Interconnectedness of international tourism demand in Europe: A cross-quantilogram network approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.155Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We study directional interconnectedness in quantiles of tourism demands in Europe.

  • Networks are dense when tourism demand growth is small.

  • Networks are sparse when tourism demand growth is larger.

  • Most of the directional dependence is capture in first three months.

  • Using ERGM, we identify reciprocity as a common feature of tourism demand networks.

Abstract

We study the interconnectedness of international tourism demand changes among 30 European countries. Using cross-quantilogram analysis, we estimate the strength of the directional (lead/lag) relationships of the international tourism demand of European countries in percentiles (10th, 50th, 90th). The complex interconnectedness of international tourism demand is studied within networks, where a fixed number of vertices represent countries, and oriented edges represent the presence of a directional relationship between the international tourism demand of two countries. A comparison of these networks reveals the following regularities. First, we find obvious asymmetry across percentiles, where demand behaves much more similarly during times of crisis (10th percentile) compared to tranquil periods (50th percentile). The interconnectedness of these networks almost diminishes when the international demand for tourism increases sharply (90th percentile). Second, we observe that the interconnectedness does not change much among the short- (within 3 months), mid- (up to 6 months) and long-term (up to 9 months) lead/lag relationships, which leads us to conclude that much of the interconnectedness of international tourism demand is driven by dependence during the first three months. On the basis of these findings, we review the possible forces that may drive the formation of the resulting complex structures using exponential random graph models. Our third finding is that there is a tendency for the relationships of the international tourism demand among the various countries to be bidirectional. Finally, our fourth new finding is that the interconnectedness of markets during sharp declines in tourism demand tends to increase for Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, and those that are less developed in terms of their relative sector size to the size of the economy.

Introduction

Since the early work of Barabási and Albert [1], networks have been found, created and studied in many socioeconomic areas. As is documented in the recent review of Martí et al. [2], in the past few years, networks have been particularly used in finance [3], [4], [5], business and trade [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], supply chain networks [11], [12], [13], transportation [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], social relationships [20], [21], [22] and also in tourism [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39].

In this study, we contribute to the latter strand of the literature. The tourism sector includes many agents such as visitors; accommodation providers; food and beverage services; recreation and entertainment; transportation companies; and travel services, such as travel agencies, travel guides, tour operators and insurance companies, and it is therefore believed that the tourism sector consists of a complex system of relationships [23]. Motivated by this idea, in this paper, we study how the international demand for tourism is related among 30 European countries. We take a macro-level perspective, where countries represent tourism destinations, and international tourist arrivals at a given country represent the international demand for tourism services in a given country. Therefore, among the many agents that operate in the tourism sector, we specifically consider international visitors. At the macro-level, we aggregate international demand across the whole country. We acknowledge that each country can influence local tourism sectors through tourism policies, however, it is likely that these, in turn, are manifested into the overall level of international tourism demand for the whole country.

We create a real-world network, where nodes represent countries, and edges are created according to the dependence measured between the numbers of arrivals of non-residents (demand) to a given country. Such complex networks are of interest to a wide range of agents. For example, a dense network suggests that the international demand of different countries is interrelated, and tourism policies, at a country level, could be collaborative (for an example of cross-country regional collaboration, see [40], [41]). Out- and in-degrees can be interpreted as measures of relatedness of among the tourism policies of countries. Put differently, in-degrees measure the sensitivity of international tourism demand to the development of international tourism in foreign countries. On the other hand, out-degrees indicate whether the international tourism demand of a given country could be used to forecast development of international tourism demand in foreign countries (for example, by including past observations of tourism demand into the forecasting equation of tourism development of foreign countries).

Real-world networks have already been used to describe the tourism sector [42]. The websites of tourism destinations on Elba Island showed little interconnectedness in a study conducted by de Fontoura and Baggio [26]. Hernandez and González-Martel [27] modeled a supply network and the interrelationship among lodging, services and tourist behavior in the tourism destination of Gran Canaria Island. There was a positive correlation among the degree of substitutability, closeness centrality, and betweenness centrality for tourism flows in China in a study conducted by Hong and Tao [28]. The binary and value network of tour operators and travel agencies, which are entities of a distribution channel, was illustrated by Tran et al. [22] in a case study of Hanoi, Vietnam. Networks can be used to help policy makers and tourism service providers improve their planning of a given destination development [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [39].

Our study is most closely related to one conducted by Miguéns and Mendes [36], who created an oriented network of international tourism arrivals in 2004, with 208 nodes representing both countries and territories. Oriented edges were created if tourists traveled from node i to node j. The resulting network led to 5775 weights, a dense topological structure with small shortest paths and exponentially decaying in- and out-degrees. The weights followed a scale-free power-law distribution. Provenzano et al. [43] created and studied a network of bilateral tourism flows within European countries using data from the United Nations World Tourism Organization (UNWTO) over the period from 1995 to 2012. They reveal that the network’s density increased, the average path length decreased, while also tourism evolved towards higher concentration in a lower number of areas. Our approach differs in several ways. First, compared to Miguéns and Mendes [36] we use a more homogeneous sample that includes 30 European countries, and each country represents a node in the network. Our sample selection is motivated by the fact that these countries are in the same region, and almost all of the countries in our sample are members of the European Union and subject to similar regulations at the European level. Second, an oriented edge is created if Granger causality in quantiles is confirmed from international tourism demand of country i to country j. Third, using monthly data from January 2004 to May 2018, we study the determinants of international tourism demand.

The remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the data and describes the methodology. In Section 3, we discuss the results, and Section 4 concludes.

Section snippets

Data

Tourism demand is, in many cases, measured and represented by data on arrivals [36], [37], [38]. In this paper, to proxy for the international tourism demand, we use data on the arrivals of non-residents at tourist accommodation establishments in a given country, retrieved from Eurostat. For 30 countries, we obtain monthly data from January 2004 to May 2018. Let Ai,t denote the arrival, where i is a given country, and t is a given month (t=13,14,,T and is the time index).

The cross-quantilogram

Topological properties of the cross-quantilogram tourism demand networks

Table 2, Table 3, Table 4 report the in- and out-degrees along with the harmonic centrality. There are several new findings that the networks revealed. First, we observe that irrespective of whether the networks are created by using only short-term information (up to three months, p=3) or long-term (up to nine months, p=9), the networks at the same percentile change only negligibly. This suggests that interconnectedness between international tourism demand is created mostly during the first

Conclusion

We study the interconnectedness of the development of international tourism demand in Europe. We create a directional network, where two countries (vertices) are interconnected if the international tourism demand of the first country leads (in Granger sense) international tourism demand in the second country within p months. In addition, we utilize the recently developed cross-quantilogram analysis, where directional relationships are determined for different percentile (10th, 50th, and 90th

Acknowledgments

Litavcová appreciates the support provided by the Slovak Grant Agency under Grant No. 1/0470/18 and the support by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract No. APVV-17-0166. Lyócsa appreciates the support by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract No. APVV-14-0357.

References (62)

  • JiaT. et al.

    An exploratory analysis on the evolution of the US airport network

    Physica A

    (2014)
  • DingR. et al.

    Heuristic urban transportation network design method, a multilayer coevolution approach

    Physica A

    (2017)
  • WangX. et al.

    Multi-criteria robustness analysis of metro networks

    Physica A

    (2017)
  • ZhaoS. et al.

    A network centrality measure framework for analyzing urban traffic flow: A case study of Wuhan, China

    Physica A

    (2017)
  • DerzsiA. et al.

    Topology of the Erasmus student mobility network

    Physica A

    (2011)
  • BaggioR.

    The web graph of a tourism system

    Physica A

    (2007)
  • VogtC. et al.

    Collaborative tourism planning and subjective well-being in a small island destination

    J. Destin. Mark. Manag.

    (2016)
  • JamalT. et al.

    Collaboration theory and community tourism planning

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (1995)
  • da Fontoura CostaL. et al.

    The web of connections between tourism companies: Structure and dynamics

    Physica A

    (2009)
  • HernándezJ. et al.

    An evolving model for the lodging-service network in a tourism destination

    Physica A

    (2017)
  • TranM. et al.

    Social network analysis in tourism services distribution channels

    Tour. Manag. Perspect.

    (2016)
  • HongT. et al.

    Network behavior as driving forces for tourism flows

    J. Bus. Res.

    (2015)
  • ScottN. et al.

    Destination networks: four Australian cases

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (2008)
  • GajdošíkT. et al.

    Destination structure revisited in view of the community and corporate model

    Tour. Manag. Perspect.

    (2017)
  • SainaghiR. et al.

    Complexity traits and dynamics of tourism destinations

    Tour. Manag.

    (2017)
  • JesusC. et al.

    Cooperation networks in tourism: A study of hotels and rural tourism establishments in an inland region of Portugal

    J. Hosp. Tour. Manag.

    (2016)
  • KimbuA. et al.

    Centralised decentralisation of tourism development: A network perspective

    Ann. Tour. Res.

    (2013)
  • ShihH.

    Network characteristics of drive tourism destinations: An application of network analysis in tourism

    Tour. Manag.

    (2006)
  • FerranteM. et al.

    Graphical models for estimating network determinants of multi-destination trips in Sicily

    Tour. Manag. Perspect.

    (2017)
  • MiguénsJ. et al.

    Travel and tourism: Into a complex network

    Physica A

    (2008)
  • ChanF. et al.

    Modelling multivariate international tourism demand and volatility

    Tour. Manag.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (7)

    • Tourism flows in large-scale destination systems

      2021, Annals of Tourism Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      While studies on visitor behaviour in space can lead to better attraction design and spatial planning implications, and reveal the demand side of tourism, on the supply side SNA can give powerful feedbacks to Destination Management Organizations (DMO) for better management and policy planning, especially when research takes a step forward from descriptive analytics to comparative or inferential methods to understand the structure of complex tourism systems (Williams & Hristov, 2018), or to mixed methods of quantitative and qualitative analysis (Mariani & Baggio, 2020). As SNA data is not confined by the geographic relations of the analytic of tourist movements, there are much more possibilities to apply complex network analytics, or even to use statistical approaches like the probabilistic Exponential Random Graph Models (ERGM), frequently used in social sciences, but only recently introduced to tourism research (Khalilzadeh, 2018; Lyócsa et al., 2019; Williams & Hristov, 2018). This paper analyses a geographically determined system of tourist flows.

    • Research on the spatial structure of the European Union’s tourism economy and its effects

      2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text