A two-dimensional soliton system of vortex and Q-ball

The (2 + 1)-dimensional gauge model describing two complex scalar fields that interact through a common Abelian gauge field is considered. It is shown that the model has a soliton solution that describes a system consisting of a vortex and a Q-ball. This two-dimensional system is electrically neutral, nevertheless it possesses a nonzero electric field. Moreover, the soliton system has a quantized magnetic flux and a nonzero angular momentum. Properties of this vortex-Q-ball system are investigated by analytical and numerical methods. It is found that the system combines properties of topological and nontopological solitons.


Introduction
Topological solitons of (2 + 1)-dimensional field models play an important role in field theory, physics of condensed state, cosmology, and hydrodynamics. First of all, it is necessary to mention vortices of the effective theory of superconductivity [1] and vortices of the (2 + 1)-dimensional Abelian Higgs model [2]. Another important example is given by the soliton solution of the (2 + 1)dimensional nonlinear O(3) σ model [3] that effectively describes the behavior of a ferromagnet in the critical region.
Two-dimensional soliton solutions of Abelian Maxwell gauge models are necessarily electrically neutral. This is because the (2 + 1)-dimensional Maxwell electrodynamics does not admit the existence of electrically charged spatially localized solutions with finite energy [4], in contrast to the (3+1)dimensional case. However, the electrical neutrality does not forbid the existence of two-dimensional solitons possessing an electric field.
In this Letter we consider a two-dimensional soliton system consisting of an Abelian vortex and a Qball. The vortex and the Q-ball interact through a common Abelian gauge field. This electrically neutral soliton system possesses a radial electric field, carries a quantized magnetic flux, and has a nonzero angular momentum. The soliton system combines Email address: aloginov@tpu.ru (A.Yu. Loginov) the properties of vortex and Q-ball. The interaction between the vortex and the Q-ball by means of a common gauge field leads to a significant change of their shapes.

Lagrangian and field equations of the model
The (2 + 1)-dimensional model we are interested in is described by the Lagrangian density where φ and χ are complex scalar fields that are minimally coupled to the Abelian gauge field A µ through covariant derivatives: The self-interaction potentials V (|φ|) and U (|χ|) are where λ, g, and h are the positive self-interaction constants, m is the mass of the scalar χ-particle, and v is the vacuum average of the complex scalar field φ. We suppose that the potential U (|χ|) has the global minimum at χ = 0 and a local one at some |χ| = 0; hence we have the following condition for the parameters m, g, and h: Note that if the coupling constant q in Eq. (2) is set equal to zero, then model (1) has the soliton solution describing an Abelian vortex and a twodimensional Q-ball. However, there is no electric field in this case, so the vortex and the Q-ball do not interact with each other. The Lagrangian (1) is invariant under the local gauge transformations: (1) is also invariant under the two independent global gauge transformations: The corresponding Noether currents are By varying the action S = Ld 3 x in A µ , φ * , and χ * , we obtain the field equations of the model: where the electromagnetic current j µ is expressed in terms of Noether currents: Using the well-known formula T µν = 2∂L/∂g µν − g µν L, we obtain the symmetric energy-momentum tensor of the model In particular, the energy density can be written as where E i = F 0i are the components of electric field strength and B = −F 12 is the magnetic field strength.
Let us fix the gauge as follows: ∂ 0 φ = 0. We want to find a soliton solution of model (1) that minimizes the energy functional E = T 00 d 2 x at the fixed value of the Noether charge Q χ = j 0 χ d 2 x. From the method of Lagrange multipliers it follows that the soliton is an unconditional extremum of the functional where H is the Hamiltonian density and ω is the Lagrange multiplier. Let us write the Noether charge Q χ in terms of the canonically conjugated variables: where π χ = ∂L/∂ (∂ 0 χ) = (D 0 χ) * and π χ * = ∂L/∂ (∂ 0 χ * ) = D 0 χ are the generalized momenta canonically conjugated to χ and χ * , respectively. The extremum condition for the functional F is written as where a variation of the Noether charge Q χ is written in terms of the canonically conjugate variables: Using the Hamilton field equations and Eqs. (16) and (17), we obtain: while time derivatives of the other model's fields are equal to zero. From Eq. (18) we get the time dependence of the scalar field χ whereas the other fields of the model do not depend on time in the gauge ∂ 0 φ = 0. From Eq. (16) it follows that the important relation holds for the soliton solution: where ω is some function of Q χ .

The ansatz and some properties of the solution
To find the soliton solution of field equations (8), (9), and (10), we use the following ansatz for the model's fields: where ǫ ij and n j are the components of the twodimensional antisymmetric tensor (ǫ 12 = 1) and the radial unit vector n = (cos (θ), sin (θ)), respectively. Note that the fields A i and φ are described by the vortex ansatz that was used in [5], while the scalar field χ is described by the Q-ball ansatz [6]. Note also that ansatz (21) completely fixes the model's gauge. Substituting ansatz (21) into field equations (8), (9), and (10), we obtain the system of ordinary differential equations for the ansatz functions A 0 (r), A(r), F (r), and σ(r): Substituting ansatz (21) into Eq. (13), we obtain the expression for the energy density in terms of the ansatz functions: It follows from the regularity condition of the soliton solution at r = 0 and from the finiteness of the soliton's energy E = 2π ∞ 0 E (r) rdr that the ansatz functions satisfy the following boundary conditions: The boundary conditions for A(r) lead to the magnetic flux quantization for the vortex-Q-ball system where B(r) = −A ′ (r)/(er) is the magnetic field strength.
Substituting the power expansions for A 0 (r), A(r), F (r), and σ(r) into Eqs. (22)-(25) and taking into account boundary conditions (27), we obtain the asymptotic form of the solution as r → 0: In Eq. (29), the next-to-leading coefficients a 3 , b 4 , c |N |+2 , and d 2 are expressed in terms of the leading coefficients and the model's parameters: where δ 1,|N | is the Kronecker symbol. Linearization of Eqs. (22)-(25) at large r together with corresponding boundary conditions (27) lead us to the asymptotic form of the solution as r → ∞: where m A = √ 2ev and m φ = √ 2λv are the masses of the gauge boson and the scalar φ-particle, respectively.
Eq. (22) can be rewritten in the compact form where the zero component j 0 of electromagnetic current (11) is written in terms of the ansatz functions Let us integrate the both sides of Eq. (32) with respect to r from 0 to ∞. Taking into account boundary conditions (27) and asymptotic forms (29) In the case of symmetric energy-momentum tensor (12), the angular momentum tensor is written as From Eqs. (12), (21), and (35), we obtain the expression of the angular momentum's density in terms of the ansatz functions: where E r (r) = − (A 0 (r) / (er)) ′ is the radial component of the electric field strength. Integrating the term −rBE r = −e −2 A ′ (A 0 /r) ′ by parts, taking into account boundary conditions (27), and using Eq. (22) to eliminate A ′′ 0 , we obtain the following expression for the angular momentum J = 2π ∞ 0 J (r) rdr: From Eqs. (7) and (21) it follows that the Noether charge Q φ can be written in terms of the ansatz functions as Comparing Eqs. (37) and (38), and taking into account Eq. (34), we obtain the important relation between the angular momentum J and the Noether charges Q φ and Q χ of the vortex-Q-ball system: Any solution of field equations (8) -(10) is an extremum of the action S = Ld 2 xdt. Hovever, for the field configurations of ansatz (21), Lagrangian density (1) does not depend on time. Consequently, any solution of the system of differential equations (22) -(25) is an extremum of the Lagrangian L = Ld 2 x. Let A 0 (r), A(r), F (r), and σ(r) be a solution of system (22) -(25) satisfying boundary conditions (27). Let us perform the scale transformations of the solution's argument: r → λr. After that, the Lagrangian L becomes a function of the scale parameter λ. Equating to zero the derivative dL/dλ at λ = 1, we obtain the virial relation for the vortex-Q-ball system: where (41) is the energy of the electric field, is the energy of the magnetic field, and is the potential part of the soliton's energy.

Numerical results
Now let us present some numerical results. We use the natural units c = 1, = 1, and the mass m of scalar χ-particle is used as the energy unit. Then the model depends on the six parameters: e, q, λ, v, g, and h. Let us choose the following values of these parameters: e = q = 0.  Figure 1 presents the numerical solution for the dimensionless zero component m −1/2 A 0 (r)/(er) of the gauge potential and for the dimensionless ansatz functions A(r), F (r), and m −1/2 σ(r). The vortex part of the solution is in the topological sector with N = 1, the phase frequency ω is equal to 0.4 m. Figure 1 also presents the numerical solution for the case q = 0, whereas the other parameters remain the same. The case q = 0 corresponds to superimposed but noninteracting vortex and Qball. From Fig. 1 it follows that the interaction between the vortex and the Q-ball has a significant effect on the shapes of the ansatz functions A(r) and σ(r), while the shape of F (r) does not change significantly. Figure 2 shows the dimensionless versions of the electric field strengthẼ r (r) = m −3/2 E r (r), the magnetic field strengthB(r) = m −3/2 B(r), the scaled energy density 0.3Ẽ(r) = 0.3 m −3 E(r), the electric charge densityj 0 (r) = m −5/2 j 0 (r), and the scaled angular momentum's density 0.3J (r) = 0.3 m −2 J (r), corresponding to the solution in Fig. 1. From Fig. 2 it follows that the vortex-Q-ball system can roughly be divided into the three parts: the central transition region, the inner region, and the external transition region. In the inner region, the energy density and the angular momentum's density are approximately constant, while the electric and magnetic field strengths are close to zero. Figure 3 presents the dependences of the dimen- sionless soliton energyẼ = m −1 E and the dimensionless electric chargeqQ χ = m −1/2 qQ χ of the scalar field χ on the dimensionless phase frequencỹ ω = m −1 ω. The dependences are presented in the range from the minimum value ofω to its maximum value of 1 that we managed to reach by numerical methods. From Fig. 3 it follows that the energy E and the Noether charge Q χ of the vortex-Q-ball system tend to infinity asω →ω min (thin-wall regime).
In the thin-wall regime, the spatial size of the soliton's inner region increases indefinitely, so the main contribution to the soliton's energy comes from this region.
In Fig. 4 we can see the dependences that are the same as those in Fig. 3, but are shown in a neighborhood of the maximum valueω = 1. From Fig. 4 it follows that the curvesẼ(ω) and Q χ (ω) consist of two branches. The left branches are finished at ω − ≈ 0.99404, whereas the right ones are started atω + ≈ 0.99389. Note thatω − >ω + so that the branches are overlapped. It was found numerically that Q χ (ω) andẼ(ω) have the following behaviour asω →ω ± : have the branch points atω − andω + , respectively. Such behaviour of Q χ (ω) andẼ(ω) in a neighborhood of the maximum valueω = 1 is very different from that of the two-dimensional Q-ball [7]. Figure 5 shows the dependence of the vortex-Q-ball system's dimensionless energyẼ on the Noether charge Q χ . It also shows the similar dependence for the two-dimensional Q-ball with the same parameters m, g, and h as the vortex-Q-ball system, and the straight lineẼ = Q χ . We can see that the two-dimensional Q-ball's curveẼ(Q χ ) is tangent to the straight lineẼ = Q χ as it should be [7]. In contrast to this, the vortex-Q-ball system's curveẼ(Q χ ) has the cusp. Moreover this curve has the gap that corresponds to the jump from the left to the right branches in Fig. 4. From Fig. 5 it follows that the Q-ball component of the the vortex-Q-ball system is stable to the decay in the massive scalar χ-particles in the thin-wall regime.

Conclusions
In the present paper, the soliton system consisting of a vortex and a Q-ball interacting through a common Abelian gauge field has been researched. This two-dimensional system is electrically neutral since only the Maxwell gauge term is presented in the Lagrangian (1). Nevertheless, the vortex-Qball system possesses a nonzero radial electric field. Moreover, this system also has a quantized magnetic flux. As a result, the soliton system possesses a nonzero angular momentum that turns out to be proportional to the Noether charge of the scalar φ-or χ-field. The vortex-Q-ball system combines properties of nontopological solitons (Eq. (20)) and those of topological solitons (topological boundary condition (27) for A(r) and, as consequence, magnetic flux quantization (28)). Finally, the interaction between the vortex and the Q-ball leads to the significant change of the vortex-Q-ball system's dependence E(Q χ ) in comparison with that of the two-dimensional Q-ball.
It should be noted that in (2 + 1) dimensions, in addition to the ordinary Lorentz-invariant Maxwell term, there exists a Lorentz-invariant Chern-Simons term, which can be included in Lagrangians of gauge models [8][9][10]. In the presence of this term, the model's gauge field becomes topologically massive, thus making possible the existence of two-dimensional solitons that have a nonzero quantized electric charge [5,[11][12][13][14][15]. Due to the presence of electric and magnetic fields, these solitons also possess nonzero angular momentums that satisfy the relations similar to Eq. (39).