 2.542 m φ eV φ mis 10 18 eV where g * and g * S are the effective numbers of energy and entropy d.o.f.s respectively [39]. Moreover, we have taken into account that in this case the ALP mass is constant, and we have used the value ρ crit = 1.053672 h 2 GeV/cm 3 for the critical density of the Universe [23]. The most precise value for the CDM density today, Ω CDM h 2 = 0.120 ± 0.001, is given by the Planck Collaboration [37]. Hence, if we want the ALP to describe the entire dark matter content, we shall require Ω φ = Ω CDM . This implies that the initial value of the field after inflation imposes a very limited allowed mass range, and vice versa. Also, the values of m φ and φ mis providing higher densities of dark matter would be of course excluded. These constraints are represented in Figure  3. Furthermore, the constraints on φ mis would affect the possible values of m T if we require the weak-field limit approximation to be valid. Such an approximation requires that m T 10 φ mis . Hence, from Figure 3 we can infer the possible values of m T such that the pseudo-scalar accounts for the whole cold dark matter while the weak-field limit is still applicable.
In conclusion, we show that the pseudo-scalar mode of Poincaré Gauge Gravity behaves like an axion-like particle.
We find experimental constraints for the free parameters from the interactions present in the theory. Finally, we provide the conditions for which the pseudo-scalar mode present in this theory can account for the entirety of cold dark matter.
We thank J. Beltrán Jiménez, J.A.R. Cembranos, and J. Gigante Valcarcel for helpful conversations. FJMT and AdlCD acknowledge support from NRF grants no.120390, reference:BSFP190416431035; no.120396, reference:CSRP190405427545; no.101775, reference: SFH150727131568. AdlCD acknowledges support from grants PID2019-108655GB-I00 and COOPB204064, I-COOP+2019, MICINN Spain. DFM and FJMT acknowledge support from the Research Council of Norway. Exclusion plots in the m φ − φ mis parameter space corresponding to the constraints on ALPs based on the predicted dark matter density from the misalignment mechanism. The red line represents the allowed values able to account for the whole dark matter and the yellow region represents the excluded parameter space by dark matter overproduction. We asssume g * and g * S to be: g * = 3.363 , g * S = 3.909 for (3a); g * = g * S = 15.25 for (3b); g * = g * S = 106.75 for (3c) [39].